>> is stormy daniels a lawyer? >> yeah. >> a lawyer? >> is stormy daniels a lawyer? >> i don't think she is a lawyer i don't think her lawyer was lawyer either, but stormy daniels is not a lawyer. daniels is not a lawyer. that is established. you saw in real time trump's current attorney concede that obvious fact now, it matters because some of this may add heat. if the d.a. proves that trump lied to authorities about where that money went. trump has been caught lying in public already about all of this the current defense by his lawyer argues the money was a legal fee because it went to then-lawyer michael cohen. >> so she is not a lawyer and these payments are made and they were, according to federal filings, classified on the trump side as legal services that was false, wasn't it? >> the payments were made to a lawyer, not to stormy daniels. the payments were made to donald trump's lawyer which would be considered legal fees. >> that lawyer was michael cohen who went to prison and was back testifying to the grand jury today. which nicole and i just discussed and h

with the trump lawyer. where his he's saying that the can -- they can be the wrap, as i were, on any notion of campaig finance violations even though that's what michae cohen was exactly what he wa found guilty of in federal court. >> yeah, that's a lawyer versu loyal or dispute, cohen versus this new lawyer. if there is an indictment, which as i suspect there wil be, if i'm in this new yor district attorney. that's going to be reviewed in court. and the prosecution is gonna have to prove beyond, reasonable doubt, that michael cohen is saying is right i think that's not tha difficult to lift, quite honestly, these payments wer made right before the 2016 election you have to be an idiot to think that it wasn't gonna benefit your campaign, whe you're paying it at that particular moment in tha particular rush. lawrence, you're absolutel right to say, there's an number of other problems wit the payments, like the tax consequences, because last i checked, paying $130,000 to th porn star you slept with is no a le

is stormy daniels a lawyer >> is stormy daniels a lawyer? >> yeah. >> a lawyer? >> yeah, is stormy daniels a lawyer. >> i thought you asked if she's a liar i don't think she's a lawyer i don't think her lawyer is a lawyer, either. >> so, she's not a lawyer, and these payment were made, and they were according to federal filings classify on the trump side as legal services. >> mm-hmm. >> that was false, wasn't it >> the payments were made to a lawyer, not stormy daniels the payments were made to donald trump's lawyer, which would be considered legal fees. m michael cohen, regardless of what we know of him now, liar, convicted, inside trump world, was his lawyer at the time and advised him this was the proper way to do this to protect himself and misfamily from embarrassment. >> that money, just to be clear on this point did go to stort l fees, it was a payment. >> it went to stormy daniels from michael cohen this is how cohen structured this he decided he was going to do it this way and ask for the reimbursement for what we billed legal fees that is not a crime. i

gorbachev, lawyer , international lawyer. i could be wrong , please correct me, because i am not a lawyer, i am not a lawyer, and i do not know anything about jurisprudence , but what i see is that the dictator appears first, then the court appears, not vice versa for to me, this suggests that there will be some other court, it will not be nuremberg, it will not be the hague, it will be something third, that is, a third dictator has appeared in the world, who would now scare everyone, and for this we need special laws, special rules, special procedures, in short, a lot something special and a special place, it may not necessarily be where the former dictators were, they fell like miloševy, or how much did hitler shoot, and so on , something like that in central africa are it just african dictators or am i right or is there logic in my words, so definitely at the moment a special international tribunal should be created because at the moment there is no possibility of bringing to justice the top leadership of the russian feder

trump lawyers appeal that order, and on tuesday the appeals court gave the trump lawyers a deadline of midnight for filing their brief. and jack smith was given a deadline of six a. m. miss morning for filing his response this afternoon the appeals court ruled evan corcoran must testify to the grand jury because judge howell, who had issued the order, had found that evan corcoran's testimony is subject to the crime fraud exception to the attorney client privilege. now let's just stop right here and consider what happened in the judicial system between the close of business on friday and the federal district court in washington, and the close of business today, wednesday, in the federal federal district court of washington. we saw an appeal of district court judges order processed in less than three days. each party had to file their briefs two days after the district judge ruled in the case. the appeals court ruled on those filings on the same day that they were filed. we have seen that kind of process take the better part of a year in other federal cases. sometimes longer than that. t

