it gets 12%, and then into king versus burwell, 6%, and the same-sex marriage case, which was 5%, lautnerersus new 4%, and baker versus car, 3% know what that is. i will just start with the bottom one. who was baker versus carr? tony: it is a little bit abstract but it basically has to do with districting and how the andes carve their counties areas for the purposes of election districts so that, you know, you would have cu -- have 100,000ricts with voters lacking a state representative and the next district with roughly the same you would have to guarantee the same voting power, in essence, and what happened in the middle of the last century is there was a lot of migration. rural areas toom urban areas and that created a great disparity in populations between the districts. there was one los angeles district where one million people lived and they were electing one state senator and there was a rural district in california that had about 20,000 people in it and they were also electing one state senator. and that has consequences because it meant that urban interests were not addressed, p

overturn a law that was passed by congress on an economic issue like health clear, at least since lautner. if thener would decide court could take away your life and liberty. announcer: this week on " landmark cases," we look at loch ner v. new york. workerstricted bakery to 10 hours a day. ner broke thatoch law. he took his case all the way to the supreme court. find why this case is so important. the professional of constitutional law at the -- georgetown university law center, randy barnett, discusses along with paul kens, a political science professor from texas state university. an3, andn, c sent -- csp c-span radio. announcer: today, the house debated a bill on the health care law and it would defund planned parenthood for one year. the house is scheduled to vote on the bill tomorrow. the beginning of the debate with the rules committee. this is 45 minutes. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from georgia is recognized for one hour. mr. woodall: thank you, mr. speaker. during consideration of this resolution all time is yielded for the purpose of debate only. i'd like to yield th

burwell, 6%, and the same-sex marriage case, which was 5%, lautner vs. new york at 4%, and baker vs. carr, 3% know what that is. i will just start with the bottom one. what was baker vs. carr? tony: it is a little bit abstract but it basically has to do with districting and how the states carve their counties and areas for the purposes of election districts so that, you know, you have two districts with 100,000 voters lacking a state representative and the next district with roughly the same population and you would have to guarantee the same voting power, in essence. and what happened in the middle of the last century is there was a lot of migration, people moved from rural areas to urban areas and that resulted in a great disparity in populations between the districts. there was one los angeles district where a million people lived and they were electing one state senator, and there was a rural district in california that had about 40,000 people in it and they were also electing one state senator. and that has consequences because it meant that urban i