this law.lewis explained, was called the law of nature because people thought that everyone knew it by nature and did not need to be taught it. and hei believe they were right. if they were not then all the things we said about the war were nonsense. what was the sense in saying the enemy were in the real thing which the nazis at bottom knew as well as we did and ought to have practiced if they had had no notion of what we mean by right then, though, we might still have had to fight them. we could no more have blamed them for that than for the color of their hair. lewis used the confrontation with the evils of nazi ism, and he gets fought germans in the first world war. use the evil nazi ism to highlight the reality of the moral law in a dramatic way. if your moral ideas can be true he and those of the nazis less true, then there must be something, some real morality for them to be true about the reality of basic moral principles known on some level by everyone was foundation all to lewis's und

theth whole purf preemption is to say if the state passes a lat violates federal law the state law is no longer fective so there is no state licensing law that would permit th would prevent the state to say don't treat diabeti with insulin. treat them only with pills and adopted in the likelihood and we will get to that shortlyecause we believe this is better treatment. federal law would say you can't do t medically accepted objected standa of care required the treatment of diabetics wh insulin the medicallpted obligation of doctors when they have women with certain conditiot may not result in death but more than likely result in very serious medical conditions including blindness for some, for others the loss of organs and for some, chronic blood strokes. idaho is saying unless the ctor can say in good faith this person's death is as likely oppodoerious illness, they can't pform the abortion. so, i don't know your aument about stateicsing law because this is what it does it tells state your licensing walls can't take out objective medical conditions that could save a person from seri

and after one year of law school as i was getting to the end of law school i told a friend that law school was going to lose, take away my ability to write well. and he suggested starting a blog and this was way back in 2003, it was in the early days of blogging. and i was like, ok, sure, whatever. and so sort of did that on the side would just do little three, 200 word stories on what i was thinking about in the legal news that day. and that sort of continued throughout that point, it continued once i was a lawyer, it was something that i, when i was a practicing lawyer in columbus, ohio, that i had. and then i got rid of it as i went in to sort of full-time journalism here in d.c., and eventually decided two years ago basically right as we were awaiting the dobbs decision that it was it time if i was ever going to try to take a moment to try to do it for myself and see if i could make it work. >> and now you have 33,000 subscribers. guest: yeah. host: who is your audience? guest: i don't know. i think it's a combination of what it sounds like law dork would have. it's a few audiences. i

federal law would ou can't do that. medically it have to be accepted in shakir to require the treatm diabetics with insulin for the medically accepted obligation of doctors and women with certain conditions that may not r in death but more than likely will result in very serious medical cons including blindness for sd for others the loss of organs. for some to blood strokes. idaho is sayings the doctor and say in good faith thats person's death as likely as opposedo s illness they can't perform the aborti so i don't know your argument about state licensing law because this is what this law does. tells states you are licensing laws can't take out objective medical conditions that could save a person fm serious injury or dea >> i i think they are two crucial responses to your point. let me begin preemption point. 1595 are telling hhs the federal government and court sug you can't unless there's a direct conflict if objective medical care requires you to potential serious medicalith the compons and abortion is the only thi

but we agreed to other fundamental amendments from the draft law 8221 and the draft law on the decolonization of cultural space. in particular, the reason for banning the activities of the russian orthodox church is the national security interests of ukraine. this is in line with the european convention on human rights and the case law of the european court of human rights. to ukrainian legislation the definition of ruskagmir as a criminal ideology, which is prohibited on the territory of our state, is introduced. it is prohibited. activities of other religious organizations that are affiliated with the center of management in the country of the aggressor. this affiliation is determined by the court. the state returns to its ownership religious buildings and other real estate in the event that a religious organization refuses to sever ties with the russian orthodox church or other organizations on the territory of the aggressor's country. another military winter passed, but in the spring of the 24th, the russian one the orthodox church continues to operate in ukraine, although for its ban the

law period to have u.n. standard just incorporate it into u.s. law. now, of course the u.n. international law standard problematic. it was created in the 1950s in response to world war two. but we live in a world of formal laws and immigration exclusion. what we seen in the last four years is a massive effort by immigrants voting with their feet to use the exception informal law to come to the united states and, seek asylum. and despite evolving efforts to restrict this exception by presidential ministrations, trump and biden alike, people are still coming and the law still stands. that people have a right to seek asylum no matter how they enter the country. and no matter how many people do unkept, it is astounding. just think about this for a minute. it is astounding giving the plenary power that was just described. the biden administration has tried numerous ways to limit but ultimately had to turn to congress and try and to change law and put a cap or a quota on the number of people who can seek asylum. it didn't work. just this past winter, to all the doomsayers that say

