92 72 i ask to vote for 214, we will not shorten the terms of the next draft law 75-77 is a draft law on amendments to some legislative acts on improving the management system of engineering infrastructure objects meliorative systems of state property, i propose to adopt this draft law as a basis for the elaboration of the provisions in accordance with the first part of article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine 75 77 i ask you to vote for 237 the decision has been adopted dear colleagues, the following draft law which we have without discussion is a draft law 82 23 this is a draft law on the introduction of amendments to some laws of ukraine regarding the protection of people from the effects of ionizing radiation, i propose this 8223 proposal to adopt this draft law as a basis, i ask the people's deputies to vote for 260 decisions have been made. i am asking iryna volodymyrivna from the procedure, please. thank you from the procedure. as we know according to the decision of the law on media, e.e., the verkhovna rada of ukraine is broadcast on the recording by ra

these law schools, these law students go someplace when they graduate. they go to these big law firms and they take the bad habits have developed at the law schools with them and they try to replicate that at the law firm level and the law firms are already moving in that direction so it becomes a self reinforcing cycle. this is particularly problematic when you combine all this together because this attack on the legitimacy and integrity of the supreme court, the supreme court by the nature of life tenure and removing yourself from active everyday society a bit and putting on roads and sitting up on a bench, the justices are not particularly suited to defend themselves. there have been attacks on the court over history and if you look, who is there to fill that gap and protect the integrity and legitimacy of the courts? do we look to the bar? and the leaders of the bar at the large law firms. they should be there defending the integrity of the court, taking the trouble to explain to people that legal decisions are not politics by other means. so if you

i propose a draft law on amendments to the customs code of ukraine and other laws of ukraine regardingng the illegal circulation of fine products . i propose to include it in the agenda of the session. i ask you to vote for 238 decision to come. i propose a proposal adopt as a basis with the development of provisions in accordance with the first part of article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine the draft law on amendments to the customs code of ukraine and other laws of ukraine regarding countering the illegal circulation of tobacco products are ready to vote, i am asking people's deputies 93:15 simply people's deputies to vote for 237 the decision has been made, we have adopted it dear colleagues dear colleagues 91:56 we have a blocking resolution oleksiyovych, can you revoke it on that period yes that is why you withdraw this resolution yes and we fail then we vote for it yes dear colleagues there are proposals dear colleagues see dear colleagues there is a proposal we have one blocking resolution let's change the order now yes we will go to it now i i propose t

during the period of martial law registration number of the draft law 84:01 ready to vote i ask the people's deputies to vote for 227 decisions have been made by factions show please thank you let's go next dear colleagues 9107 with the icon one is a draft law on amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine regarding the improvement of the procedure for withdrawing a bank from the market under martial law repeated second reading 9107-1 we agreed that it will be three minutes yulia volodymyrivna tymoshenko and we vote correctly and who else will be ani petrivna i'm sorry it's not written in me ok well first then we'll give it to yulia volodymyrivna because i'm out loud let's go from the procedure then yulia volodymyrivna yes be please, you are also in the procedure dmytro oleksandrovych ok, let's start with the procedure eh nina yuzhanina please danylo oleksandrovich take your seat i want to draw your attention just when the preliminary draft of the law was reported 84:01 the chairman of the committee said no on behalf of the committee and from yourself, and therefore when you gave

law that the law is the rule of law that the law is enteaset— the rule of law that the law is enforcedthey don't, because that's what they enjoy at tneta— because that's what they enjoy at their festival. _ because that's what they enjoy at their festival. not at all. wet— at their festival. not at all. wet tney— at their festival. not at all. wet tney ae— at their festival. not at all. not they are complicit with satntnat— not they are complicit with criminal activity. they should be criminal activity. they should te tene— criminal activity. they should be done with— criminal activity. they should be done with conspiracy to supply _ be done with conspiracy to supply. g be done with conspiracy to- supply. completely disagree that a festivals have no a lot of festivals have a no tolerance policy. they clearly ten-t— tolerance policy. they clearly don't because _ tolerance policy. they clearly don't because they- i i they clearly don't because they want to i tigt they clearly don't because they want to test the don't because they want to test tne taag— don't because they want to test tne

