i will leave it there and that's what his lawyers said but this is something the president takes very seriously and we have been coordinating, they've been coordinating with their lawyers and working closely with the department of justice. >> on monday, all the conversations -- [inaudible] december 20 did not immediately address that it was already known and not discussed. >> i want to say we've been transparent here and that's why the minute his lawyers found those documents, they reported reached out to the archives of the department of justice and they did that voluntarily and they were not compelled, they did it voluntarily. i want to step back because you are asking about the timeline. the lawyers said we've been working closely with the department of justice ordaining a search is still ongoing to ensure any additional documents in possession of the government. after that search, after the search concluded last night, we released a statement disclosing the facts from that search as you know this morning, this is all part of the justice department process and you heard attorney ge

and i was going to become a lawyer because they told me lawyers help to solve problems. and i wasn't going to apply to the university of alabama because i knew everything was segregated and that they wouldn't acceptme . but i would finish, get enrolled in law school, take advantage of a program that the southern states had where they would pay a portion of the tuition room and board for blacks if they wouldn't go to the university of alabama or all auburn university for graduating schools and professional schools which those courses they could not get at the historical black pool, alabama a and m. then the other part of that was i was going to take advantage of some money they would give us in order to go out of state to take those courses to keep us from going to the white schools. and but i was going to become a lawyer and this is the part i didn't tell anybody i told people i was going to be a lawyer but i didn't tell them what time but the secret that i was once finished wall school,, bar exam, become a lawyer discipline. i find that was? i see youngster, and upper t

a thorough review will show that these documents were inveently misplaced and the president and s lawyers acted promptly upon discovery the mistake. meanwhile, special counsel robert herr released his own statement saying, i will conduct the assigned investigation with fair and partial and dispassionate judgment. i iend to follow the facts swiftly and thoroughly without fear or favor and will honor the trust placed in me to perform this service. more now on the appointment of a special counsel with white house press secretary karine jean-pierre. she was asked how classified materials wound up in president biden's office and delaware home and reactions to this week's disclearures. the documents were recovered in november, 2022, and the ones at his privates remain democratic were -- residents were discovered in december, 2022. karine: all right, chris, it's yours. reporter: a few questions about the classified documents. is the president willing to be interviewed by federal investigators about his handling? karine: let me just say i'm not going to get into hypotheticals. this is something f

lawyers couldn't advertise like they can now. so when i got back, the people that i knew, worked with me, i had an open house of my law office so people would know i was there, and it wasn't long -- and i had met mrs. rosa parks who was the secretary to the montgomery branch of the naacp. she was also the youth director, and i had known her from the time i was in at alabama state. so with those, we ended up opening up the office, and mrs. parks assisted in that. i found out that she was working in the department store, a block and a half from where my office was located. we talked every -- she would usually bring a little lunch to my office during the middle of the day, and i didn't have any clients at that time. we talked about problems. we talked about the buses. we talked about if a person had a problem and was asked to get up off the seat, what they should do, if they didn't want to do it. and then it was only about six months after i started practicing, that claudette, the 15-year-old girl, who lived the northeast section of

sorrel review will show the documents will be inadvertently be misplaced and the president and his lawyers acted promptly upon discovering of this mistake. with that, my colleague is here to talk to tomorrow and then i will come back. >> president biden tomorrow will be walking with the prime minister of japan to the white house and we are looking forward to that. he does have already gotten to know each other quite well during in-depth discussions last year, cambodia tokyo for their meeting in may of 2022 as well as the g7. president biden invested in alliances to better equip us to collectively take on 21st century challenge whether it's the epr case pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile program, china's assertiveness and indo pacific region and globally or provoking war in ukraine. each of these challenges, japan has proven steadfast allies ready to step up and do its part to advance shared national security interest and values. the backdrop here for this particular visit, last month prime minister released the national security strategy committed to boosting japa