why then adopt such a law at all? we spent so much time and effort in the committee to make a quality law that would really solve the problem, we were offered to throw it all in the trash. but des officials went further. they also proposed to implement the statute of the russian orthodox church into ukrainian legislation, i.e. to give the moscow church legal status in our country. how interesting it turns out, my proposal to include tomos in the law of the board. refused to support, and please introduce the statute of the russian orthodox church into the legal body of ukraine. such amendments are at least sabotage, if implicit work on interests of the enemy. i hope that someday we will learn about the motives. colleagues, who is in favor of recommending to the verkhovna rada to consider draft law number 8371 in the second reading, as a whole, taking into account the amendments to the comparative tables approved by the committee. please vote. kuturaev for. knyazhytsky za. i congratulate you on the adoption of this impo

law. ten years later. black wilderness artists and members of the black community of philadelphia and harrisburg, pennsylvania played a critical role in the release of a man with the interest. a black man with the interest, the name of daniel webster. at the time, webster was living with family in harrisburg, where was arrested on a warrant issued by a local commissioner. webster was accused of escaping from his owner in virginia five years earlier. words of his arrest was telegraphed to friends in philadelphia and a number of opponents of slavery in the state house of pennsylvania began in search of witnesses, testify in webster's behalf. five african-american witnesses traveled from harrisburg, including in the 60 year old dr. william jones and his doctor, his honorific who had long played an active role in the community's resistance to the all claim to have known webster a year before his owner claimed he had escaped. scores of philadelphia supporters arrived early for the hearing. all

it leaves the state law. it is a list of your argument today has been dedicatedohe proposition of idaho law and that may very well be the case. but what you are asking us to do isoonstrue this statute that was enactedecting the reagan administti. send signed by president reagan to maine to have performed an abortion even if during that is a violation of state law. >> of congress had wanted to spce protective or permanent weight who are in danger of sing their own lives or their health that could redefine the state so the fetus self as an iividual with emergency medical condition. at is not how congress struct this they put the women that run johor in ant situation her own life health i is clear the hospital has to offer her staling treatment but she ds not have to accept that these are tragic circumstances manyom want to do whatever they can to save that pregnancy. the statute protects her and gives her that choice. t only way you try to get out of the statutory interpretation is by focusing on the term indiv

to pass the law . the government should follow the law in implementation. it is not going well. the problem is very clear. we are developing three very important indicators, one of which is the so-called individual capacity, social capacity , individual capacity, social capacity , administrative capacity. make an ordinary employee the general manager of a place, this person is very good because he has not gone through the hierarchy, as a result of his behavior, his decision- making, his movement, he does not have legal frameworks because he has not followed his own path. in the qur'an , it says to abraham, "kohnas imams", that is , when abraham goes through the steps and passes the exam, he becomes an imam. don't know , he doesn't implement the law here, then even make honest decisions, but because within the framework of the law is not. a common language and communication of common behavior is not established even between the personnel and him , it is not established between the personnel and the soci

there was no separate law of -- property. there was no separate law of -- contract. the world of property law is very, very conservative. doesn't change very fast. and so when black people enter into contract relations, when people black people buy land or borrow, they are now part of the legal relations. they're part of a web of legal relations that white people are also a part of. and so white people are deeply when black people do things in the world of property and contract, and also when things are done to black people in the world of property and contract. so when black people get lynched, it affects the people to whom they own. owe money. it affects who might need or want to buy the land that they owned. it's not to say that black people not be lynched. but those webs of relations made clear that black people were people with and that they were, in a sense, people who people whose rights were intertwined with the rights of white people. so you many in the audience have been hearing a lot about critical race theory. it's it's often made out to be a kind of boog