from columbia law school. and in 1946 and when she went to apply for jobs with law firms, new york city law was the most sector of legal profession. she had the closed in her face because she was a woman and, also because she was african american. and this a common experience. it just happen to her. in fact, this continued to happen years later when ruth bader ginsburg came along and sandra day o'connor. so this was the fate of women even those who performed well in law school and who went to these brilliant careers as lawyers. motley did not let it discourage her that that being shut out of the law firm? in fact, it created an opportunity for her in public interest law in 1945. well she even graduated from law school. she went to the icp legal defense fund, asked thurgood marshall for a job. she hired her on the spot. it was her dream job because. she had been a person with strong social consciousness from, a very young age, and she was delighted to work at the fund. marshall was a mentor to her and she learn

in period of martial law registration number of the draft law

in this regard, i mentioned the penal law and we have the trade union law, but we don't have laws, soow if we are looking for this let's implement the rulings. it is possible to implement the existing laws. we only consider the agreement that was made between the heads of the three powers to be gradually formed on the first of the month as a violation. don't do it directly with people in fact, the police force should not deal directly with people in public in the garden and at the beginning of the work, so the approach was to first punish him with a fine , then we will go to the actual criminalization and the punishment that we brought as a supplement to the existing laws. it is that no, in fact, it will not create this way to escape, to whom should i tell, sir, we have a way to escape from the city, in fact , we are leaving the existing laws, which in our opinion can guarantee the implementation of city ordinances , and this is also a way. which actually caused it to be managed from in any case, you are facing a social phenomenon that is based on the existing reports presented by the

it in the laws, so right now if we are looking to actually implement these laws. let's do it in the existing rules, it is possible to implement it in fact, considering that in fact this agreement that was made between the heads of the three powers, which in any case, the punishment aspect of this issue will be gradually intensified , we will see it as a violation on the first of the month . in fact, the general public should not directly deal with people at the beginning of the work, so the approach was to first punish them with a fine, then we will go to the criminalization and the punishment that we brought as a supplement to the existing laws. our opinion is that no, this is the way. will not create to escape, to whom should i tell, sir, we have a way in fact, we are trying to escape from the city. we believe that there are existing laws that can guarantee the implementation of city ordinances, and this is also a path that has actually caused you to face a phenomenon in order to manage it. you are faced with a social situation that based on the existing reports

of the laws approved in the country's economic law transformation package , which is the foundation of a popular, transparent, intelligent and efficient economy. the vice president of skoda also said that later we will explain the reasons for the delay in detail, but the legal commission of the parliament is going to follow up on the delay of these two institutions, which we did. does not have legal duties, so we the parliament should be questioned about all the supervisory capacities of the use of qal, why it was not implemented at the stage, with the economy desk, from here at the time of haji deligani, the representative of the designer of research and investigation of the islamic council of the islamic council, from the association of lawyers. we will be at your service for information and many things from the national center for improving the business environment of the ministry of economy and finance. i will start by calling the guest of the haji deligani program. don't miss out on one of the lawyers' association. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. we

it has not been mastered that we now have the image law, but even if the laws are contrary to this law, they do not rely on the ability, and what about the fact that the internal regulation is a power in many other axes that differed, referring to the situations of some of in our program, we spend our money on economic issues, how to spend the income daulatabadi, you are a lawyer, you have a lawyer's license in the province of sahand, tehran. you want to go to alborz province, from alborz province, khuzestan province. what number do they take from you ? it is called a number, for example, 20 million, three million , you are a million. we also heard that there is no legal prohibition. it can be done by an institution that is not a government institution, it should be based on a legal basis anyway. money is always taken from people. why do you receive money? the answer is no. for some people , other actions are taken with the money taken. i will tell you openly here or other programs your mother has 650,000 people employed, we have graduates in 99, for example , more than 80,000 people p

