or lawrence walsh, depending on your political perspective. but it was a pretty ambitious idea in terms of trying to diminish, regulate, and contain executive branch corruption. in the after math of watergate, this was a serious problem. that's a grand expectation about what government could achieve. i'm not sure carter -- i mean i see the image of carter. it's the malay speech that people point to. he's lecturing americans on the need to deal with it and understand the limits of what they are going to have. that said, there's a lot in carter that isn't diminished at all. very bold. i think sometimes it caused some political problems. it was too much for many democrats. this is not what they wanted to try to focus on. >> dr. zeller -- zelizer, pardon me, as part of the forums, let me congratulate you on a truly outstanding presentation today. could you talk about the strength and weakness with carter's cabinet, relations with the vice president and the cabinet? >> he has two sides of the team. the one side is the georgia mafia. the group of pe