and all of us thinking, well, he can't be trump's lawyer anymore. he has to immediately go get a criminal defense lawyer and take care of himself. yet he has tried to hang in there as donald trump's lawyer all the way to now. is this the end of his capacity to serve as a donald trump's defense counsel in this case? >> he would be unlikely to be able to be on what's called council of record if there were to be a case involving the mar-a-lago documents, involving obstruction, and the retention of classified documents. you cannot be a lawyer and a witness, to state the obvious. so, he would not be able to do that. until such time that there is a charge, he could, still, represent donald trump, because donald trump could decide, even though he knows there is conflicts, that he will use him as counsel. but, i think that anybody and mr. corcoran's position who i think would take the better part of valor and say i can't, ethically, do that. but there is nothing the government right now could do about it. i highly doubt, he will remain a council of record i

that if you are a client and you try to commit a crime using your lawyer whether the lawyer is winningor unwitting there is no attorney client privilege in that context that is an unassailable ruling. but usually, people are allowed to appeal and to say, to get a second bite of the apple to see whether the panel would agree with that. here at the, appellate panel has said, yes, you can specify exactly which documents you think should not be turned over, but you have until midnight tonight. the government said you have to have until six a.m. so i do expect we could have another ruling even by tomorrow. one thing is they keep adding grand jury appearances, moving along very roughly. there is law that when you have a grand jury the courts are supposed to be quite rapid in keeping that grand jury process moving. that is what allowed the system to hold people to account and to either charge people or to find that they shouldn't be charged. so this is in keeping with that body of law but i agree with neil i have never seen something quite this quick. but again i think judge howell has strong

has i gwyneth paltrow's lawyer. has i heard a scream _ gwyneth paltrow's lawyer. heard a scream from _ gwyneth paltrow's lawyer. has i heard a scream from behind - gwyneth paltrow's lawyer. he�*s i heard a scream from behind me. a blood —— a bloodcurdling scream. like godzilla was coming. then he was hit directly between the shoulder blades and driven to the ground. shoulder blades and driven to the round. �* , ., shoulder blades and driven to the round. , ., , ground. and you personally don't know what _ ground. and you personally don't know what happened _ ground. and you personally don't know what happened that - ground. and you personally don't know what happened that day? i | ground. and you personally don't - know what happened that day? i was not there. and _ know what happened that day? i was not there. and your _ know what happened that day? i was not there. and your dad, _ know what happened that day? i was not there. and your dad, after - know what happened that day? i was not there. and your dad, after he - not there. and your dad, after he sa s, not t

if a client is using a lawyer to commit a crime, whether the lawyer is in on it or not, the lawyer doesn't they, are it's more serious. there is no attorney client privilege. the court ordered that he has to go into the grand jury and testify to the question of where did you get the information that you put in that certification. if his testimony is that came from donald trump, that's going to put donald trump, really, in the hot seat because that's clearly a false statement. she also, the judge, also turned over the notes that mr. corcoran took of the conversation about that certification. presumably, whoever gave him that information, he recorded that. those notes could be a powerful cooperation for the government. the government, now, has those notes because it will halogen the unusual thing, she had them, looking at them herself, and she turned them over to the government. they're in the government's possession right now. >> andrew weissmann, thank you very much for joining us on this one. >> you are welcome. >> we'll be right back. >> we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ get directv with a two ye

david, lawyers play a big role in this. a lot of people you don't really talk about or hear about the lawyers. i would like you to talk about the evolution of the law because like we said we are not talking attica finch here and what happened and how their tactics are influence things. >> first of all, it is great to be in tuscon, which i have never been before. i do feel a tiny bit like a third wheel because serrie and beth are like the world leading experts on the opioid crisis and i am not. so, i started working on this book because i had been covering business and finance almost 20 years and basically every big scandal i encountered there was a big corporate law firm in the background pulling strings, working their connections, spins journalists like me and it had been gnawing at me how effective the giant law firms were. so i decided to look into the role they played at not only representing some of the world's and most dangerous companies but in many cases enabling them. i quickly settled on jones day for a couple of