who does this law particularly target? seems| this law particularly target? this law particularly target? seems to particularly target _ this law particularly target? seems to particularly target chinese - to particularly target chinese citizens who may be collaborating with foreign consultancies or human rights ngo, diligence firms, these organisations and chinese state media for weeks before the law was passed officially, we have seen warnings for chinese citizens not to collaborate with due diligence research in the area for some of the alleged forced labour is happening. and i would not expect immediate hundreds of this for instance for foreign generalists and executives because that's would directly harm the image that shannon is trying to get across and also by implementing this law and that is responsible stakeholder they do not want businesses running away from china overfear businesses running away from china over fear of this new law.— over fear of this new law. china's economy is _ over fear of this new law. china's economy is starting _ over fear

well, since it did not become law, it continues to still be a draft law, but er, well, colleagues fromonomajority did not listen to these things, the law was adopted then by a majority of 22 8 votes any further movements with this draft law will be stopped permanently and we will return to a-e meaningful discussion with all interested parties of the possibilities of how urban planning should take place and on which principles it should be a-a based, although colleagues they obviously tried to lie in the eyes of the whole world, in particular ukrainian society, about the fact that they said it was a very european integration bill, you said that the law, the bill 56-55 to be precise, has not yet been signed by the president, which is probably not bad because everything can be canceled, but on the other hand, although many people believe that the constitution of ukraine does not contain such an imperative norm that the president is obliged to sign a bill within 15 days if it is approved by the verkhovna rada, otherwise the right to sign passes there for example, to the verkhovna rada, nev

funds, i once again did not hear where the funds provided for in this law are clearly written. the money does not require additional expenses from the budget, and it is not the first month to pull this cat by the tail. we suggest that no ministers appear in the cabinet again who will come out and say we want to take away the salaries of the military because they asked us to do so and make fools of the ukrainian army, so let's establish a norm that will really give the opportunity to receive 30,000 for our defenders, the cabinet of ministers will within two weeks bring to the verkhovna rada a tariff grid that we will approve and it will be clear how much who and how will receive 30 km on the first line out of 3.5 km or etc. thank you, please make corrections, you will put the numbers, this is the 33rd truth 33 amendment of people's deputy razumkov it is taken into account editorial people's deputy razumkov proposes to put it into full consideration the committee determined how to list it editorial i ask to vote for the proposal of people's deputy razumkov for 100 no decision mad

those are our laws. we have to operate within our laws. but we cannot do that, if we operate within our laws, we had different policies, programs and operations, we could shut down the border till tomorrow, and we could go after the criminal cartels, and we could save american lives from all of the fentanyl, poisonings that are happening here in united states. >> mr., did you get the sense that the administration has said they've been trying to work with other countries in order to get them involved and stop the cartel stop the migration issue, do you get a sense of these other countries doing their part? >> not at, all not at all. in fact there's no reason for them to do their part, if you look at the amount of money that they have in their economies, let's just look at, talking about the mexican cartels alone. from illegal immigration, this is not drug, trade illegal immigration, they are generating a minimum of 13 billion dollars, that money goes right back into the economy, why would they want to shut that down? it doesn't make any sen

1999, the copyright law was revised in a law known as the millennium law to be compatible with thisce because it has stricter mechanisms and laws , so that when entering the virtual space, their identity and behavior are controlled by the government. if they deviate from the rules , they will be dealt with. muthaidah , i said, first of all, the platforms do not have much authority, and these users and content publishers or the owners of pages and internal media are the ones who are responsible for the food system with rules. there is an inhibitor individuals do not dare to violate the regulations, but now the platform should not be too difficult . since the private gpr was approved a few years ago, the european union moved towards installing platforms, and with this new law of 2020, the act of different countries of brazil, france, and one from the countries where the law of this country tried to expand their sovereignty and make the platforms responsible for what happens, mr. mahdi omrani, an expert in cyber space, has also joined our group, ai omrani. hello , good time. you are do

it's not law or politics. it's law and politics and law can shape the way politics works. i think giles expresses that more than any other case, right and at the same time we can't pretend that there's this hermetically sealed supreme court in a temple and they come up with decisions that are not influenced by what's going on around it. although maybe logan would say you're thinking, you know, there's a disciplining that's going on with your constitutional lawyers as you can't make that argument that argument will not be recognized in this particular discourse. so that's a discipline. that's a boundary policing and it's done for strategic ends. we want to win this battle in the courts. we want the courts to hear us. we can't argue over here. they don't recognize that argument. but at the same time it is a narrowing of possibility which has all sorts of kind of power implications right the kind of very institutional structuring of legitimate. discourse as logan was saying is itself a kind of hierarchy of power that yeah, i don't, you know andre sympathetic to the strategic