, people think tax lawyers _ was a tax lawyer, people think tax lawyers are — was a tax lawyer, peoplemes, not in the last 20 years. — avoidance schemes, not in the last 20 years, usually it is much less glamorous _ 20 years, usually it is much less glamorous. you have got a client who is taking _ glamorous. you have got a client who is taking up— glamorous. you have got a client who is taking up taking over a company, what _ is taking up taking over a company, what other— is taking up taking over a company, what other tax skeletons are in the closet _ what other tax skeletons are in the closet of— what other tax skeletons are in the closet of that company? because if you buy— closet of that company? because if you buy it— closet of that company? because if you buy it and it finds out yet they did bad _ you buy it and it finds out yet they did bad tax— you buy it and it finds out yet they did bad tax stuff, that is going to cost you. — did bad tax stuff, that is going to cost you, the buyer, money. so entireiy— cost you, the buyer, money. so entirely selfish capitalism incentives drive

he is going to work as a lawyer, which, in general, we have encountered, probably for the first time, because our professions have always been in demand, therefore, this year we proposed, already in the twentieth year, we have strengthened a lot in order to correct this situation, we are now with an active work with higher educational institutions with almost all institutions where lawyers are trained, we are prohibited from complying with agreements and i think that this year we should change this situation for the better. the fact is that we train a lot of personnel, but, unfortunately, not everyone copes or feels that they may not be convincing enough, but in order to come to the legal profession in particular, children's lawyers have very high requirements. this is an extremely high requirement. as for knowledge, as for the moral, political and ethical image of lawyers and, in fact, now the ministry of justice conducts such periodic checks even of the quality of work of lawyers western strategists this year, the institute also faces the task of ensuring the availability and qualit

and i'm not going to go beyond what the lawyers said. i have to go around. >> there is going to be a limit in transparency, public, not legal transparency, and what can be shared and said by this white house. >> i disagree. i disagree, ed. there lass not been a limit of transparency. that is not a limit of transparency. that, i will disagree with you on that. justin? >> thanks, karine. i didn't, i did want to follow up on what was being asked, the president's lawyer acting properly on handing documents over and there is a lingering question why there wasn't an acknowledgment about the second set of documents earlier this week and you said you're working through a process and going by the book and i'm curious if you're trying to hint at the idea that the justice department asked you not to reveal a second set of documents or you were told in some way not to disclose anything that had not been made public? >> i would not jump to those conclusions. that is not what i'm stating. i am genuinely saying to you there is an ongoing process that we are going to fwol,

lawyers don't typically search locked closets. yours probably don't. but biden's lawyers did. and we guess they did because they understood that republicans were about to win back the house and with it, congressional subpoena power. so they were likely conducting a cleanup operation, preemptively trying to get ahead of a scandal they knew was coming. and , of course, they hid what they found in that closet until after the midterm elections because there's no reason to influence voters too much with information. so there's that. and then there's the question of these so-called pen biden center, the university of pennsylvania. >> what does that exactly? the whole idea of an academic biden center is pretty funny. joe biden is a. he's always been a . even before the dimentia for decades in washington. >> ask anyone who lived there. biden was famous as the dumbest member of the senate. people made jokes about it. so why would an ivy league university name a think tank after a man who can't think

so what i then did is kind of what my dayjob was when i was a tax lawyer. tax lawyers are dreaming up tax avoidance schemes, not in the last 20 years, usually it is much less glamorous. you have got a client who is taking up taking over a company. what other tax skeletons are in the closet of that company? because if you buy it and it finds out yet they did bad tax stuff, that is going to cost you, the buyer, money. so entirely selfish capitalism incentives drive companies acquiring other companies and the tax lawyers working for them to try and uncover tax problems, so for me to do that on zahawi's companies was not really any different from what i had been doing for many years as a tax lawyer. and this was last summer and you mentioned the independent and i should bring in anna isaac, who is now at the guardian. but talk to me about when you got involved in this story, because you were at the independent at that point? that's right, in early july last year i worked with simon walters, who has been a long—standing lobby reporter who was working freelance f

i am an experienced lawyer. i know how these things work., please put "in writing, and i won't accept without prejudice "correspondence," meaning, private, confidential correspondence i can't repeat. later that day i got an e—mail from them which was headed with without prejudice, the very thing i'd asked them not to do, which ordered me to retract and said that i could not publish or even refer to this communication. if i did there would belserious consequences. i didn't mention this on social media at all. partly, some say don't interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. partly, i thought the e—mail was so confused, i didn't really understand what their position was, and i wanted to draw them out a bit more. i'm just going to interrupt you for a second just to say, anna, mostjournalists presumably don't necessarily have the confidence to deal with legal letters. they are quite scary. i suppose, if you're working in a company, there will be a lawyer to advise you, but even so, there are fears around it. maybe it helped that dan wa

