id laws. a more than tripled from 3.4 to 13.2 points in primaries. and i can go on and on with respect to other racial groups. >> thank you. research has shown that proof of citizenship laws disproportionately hurt latino and hispanic voters who face difficulty in obtaining documentation of citizenship, like a passport. these documents are costly and require taking time off of work to get these documents. in several states provide proof of citizenship or have proof of citizenship laws that have been found to be preempted by the national voter registration act, but litigants take several years to obtain a judicial ruling striking down these laws. what can congress do to make it easier for litigants to make it seem like an effective relief on unlawful citizenship laws? >> thank you for that question representative. one thing that congress can do is work on legislation to restore the voting rights act, as you have mentioned, litigation is costly and time-consuming, and it can take many years to g

we need to make sure the every lawful ballot is counted according to state law. we want to make sure that it is easy to vote and hard to cheat. the far left has been working overtime in this manner ms. characterize new voting laws across the united states and the less characterization of voter laws like those regionally passed in georgia and in other states earn multiple pinocchio's with pants on fire when they were rated by fact checkers. unfortunately democrats election legislation, h.r. 1 or s1 in the senate gutted voter id laws and continue to push this false narrative that election safeguards like voter id are somehow racist or an attempt by the publicans to suppress the vote of americans from minority communities. americans are used to showing their id to do common things like open a bank account, by alcohol, fly on a plane and i don't believe my local bank or the quiktrip convenience store where the tsa is racist or has just committed tory intent when they ask for my id. i think it is common practice but even if a voter doesn't have an id on election day s

our research has mostly looked at district id laws compared to other laws. as you know, restrictive types of id laws were introduced in 2006 and indiana and in 2008 in georgia. our research has really looked at the effects of the strict id laws for the most part and in comparison to their counterparts. the results that i spoke about in my written testimony in my oral testimony refer to the strict. >> i appreciate that. can you speak to the harm that this question can impose on minority voters? >> certainly. i can tell from my testimony and in my first paper in 2017 we found that in general elections latinos in our survey were 100% less likely to turn out with strict identification laws then in those states without strict id laws. these effects were at large primary elections were strict id laws can be expected to depress latino turnout by three percentage points, block it by six points and asian market by 12 points. given the already turnout of these groups across the country these declines are all the more noteworthy and i want to say one thing if i may abo

existing laws. please whom would you not forget compassion for good people going through a difficult time. >> thank you. mr. horwitz? >> good afternoon chairman blumenthal, ranking member roos, and distinguished rivers of the committee. thank you for giving the opportunity for -- giving me the opportunity to testify on the importance of extreme protection laws. like you and so many others, i came to violence prevention because of my own loss. back then i did not have the knowledge or tools to intervene effectively. i wish i could go back in time, but i cannot and i cannot bring my friend back. what i can do, is what i'm doing now, encouraging policymakers like you to usual power and support lifesaving policy so that no other family or friend has to experience this type of heartbreak. gun violence remains high, taking 40,000 lives each year. 60% of those are suicide. extreme risk laws help prevent needful violence before it occurs have the potential to save many lives and are gaining traction through

anything that breaks the law. >> just like any other breaking the law. >> anything that breaks the lawsubject to prosecution. may not be subject to federal prosecution. there has to be a federal crime involved but if it breaks a law it subject to prosecution. >> a lot of it could be federal. >> it could. the justice department looks for places where they are federal crimes. >> mr. secretary, in the past five years congress has directly provided the department of the homeland security with billions of dollars for the construction of a border wall, and we know where it is today. i think it's affront to this committee and a lot of us in congress, through congress' power of the purse, but worse it makes the work of our dedicated border patrol agents more difficult and dangerous on what's been going on there. i think these agents must stand constant guard by incomplete sections of the border wall, which now serves as funnels for illegal immigrants, human traffics and drug smuggling, you know? i think the dynamics there are straining the resources of our border patrol under your leadership.