categories, the lawyer can be complicit sometimes. times, the clients can be taken advantage or taking advantage of the lawyer, or trying to do that. and these lawyers can then become very powerful witnesses. they often have notes, corcoran has notes. and that can backup their oral testimony. so, it can be very dangerous for a potential defendant like donald trump. >> yamiche, you mentioned a moment ago that a lot of republicans are kind of running their mouth in one way or another in the hush money case, of a possible indictment in manhattan. and we will talk about that after the break. but this federal investigation, this documents investigation, do you think there's a different level of concern over this case? from the very beginning, when mar-a-lago was searched, you had some republicans looking uneasy. because, these are the national security people. >> it's interesting thing, because i think you saw the beginning of this, there was this real push among some republicans to denounce former president trump's handling of classified

he was never my lawyer. >> he was not at that time your authorized lawyer.hree that you waived attorney-client privilege. is that true in. >> that's another one. if, nah fact, i waived attorney-client privilege i'd like to know when, how, where? i don't recall waiving anything, but -- again, this is -- this is -- i don't know what he's talking about. >> did you sign anything when you were deal web sdny like that? >> not that i recall. >> let's play this part. >> yeah. >> by the way, he's got his point and you will respond because he said this was, quote, stupid, et cetera. let's listen. >> they notified me that michael cohen had executed a waiver of the attorney-client privilege for reasons i have no idea. frankly, it was a very stupid move by michael cohen because now we are able to tell the truth about what michael cohen was saying at any point in time starting in april of 2018. so that's why i wanted to get those materials that i gave to the u.s. attorney's office and sat for a two-hour interview with them back in 2019 after which you may have noticed the

the fox lawyers said no. dismiss the whole case.ing quote coaching she was getting from fox lawyers. now, fox had every right to defend itself and their lawyers are going to prepirwv g people sometimes that might involve telling people the type of things4r they think are good fo their side with inaccuracy.e1 not committing perjury. she is basically saying these lawyers paid byfá fox under tha ave been aid byfá fox under tha crossing the lines and gone further. now she was a senior producer for not just any randome1e1 ent. she was a senior producer at the heat point and with some of the greatest vulnerability for what could cost this company over a billion dollars. that's the maria bartiromo show whichh >> dominion voting systems. they have businesses in venezuelaz8zz ra kuss. they have businesses ine1 cuba. you said that they have been kick backs to some people who accepted the dominion software. >> that right there is the kind of defamation evidence being reviewed in court and that a jury may look at to see if this was just an inte

it doesn't matter if you're a lawyer or non-lawyer. the reporting is very careful as it seems to say they're being asked whether a lawyer did this outside of a joint defense privilege. now if that is going on, that same sort of coaching, that improper coaching is going on within a joint defense agreement or just from a lawyer speaking to their own client without other clients being involved, that would also be improper, but the issue is in order to ask those questions, what's going on between a lawyer and a client or what's going on in a joint defense agreement, you would have to get a judge to approve that because if you can't show that that's in furtherance of something like crime of fraud, you won't be able to pierce the attorney-client privilege. we've heard about that exact kind of motion being made by jack smith to be able to ask those questions about what's going on between lawyers and lawyers and clients but they have to get court approval in order to do that. but it does suggest that what they're really going after and explori

>> i don't think a lawyer was a lawyer either. michael cohen is a fraud, liar, convicted perperjperjuror >> his lawyer advised him to pay legal services >> it went to daniels. >> there was no obligation to disclose this at all retribution means getting rid of all bad apples this will catapult him to the white house. it's not a campaign law violation. >> ben what you should do when someone brings the receipts, try to grab the receipts >> that's not a lie. here is why. >> that's not a lie? did you know about this? did you -- did you know about this >> we don't need that. >> he tried to grab the evidence i would like to see this guy in court. judge, judge, judge, shut up. enough of that give me that wow. you are not so smart now that you are naked. >> your thoughts, john >> it made me think of a friend of mine from years ago i was in court with him once i wasn't handling the case the defense attorney did something and he shouted, your honor, stop the music. the judge went nuts. if the jury knows that you are acting, you are not actin

