i am sure that they paid attention to what lavro said when he started. you mean, this western minority should listen to the majority, that is in fact, they are trying to marginalize democracy itself and make normal abnormal, i.e. make normal tyranny, e.e., autocracy, disrespect for human rights, that is, for those basic values ​​on which international organizations are based . of course, they do not meet the challenges of the present time. i wanted to ask you about a number of materials which appeared in the last few days in the world's influential media, well , the day before, the politician wrote about it yesterday, even degardiam, er, our british colleagues, in particular , simon, passed in the article where they write they are about the fact that the partners will force ukraine to a truce, even if it is successful . and nato will alleviate the global economic energy and food crisis and bring some peace many in europe and the south would vote for it right now the author degardin is writing what do you associate with or have you read these materials wh

negotiations, they are constantly talking about it, well, at least, someone is saying this, the last lavro to have said somewhere in brazil , er, there is always talk about it, but the question is what because what is meant by by the subject of the negotiations, russia means by the subject of the negotiations that it should take over the occupied territories, it should legalize it, it wants to talk about it extremely, ukraine and the position of all ukraine's partners, it is about the fact that the negotiations can only be about de-occupation, so this is theoretically possible, for example, on the administrative border like crimea, when the ukrainian troops arrive there, they can, we can say that the algorithms for the deoccupation of crimea are ready by other methods, not by troops, but by diplomacy, e.g. russia constantly talks about negotiations and all her efforts about negotiations, but talks about annexation, about having a conditional minsk-3 , about saying that russia has the right to own the territories it occupied, that's about putin himself and his visits or his figures mr. olek