we need laws like ethan's laws to mandate safe storage and save lives. come -- the gun owner could have saved ethan and the time it takes to draw one breath i simply locking up his gun. if he had, my beautiful boy, with his infectious smile would be walking across the stage to accept his high school diploma next month. instead, that night while his friends are throwing their caps into the air, i will be sitting at ethan's grave and the only one speaking his name will be me. thank you. >> thank you. i would like to call on mr. williford next. >> hello my name is stephen williford i'm from sutherland springs, texas. i am here to tell you about decisions laid on november 5, 2017. and the consequences of those decisions. this is the hardest statement that i will ever make in my life. i have been a gun owner all of my life. i own a safe because i thought it was the responsible thing to do. i cap my rifle and my handguns locked away because nothing bad happens in my town, until it did. on november 5, 2017, an evil man opened fire into the first baptist church

i think if you're for law enforcement you have to be for law enforcement. increasingly gangs drug dealers and other nefarious individuals assembling untraceable firearm for elicit activity in 20 alone los angeles police department recovered more than 600 ghost guns at least 231 of which were used in serious or violent crimes such as murders and attempted murldz and kidnapping and 145 which were recovered from felons who are prohibited from owning or possessing guns. ghost guns are a clear and present threat to public safety, and it is imperative that we take action now. we cannot continue to live in this a society where you could be a victim to then violent just by beginning to schools and movies, the musical festivals and even grocery shopping i'm committed to engsding violence in this country for many in this room, some of us were here as the nation and commitment then was to stop gun violence. must do more to address what is an issue of life and death for far too many americans and must complete this work, and we have started on legislation that we know

except under federal law. they are becoming the preferred instruments for criminals and violent extremists. the fastest growing gun violence menace in the nation. only under current federal atf regulation is this statutory definition treating them not like guns. behind me are two pictures of guns. one is a standard gun. one is a ghost gun. i challenge you to tell the difference between them. a ghost gun is, in fact, fully functional as a firearm. it can be made at home using do-it-yourself gun making kits or a 3d printer. this frame, in a so-called jeg was made by a 3d printer. it can be made by anyone drilling holes to make it functional. and then parts can be bought in a gun store or elsewhere. it becomes a firearm capable of killing, injuring, and doing as much damage as any firearm bought in a store, except it has no serial number. it is untraceable and often undetectable. the kinds of kits that produce that firearm contain a, quote, unfinished frame, or receiver. the key building block regulated under fed

all of us are united by our commitment to the rule of law and to seeking equal justice under the law. we are united by our commitment to protect the country from all enemies foreign and domestic and by our commitment to enforcing the laws and to ensuring the civil rights, liberties of our people, i approach the departments mission and it is reflected in our fiscal year 2022 budget request. i will share a few highlights. first our budget supports my commitment to protecting our national security including addressing both international and domestic terrorism while respecting civil liberties. it includes increases of $45 million through the fbi domestic terrorism investigation and $40 million to manage increasing terrorism caseloads. almost 60 -- 65 years after its creation, the civil rights division work remains vital. our budget seeks to increase the civil rights funding by $43 million, providing a total of $209 million for the civil rights division and related civil rights work. from protecting voting rights to prosecuting hate crimes, the department and the civil rights work is criti

this justice has a central role for law. law and rule of law. equal dignity and fair due process. is small. american women have been able to turn to the law and to legal change in a way that is not always been possible for women in ways in which the law is more deeply flawed and corrupted at its core. it is not only would people understand it. people interested in justice for women do not always understand the relevant laws and their background. a large part of my purpose in my book is to describe the relevant areas of the law in history clearly so that any reader that wants to use the law will be pretty well-placed to do so. hip may sometimes seem technical because the impartiality of the law means that it is in fact technical. narratives play a role since ours is what is called a common-law system in which they develop through cases. i will be telling the stories of some crucial cases. i want my readers to embrace the larger goal of a system that stands for all and is fair to all. standing above any narrative and where someone should be immune to bias and favor. the very abstrac

we're also a nation of law and order. without law and order we are creating chaos. my biggest concern is the flow of people. not those who are coming through the pointsh of entry but it's the ones who are taking advantage of this crisis in the human track like it's the drug smuggling bringing and of foreign nationalsre. some who have apprehended we know are on the terror watch list. can you address what is the department of justice see at the border? are there foreign actors coming across that could be dangerous? what are we doing? we all respect the fbi enter law enforcement communities. just feel like we are adding a huge burden upon them. but more so on our local law enforcement officers that are basically dealing with the criminal activity that's coming across in the hard narcotics in their backyards. can you quickly address with the department of justice is doing? and how are you advising the administration to get this under control? >> the issue of narcotics traffickers and narcotics across the border is a vital concern to us. now the n transition to synthetic