so you often had a big diverse movement, sometimes talking each, but agreeing that laws, least some lawsbirth con abortion had to change. there was a pretty vibrant debate within the black community to some leaders of the black power movement like brown, pictured here argued that abortion and birth control both were strategies for what he called black genocide. and there were two flavors of this argument. one provided that abortion, birth control were trying to reduce the size of the black commun time the black community needed numbers to fight for civil provides that people offered in the white world abortion and contraception solutions to poverty rather than addressing the root causes of poverty itself like a lack of education or structural racism. women in the black power and civil rights movement often pushed back against this claim suggesting that women in the black community needed wanted access to abortion and contraception, and that abortion in. contraception would help people of color equality rather than undermining the struggle of equality and framing the black genocide argume

we're talking about people changing the law and order to change the law. you have to to practice making those arguments at the appellate and supreme court level. how do you do that without practice, moot court competition? how do become a chemist without a laboratory right. or a biology without some type of practice beforehand? it's impossible. he fundamentally changes howard university school of law as an institution, it becomes nation's premiere institution for turning out civil rights lawyers hands down, second to none more from this school will bring cases before supreme court decades of the fifties and sixties that with respect to civil rights law than anybody else, fundamentally transforms. okay, we'll talk about a few of those. i told you had a short time. short time, because he's making these changes started in 1929. by 1931, the american bar association has accredited how university school of law two years. that's phenomenal. that's phenomenal. turn it out, lawyers. okay. turning out lawyers making changes. questions. a pause for a second because

the government has tried to write a law and plan . it has become a law. it has been approved by the honorable guardian council. why should we sit again in the 4 years we have now? let's write in my opinion, the parliament is obliged to demand the writing of this law from the government and any government that comes. you brought this law yourself, let's see why you didn't implement these laws. we will sit down and write laws again. i am here to tell you a discussion about this economic trend and economic growth. i was the vice president. i thought we should write a law against corruption. rent, bribery, smuggling, land grabbing, should be removed. what should we do to write this law? well, we didn't study before , we didn't know what the previous rules were. now we like he wanted to write a new law. we checked and saw that there is a law. we sat down with the experts and the people we saw . there is a law for what we want . the governments did not implement it again in these governments . we came to this parliament again and wrote the anti-corruption law .

promoting these laws in state legislatures in the 19th centuryinced legislatut states to introduce lawsthough they rejected some of the harshest proposals that were introduced. it was■[■q state laws to authorize felony punishments for abortion seekers and virtually all with the sole exception of new hampsre,include pregnant person, something that not concerned about in his proposal storer was'tnting to regulate reproduction in this era, this handsome gentleman anthony comstock was part of the picture to comstock's proposals were different, though he was not concerned with what he saw as the taking of fetal life. he was concerned instead with what he asso business model firt developed in new york in the late 1860s came about because comstock, his own account, was a compulsive master who worried that exposure to pornography was damaging the nation's fabric for young men and women alike. he proposed to new york law tha would define a much broader class of material as obscene everythingxtbooks to involving s as abortion and contraception which hein to indeed, not just abortion and contracep

there exceptions to this there were laws, for example, poison laws that regulatedarly and pregnancy, particularlyhigh profile deaths from poisonous concoctions used to end pregnancies. there were some s treated abortion as a misdemeanor for early in pregnancy. tle regulation of contraception at all. until the late 19th century and that was to change because of two independent social movements. the first was in what we would view as an anti-abortion movement, though by no means, a fetal rights movement that began in the mid-19th century and was led by in the american medical association, including horatio daughter whose pictured here the american association was new at the time and medical education in general did not in any meaningful way resemble what we so there were no real licensure in a modern sense. medical education was completely and often not very credential ized at all. the difference between a so-called regular physician and a midwife or a homeopath medicines in the pages the nation's newspapers was hard to the doctors in the american medical association looking for a way

of the law. finally the new constitution of 1358 came out from under the surgical blade of the nation's representatives. but this story was not a simple story. year 130. it was just the beginning of the story. hello, i would like to ask, how are you ? has your health been disturbed, sir? hello , hello, how are you? he was a student at the officer's college. when he graduated , he came to be a suitor whom my father loved very much because he was his brother's child. he was your cousin. yes, he was a cousin. he had come for his brother's wedding. he had married my sister. right there they like me and we just got married, a very simple and ordinary life was his salary very good or not normal ? he only had a small salary of 1400 tomans . at that time, he used to go after the morning. when there was still no war, he would go from the morning until the afternoon. after that, he would go to the academy and teach languages ​​to his parents. he used to keep his salary for us. how many other children do yo

