laurie andrews as the title of your book suggests, you've raised concerns about privacy online. what concerns do you have about what google is doings? >> well,ing into at heart is an advertising platform. it makes 96% of its money, or $36 billion a year, by targeting ads. so this new policy allows them to target ads across platforms. so if i send an e-mail over gmail to a divorce lawyer and then i do a google search for depression, if i then am watching a youtube video with my... a young son, ads will pop up related to divorce and mental health which might trouble him. this private information of mine will become visible. anding intoed as erred in the past. in 2010 when young people went on google chat rooms to say "i'm thinking of committing suicide with x chemical" a google ad would pop up immediately saying "dial 1-800-blah blah, get that chemical two for one." so the algorithms may push us toward harmful behaviors. >> brown: well, markham erickson google would say this is a transparent system and a service to its customers. what's the best argument? >> frankly, the criticism

. >> laurie andrews examines the way social media are surveyed by a host of parties. they range from employers to data servicesers and how personal information is collected and sold. she argues that a social network constitution is needed to protect privacy rights online. this is a little over an hour. >> as we tackle and timely thorny topic in the age of individual freedoms. our founding fathers protected individual freedom, right to privacy, the right to a fair trial but now online social networks are creating an entirely new set of questions and challenges. colleges and employers reject applicants because of publicly available information and photos found on social networking sites, jurors post details on a case and ask their friends to vote on whether a defendant should go to jail. marketing companies are facing lawsuits for allegedly collecting information on citizens based on our travels on the web without our knowledge and consent. how would our founding fathers would handle this? we have a fantastic group of experts with us tonight to delve into this subject.

laurie coleman, "the sunday times" of london and bermuda old schlick, the freelance photojournalist. andrewbreitbart and finally cbs correspondent robert year point for distinguished reporter and when you didn't take himself all that seriously. beyond made an indelible mark on our profession. thank you for letting us honor them tonight. [applause] our next award is for excellence in all my journalism presented to i watched neustadt or the online home for public integrity. expecting the worst cucina committee can committee, officer of the senate. christine. [applause] >> hi, i am absolutely honored and humbled to be standing up your accepting this award on behalf of the center for public integrity and especially for our leader, executive director, bill peterson berger had the vision and the courage to last year completely transformed the senate for a public integrity. 22-year-old nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative newsgroup. it has been going around pretty good in 22 years in nonprofit years is like 100 journalists in years. the bill had the courage really to say we need to leap headfirst