, i'v been a lawyer for over 50 year and i know the differenc between lawyers who get into granular detaile fact by fact, that corroborate facts with the documents and corroborate documents with checks messages and telephon calls. and surround every fact with corroboration an documentation. nobody out, there is not one talking, had not with all du respect, know the detailed cas that they have built up over all of this time and i hea talking heads speculating, wel this case is weak. how do you know it is week i you do not know what their evidence is? why doesn't everybody keep their -- dog trump is innocent unti proven guilty, but wait fo these prosecutors to show what they have and do not jump to conclusions. >> are you answering the question that claremont of tad the frustration that she, like so many other americans have o what in the heck is taking s long is the answer to that, detail? they are going through every possible detail because ther is too much at risk to make mistake here >> i can only say, i know clea well, and i am sort of like he in a way what takes so long, and sittin wit

they raided a lawyer's and is a lawyer and a good one. rudy proven right about a lot of things with ukraine and others. but one thing i have to say lawyers i thought they were a little secretary. if you near litigation, the lawyers never bruin i have every time memberments to represent meand i have a lot of people that want to they think it is unfair the way we have been treated. they get called before grand juries and sued individually. i say sometimes are you sure you want to represent me i have plenty of people weapon great spirit that do want top represent me and we have good people. but think of it, larceny for the first time i had lawyers that i have known calling me, do you think this is changing now where lawyers are sued for representing lawyers have to reveal every conversation with the client. i got that with the box hoax. garnt you biden does not have it and when he did with classified information. he stuff when he was a senator. i watched senators i watch democrat senators get on television and say i can't believe that are yo

donald trump's lawyer might really need a criminal lawyer because trump just lost a huge legal developmentg lawyers never have to dow3 turn over normally privilegede1 transcripts of any discussions with donald trump, other evidence, tapes if there are any. because he stands credibly accused of actively participating in a crime which thus wouldw3 shred the normal privilege you hear about, attorney/client privilege. there's a bomb shell report he may have also dealt with lies. basically that trump lied to cochran or cochran was part of q misleading the government through, you guessed it, one more lawyer. abc news reports the special counsel had compelling evidence that donald trump was u deliberately misleading his own attorneys. the judge writes the doj showed that the former president committed criminal violations or at least enough evidence of that to pierce the privilege. meanwhile, on the trump side, they're saying the report itself is false and, quote, illegally leaked. the big news is a judge that's independent, separate from a prosecutor,e1 ruling against trp here. we may learn a lot

the only time a judge can forc a lawyer to testify as whe there's reason to believe that the lawyer aided their clien in committing a crime. it's called the crime frau exception. and if that sounds familiar, i is because that is also wha happened to trump lawyer joh eastman, who had to turn over trove of privileged emails after a judge found that he an trump more than likely committed crimes in thei scheme to overturn the election so now, we have yet anothe finding by a federal judge tha another trump lawyer may hav done too much crime-ing an will now have to get out of hi lawyer chair and sit-down in the witness chair and star answering questions. and evan corcoran is now not the only trump lawyer facing new questions about hi behavior joe tacopina is -- trump's attorney and the manhattan da hush mone investigation into - trump's payouts too adult film star stormy daniels. at least for now because today, just securities ryan goodman uncovered several 2018 media appearances by jo tacopina, in which he claime that to stormy daniels approached it tacopina t represent her. that could be a pr