. >> martha, some lawyer wrote that and give it to the president. who? >> martha: it's a fair question, and as you point out they were aware on the larger team that december 20th there was a second set of documents found at the private residence. peter, we will be watching, keep us posted we are a couple minutes away right now so republican congressman byron donalds from florida sits on the house oversight committee investigating the discovery of these classified documents here in congressman it's very good happy with us as we are inside a couple of minutes and what are your thoughts on what you need to hear today from the white house and how do you view it from your committee? >> i mean to be blunt i'm not really interested in what they are going to say because i know will be double speech. they will not be forthright, they want talk about how the vice president at the time when he was leaving office had classified information, had it stored now for six years at the penn biden center which we now know has been funded by china this think tank. we find ou

as soon as the lawyers found these documents.rchives and department of justice as i've said many times already to make sure they were handled properly. the president has said this. they were being fully cooperative as part of the president's lawyers look through the places where documents could have been stored, and the counsel's office release as you said, a statement explaining that. i would refer you back to the statement. i don't have anything more to say, but that search was completed last night, and now this is in the hands of the justice department. so look. i want to be very prudent here as i said yesterday, as you all have reported over and over again about any questions about this, any specifics. there's a review going on, and i would refer you to the department of justice or my colleagues in the counsel's office, but i'm just not going to go beyond what the president said. we just laid out -- we just laid out the process that was taken. >> are you saying it was found in garage ande adjacent room? >> i'm saying i'm not

to his lawyers reached out immediately to the archivist. they reached out to department of justice to let them know that the, the, the papers or the documents are kind of just general this morning said that the attorneys reached out to the archives. it was only later in december when the 2nd batch was apparently out of the dry. we'll leave it. i leave it to what the department of justice is laying out. we are saying that we reached out to the archives reached out to department of justice. that is, what is the right thing to do in this case and not and, and, and so i can finish here. what has been transparent in this as well is that the white health council has let, has laid out in detail on monday to all of you and everything. korean, and you know, 1st of all, i can't talk about this, right? because it is the department of justice is reviewing it. there is a review happening. and right, you know this, we just heard from the attorney general. there is a review. i am limited in what i can say to them, but richard sour has come here. i thought

motorists sought the help of a lawyer., through the court, they definitely want the company to increase the cost of compensation, they have already appointed an independent examination, the insurance company goes to all sorts of tricks so that the victims sign this agreement, and this was almost always the amount underestimated. how shows the practice of those who get to us for help in about 90% of cases, the amount is delayed in the repair of a car for insurance. now, in most cases, they refuse because of sanctions and the withdrawal of automakers from the russian market of new spare parts, there are practically no, and it is extremely difficult to order them, or i will take a long time, yes, according to the law, the service must return the car to the owner no later than a month, or even at all some countries will not come. and now even sometimes spare parts are not allowed, that is, they can skip a used or new car. like the item in side of russia but they may not let through, for example, a container with spare parts, w

these kind of lawyers are not completely independent lawyers.thorities and the regimes. because this case was in revolution�*s court and the revolution�*s islamic courts in iran was not trial lawyers and completely all of them, thejudge, in this kind of court are not independent. the are aligned to the intelligence services in iran. they are aligned to the authorities, not an independentjudiciary. 0k. in which case, given the defects in the legal process that you've pointed out, what sort of accountability is there? what kind of action can be taken to hold iranian authorities to account for that? of course, as you know, in iran's... in this case, there is not any disparities between a crime and punishment because based on the law in iran in this case, execution is not a part of punishment in this case. unfortunately, iranian authorities use this case based on the political claims and this case is completely directly with the recent protestations and demonstrations in iran and otherwise the iranian regime use dual nationalities or citizens as pre

let us know, but it's strange, lawyers don't usually search filing cabinets, but not biden lawyers, and we think they did this after realizing that the republicans were about to win a majority in the house of representatives , and with it the right to challenge witnesses to testify it is likely that them were running a pre-emptive sweep operation to hush up the scandal before it had time to flare up. and, of course, they hid what they found in this closet after the midterms, because there is no need to ship. extra information also has questions for the so-called biden center. is it that the very idea of ​​a biden academic center is ridiculous in itself joe biden is a cretin and always was even before dementia for decades in washington you can ask anyone who lives biden was called the dumbest senator and constantly joked about it, so why call a think tank after a person who is not able to analyze and allocate almost a million dollars a year to him for doing nothing. we are moving to the united states of america the chief of our