law, we checked and saw the law.s this work at all? we sat down with the experts and the people we saw . there is a law for what we want to say . governments do not implement it again in these governments. we came again in this parliament , we wrote the anti-corruption law. if we were to implement the law we wrote , it would not be possible for me to take a bribe so easily. it is not possible for smuggling to enter the country so easily . do you know why it enters the country because we did not implement the laws? we have a postal code law , we have a national code, we have a land code, in addition to article 169 , we have frequent taxes. where are these fields , what birth certificate do i have related to kn melin? agriculture is whatever it is, article 169 of the tax repeatedly says that every iranian has the duty to declare to the ministry of finance what he owns, what his assets are, how much he earns, how he earns, what his job and business are , if we connect these together, i am now a representative. because i

it was not a state law. it was a civil law. and this did not criminalize abortion explicitly, but it made it functionally impossible to provide because if you provide it, you risk this suit. that would be untenable to to go through with. you have to defend yourself in court and probably would lose at least $10,000. and this was this was so it was so smart because it a ban on abortion. but it was like if you could argue listen doctors can go out there and provide abortions as long as they're willing to pay $10,000 every time. but it means that you could be sued out of existence. and after that ban took effect, what we did see was even while states were preparing for the decision, figuring out what kind of bans they would want, there were a couple idaho and oklahoma, who also passed copycats of this texas law just in case. so that no matter what, they would be able to ban abortion when the time came. and of course, it couldn't. i mean, at that point, the supreme court didn't need to overrule it because it technically circumvented

of that law -- of the spirit of that law through rulemaking.nd in everygle one of these states that have statutes protecting women'sting private spaces, protecting against the ms. jen during -- if you look at that don't see how that could be held up. it is clear-cut to me but i am not an attorney. ms. burke: our next cano will delve into the legal analysithey will be able to give you a perfect answer for that. yes, ma'am. thank you. say first you talked about the siloing. atch out for international silos too. the world health organization is on to as well. you talk about mom's not wanting to talk about politics. there is another group that doesn't like to talk about politics and it is church pawe have a big problem with church pastors thabible verses that say to respect the government and everything. we need to stop that. i'm wondering if because of florida and all you have done is not any different -- do you see anymore pastors speaking out standing against the title ix stuff? comm. diaz: in florida we have been fortunate and it doesn't mean i

under tpherlederal law.-guessing of medical expertise, scientific expertise, of professionalism within agencies. expertise. what i found intesti is a lot of the health sector' very nervous about as well not just on expertise but uncertainty and i wonder if any of you could comment on the role of the in is and how that would affect the■be decisions are made. >> it's believed if the chevron congress treupbaway that would agencies and the public. erin: the reason ishe process by which a rule, process used to mean that ast long as the agency followed the procedures and did its rulemaking, then because of chevron deference, any construction of the statute or authority would stand. what this does is basically opens up, because of a second-g it, if you are -- somehow your indu penalized or you have some political reason to object to it, all of the agency, but past ones as well are up for grabs. that meanshe front of the court, ask these justices do you regulation?w t this is the right reading of the statute? that m

the verkhovna rada regularly adopts new laws. but how do these changes affect our lives?e new decrees to inform you about the latest changes in ukrainian legislation. how do legislative norms change our lives, what should we prepare for? leading lawyers of the aktum bar association will answer these and other questions that concern ukrainians. watch every tuesday at 7:55. in the legal expertise program on the espresso tv channel. the information day of oksana savchuk tv channel continues. a people's deputy of ukraine is currently in touch with us. glory to ukraine, mrs. oksano, we congratulate you. glory to the hero, glad to see and hear you. well, first of all we wanted to ask you about the visit of prosecutor general kostin, yes in the case of his deputy verbytskyi. kostin was there, he wasn't, what were the explanations. did it just disappear, so to speak, and someday maybe they will explain to us the situation, what is going on with such incompletely declared millions? well, we really wanted to see if we lived in a different situation, when the parliament would be mor

they can be approved if they are disqualified if they respect the law. if he is ethical, he is a subject of the islamic republic , otherwise what is not acceptable to the nation, when he breaks the law from now on, be sure that he will break the law later, if he does not accept it. it means that they have not followed election ethics and it is the duty of the iranian people to obey the constitution and the final opinion of the guardian council regarding the approval or disqualification of important candidates. yes, and everyone should obey the opinion of the guardian council, it is our duty to respect this law and accept the opinion of the guardian council. what is the process of qualifications or certification of qualifications? could you explain a little what it may seem like? now some people say that at least the guardian council may he has explained over the years about what this procedure is exactly, maybe it has fueled some suspicions, can you open up some of this procedure for us? yes. please see that similar to what is done in the guardian counci