we were we were faced off against 30 lawyers from the ervin committee, 60 lawyers from a special process tutor, 45 lawyers from the impeachment committee. and we had as sure very familiar some lawyers, but it was a pick up game. it was a ragtag bunch of bunch of people. we had no colleagues. it had been established, i want you to litigating, jeff, with all due respect. i think we've answered the question, jack, you want to ask, do you want to pose. and i guess it was you got another question. do you want to close out on? it's a little bit forward looking, jeff. why don't you forward for us? oh, you where are you going? to read a question. yeah. based on these lessons learned. i'm sorry i thought i thought you were telling us to close up. i'm sorry. go ahead, george. sorry we can use this as sort of a closing statement. how can we improve transparency and integrity in prosecutions, particularly of high ranking executive officials and other top political employee appointees? well, if you. well, what really are the lessons learned? one, independent prosecutors don't work. i think we might g

federation there are requests for lawyers, uh, if a lawyer makes there are certain deadlines and thisocument is on the priority list for a response, and now they have stopped responding because the first is a lot of lawyer requests because there are a lot of violations, the second is the same, now the whole system is overloaded, because there are a lot of confused people and the fact that they avoid the military service of the russian federation , many did not want to, many criminal cases have been initiated and now, as i am informed, yes, there are fellow lawyers who work, including with the law offices of the post-soviet space that in fact it is now overloaded and now you know that there is a confrontation between lawyers in the russian federation , including lawyers in the ministry of defense of the russian federation, so they simply stopped responding to it, but they could not do it without the sanctions of the highest leaders . first , secondly , the intensity of the exchanges, the exchanges actually push the families of the prisoners of war. defense and the wambudsman are involv

prosecutors to force trump lawyer evan corcoran to testify before a grand jury.n's testimony is related to the former president's possession of classified documents after leaving office the request was made when prosecutors sought a crime friday exception to his testimony. a lawyer can be forced to divulge private conversations with a client if the client is seeking advice in furtherance of a crime. this is an unusual move but it suggests that jack smit's prosecutors provided significant evidence that trump did in fact do that. corcoran, who has already appeared before the grand jury, had previously testified to federal officials that trump had returned all classified materials after they searched mar-a-lago looking for documents they had sought to recover for more than a year a claim that was proven to be false. "the washington post" is reporting that trump's legal team, the ones who have yet to allegedly commit a crime on his behest, are expected to ask incoming chief u.s. district judge james bozberg, who succeeds the term limited howell as of midnight to stay

i don't know what information about a trust administered by a lawyer has to do with lawyer secrecy , else can you get this information, and it seems to me that we have our own well, we need to decide whether we are smarter , more beautiful, or we demand the return of military payments , or we protect foreign trusts, where is the money hidden ? we have finished discussing this and one more for confirmation yes, please gerashchenko dear colleagues, one amendment for confirmation , then we will vote on the law as a whole, please iryna volodymyrivna thank you, colleagues, i want to confirm amendment 276 and also pay attention to the following: we are currently discussing a very important draft law and all the deputies who have now presented their amendments have definitely worked on improving it and did not engage in amendment spam, and it is very unpleasant to hear that these are bad amendments. these are incorrect amendments from the head of the committee, we are currently discussing very serious topics. i want to remind you that mrs. yuzhanina . five years of this documentation well,

criminal defense lawyer inw3 georgia who said the d.a. there is bias in his view and that discussing the outcome ofe1 the election as well as some of the other questions would be quotee political. what do you think? you can hit me on anyt(e1 socia media. do you think any of the allegationse1 valid and is discussing results automaticall] the reid out starts next. >>> tonight oni] the reid out. >> while i do not believe i did anything illegal orçó every thought i was doing #v3q!%9 illegal, i did an awful, awful lot that was wrong and there is no one else responsible for my sins. >> as we await news of a possible trump indictment, let's recall the case of john d the rich and powerful democratic politician who was indicted for something similar allegedly breaking campaign finance laws after a tawdry affair. also tonight, a fox producer accuses thexdxd network of coer herfá into providing misleading testimony in the dominion lawsuit as a judge begins hearing pretrialfá arguments. plus,x#uq' indictments are announced after sheriff's deputies pi