does anyone believe lawyers are involved in the moving business?ould pay high dollar lawyers to physically move documents and boxes in a move from one office space to the other? i'm not buying it. this was discovered on november 2nd. why are we just now finding about it? >> neil: james comey, the chairman of the oversight committee, if you had a moving firm, dressed in pinstripe suits, that might be a different marketing point, but a lot of people asking why were lawyers involved, and potentially so many of them, as we try to get to the bottom of classified documents, three rounds reportedly tied to the president's home in delaware. this is right after he stepped down from the vice presidency in 2017. shannon bream joins us, and john yu, the former deputy assistant attorney general. shannon, to you first, where this goes, with the special counsel, because we have the oddity right now of two special counsels going after two different presidents at the same time. what do you think? >> yes. i mean, this is definitely one for the history books. so we h

on that boat be a lawyer, but also have your lawyers like me home waiting to hear about what's happening so that we could file immediately for your, for your you know, lawyers from the u. k. maricia and the u. s. prepared to seek your students are apprehended, but a lawyer on the boat could help sort of, you know, make sure that your rights are being respected every step of the way. but if we think about it, which one we, we take on bullet deal. but if i get arrest that i can't help you. if you're picked up by the american forces, they could charge you with some sort of espionage actor or some trees in this act. i'm trying to infiltrate a u. s. space, and if they were to get you 300 miles off shore, then granted, they haven't, they haven't total. a reason to believe you're trying to get on the base. you're doing some sort of act of direct activism. you're trying to get on the base and trying to sneak on the base and that concerns me because it would leave you very little opportunity. and it would be a great risk tiered to your safety honestly for you to challenge them so openly. if you w

in the best possible lawyers, well, there is also the question of the prosecutor's office. i want to note that there are three lawyers present today, and from the side of the prosecution there is one lady prosecutor, and while she the judge spoke, there were questions, in particular , before her speech, but in my opinion, andrii kobolev's lawyers were more convincing in their arguments, in particular, in the resolution of the cabinet of ministers 859, which contains three editions, as the lawyers noted, and about the fact that the award in a large amount , the members of the board cannot keep such a revision only in 2020, and this is exactly what andriy koblev's lawyers are appealing to. well, they called some additional possible witnesses in this case. by the way, the situation with witnesses is also unusual because e- it's today except for those who took the time of the year, no more witnesses came forward. and this is also what the lawyers of andriy kobolev appeal about the fact that they didn't ask those who were scientists of the supervisory board, but the prosecutor n

the lawyers made it so that the score was 393 divided. it be well done, probably zero, 393 vice versa. enthez gel enterosgel is the right choice for adults and children happy new year. let the goodness come to the house to live without the flu and the common cold, the fluferonnik wishes everyone the first part of the sixth of january at 21:00. we bring to your attention a system for moving furniture conveyor with its help you can easily cope with the movement of heavy objects on your own and do not even get tired of moving furniture, general cleaning. just lift a heavy object with a special lever. put it on a movable platform. and move where you need the moving system will allow you to move a cabinet or refrigerator, and you don’t even have to pull out all the contents. the ready-made system makes it possible to move furniture weighing up to 150 kg with and without legs standing on a smooth surface or on parquet no more scratched floors or damaged walls, quick, quiet, neat and easy rearrangement of furniture thanks to the conveyor. you wi

change from the family lawyer-— in this call for change from the famil la er. ., ., , family lawyer.ly lawyer. the mother of tyre nichols broke down crying a - family lawyer. the mother of tyre i nichols broke down crying a number of times and still very upset and understandably. she said that her son always wanted to be famous and she did not know this is what he meant which is not what he meant but he is now famous for a very bad reason and through the lawyers, the family wants to make changes as a result, to be its legacy and they want a law passed which will require police officers to intervene if they see their colleagues doing something they believe is a crime and they also want the police force to disband the special crimes unit of which these five officers were part. there has been a rise in crime in the city of recent years, the special crime units will deal with that but they said that the family thing that this this is the result that has to be stopped and focused on community policing. another of the lawyers starts with the swift justice that we're seeing that the five of