in this way, it is not clear, but what is foreseen and the law and the draft law so far which has alreadyused a wave of indignation in this and indeed our language community has made a statement today with a protest because in essence the goa of the ukrainian state proposes in ukraine to prohibit companies from showing in cinemas uh those films in ukrainian language which are filmed in english and this is about 90 % of all on rental in ukraine hollywood companies other english-language films that is, this means that, well , first of all, people will simply be deprived of the right in their own country to watch a film in the ukrainian language, except for those rare exceptions when it comes to, for example, films there are ukrainian productions, that is, people will not be able to watch movies in the ukrainian language, the cinema is clear that this will lead to the collapse of attendance only at cinemas, and there are already statements from cinemas that this is an absurd , extremely harmful and murderous law for the industry. in fact, the field of dubbing, so all these people who work on

you say, you don't like the law. you abide by the law.ou mean you disagree with all of these decisions from the nlrb? you think that they got the wrong and all of these cases? >> i think what you are talking about our allegations that we look forward to the case to defend ourselves. >> some of these are orders from judges to reinstate employees based upon violations of conduct. do you think that, in all of those cases in which judges have required stores to be reopen or for workers to be reinstated that they just got it wrong? >> in memphis -- >> in every! case >> in memphis, as an example, we -- >> i -- i am not looking to litigate each specific case. i would like to clarify when you say you are abiding by the law mean that in every case in which and nlrb have ordered you to take steps to remediate actions in every single case they have gone wrong? >> we will follow the law and follow the judges order. -- but the judge is making a finding that you have engaged in conduct that is not allowed by the underlying law. i.e., illegal behavior.

on the legal regime of martial law.nfortunately, i cannot agree here either, because this law does not local military administrations are provided with opportunities to somehow limit the rights and freedoms of citizens specifically for medicine and medical care , there are indeed certain norms that allow management of a-a educational institutions e-e, as well as health care institutions, but this is only management and it is possible in other aspects it can be carried out, but in no way limit the rights of citizens to access to medicine. it is correct that the radio of the defense of the ivano-frankivsk region was written in social networks. it is not clear who actually published it. this is a precedent in general in ukrainian legislation and the legal field . have there already been similar cases, in particular during a large-scale war, perhaps you know a if i am not mistaken, at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, or before february 24 or 125, such an order was issued throughout ukraine prohibiting the hospitali

soldiers, how many more such incidents should happen when we start in this hall to consider the draft law on banning the churches of the aggressor country on banning the russian orthodox church. in may, then we were promised that we need to be patient a little longer, this law was passed by the committee in 2022, i remind you, and it has not yet been brought to the hall, unfortunately, until we are spiritually cleansed, we will not have full peace and stability. i strongly urge my colleagues in this the hall as well as the leadership of the parliament to listen to the president and start spiritually purifying ourselves and begin to introduce the law on the ban of r in ukraine into the hall and let us take this historic step because if the rpc remains on the territory of ukraine we will always have destabilization we will always have half peace and russia will always stabilize us not by the army but by other economic , spiritual, and cultural means. european solidarity, that is, iryna volodymyrivna herashchenko, please, dear ukrainians, dear colleagues, happy constitution day, at that time

and guess what, under current law, federal law, the internal revenue service law, starbucks is able towrite off those costs as a run-of-the-mill business expense, meaning taxpayers -- taxpayers -- are subsidizing union busting united states of america, including starbucks. i so, mr. schultz, i would ask you, as a private citizen in your capacity, do you believe the corporations should have the right to get a tax break, a tax break for union busting and activities. >> senator casey, you said a number of things i'd like to respond to -- >> well, just answer that question first. >> no, i will. -- starbucks -- >> i did ask you about starbucks. i asked you for your personal view. do you think that provision should stay as the law should be changed? >> my personal view is that we should follow the law as the congress has set up. >> do you support that? >> i support the law. >> you support the provision that allows a company to hire union busting firms and conduct other activity that interferes with the rights of workers to organize. >> i understand it's the law. but you are saying you suppor