, lawyers, please help to gather a group of lawyers who are specialists in this field, i repeat once again that, until now, the girl was protected by a lawyer provided by the state, that is, a lawyer for free and legal aid, because the family is quite poor and could not afford allow a good professional lawyer. i am sure that now that professionals have taken over the case, there are more chances to get a really legal decision and after the resonance in this case, i am convinced that it will be much more difficult for us to close this issue that it is under the control of society, mr. vitaly, well, the head of the regional military administration of transcarpathia also got involved extremely actively. how powerful do you think the attempts to close this case will be, so to speak, and public pressure, so to speak, the chances are, well, they are always there, but they have decreased in dozens of times because , well, we have the influence of those people in this community who are relatives of the rapists , who, well, it was not enough that they raped a girl and distributed videos of th

i'm the best lawyer in this state. can talk my way out of this. >> jesse: he didn't. >> bill: he did not. >> jesse: so they are going to have this sentencing tomorrow, and you're going to hear, what? you are going to hear victim's testimony, family testimony, people in the community, and your assessment of how this judge is going to handle tomorrow? >> bill: that is clifton newman and pretty impressive guy i would say, just the way he handled himself and talking about the rights of the victims, too. and that comment he made where he said the evidence of guilt is overwhelming. >> jesse: overwhelming. >> bill: so the suggestion that a mistrial should be considered was thrown out immediately. probably not uncommon in a case like this. but we will see what happens tomorrow morning. back in court at 9:30. one of the intriguing things that happened earlier today is they had two alternate jurors on this case. just two. so there is 14 men and women and one was excused right before closing arguments were delivered by the defens

i don't think her lawyer was a lawyer either, but stormy daniels is not a lawyer. >> that matters, becauseu saw on the screen, if you say something is for a lawyer, legal expenses, well, you already have a lie right there there's also new signs trump would face legal problems even if the new york d.a. never charges the payment as a type of campaign finance crime, which brings us to this report right now. i'm going to get into this there's a legal argument that the payment was lawful and then trump broke the law by lying about it just think about it like this. you can pay money to buy a house. that's obviously legal if you lie to the irs and state government about it, about the money you spent or money coming back to you, you're now breaking the law. right there, just off that payment legal, lying about it illegal, separately. the original purchase is legal now, there's a connection here to michael cohen's conviction, which has clues, and this has come up a little bit but right now we're going to do it in more detail so you can see what the case would be and make your own judgments. this is

his client, this is his lawyer, not my lawyer. and bob costello is one of the most respected lawyers anywhere in the country. he served in the government at the highest positions. all of that.z we he went innessed because he wite he was a lawyer from michael cohen. he went in because he saw what michael cohen was saying and he said , that's a lie. >> that's terrible wha st he said on my show last week. i know. . and i thought he was amazingthat and fantastic. and he's doing tha ot of civic duty. >> he's not doing that fory th y reason. i don't know. bob corsello, by the way , peopl i don't know. >>e i know heth representats pe that i'm close to in some ways ,but i have to i don't know .him. i know this is a highly and c respected person and he couldn'tou stand to see this wae his line. he couldn't stand to sees thigs guy who's already a convicted hemean, he's a felon. he's been to jail. and this is a unstuff not having to do with me. his reputation is terrible. bew, before all of this happened, hifos reputation was e was a normal

they want on their own without a lawyer. anna bolana ekaterina chervisheva.xander ovsyannikov there are thoughts that the next issue of federal news will be aired at 16:00. news is always available on the media platform. let's examine the application on the site we look.ru with us until we all see you. good afternoon. this is a program of who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov , the head of the pentagon, suddenly announced that artyomovsk has more symbolic than strategic and operational significance , the logic of reasoning is interesting. at first he lost strategic importance to this has already been heard. uh, 2 weeks ago somewhere began to lose strategic importance. but today it has already lost operational significance. probably this, especially everything that is pleasant to know for relatives and close to tens of thousands of dead and wounded in the artyomovsk direction of wall street.