the other person's a lawyer, a court appointed lawyer, was, was reported saying that when he met him in prison mohammed rossini and his, his client was in tears reported to torture. and even the court appointed lawyer in this case had said that this of his, his confessions you know, had no really legal standing given that it was extract extracted under, under torture and pressure changes in the home. and she for weeks, their friends and family hoped they could be saved. or i kindly asked the members of the to do, sorry. i bake you please remove my son's death. said please, i, who is our house. mm hm. they're called where echoed, not only by iranians, around the world, but also by politicians. here in germany, haggling book, a green member of parliament was a sponsor of color me and campaigned against his execution. this new executions will have consequences at the moment is not pretty clear which shaquanda grims exec that will be what there will be consequences. we won't be quiet the german government, nor the you will be quiet till this violation of human rights within iran. people

the white house lawyers and says they immediately turn the documents over to the national archives. still, the department of justice is appointing us attorney robert her as special counsel to investigate whether biden broke the law. i will ensure that mister her receives all the resources he needs the conductor's work. the white house insist it's cooperating and is denying any impropriety. it's in the statement of her from his lawyer, richard, somber, and at the end, he said, we are confident that they are thorough review will show that these documents were inadvertently misplaced, still, it's in administration under increased scrutiny earlier this week, while biden was at a summit, in mexico, the white house admitted lawyers found similar secret papers and a washington d. c. think tank called the pen biden center. the president says he doesn't know what's in those documents, but the discovery has prompted charges of hypocrisy. in january 2022 classified documents were found at the florida residents of former president donald trump. a justice department special council is also looki

first professor, you are a based lawyer. what exactly is a space lawyer? i mean, to the surprise of many, myself included. this is an actual area of law tell us about this specialty and how it actually works. well, that's a great question. and many people i assume when they hear the word space. ready think about suing somebody else in, in court on a space issue, or that is not what most space lawyers do not yet, that may change in the future with more and more private space activities, but currently space lawyers i to the people who are engaged as part of the private sector management team in among the legal issues on contracts on buying the licenses. there are space lawyers work for governments in posing licenses and developing further regulations on how space deducted their space for volts in each member. organizations like the nation sort of telecommunications, the same type of stuff. then you have a recent number of people like me who teach space more in the context. research investigates. she what the problems are and what the solution. we now also a

as lawyers practicing for quite some time in this state, what do you make of that? >> proud. proud of our legal system. proud of our attorney general. proud of our judges. >> i want to add something. >> yeah. >> i am not proud. i am angry. i'm very angry. you asked how we feel about this? alex threw all of us under the bus. the entire world is looking at south carolina, and every lawyer at this table is on trial because of greed and avarice. i represent the family of a 19-year-old kid who was poor, who was brutally murdered and left on the side of the road. who gave a crap about that in 2015? >>> when we return -- >> they beat him to death. >> now we know, there's missing evidence. >> a look inside the five mysterious deaths. >> paul recorded a video. the evidence will show that he was there. >> all circling alex's orbit. >> there ain't no allegedly. this is what happened. young lady who was, you know, mid 30s, couple of kids, recently went through a divorce. she had a lot of questions when she came in. i watched my mother go through being a single mom. at the end of the day,

and i'm an experienced lawyer. i know how these things work.rivate confidential correspondence i can't repeat. then later that day i got an email from them which was headed without prejudice, the very thing i asked not to do. which ordered me to retract and said that i couldn't publish or even refer to this communication. if i did, there would be serious consequences. but i didn't mention this on social media at all. partly, you know, say you don't interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake. partly, i thought the email was so confused. i didn't really understand what their position was. and i wanted to i wanted to draw them out a bit more. i mean, i'mjust going to interrupt you for a second. just to say, i mean, anna, mostjournalists presumably don't necessarily have the confidence to deal with legal letters. you know, they are quite scary, i suppose. you know, if you're working in a company, there'll be a lawyer to advise you. but even so, you know, there are fears around it. but maybe it helped. that dan was a was a lawyer himself. he