lives of fallen law enforcement officers.ore than 2200 names are etched on its wall, representing federal, state, and local officers who have died in the line of duty throughout american history. ♪ >> his name is shannon bennett. he's my brother. he was 39 years old. end of watch april 3, 2020, due to covid-19. >> is a was chuck williams. he was 63 years old. >> end of watch july 13, 2020, due to covid. >> his name was lieutenant eric lloyd. he was 53 years old. end of watch 7/29/2020 due to covid. >>'s name was oscar. he was 56 years old. his end of watch was july 23, 2020. tragically, my husband oscar was not the only one. ♪ >> his name was sergeant william darnell. >> name was tom booz. >> chief dale allen. >> deputy. >> sergeant tj johnson. >> rick treadwell, age 61, end of watch august 22, 2020, due to covid-19. >> corrections investigator. >> bester corporal norman dave junior. >> corporal charles holtz. >> lieutenant. and officer jerry jones. what a horrible year 2020 was for all of us. >> deputy. >> deputy sheriff cla

should we repeal that law? >> well, it's essentially taken that ability away from them. the protection of lawful arms act prevents the vast majority of victims of gun violence from suing irresponsible actors within the industry, whether it's manufacturers or sellers. if you look at the way the civil justice system has been used, for instance with automobiles and with tobacco, civil lawsuits against those industries led to significant increases in-- ments we should repeal the law? >> we should. >> and why the short barrelled assault barrels and pistols, often weapons of choice of people intended for mass shooting? >> these are designed with the specific purpose of firing many rounds in a short period of time and equipped with large capacity magazines like the one used in the dayton shooting that held 100 rounds and that's why mass shooters use them. >> and what can congress do to ensure that every american as an access to extremist protection order that they can intervene when someone they love is in crisis? >>

something quite serious happens when the approved to the nation who law or the nation law was stipulated the learned dentist say historical. palestine is the historical jews on the right to self determination exclusively for kills. i would like to say that this was a constitutional law defines the state and what is important, if not only the very great article of this world, but the reason that had taken place within the constitutional committee, within the excessive some of the members suggested the introduction of the principle of democracy, but that was refused. they introduced the principle also equality, but that also was refused. while that was because of the instructions given by mister the head of government at the time. and that was the most you know, without severe at $900.00 g m. j. continuing live coverage of a special session of the un human rights council on the situation in the occupied palestine. territory garza, we like all people have seen the soldiers storming from off launching gas bombs to worship while they were surrounded in the.

she is the shannon cecil for professor of law at the university of california law school also co-author along with justice ruth bader ginsburg

how unusual is this law? this law is very — how unusual is this law?usual, - how unusual is this law? this law is very unusual, it - how unusual is this law? this law is very unusual, it is - law is very unusual, it is the first of its kind in texas at least, we have not seen an abortion ban this early in gestation period in texas since roe v wade was decided, and it is very unusual nationally. several states have passed similar laws that have banned abortion at six weeks gestation, this is the only law that would be enforced by allowing anyone to sue anyone in the world, and abortion provider, nurse, counsellor, anyone who supports a patient who needs care, it subjects them to unlimited liability, so in that way it is very unique and extreme stuff given the doctors and clinics could be leaving themselves open to unlimited liability, in your view does that mean that they are therefore going to be unlikely to provide these services or continue to provide these services to the women of texas? if i was a doctor, it would give me pause, and we are fighting

well law. s in public race issue of laws and policies, you know laws and policies laws are there to protect all of us? but the reality actually shows that the law doesn't work in favor of the poor very often. there was a commission set up a commission on the legal empowerment of the poor which was set up by the united nations. it included madeline albright and under desoto mary robinson, very eminent people including arbit fazli abid that some people from bangladeshire in this room will recognized for his work there and that commission discovered that the law doesn't work for the poor. there are millions of caves poor kids who are never registered whose birth is never registered because the system is either two bureaucratic or is is simply not applicable to people living in conditions of poverty the law often police in many countries require bribes before they will do anything judges belong to an elite that don't understand the poor very often laws are there to restrict people i mentioned earli

they all violate the rule of law. yet, in the face of this utter contempt for the rule of law, so many have chosen to stand idly by excusing one while condemning another. such rationalization of inappropriate and even illegal behavior i think is dangerous. and i believe the american people see right through it. moreover, it's dangerous for our leaders and law enforcement to focus on one threat to our nation while ignoring the other. such behavior raises questions as to whether justice is still blind and whether the rule of law still has meaning and force in america. and let me be clear, this isn't about taking up for one side or the other. or about advocating for the enforcement of one law over another. i believe the vast majority of the american people believe in the rule of law and they see it under attack. i also believe that they want to see anyone who transgresses it to be held to account, regardless of race, political dogma or other motivation. fbi director christopher wray recently testified before the senate j