>> two days ago, a federal court throughout a law that blocked application of state laws under preemptionoctrine. states can restrict child labor lawfully, it cannot expand child labor lawfully. on many points -- i disagree there is some sort of consortium of big business. most of the violations i have been looking at were from rogue actors or franchisees. i was chief hr officer for coca-cola enterprises worldwide and we had some rogue actors. it might send a signal to these rogue actors that it's ok to do this until you get caught because the fines are fairly minimal. i don't think the laws will stand to the extent loosen. i think wisconsin allows 14-year-olds to serve alcohol. it's hard to imagine a 14-year-old serving cocktail waitress in some honky-tonk in this country. these won't stand, but the signals they may send our bad ones. >> about these being rogue actors as opposed to orchestrated larger attempts, would you like to weigh in on that? >> sure. i think with violations of y laws, there are rogue actors and larger systemic issues. with many of the recent child labor violations,

is law enforcement agency tasked with keeping guns out of the wrong hands and keeping our gun laws in line with congressional intent to rule making. 1934 congress passed the national firearms act creating additional requirements to own certain, especially deadly dangerous firearms like short barreled rifles, which were widely used by violent criminals. congress included short barreled rifles because they combine the firepower of a rifle with the concealability of a smaller gun. in recent years the gun industry discovered a way to circumvent the restrictions of the national firearms act by selling stabilizing braces, an accessory that allows a pistol to be fired from the shoulder turning it into a deadly yet conceivable short barreled rifle. in 2020 under the trump administration the a.t.f. concluded the stabilizing braces were being widely used to create short barreled rifles and published guidance regarding their use. house republicans cried foul. four days after the guidance was published, 90 house republicans sent a letter to a.t.f. and d.o.j. expressing their opposition. just a fe

an unjust law is, a human law that is not rooted in eternal law or in natural law. any law that uplifts human personality is just any that degrades human personality is unjust. all segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personnel. it gives a segregated tour a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of in segregation. to use the terminology, the jewish and jewish philosopher martin buber substituted its end quote. i it unquote relationship for end quote. i thou. unquote relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. and segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound. it is morally wrong. and sinful. paul tillich has said that sin is separation is not segregation. existential expression of man's tragic. his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness. thus it is that i can urge men to. the 1954 decision of the supreme court, for it is morally right and i can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances for they are morally wrong. let us consider a more

chairman, dear colleagues and friends , a draft law of ukraine on amendments to article 29 of the lawukraine on road traffic is proposed for your attention. this draft law envisages and what it came out of e.e. our defense forces today are in dire need of mobile vehicles and there is a critical need for cars capable of overcoming off-road conditions, as well as having high cross-country ability and good maneuverability, given the fact that our draft law lacks e-e the rules for permitting the import of such cars with right-handed and right-handed steering wheel positions and there are no rules that allow which vehicles to move on the roads of ukraine are proposed by the draft law to make changes and allow during the e -e establishment that there are exceptions exclusively during the performance of combat tasks or official duties of military personnel that do not allow such to be made for private purposes and do not fall under the essence, we also expand the list of military not only the armed forces of ukraine or of specific structures and covers all the general concept of other milita

law, echoed that. the statute in pennsylvania that requires matching of signatures on absentee ballots, the secretary of state said something out in september of 2020 saying to all the county election officials saying you don't have to do signature match because of covid. i wasn't aware you couldn't sign your name because of covid, but it's one of the examples. they just were lawless and you're right when your elected representatives have adopted the statute and you have administrative the just disregard it, then you are, you are eliminating the consent of the governed. yes? >> abby hutchinson and a working claire booth luce center and go to school in oklahoma wesleyan university. i like to ask you, we've seen an alaska and that lead me in the ranked-choice voting and like to ask your take on it and if you believe it is unconstitutional? >> all right. the questions that ranked-choice voting and actually i do, i conducted weekly call with leaders from around the country with a presentation this morning