but it would stand to reason that the lawyers here and his lawyers -- personal attorneys don't want him talking about it until the special counsel decides what they are going to do or not do. >> bill: one more question here with the saw in the background and the atv. beautiful day, by the way. so they -- his lawyers report the classified material on the second of november at the penn biden center a few days before the mid-terms. is it too much to say or assume that the attorney general had to know around that time that there was an issue here with classified material? >> well, that would be -- we don't know. we don't have any reason to think merrick garland was sitting on this but it would be up to the biden team ultimately. these guys with no security clearances going through documents or going through boxes that they were moving. and again, dana had asked earlier what some of the questions would be. i know that many legal experts on our air over the last couple days have posed the rhetorical why were they looking for documents in the first place? i think maybe more relevant question h

lawyers.ities and the regime because this case was in violation�*s court and revolution�*s islamic courts in iran was not a trial lawyers and completely all of them judge in this kind of court are not independent. the lying on intelligence they receive in iran. despite they are relying on intelligence. they rely on the authorities, not independent judiciary. we make in this case, given the defects in the legal process you have pointed out, what sort of accountability is there? what sort of action can be taken to hold iranians authorities to account for that? of course, as you know, in iran's... in this case there is not any distinguish went in authorities between crime and punishment because based on the law in iran in this case execution is not a part of punishment in this case. unfortunately iranians�*s authorities using this case based on the political points and this case is completely directly with a recent protest stations and demonstrations in iran and otherwise evading regimes use dual

so i'll be a lawyer.atiana, but i have to see him, you know, but you're such a smart girl, you're a genius, please, come up with something, but i'm asking you, yes, you're crazy. it's just impossible to forget why. yes, because in the first place you need a lawyer's id, and it's up to you. oh , how difficult it is there, you know what degree protection? second, the warrant colleagues and lawyers. well, let's say it can be done? well, you understand. you will have to show him to follow, but the investigator does not know you, it means to check the vertebra for sure. this is where you fall asleep. forget it, tanya, well, i must see him, please. well, i have to help him somehow. well really, take it easy you love. all love-absorbing beauty military madmen what they came up with, but my certificate is fresh in 2005, they changed photos there only to re-glue and print paint on. what happened . and who will represent you now with another lawyer? aramovna and you know that we have his client, by the way, had a s

similar to this , we also had about lawyers, which was supposed to improve the performance of lawyersinstitutions providing legal services and the law firms should make their performance transparent and in fact know the introduction of the best people, regardless of which lawyer they refer to, for their benefit. well, there is no such thing now. this happened in relation to legal services or professional services related to food. please explain in a few minutes. last month, a good law was passed in the islamic council, and the law to facilitate the issuance of business licenses, which added new regulations and laws in the three areas of official expert representation and notaries public , based on which the exam was supposed to be held every year. besh and the process of preparing the document for holding the tests there have been changes in judicial law during the past few months , both in the past and in order to be able to implement this law, the judiciary is the most important role of law enforcement, removing the supervision of the implementation of laws from itself, you must be

the white house lawyer richard sauber admitted the biden family lawyers in the search do not have securityances to handle the nation's secrets. why were they in the first place looking for classified documents? why are they even allowed to touch the nation's secrets? >> we don't know that. that is an important question, as tom said one of the key issues here who had access to these documents. we're talking a very broad period of time. we're talking when joe biden leaves as vice president all the way through and your question about visitor logs, sure there may not be a quote-unquote visitor log but the secret service knows who is going in and out. you can reconstruct it if you really wanted to. elizabeth: should they subpoena the secret service, the house gop? >> i mean i think that information is going to be a fight because the executive branch is going to resist saying confidentiality i think it is reasonable to say look, give as you list who had access, who had access during this time period, i think is a very reasonable ask. we're not asking who was there when on what subject, let us kn

i do exactly what my lawyers tell me. this is what we do, there is nothing there.ident says that he has no regrets, it works. he believes that everything was done correctly, that is, to leave classified documents where, without getting into things, even biden's colleagues in the party believes that by making such statements, the head of the white house only makes things worse for himself. lucky, i'm worried there are secret information standards that we as members of congress follow at the door. my office is closed, the person who hands me the document takes it out and the closed briefcase and is present while i read, then he takes the document, puts it in the briefcase and leaves. that's how cautiously we treat such papers to imagine that one of these documents will be stored in some box or somewhere else it is simply impossible to pierce the white house, even in trifles on friday became. it is known that the president of the united states suddenly changed his plans and instead of his home in willington he will go to another journalist. they immediately suggested