so who is this lawyer?he is patrushev, and before that he was thunder, formally a lawyer since the late nineties. according to our data, in the 2000s he was involved in the alcohol business, even patented the recipe, here. because of which the conflict supposedly arose, because of this huge house, it is almost completed, the exterior decoration remains and because of this large plot, the view is luxurious, the place is amazing, there is a big lake there, the mansion belonged to the wife of lawyer paturshev , young designer louise michelle, full of the tyranny of a french revolutionary of the 19th century, the house was listed as collateral, the rights to the property were bought by the same alleged mastermind of the murder, ginteros alfantsera gauskas, but... st. petersburg louise michelle, it seems, really did not want to leave her cozy nest, her husband , a lawyer, bombarded the courts with pieces of paper, not allowing the decision to come into force, apparently, then ragauskas decided to act radically.

order to kill a local lawyer.lawyer. with his driver, the alleged organizer-perpetrators were detained, what did they not share with their victim and what could the lawyer himself be hiding? reporting by maxim movchan. in the oktyabrsky district court of st. petersburg , two people in handcuffs entered the corridor, the alleged thug, the customer ginter salfantsauska, and the frail andrei artyukhin. likely performer contracted reprisal against a st. petersburg lawyer. the supposed customer already knew from the news that his plan had failed, but it seemed he couldn’t come to terms with it, hence the tears and a couple of scratches, for which he was detained, you know? no, but investigators and detectives from the disclosure department do. murders, the criminal investigation department of the main department of the ministry of internal affairs of st. petersburg has already established all the details. the massacre took place in front of dozens of small eyewitnesses, students of an elite gymnasium, and was captured

, and found a board in which the lawyer was registered.patrushev is a member of this bar association, which is located on vasilievsky island, you can’t just go there, the door is locked, entry is only by prior arrangement, but even if... you get inside, you won’t find a lawyer there, here he doesn’t come, but his personal file has been collecting dust here for years, to which a special attention is now attached investigators' attention. we talked with the lawyer’s colleagues, according to them, viktor patrushev receives clients in a modest office, at a completely different address. as far as i know, he was not involved in high-profile cases, this is his personal matter, we are ready to help him if he applies. but lawyer patrushev not only didn’t contact him, he seemed to have completely disappeared from the radar, all roads to him were cut off. on the halfway. according to patrushev’s colleagues, he receives his wealthy clients no other way than here, in one of the apartments. it would seem a dubious place, but everything is explained very

they wanted to look like nine lawyers, doing kind of dry lawyer stuff., to that extent, i think they did succeed. and, i do think that they were on, generally, good behavior. there wasn't the kind of grouchiest or anger that sometimes flashes through the justices and major arguments like this. you, know they all wanted to get to the bottom of the case. and, they did end up having consensus towards the. and trump will twist that into something that it isn't, ruling for trump does not mean he didn't engage an insurrection. it just means that the theories put forth by colorado voters here didn't cut it at the court. >> joyce, there has been a lot of talk lately, about the quality. the poor quality of donald trump's lawyers. but we did not hear that today. what did you think? >> no, he was capably represented today. and, something that i noticed, and i appreciated was that this was not a lawyer who was pandering to an audience of one. this was a lawyer who conceded arguments, when he didn't have a strong position. he behaved in the way that we assume lawyers

i— this morning, there is too much lawyering going on. i think- lawyering going on.y think— everything is overengineered. i equally think one _ everything is overengineered. i equally think one of _ everything is overengineered. i equally think one of the - everything is overengineered. i equally think one of the keys . everything is overengineered. i| equally think one of the keys to resolving — equally think one of the keys to resolving alt— equally think one of the keys to resolving all this _ equally think one of the keys to resolving all this is _ equally think one of the keys to resolving all this is to _ equally think one of the keys to resolving all this is to think i resolving all this is to think creatively— resolving all this is to think creatively in— resolving all this is to think creatively in the _ resolving all this is to think creatively in the way- resolving all this is to think creatively in the way that l resolving all this is to think i creatively in the way that the minister— creatively in the way that the minister did— creatively in the way tha

as the trump's lawyers don't seem to know it.ining us on this important night. >> you're welcome. >> thank you, we'll be right back. ou're welcome. >> thank you, we'll be right back. i have moderate to severe crohn's disease. now, there's skyrizi. ♪ things are looking up, i've got symptom relief. ♪ ♪ control of my crohn's means everything to me. ♪ ♪ control is everything to me. ♪ feel significant symptom relief at 4 weeks with skyrizi, including less abdominal pain and fewer bowel movements. skyrizi is the first il-23 inhibitor that can deliver remission and visibly improve damage of the intestinal lining. and the majority of people experienced long-lasting remission at one year. serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms, had a vaccine or plan to. liver problems may occur in crohn's disease. ♪ now's the time to ask your gastroenterologist how you can take control of your crohn's with skyrizi. ♪ ♪ control is every