a just and lasting — international law. a just and lasting peace _ international law.sting peace, based on fundamental principles within the _ lasting peace, based on fundamental principles within the interests - lasting peace, based on fundamental principles within the interests of - principles within the interests of ukrainians— principles within the interests of ukrainians at— principles within the interests of ukrainians at its _ principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. _ principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. we - principles within the interests of ukrainians at its core. we can'tl ukrainians at its core. we can't forget — ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that— ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever— ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there - ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there is l ukrainians at its core. we can't forget that wherever there is a | ukrainians at its core. we can't - forget that wherever there is a war, there _ forget that wherever there is a war,

amendments, for example, to that law and to migration laws.e, only implement the whole programme that we have. if there is a referendum in france to change the constitution — we have a written constitution in france that can be amended, there are different procedures for that — and what my political party proposes... that clearly isn't going to be easy. some of the things that mr bardella and others in your party say seem to be very far from what is politically practical. there's also a question of morality. i mean, france, of course, famously, is committed to egalite. i wonder how much egalite there is whenjordan bardella says, as he did a couple of days ago, quote, "our compatriots of foreign origin who work, who pay tax, who respect the law, who love our country, have nothing to fear from our policies." the clear implication of that was that people who perhaps are unemployed, who live on benefits, who aren't altogether in love with france, have something to fear. no, but what we are saying is that we want to... of course we want to reward t

working with law enforcement. so, partnerships are in many ways stronger than ever, and that is one of the things that is keeping this from becoming an even worse problem. we work with state dda on everything from strike forces, we have dea task force officers on a lot of our task versus, and vice a versa. we work out at their sod where there is intelligence sharing. so, there is a whole range of ways in which we all work together. obviously, always room for improvement, we are always looking for ways to innovate and take that to the next level, but if there is one bright pot that i can leave the committee with is that the partnerships among law enforcement are, in my career, the best i have ever seen. >> well, is mexico honoring our law enforcement efforts to bring the cartel leaders to justice? >> as i think i said earlier, uneven. uneven. so, we have had instances, individual instances of successes, including events -- significant cartel figures and extraditions, but then the reality is, especially the two majo

under federal law.xpertise, scientific expertisf professionalism within agencies. what i found interesting is a hy nervous about as well nott on expertise but uncertainty and timing. timip÷d comment on the role of the courts in inserting themselves and how that would affect the processes by which some of these desi made. >> it's believed if treupbaway d introduce a lot more uncertainty for public. erin: the reason is the long process by which ang goes throut process used to mean that as long as the agency followed the procedures and did its rulemaking, thecause of chevron deference, any permissible or reasonable construction of the statute or■g authority would stand. what this does isuse of a second-guessing, the opportunite -- somehow your industry is penalized or yoo ity rules, not just the new ones, but pa for grabs. that means they can be challenged in front of the cour ask these justices do you agree this was the right regulation? this is the rht reading of the statute? that means that the certaint

this is frightening to the rule of law. can you talk about the work they are doing to address this issue? >> the threats to the judiciary and threats to prosecutors and threats to law enforcement agents have all spiked significantly. some cases have accelerated from threats to actual violence. we have a threats task force engaged in investigating these matters. we intend to aggressively investigate and prosecute threats against our public officials including members of congress in which the numbers of actually exploded in the past couple of years. our democracy cannot continue if the people who make the democracy run or are afraid. if they make their decisions. based on being threatened or assaulted. no democracy can survive under the circumstances, and we will do everything we can to investigate and deter and prosecute anyone who makes threats against public servants. >> y jack smith? why did you pick i appointed m smith i explained he was independent. a long time career prosecutor. >> but there are probably others you wou