mohseni ajei, who needs to update the laws, which law schools can help with. we, as lawyers of this country, do a lot to this issue the educated people of this country have predictions regarding the issues for the future . what infrastructures do we have in iran? we are strengthening them. this research institute is the research institute of the judiciary and the university and the faculties of the law depository between themselves, from the university of judicial sciences, the judiciary has a lot of communication with other universities, it must be strengthened and improved. the data of the judiciary are very useful and respectable data. may they said that we are using it, but it should be completed and become a structure to become a mechanism. it is true that some of the capacities that are in law schools or the judiciary can be used by scientific capacities. mohammad reza fallahi, sed and sima news agency, can use your experiences. i spoke to many people, but i was not with the people . with my report, there are cases of use of field work . the most importa

kurds have passed the law on the development and support of marine industries. now, with the meeting of the supreme council of marine industries, after six years of law enforcement , it has been put on the agenda. let's upgrade it, it includes transportation, but it's free according to article 1 of this law, our tourism sector can establish a maritime industry development fund to support the construction, production and repair of all types of vessels and equipment. it was supposed that 40 million dollars would be injected into this fund in the country every year. the dollar has never been used in these years. four sources of input have been defined for this fund, and now the executive regulations of one of these clauses have been announced. according to clause 4, 10% of the cost of transporting imported and exported oil and gas liquids by non-iranian fleets. according to the implementation in the meeting about three weeks ago of the high council of industries marine

that's what the political wall is and that includes things such as election law, campaign-finance law all of those as i say the business and regulationon politics and advocy and policy. i've had the opportunity over the years to be involved in election lawol and i want to tak about that today. it's important to tell people so they know how many more does she have to go. i want to talk about the history of election law in america and a little bit about the status of the elections today. the sad state of media, lack of coverage and misreporting about election issues and system issues, what the left has done to the systems and what we as citizens can do about it because i'm a big believer you don't lay out a problem if you are not willing to talk about how to resolve it, what do we do about it and, i mean, for everybody in the room to take up a task and do it. a little bit about the history of b elections in america. as a constitutional convention, article one, remember this we don't often think about this. article one is not about the executive branch.h. article one of the constitution

first, the rule of law. when i began my tenure as attorney general i said it would be my mission to affirm the norms that guided the justice department for nearly 50 years. i did so because those norms are happening more than ever for our democracy. they treat like cases alike and we apply the law in a way that respects the constitution. it requires that as much as possible, we speak through our work in our filings and our report and we jeopardize the viability of our investigations and -- the survival of our democracy requires that we stand firmly in their attempts to undermine the rule of law, of that home and abroad. i'm proud of the work that the department will get in on each of these fronts. protect the departments integrity. there are convictions for a wide range of criminal conduct ability to the january 6th attack on the capital. they're disrupting investigating violence and threats of violence, targeting those who serve the public. we are working closer than ever with ukrainian, partners our democr

and that law, the law did not satisfy script scrutiny. a narrowly terror law would. -- is intelctlly disabled, particularly vulnerable to that encouragent . >> i think if a state or congress -- in -- itve well might passkts strict score. today -- . ,,, -- . , -- ,. -- >>? >>,,. . -- . . ,. . ? >>, -- ,. ,. -- . >> -- ,,,. . -- . ,. or the inquiry, is simply does the statute, even if you narrowly construe it. does the statute reach protect expedient it looked at the fact at many people are engaged videos. is a reason for us to apply t over -- . similarly and free speech coalition, this court look to the fact that mainstream movies, such as romeo and juliet, or american beauty might fall within those terms of the statute. vis-À-vis actual child pornography. >> mr. fletcher points out that the statute has been with us long time. we just have never seen such prosecutions, or at most just a handful of cases. in that circumstance, our task is made easier with respect to over, breath if y n just say look at the history. >> two responses, justice