as the trump's lawyers don't seem to know it. katyal, thank you suppose so much for joining us on this important night. >> you're welcome. >> thank you, we'll be right back. right back. wanna know why people are getting a covid-19 shot? i'm turning the big seven-o and getting back on the apps. ha ha ha. variants are out there... and i have mouths to feed. big show coming up, so we got ours and that blue bandage? never goes out of style. i prioritize my health... also, the line was short. didn't get a covid-19 shot in the fall? there's still time. book online or go to your local pharmacy. i'm adding downy unstopables to my wash. now i'll be smelling fresh all day long. [sniff] still fresh. ♪♪ get 6x longer-lasting freshness, plus odor protection. try for under $5! nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid for twice as long as pepcid. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day. choose acid prevention. choose nexium. (♪♪) there's two things a young man wanna be - a cowboy or a gangster. and a gangster's o

and lawyers in the studio, i ask the teams to the studio, lawyers, here they are, why do i like lawyersents, we all work in the same company, assesses their situation and decides whether we can help them or not, so he has a lot of responsibility, understandable, maxim, okay, yura, young , but a promising employee, he works in the bankruptcy department and he has no equal in this matter, the head of the company andrei, he is one of the best lawyers in russia, well, i’ll tell you honestly , he has no false modesty, indeed, he considers any situation so deeply, that well, in general, in all trials he wins everything, just like that , the absolute truth, andrey, well, he looks like one of the best lawyers in russia, because the suit, tie, glasses, facial expression, well, excuse me, i didn't want to offend anyone. okay, yes, we support you , okay, someone tell me about ruslan, i want to introduce ruslan, the founder of the company, the most singing lawyer, the most legal singer, you didn’t know, tell your girls, your girlfriends, that i don’t sleep at night , dreaming about her, that of all

a good lawyer and introduce the selected lawyers. i emphasize to everyone my colleagues um musaf and the staff and especially the head of the judiciary in the supreme judicial council gave an important mission to the judicial officials. that all-round cooperation with the country's election authorities. they have a resident judge and a duty judge all day and night from now until the day of the election. if there are any reports that something is wrong somewhere, it will be done. they are committing a crime against the prevention of the respected prosecutor kalshor , prevent those that can be prevented and if a crime is committed , our prosecutors should investigate it quickly. mr. mohseni is special also in a special order from the center lawyers wanted to introduce the characteristics of a level-headed lawyer to the public so that it would be a model for other lawyers to do better judicial affairs. a good lawyer has these qualities, he has these conditions , he has these qualities, and then every year on the occasion of lawyer's day

his lawyers are stupid. the russian _ that accusation? his lawyers are stupid.ssian authorities because russia will have fresh elections in a month. supposedly vladimir putin will win the first round of something like 75% of popular support. the news of the death of one of the antifa vladimir putin politicians is bad news for campaigning for the russian presidential elections. if campaigning for the russian presidential elections.- campaigning for the russian presidential elections. if he wasn't killed by the _ presidential elections. if he wasn't killed by the russian _ presidential elections. if he wasn't killed by the russian government, j killed by the russian government, how did he die? he killed by the russian government, how did he die?— killed by the russian government, how did he die? he was quite healthy before. ithink_ how did he die? he was quite healthy before. i think it _ how did he die? he was quite healthy before. i think it was _ how did he die? he was quite healthy before. i think it was a _ how did he die? he was quite healthy before. i think

-- read them are the lawyers in the case or some set of lawyers who specialize in the subject matter >> try being a court of appeals judge. it is worse. >> yeah. i tried to not think about that. i try not to think about that the only people who will read this opinion are specialized lawyers. i really try to write so that interested americans can figure out what i am saying and why i am saying it. and you try not to dumb it down too much, so there is a balance you have to strike because you don't want to dumb it down. you don't want to be in terms of the substance, sophisticated and you know, to treat difficult things as though they are difficult things, but at the same time, i guess what i would like is that it should be the case that even you know, even if they don't understand every in and out that an interested person with some amount, you know, like i say, i think of myself as like writing for, you know, serious newspaper readers or something like that, you know. that they should be able to pick it up and get the gist and figure out why it is the supreme court decided what it dec

donald trump finished his social media advertisement for lawyers today with a last line calling the lawyer, he hasn't even hired yet, crazy. he said, any lawyer who takes a trump case is either crazy or a true american patriot. respectable law firms care about their reputations, and then turning down donald trump as a client for many years, long before he was a politician. that's why donald trump has the most incompetent and unprofessional lawyers who have ever represented a president united states. donald trump could have made that last line of his social media post a bit more accurate by saying any lawyer who takes a trump case is either crazy or needs the money or both. donald trump has spent more money on lawyers than any politician in history. none of that money is donald trump's money. the new york times is reporting that on trump has spent $50 million on lawyers just in the year 2023, with all of that money coming from the poorer people who answered donald trump's electronic solicitations for money. these are the same people who donald trump told, when he first became a presidential