you're a lawyer. that's lawyer 101. they should teach that in the first year of law school. don't sign that. ia let's go to january 6th. this is the one you have said, and you have been good about saying this is the most difficult one, very complicated. boris epshteyn is involved in this one. i think right now about the attempts being made to talk about the weaponization of government in this sham committee that's going on in the house. but the weaponization of government to me, you can boil it down to what was happening at the doj when trump was in charge. after his attorney general says no, it's bs, there's nothing wrong with this election, they try to install a different attorney general so that he will say, oh, no, there's something wrong with this election. they have false electors they're trying to put forward. they're trying to use governmental offices and power to keep him in office. this should be the biggest one. and boris epshteyn is in the middle of that one. can you explain why despite what seems to be the worst one, why that one is the most complicated? >> yeah

won lawyer. rogova lies here is roggo's lawyer. good dreams, you, i'll pick up the case tomorrow morning. sing did not understand who ordered to transfer our affairs to you, the surname is familiar. i'll pick it up now. pick up in 5 minutes. i'm sorry. i'm sorry, but i have an order. we will do nothing. so what to do? shall we go somewhere? well, there is a cafe, on the contrary, but not there, it’s better to me. i have pilaf compote prepared everything myself, ready myself. so let's just go. well, will you stand like columns? have a seat. thank you, comrade general. thank you, general. who will start? well, maybe you are comrade general, do it. well, maybe you can explain why we were taken off the case. the main thing is why. and you will do it well. can you not send you on vacation for a week, otherwise i see that you have reworked a bit. no, comrade general on vacation, we don't need to be sent. i think that captain krupitsyn and i will prove our professional suitability with a high degree of disclosure, so to speak, we will was

and the main thing is to understand the difficult situation in which the country is located, a lawyer should protect the interests of the citizens of the country and society as a whole. at me by this time, all i give the floor to the gift of tarasova dasha hello, what's the news in the minsk region, hello yulia agricultural season at the start of the park of equipment of the krupsky district is already ready for the sowing season and in the rhythms of coffee cantata. how the comic bach's canvas performed by the sinorus chapel sounds, we will hear in a few minutes on our air. thank you dasha watch the news of your region immediately after the sports review and see you at 17:00. the rotation, which also brought results to the commander-in-chief of the zhobinsky metallurgist, dmitry kravchenko, for the second fight in the semifinal series of the president's cup in hockey against soligorsk shakhtar made several changes in the composition compared to the first match. so the leaders of the steelworkers of havru laughed at the new gaaruse for the meeting and watched from the stands, accordin

a current trump lawyer, corcoran, facing the federal grand jury, not as a lawyer, as a witness.at is unusual, and usually a very bad sign photoclient. so trump's lawyer goes under oath, only because he lost, and trump lost the privilege he would otherwise normally have. a judge ruling that significant evidence exists that the doj provided to establishment former president donald trump committed a crime dhow his attorney. you may think, gosh, new york is not resolved, but in the federal case, they found a crime in it's not an indictment, but it's a bad, bad sign for this lawyer and trump. you see it on the screen, the judge finding the doj put forward sufficient 6th establishing that trump committed a crime through his attorneys. abc news reporting that they had to hand over any transcriptions of personal audio recordings. we do not know who was on the recordings, and if it includes people who have evidence against trump or trump himself. that abc story has not been affirmed, but the judge's statement is now in public, "new york times" reported on as well. i want to be clear, it'

he's had lawyers who had government experience, lawyers who are highly respected.he's had other more traditional lawyers. the "x" factor is him. let's take a look at this exchange. >> one thing you have to say, lawyers -- i always thought they were a little bit sacred territory. in other words, if you're in litigation, the lawyer's never brought in. every time somebody wants to represent me -- and i have a lot of people that want to represent me, because they think it's so unfair the way we've all been treated. they end up getting called for grand juries. they end up being sued individually. >> i want to say -- and then i want your response -- fact check true. judges who are independent have compelled more trump lawyers before grand juries -- two and counting in the classify documents case, michael cohen in the mueller probe, others in other cases -- than is typical. there are people who are accused of heinous crimes who as you know, and i'm reminding viewers, never have their lawyers brought in. so what donald trump saying is true, but it seems like true bad for h