above the law.s indictment and you think to yourself, man, this person should robenot be charged with it. the only person, you're basically saying as mr. jordan is, that mr. trump is above the law and that is not how our rule of law works and that's not how our system works. >> president biden also has a special counsel looking into the way he classified on on excuse me, he handled classified documents after he left the white house. he is also a candidate for president. do you want the justice department to move quickly on their investigation of biden so that the american people have information about what's going on with that investigation, just as much as trump? >> absolutely. absolutely. i think it's very important that the special counsel do a thorough investigation to determine whether president biden willfully concealed classified information and knew that he was doing it, and that's the critical distinction here between mr. trump and former vice president pence, president biden, secretary cli

i think it a democracy, a real law is essential and that means that anyone who violates a law that in particular powerful people who violate the law need to be held civic account. and that seems to be what the department of justice is doing today. me out of the, the $37.00 charges out which one struck you as, as to pricing or something that you maybe didn't expect to see as well. i think, you know, i don't know that anyone was expecting any of these charges, but you know, the, the 1st 31 churches relate to the retention of these incredibly serious and sensitive documents. these documents pertain to are military capabilities or nuclear capabilities or vulnerabilities as a country, the vulnerabilities of our allies. so i think what is alleged to have been kept by the former president trump? it's just all very serious. and so it's, i think the charges altogether are absolutely stunning. the, the amount of evidence that appears to be against him, including a lot, a lot of the evidence against them is, are his own words and the information that's from people very close to him. and so those

what is the previous law, if it could solve this problem, to change the emergency association law, itced us to change the secret law , it is still in force, that is, it caused us to change the remaining philosophy of the problem, the problem has not been ruled out, the change of the law is canceled and itself so we have to move somehow that the resources needed to insure the back of this resource are provided and that the workers who are insured now have security, if we revive the previous law, i don't know if it will solve this problem, a solution must be thought of, dear brothers, finally, in the possible details, the comments and suggestions of the doer let's look at the main story here, and with naft, he rejected the issue by erasing the issue . this is the first point. let's do it. this is an injustice social prepared, of course, the numbers can be changed. the numbers can be increased or decreased based on that table. it is closer to justice. i am not saying that it is fair and justice is closer. why should someone who lives in the north of tehran , on the outskirts of the villa

of the parliament, the law, my law is this, this is an inquiry into the law of their executive development plan and the government before that. no, the law clinic number 1 if we want to draw a line, he wrote the law of the sixth five-year development plan approved 1411 1374 and implemented it, making the air and passenger transportation rates realistic based on article 53 of the law of the sixth five-year development plan is one of the duties of the government, which cannot be claimed if the law we want to improve the legal solution in the civil aviation organization of the government. the government can't make a law on the method of making development plans that are approved in the parliament. the legislator has specified the tasks and duties of the civil aviation organization, and most of these issues are the responsibility of the legislator to regulate the climate. in paragraph 2, article 5 of the civil aviation law, it is clearly stated that the civil aviation organization has the responsibility of regulating air transport and aviation activities, and this should be done in the face of

those laws don't exist. these laws are aimed to stop the sexual abuse of children by prohibiting their adult abusers and those in the abortion industry to help facilitate that abuse by transporting them across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion and thus hiding the fact that they got an abortion from their parents. there good reasons for these laws mr. president. in 2004 for example a 14-year-old daughter of marsha harold was taken by her boyfriend's family from their home in pennsylvania where they lived to new jersey. new jersey where parental consent for an abortion was not required at the time. went to new jersey they threaten to leave her in new jersey unless she got an abortion which she did under duress and under coercion, afraid. the grief and devastation crashed this 14-year-old girl and her family. they had agreed to keep the baby in and the so-called freedom to traffic act would hamper the ability of states to punish such criminals and actions. i don't think there's anyone here th

at this i think critical year for the law.as senator wyden said, wikipedia would not exist without section 230 and that it's absolutely true. section 230 not only protects, and just to clarify, the wikimedia foundation which i work for is the technical and legal host of volunteer run platforms. so wikipedia of which andrew is an active editor is all the content is written and edited and uploaded by volunteers. the rules that are set by volunteers and enforced by volunteers, foundation hosts technically the servers that enable wikipedia to be accessed by people around the world. and we also have the lawyers and the policy teams that of course deal with many government requests, demands, deal with compliance around the world and so on. and so just to come back to our position, section 230 then makes it possible for the foundation to run the servers, to host wikipedia and other volunteer run platforms without having to intervene for fear that anything that people might write on a particular encyclopedia article might result in us