let's talk about safe storage laws, ask unanimous consent to enter an article from the journal of law and academics, i'll read-- >> without objection, so ordered. >> thank you, madam chairments it's frequently assumed that safe storage gun laws reduce accidental gun deaths and total suicide and impacts on crime rates are ignored. ab tract says we have no support that safe storage laws reduce accidental juvenile death, instead impairs people's abilities to use guns defensively. it's come moen sense, if somebody breaks into your house and your gun is locked up. how are you going to use it to defend itself. we doesn't want more victims of gun control. let's talk about background checks, first of all i've heard it say that 90% of americans support background checks. maine and nevada on their ballot, there weren't 90%, it went down by 4% in maine. it lost, the initiative lost to have universal background checks. and in nevada, bloomberg spent $35 per vote and it barely won by .8% of -- in that battle initiative. clearly 80 or 90% don't support background checks. let me tell you why. there

this is a revolution in law. it's also a revolution in state law. in 1868 before the 14th amendment is ratified, the iowa supreme court declares segregated schools are unconstitutional under the iowa constitution. so that we have the precursor to brown before there is a 14th amendment. this is clark versus the directors of the muskatine schools. clark, by the way, alexander clark, will ultimately be the u.s. ambassador to liberia in the 1890s. the long reconstruction is about the changes that are taking place when a man sues to get his daughter into the public school to becoming a u.s. ambassador to liberia. immediately after the war ends, as we know, the confederates are still running their legislators. they pass black codes and within two years, those black codes are all repealed, as african-americans and white unionists begin to take over southern legislalegislatures. again a revolution in law that takes place. probably the most obvious example are laws which say that it's now okay for african-americans and white americans to get married in the s

it's by law in 17 states. it's by custom and some other states the customs vary from state to state. the laws are very harsh right some of the states one reads the laws and you get the impression that state legislators spend weeks trying to something new to segregate. so that the at one point the florida legislature says that at the end of the school year this books from black schools must go to one warehouse and the books from white schools must go to the other. i i don't know. maybe they thought these books would date over the summer if they were if they were this they were the same warehouse. we know some places when you went to court. they had a black bible you could swear i had a white bob because we're on so it's those miniscule kind of differences. they're trying and they were they were places where the tax rolls. there was a book for black taxpayers and for what so it's it's almost a constant contest. what else can we say good so in this world this gigantic world of racism everywhere. where does marsha

the laws are made, we do not need to reform the laws, we have to get people to abide by the law.ll you keep talking about is the police, the police, the police have the interaction with the people that are breaking the law. ok. i say that police should use different tactics when they are approaching someone, they have two or three cops there, they should be able to apprehend the perpetrator without having to use deadly force. but again, you have to remind the people that if you run, that is what you are going to have to settle for. host: for some of these issues that have been brought up in the george floyd just as in policing act, would you agree with the banning chokeholds, that is one of the things in the act is that something you think would be -- caller: you do not need chokeholds, but you need to remember the condition of the man, he was not -- host: what about the issue of requiring the use of body cameras, federal efforts to promote that in police departments. would you support that? caller: body cameras, i agree with. host: another one, limiting the transfer of military

constitution and federal law. secondly, a uniform law adopted at the state level would likely take three to five years, and by that time marketplace lending would normally be the province of nationally chartered institutions. there would then be no need for the law. so where does that leave our dual banking system? the o.c.c. true lender rule collar nice a thorny legal question and restricts the application of state consumer protection laws, providing legal clarity in the marketplace lending to 21% of the banks in this country while essentially telling the other 79% that they should convert to a national charter or risk being left behind. that is the kind of choice congress has rejected in the past. many question the value of using the congressional review act against the true learned rule -- lender rule since it will prevent the o.c.c. from adopting a similar rule in the future. however, again, both the fdic and the federal reserve likely do not have the requisite statutory authority to adopt their own true lende

that should be implemented if the law of the land, not the law of the occupier.t is your duty to sustain law and order, but ultimately, it is the law of the land. in what israel has been doing is suspended the law of the land for selectively take it here and there and they go back to the ottomans to take and put together what suits their cause. what suits the idea and the agenda of the israelis. this is what led us to where we are today. what we are seeing was not started in the last week or so. this is a systematic approach that has been taken since 1967 with the occupation of the west bank and gaza. before that of course with 1947. since the recognized occupation of the west bank and gaza, israel has not upheld any of the international standards, and certainly have not upheld or materialized or implemented any resolutions that were referred to in your report. the largest number of resolutions that are extremely explicit and very clear, black and white. none have them have been respected or upheld. anchor: we will look forward in a second or two. what parallels

