let's just begin with justice breyer there, lawrence hurley. what is he saying?as you can tell from what he was saying, there's no interlocking rules for criminal sentencing. there's drug laws and other laws about armed criminals and various other things. and the point he was making was that the first stepback in this law that reduced sentences -- reduced the -- retroactively the law that reduced the disparity between crack and cocaine sentencing was not really -- didn't really address this issue of people, no level offenders who were covered under this under provision of the law which included these criminals. so -- and the court was unanimous on that in the ruling yesterday. so it wasn't like a divisive case, it was more that congress drafted the law in a way that would allow these low level offenders to be included. >> who brought this case before the court and what was their argument? >> a lot of -- actually the sort of dozen cases, actually, pending at the court on this very issue. but the one case the court took, terry, the defendant from florida, and made