one echo is trump's lawyers getting lawyers.onstitution" reporter greg bluestein. charlie savage pulitzer prize-winning washington correspondent. and here with me for the hour a former southern district civil attorney and former federal candidate in new york maya wiley. welcome to all of you. greg, walk us through why this matters. we're talking about a filing in a case where there's actually no case, or that is to say no case of d.a. vs. donald trump as a defendant. >> yeah, exactly. and that's what was so surprising. there's no case yet. there could be but there's no case yet. the district attorney here in fulton county, fani willis, has said that charges -- or a decision could be imminent, but imminent in prosecutorial standard time is very different than imminent in our standard time. but look, my first reaction to this is they must be very worried. they're going on the attack right now. it's a sign that trump's legal team isn't going to wait around and see whether the former president is getting indicted. they're going to g

he didn't pay, and he did have his lawyer pay. you're gonna tell me, by some coincidence -- >> there were no settlement in the last ten years. confidential, that supposed to be confidential. they're confidential as opposed to be. i can say plenty but their potential. >> before the election, you had his lawyer that made the payments say, it was because of the election. and because of personal embarrassment to himself in his fame. >> does it matter. >> it does. >> because of the election, an election violation. i'm not a lawyer. >> the ftc chairman said it does matter if it was something for a personal funds were used, other than exclusively the campaign, then it's out of campaign finance law. you could pay with tax funds, you gotta pay with campaign funds. >> if mr. donald trump reimbursed a lawyer, for paying this woman at a time that there was going to be damage to his campaign, it is, in fact, about his campaign. >> no. >> that is campaign finance. laura >> lowe, the law has to be exclusively for the campaign. >> your defense, i

everyone in the law, lawyers of all stripes and rolls, judges particularly, are very hesitant to break attorney-client privilege. it's one of those sacred things at the core of the practice of law. and it can only be broken when someone, a judge in this case, determines that there is evidence a crime was committed. -- you can't use your lawyer to commit a crime. in this case, the crime reportedly is obstruction of the governments attempt to retrieve those classified documents from donald trump's mar-a-lago. now, as the post reports, the court says corcoran must turn over, and this is important, quote, notes, transcripts of recordings, and -- in his possession to the special counsel office. because, according to their source, quote, the judges review the material and concluded there was evidence suggesting trump may have misled his own attorneys and the classified documents matter. in other words, federal judge -- trump may have knowingly misled his own lawyers into lying to the government on his behalf. the judge determined trump's conduct may have been criminal. in fact, more likely c

trump denies a lawyer for mr. trump says the former president has been notified of the indictment the action is unprecedented. it is the first time a former or sitting american president has been indicted. nbc's garrett haake leads our coverage garrett, what more do we know? >> lester, this historic vote came two months to the day since this grand jury was impanelled the case is all about an alleged hush money payment that former trump fixer michael cohen says he made on mr. trump's behalf to an adult film actress to silence her claims of an affair that mr. trump has denied the payment itself is not illegal. and we don't know specifically what charges mr. trump faces. it could be a misdemeanor relating to falsifying business records or manhattan d.a. alvin bragg could also have charged a low-level felony, which would be more of a legal gamble >> and, garrett, this is a moment the president has been anticipating for weeks. he was making this public at a time a lot of people weren't talking about it >> reporter: tha

with lawyers, it can be a little bit different.akes that decision that they want to be a witness or at least they want to cut their criminal exposure and cooperate in exchange for a deal, they are no longer involved with their former client. they have to walk away. so, what we can read into this here is that they have not made that decision yet. they perhaps don't believe that special counsel has a strong case against them. or they are just not there yet. >> not to mention the potentially uncomfortable position they are putting their client in on a potential witness tampering charge. what we will leave that discussion for another day. joyce vance, it is always great to see you. thanks for your time tonight. >> it's nice to see you too. >> when we come back, one of the nation's largest drugstore chains caves to pressure from antiabortion groups. plus, campaign stop? or infomercial? when it comes to donald trump junior and his fiancÉe, -- actually difference? we will have more on that next. e on that next oh booking.com, ♪ i'm going