these are about state laws, not federal laws. >> i was a prosecutor for several years. i worked in a jurisdiction that was engaged in an agreement with the locality to honor ice detainers. when law enforcement agencies don't honor ice detainers, these individuals who often have significant criminal histories are engaged in sex trafficking, drug trafficking, are released onto the street and present a potential and real safety threat to the public. as our nation's top law-enforcement official and someone with the statutory responsibility for fostering a relationship with state and local law enforcement not to mention doj federal partners, do you believe that law enforcement entities should honor ice detainers? a.g. garland: i believe that if ice has lawfully detainers then yes, they should. >> staying with this issue related to local prosecutions, i was a domestic violence prosecutor for many years and your budget claims to expand funding for justice programs using a portion of the funding allocated for violence against women act programs. domestic violence perpetrators a

all human laws even the constitution the supreme court declared must bend to the law of the creator makingany notion of equality between men and women, silly and downright dangerous. two years later virginia minor appeared before the court using the 14th amendment to insist on her right to vote again a unanimous court rejected minors argument her status as a citizen was irrelevant entering into perfectly circular logic the court reason that since women are citizens, but cannot vote that women did not have a right to vote. when congress attempted to protect the equality of black americans with a serious series of civil rights acts the court overturned them on the basis of congressional overreach in trying to enforce the 14th amendment congress had violated the 10th. extending its reach into private matters if a southern state wanted if southern state governments wanted to limit the rights of their black citizens, that was their business the court inpatiently noted that 18 years had passed since the civil war surely it was time to move on from these issues. the civil war in reconstruction ta

all of us are united by our commitment to the rule of law and to seeking equal justice under the law. we are united by our commitment to protect the country from all enemies foreign and domestic and by our commitment to enforcing the laws and to ensuring the civil rights, liberties of our people, i approach the departments mission and it is reflected in our fiscal year 2022 budget request. i will share a few highlights. first our budget supports my commitment to protecting our national security including addressing both international and domestic terrorism while respecting civil liberties. it includes increases of $45 million through the fbi domestic terrorism investigation and $40 million to manage increasing terrorism caseloads. almost 60 -- 65 years after its creation, the civil rights division work remains vital. our budget seeks to increase the civil rights funding by $43 million, providing a total of $209 million for the civil rights division and related civil rights work. from protecting voting rights to prosecuting hate crimes, the department and the civil rights work is criti

law-enforcement covid deaths, we will be reading the names of law enforcement officers who didn't have the choice to shelter in place, but put their lives on the line to make sure our communities were safe. so thank you. thank you, leader mccarthy, for making this your priority this morning. rep. mccarthy: appreciate it. [applause] i would like to call up pete stauber, former officer who was also shot in the line for duty -- line of duty as well. >> thank you, leader mccarthy, for that introduction, and for everything that you do to support america's police officers along with all my colleagues here today. i am proud to be standing here today to publicly thank those -- for those -- who proudly wear the uniform. and to honor those brave officers who have fallen in the line of duty. as a former police officer, i know firsthand how dangerous the job is. i know what it is like to put on the uniform, kiss your family and kids goodbye, and head to work uncertain what type of call or situation you will encounter that day. it is a hard job. it is a noble job. and it is an honorable profession.

the 1st thing i did was change the law. my duty is my daughter safe. that means breaking the law. then i'm willing to do that for one shelter in place and a fight for housing owner to 0. the roper hotel is the most talent that i've ever stated. the biggest box you have ever seen? how did explode, taken out the hotel? this was the church. we loved it when it was built and read it even when it was a major, told it at the conflict in northern ireland in the late 20th century belfast europa, a new episode of war hotels on al jazeera a . this is al jazeera ah hello there. i'm sorry, hey, and this is a news ally from our headquarters here in doha, coming up in the next 60 minutes, a sci fi between israel and mass has held through its 1st few hours with both sides, claiming victory. while even as the contact and gaza stopped israeli forces have again and to the most compelling to jerusalem firing, rubber bullets.

