intervention has been hit by continuing criticism of the number of civilian deaths historian lawrence davidson says the u.s. and nato have made themselves hostages to conflict. with this cause into question the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was. just the media story for our domestic consumption you can either enter being anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening with the type of munitions. i cannot avoid killing. i think that nato and its commanders and the president the power to sherry's involved in this are beyond a point of no return or so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore a great war ended up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover. well for the latest news from libya go to our web site that's dot com online right now nato airstrike reportedly kills fifteen people as an explosion rocks the house the top gadhafi general d

very beginning that it's humanitarian operation would cause civilian deaths so as professor lawrence davidson for me west chester university in pennsylvania. what is causing to question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for our domestic consumption you cannot intervene anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians and there but the type of munitions that they're using where there are these are are you know piloted aircraft or a drone strike in afghanistan i mean you can either void it you can these are not smart weapons whatever they might say and if you're going away attack a building in a urban environment you don't know you know there's a margin for error it's a large and you're going to kill civilians there it's just they know that they know that and they've only admitted to one but you know there has to be more. they're watching that weekly here on r.t. and turning our attention now to syria where syrian forces have opened fire at funerals for the victims of a

might pull it in from the west only one professor lawrence davidson from west chester university in pennsylvania told r.t. that nato has understood from the very beginning that it's humanitarian operation what it adds really bring civilian deaths what this calls into question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for our domestic consumption you cannot enter being anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening with the type of munitions that cannot avoid killing civilians and i'm think that nato and its commanders and the president and the politicians involved in this are beyond a point of no return so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore they will end up doing whatever is necessary to secure their three in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. and you're wanting to live from moscow still have for you this hour fighting terror was torture. i was

major's actions in libya and what's in store maybe for the water and country let's not talk to lawrence davidson of the festival the sister thanks for being on the line with us on r.t. as our correspondent said in that report that nato is actually in libya it appears aren't winning over hearts and minds instead they are paid if it comes to twenty people support for gadhafi what they didn't want over three months on should there be a change of strategy. well it depends upon where you're getting your news you know your program. admirably clinton treats at least sometimes. the victims of the nato attacks and the media in my neighborhood never get. the american people don't realize that the the if i get the story well. yes and then the one side that comes out ahead unfortunately usually is the side that can kill more people than the other side. but i think. what this points into question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was. just a media story. to mess to consumption you cannot intervene. anywhere with this munitions

and nato have become prisoners of the situation in libya that's the view of professor lawrence davidson from westchester university in pennsylvania the queen the queen is that think that nato and its commanders and the president and the politicians involved in this are beyond the point of no return so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore they will end up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. and it's not just in libya where foreign intervention is it claiming a growing number of civilian lives as we reveal later in the program. the u.s. is coming under criticism for its use of drone strikes in pakistan and yemen with critics warning that instead of fighting terror it could be fueling it. and the newest safety hopes for russian aviation the latest aircraft designed to make pilot error a thing of the past takes to the skies of the largest air show in the world. the greek government has won a crucial vote of confidence in parliament the new finance minister will now s

lawrence davidson is a professor of middle east history at west chester university says nato is determined to see its libyan campaign through to the bitter end the queen queen is that i think that nato and its commanders and the president and politicians involved in this are beyond the point of no return so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore if they won't end up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. it's not just in libya where foreign intervention is claiming a growing number of civilian lives as we reveal later in the program to the u.s. is coming under criticism for its use of drone strikes in pakistan and yemen critics want to get instead of fighting terror the feeling. now that the moment of reckoning is approaching for the greek government within the hour it's facing a no confidence vote in parliament over its harsh austerity measures they need to be implemented to secure a new loan from the e.u. designed to prevent defaulting on its debts and triggering a eur

criticism of civilian deaths historian lawrence davidson says the u.s. . sells hostages to complete it. well it's cause into question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for our domestic consumption you cannot enter being anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening type of munitions that cannot avoid killing civilians i'm thinking nato and its commanders and the president and the politicians involved in this are beyond a point of no return so they simply cannot stop playing in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore you they will end up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. well for the latest news from the v.a. it's a website that's awesome dot com online right now nato air strike of today kills fifteen people as an explosion rips the house the top of the general for his grandson as

intervention has been hit by continuing criticism over the number of civilian deaths and storing that lawrence davidson says the u.s. and nato have made themselves hostages to conflict. what is causing to question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was. a just a media story for domestic consumption you cannot enter being anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening with the type of munitions that cannot avoid killing civilians i don't think that nato and its commanders and the president and the politicians involved in this are be. randa point of no return so they simply cannot stop ok in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore they will end up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. the lawyers for the european commission have announced that the proposed deal allowing america to store personal data on passengers flying between europe and the us is illegal that's

the very beginning that its humanitarian operation would cause civilian deaths says professor lawrence davidson from west chester university in pennsylvania what does cause him to question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for our domestic consumption you cannot enter being. anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians and there but the type of munitions that they're using where there are these are are you know piloted aircraft or drones like in the afghanistan i mean you cannot avoid it you can't these are not smart weapons whatever they might say there and if you're going to attack a building and enter an urban environment you don't know you know there's a margin for error it's a large and you're going to kill civilians there it's just they know that they know that and they've only admitted to why but you know that there has to be more. with nato intervention in libya stalemate and civilian casualties mounting u.s. is coming under fire on a different front washingt

on the heels of condemnation of nato's involvement in a number of civilian deaths historian lawrence davidson says the way nato campaign was conceived makes the killing of ordinary people inevitable is causing to question your original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for domestic consumption you can either intervene anywhere this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening with the type of munitions that cannot avoid killing civilians i don't think that nato and its commanders and the president and the politicians involved in this are beyond a point of no return or so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore he they will end up doing whatever is necessary to secure you can be in libya and they will project media stories to cover. you look at some world news in brief for you this hour at least fifty salim al qaeda militants have managed to escape from a jalen yemen after insurgents attacked

intervention to criticism over a number of civilian deaths historian lawrence davidson says the u.s. and nato hostages to conflict. what is causing to question is the original justification for american intervention which was humanitarian my own personal opinion is that that was always a just a media story for our domestic consumption you cannot enter being anywhere with this level of munitions and not kill civilians so ok you're going to protect civilians by intervening we think type of munitions that cannot avoid killing civilians think that nato and its commanders and the president and politicians can probably do this are beyond a point of no return or so they simply cannot stop in terms of their own mind what they've invested in this and therefore they want to end up doing whatever is necessary to secure victory in libya and they will project media stories to cover it. up for the latest news from libya to get to our websites i thought he got caught online right now nato air strike one of the kills fifteen people as an explosion rocks the house of the top and down from the general