forward and this law should not trump federal law.'s saying this court should do more, saying states like texas and other states that have a near total ban on abortion, that would stop a woman were getting an abortion that she needed if it dealt with her health, not her life, that those things should have been made in clear today. in talking to reproductive rights groups today and with democrats ahead of the debate, they are echoing the language of ketanji brown jackson saying this is really a temporary win but that women in idaho, while they can right now get emergency abortions, it's not clear that that's the case for years to come. i think it's a really important point that she's making here, and i think we should remind people between the difference between life and health and writes in her dissent. part of her dissent is women could go into emergency rooms and not be on death's doors or could wind up with future infertility. this issue needs to be given more claire tie to women and their doctors. >> ken delainian, you're reading

the rule of law here.of that matter is you can and date a president after they become president for actions they took having nothing to do with this presidency. it's not even what is that before the supreme court which is the actions of a president when the president leaves it. this is about the actions of a president before he was president. vice president when he is the private citizen when he was the senator. what about the statute of limitations? they don't matter. we have a case in new york. the statute of limitations, what statute of limitations? for goodness sakes we just believe in getting bottom of this. we have so much evidence in this report a willful violation of classified information. the department of justice said they're not going to act because he said and certified joe biden is an imbecile. plus you cannot indict a sitting president for a number of monies to present him with the defense is one a trump attorney general has to accept. joe biden is exposed and it did look in classified infor

this law went there, it was passed , it came, it was promulgated, well, now we have to say that a law was an obstacle, this law filled the hands of the negotiators, as hazrat agha said, when a law came, they had a conversation, what they said was , look, if you remember. when trump left the jcpoa, there was a discussion that, well, now us should we go out or not, there was a discussion that sometimes there was an opinion that we should go out, anyway, the government decided and said that we will give them a week to come back. we make a decision. well, it's been a week, two weeks later, we say a month, then we say 2 months . this is how it went. this was the same indecision that hazrat agha said, "well, this law has been passed. what did we decide here? how did we reach something from this?" we want the us government to say, sir, this law is not our authority, this is the congress, so here the parliament fills this negotiator , we wrote in that law, what did we say? the additional protocol that we used to implement as a volunteer , now that we are out of jcpoa, sanctions are coming , w

those who will not live by the law shall die by the law. >> ♪ ♪ >> it's a classic for a reason.s book, one nation under gut, how corporate america invented christian america he chronicles how he prepared for the debut, he worked with a group called the fraternal order of eagles on a plan to present plaques of the 10 commandments and stay capitol grounds on courthouse lawns, public parks and other places so that as many as possible might view the laws of gut. now that marketing effort is guiding a new louisiana law. kevin kruse joins me now. i was fascinated to get a glimpse of the history and to put in context. it's a recurring, i hate to call it a bit, it's a recurring bit in conservatism down through decades of this specific thing as a test of the first amendment and a test of the lives into unified church and state. >> yeah, that's exactly right. there's a desire on the part of conservatives to see what they can do to push the envelope and that pushes it. >> what was the origin of this campaign. he was also a committed believer. i found out it was the second 10 commandments h

guest: it's a term used to describe whenutweaponize the rule of law the system of law, law enforcement go after their enemies political or otherwise. for example, a department of justice that chooses not to prosecute a particular politician for classified documents in his garage he's not allowed to have while raidingó another politician, someone challenging the current, a regime that goes into rice to put his political opponents in prison, tries to censor political and needs to stop. host: do you think a candidate'inal record is a legitimate issue for an election? guest: can you be more specific? host: just that. criminal record, a felony convictionthat a legitimate issue to bring up in an election? guest: one when you are the one running the regime and bragging about how the person you are running against has b convicted in a system that you oversee or people from your own apa were deployed to make it happen, i tell you that's absolutely going to be an i don't think it's going to turn out the way this administration wants, but this business of biden going around and calling trump a co

and following the letter of the law in m because so much is policy and regulation in in law there isot of inrptation that could bete made by the various factors transfer decision-making process but also the ch i'm wondering whether congress or executive branch or civil do better to more effectively implement u.s. law and policy as intended wre or favor to certain government so were looking a these as arms transfer policy indicates could these criteria norms be emplaced, who wants >> all go ahead. i have said today many others have said as i mentioned earlier that the united states is not complying with the law when it comes to the u.s. arms generally when there's no compliance of law courts involved in the place where i arms trade because intervene on any substantive issues transfers and the reason comes down to something called sociability the set of principles that rooted in thenstitution for when the system what way and uncertain disputes. you probably heardin the mutinouss a political question in the political doctrine is one of the largest barriers i have seen for judicial enfor