of law.let me go to another one according to whistleblower complaint by former head of the departments intelligence branch, mr. wolf -- made the president look bad. the inspector general the office investigated it, and found that the department did not follow its internal processes and policy standards when edits an intelligence products regarding russian interference with 2020 presidential election, and acting secretary mr. wolf participated in that review process. mr. chairman, i know my time is up, for record that inspector general report my staff will give and before we start attacking this intentional sabotage. the rule of law, we should look in our own glass house. i yield. >> house objection. -- without objection, mr. fleuger from texas. >> how rich was that. >> how many apprehensions. >> i don't have that. >> how many since biden takes over. >> over 6 million. >> no got aways? >> known got aways 1.5 million plus or minus, that -- is the known. >> known or suspected terrorists. >> 200,

[000:00:00;00] we didn't have a law, we had a law, the enforcement of the law was not implemented, it remained corrupt and the cost was paid to the government to argue that this product would be destroyed anyway, and the vitality of this product could easily enter the consumption cycle. i will complete this point, what action was taken, now i want to understand what action was taken, did you bring these goods, were they corrupted or destroyed , or are we taking them out of the country, because of the packages that were taken out of the country at the end of 1400 anyway, the government is discussing regulation he passed the bill under the title of the bill to prevent the deposition of goods in ports and customs we are moving towards this, god willing, god willing, it will be finalized that we will cooperate. the goods that you see now are the goods that, for example , you expressed your opinion on the issue of corn. as far as sefane, because the entry of the goods into the free zones is allowed, if it is contaminated, it will be fine, because of this , it is being unloaded at the ports

aquatic resources protection law the upstream law that exists and this law on the protection of aquatic resources says, sir, you must harvest in such a way that the stocks can be stable. this is what i want to ask you. we took the hall, we respected your warm hands, that is, based on the basic fishing license, which is based on the allowed amount, when you have, when you have excessive fishing, when you talk, if you have a grudge, no, i do not judge. rule out a second and to artificial habitats cause the reconstruction of the reserves was not enough in this government, in this government, we did it with permits and securing credit , and you can see that the reconstruction of the reserves, proliferation and release 126 how south biotechnology 126 how a sea does not have all of these anywhere in the world, only sometimes commercial yuna and can reproduce and release that this and keep it stable. how many tomans do you add to the concept? you can increase a lot of effort in the form of images. thirdly, the artificial habitat of the law must be cleared. 6502 hormozgan provinces have been ph

hosseini, what does the law say about this issue ? of course, i know what the law says. please, you and your colleagues in different provinces from this platform declare that the law of the islamic republic says that the same sea as the national portal for issuing business licenses is available to fishermen with a valid contract and the law to cooperate with these fishermen is the duty of the institutions, including the provincial fisheries departments, whatever is necessary, part of these conversations that the fishermen of the southern region the rescue was due to not knowing the law. of course, those in the organization , including the fisheries department, who come to guide them, they will probably obey the law, and thank you very much to mr. hosseini, although i always think that you will pay in the end. please summarize the situation in this planet we are at your service and on thursday, friday last week in hormozgan, i went to see them. you are aware of this matter. honorable governor of hormozgan. and the relief committee announced that we said it would be good t

putin held a meeting with the heads of law enforcement agencies.sian military destroyed intelligence

and now, criticizing the law on national minorities, they actually return to criticizing the law on theguage of education, but to a much greater extent than in the conclusion that was once, which concerned precisely these laws, at the same time, they do not pay attention to the constitution of ukraine to the decision of the constitutional court of ukraine, which contradicts the very statute of the venice commission, in the venice commission, various experts. well, for example, the same commission is already returning to the protection of the national minority of the so-called russian pagan population, which says that their rights are limited and should not even be despite the fact that russia occupied the crimea, you understand, they issue a conclusion uh, which uh, is made public when russia occupied a large part of the territory of ukraine and fierce battles are being fought, and it is recognized by international institutions that including the council, including the european union, for example, the european parliament, that they are waging a genocidal war against ukraine and the ling