god forbid that a president enforced the law actually enforces the law. please, my colleagues on the left, tell me how my colleagues are safe from cancel culture when your side isn't safe. just the other week, the famed aggetivity and we find offensive for his big on thed attacks. dalkins was stripped of his award that he received back in 1996. and what was he found guilty? he believed that a discussion was legitimate. canceled. a professor, even canceled, lecturing on the writings of james baldwin, known for his participation in the gay liberation movements because his students said it made them, quote, we live in intergenerational are trauma, unquote. fox news has been canceled. simply because he didn't want to defund the police. again, my colleagues, tell me how cancel culture doesn't exist and tell me that conservatives are not being attacked. who are the conservatives being canceled. the left tried unsuccessfully to cancel goya foods because he supported donald trump. president trump lincoln who ended the institution of slavery is being canceled. lin

for law enforcement you've got to be for law enforcement. increasingly drug dealers and other individuals are assimilating their own untraceable firearm for the illicit activity. 2020 alone the police department recovered more than 600 of those and more than 230 that were used in the violent crimes like murder and attempted murder and kidnapping and 145 of which were recovered from felons prohibited fromar owning and possessing gu. those are a clear and public threat and it is imperative that we take action now. we cannot continue to live in a society where you could be a victim to gun violence and a jut by going to schools, movies, musical festivals and even grocery shopping. i'm committed to ending this scourge in the country and for many that are in this room, some of us were here as columbine had the nation and the commitment then to m stop gun violence. we must do more to address the issue of life and death and complete this work. we started the legislation that we know will work and therefore i call on the senate to pass the bipartisan

don't just go make a paycheck and don't just go make money with a law degree. that was a life of service and to cut corners life wouldn't afford her to cut corners, all the discrimination along the way she always had to be that much better, it was also, she did not seek out the office in order for self-promotion or to draw the limelight, it was all about service an important part of that is a very strong ethical and moral compass of trying always to do the right things and trying to think outside of one's selves and be in the service of others. >> let me turn to some questions, we have a number and we encourage everybody to send them in. i'm getting combined with a question that i have because i was surprised your story about returning to work when you had a baby and you were nervous and you told her about your hesitancy, i'm curious what you said in your letter and what she responded to your letter and the advice that she gave a want to combine that with a question and the personal advice is. >> she gave me a lot over the years, one of the stories i would talk

while much of this law is redundant to the two laws that currently protect pregnant workers, i agree with many provisions in the bill and it was substantially improved from the version introduced in 2019. . during the markup i asked forean amendment to clarify one provision. my provision singles out religious organizations by removing the exemption found in every nearly civil rights bill, including the civil rights act. because each religion has its own unique customs, requirements, and traditions. it's not reasonable to mandate employment decisions that conflict with people's faith. by not including this long-standing civil rights provision, h.r. 1065 is likely to create legal risk for religious organizations. pregnancy discrimination or accommodation laws in at least 16 states and the district of columbia also include a provision similar to the religious rights act, religious organizations protection. by adding a simple reference in h.r. 1065 to the civil rights act, we can harmonize the bill with surnt law and ensure that religious organizations receive the same protections as out

can enforce the law. many federal law enforcement officers fear that the biden administration will further restrict where they can do their jobs. if the federal government will not enforce the immigration laws our state and local law enforcement should be empowered to do so. that's why today i introduced the empowering law enforcement act which grants inherent authority to state and local officials to enforce our nation's immigration laws. additionally, my bill will give federal authorities the flexibility to extend the amount of time they can detain criminal aliens. if a state or local law enforcement entity is detained, an alien in this bill would be required by homeland security to take that illegal alien into custody upon request from that entity. and the bill ensures state and local authorities can get reimbursed for the costs related to the incarceration and transportation of the alien. the empowering law enforcement act is about common sense. if the biden administration won't enforce the law, let's

you think this will become law— and seas are. you think this will become law in - and seas are. get watered down during the process?— will it get watered down during the process? this will be voted toda , the process? this will be voted today. so _ the process? this will be voted today. so this _ the process? this will be voted today, so this is _ the process? this will be voted today, so this is a _ the process? this will be voted today, so this is a process - today, so this is a process that has only taken case, and there are lots of thoughts around this idea and this is part of the law that is brought in. of course that will be the decisions with the other chamber, but i think this is one of the things that the convention of citizens, you may know that this has been a long process where citizens were randomly selected, 150 of them, just to try to deal with these issues and tackle these issues related to climate, so at the end we have a series of laws that affect the car industry, the advertising industry, the housing and hospitality industry, the retail industry, so from the