>> yeah. >> so what did you think, andrew, of hearing a trump lawyer who isn't impeachment lawyer, asn star successor, saying of course you could prosecute a former president? >> yeah well, you know who also seems to have said exactly that? brett kavanaugh, because brett kavanaugh also, who is now on the supreme court obviously, was part of that same group of special counsel, and obviously thought that bill clinton went out of office, would be able to be prosecuted for crimes. let's just, let's just call it for what it is. the only person who is really saying that is somebody who is currently indicted, trying to figure out how -- >> exactly. i >> mean, this has failed in the district court, it has failed in the court of appeals, this supreme court if it takes, it will fail there. it is really, i mean it is a strategy that the defense counsel has, which is delay. that is really the purpose, it's not really the merits of the case. >> yeah, andrew weissmann, on more than one topic on this special historic week, thank you sir. we will be right back. sir. we will be right back. (jen) so we

donald trump's lawyers were not actually asking for the supreme court to hear the case now. the trump lawyers were asking to send -- for the supreme court to send the case back to the circuit court of appeals for another hearing there before the full 11 judges of the circuit court of appeals. in jack smith's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals court, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now has done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor general and host of the podcast courtside with neal katyal. he is an msnbc legal analyst. and neal, i want to begin the way all lawyers begin when they get these notices from the supreme court that they're going to hear your case. they have the supreme court identified for the lawyers on both sid

this isn't trump's lawyers saying it. this is trump saying it. the leading candidate in the republican party saying that i should be -- the way i view the presidency and the role of the president is outside of the bounds of the other branches of government. that i literally could kill somebody as president and get away with it. that that is an appropriate function for a president of the united states. i think that is the picture. that is sort of regardless of what would happen in a criminal case. that is where we are in this country. in many ways, it's the message, and in some ways i think it is what we are experiencing in the course of these litigations that's the message. i think we tend to forget that because we're so focused on where does it go on the clock, when is he going to have his trial, will it happen before the election. but if you stop to think about what it is that somebody is saying who is running for president, and not just running but succeeding so far in running for president, i think that's really the story. >> yeah, i apprecia

well, you're reminding folks, and maybe young lawyers, what makes for effective lawyering.e sdny you used the same skills you shared with us. you read up on the case, you had a view, you listened to the oral arguments and your view adjusted with the facts and arguments as they developed. it sounds like good lawyering, david. >> that having been said, look, i also think there's ways to come out with a pretty solid reasoning the other way. you know, it's a tough call, but i do think that it seems like there's a lot of alignment on the court and my guess is they're going to try to come out with a precurian unanimous decision. >> yeah. >> i think they can do it pretty narrowly without hitting too many -- >> if they do it -- i'm only jumping in because they push it on time. if they do it narrowly, unanimously, they can do it fast and have deadline issues for doing that. >> yes. >> david, half a counter point and an evolution, less than evolution, keep our minds open. thank you, sir. >> okay. good night. >> david kelly here with us. >>> tomorrow we're doing a special at our norma

having a lawyer and a lawyer's orders to defend oneself in the courts should not be denied. we have implemented this right, which the head of the judiciary has repeatedly stressed to the judicial authorities to follow up. the restoration of public rights is not a one-time thing. from the ongoing issues , the thing that is being done is often not enough, mr. mohseni ajei, now in the second. homai of the board of directors of the center for lawyers and experts of the judiciary the most important characteristic of a lawyer in the judicial system is that he is a people person , he plays a role in the spread of justice, in the restoration of public rights, in the prayer of the people, in raising the awareness of the people, where is that part , that part is you, that part that interacts with all strata of society with all spectrums the society is connected and this center can make the public image of the judiciary better and more prominent. mohammadreza fallahi of sda news agency, minister of foreign affairs emphasized on the continuation of iran's strong support to the lebanese

to become lawyers.ording to the special quality law of dadgose attorney license in 1976, two people from the judiciary and one person from kano determined the capacity. it was a special quota at that time. it has made it difficult for people to get legal services at a reasonable price. the cost of a lawyer is too high. it was not worth it. i wanted to get a lawyer. did you get a lawyer for your case? no dear john. the cost of lawyers is high. with the approval of the law on facilitating the issuance of business licenses, the determination of the applicant acceptance limit in the bar exam was eliminated . according to the new law, anyone who scores 70% of the top 1% will be accepted in the written test. facilitation came to make this adjustment. it made a fair adjustment. how're you? 1% of law graduates, when they participate, they are the top 1%. whatever their average grade is up to 70 the percentage of the center, lawyers' center and lawyers' associations should accept this. in fact, this was the fair

is costing and lawyers in the meantime the _ that is costing and lawyers in the meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying _ meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying to _ meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying to do _ meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying to do is— meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying to do is to - meantime. the key thing which kevin hollinrake is trying to do is to cut - hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers — hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out _ hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out of _ hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out of it _ hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out of it and - hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out of it and he - hollinrake is trying to do is to cut the lawyers out of it and he is - the lawyers out of it and he is trying the _ the lawyers out of it and he is trying, the advisory _ the lawyers out of it and he is trying, the advisory board - the lawyers out of i

of lawyers choose a good lawyer and determine the lawyer. introduce the chosen ones. i emphasize to all my colleagues and the staff and especially the head of the judiciary in the supreme judicial council gave an important mission to the judicial officials. that all-round cooperation with the country's election officials. resident judge. judges should be on duty all day and night from now until election day. if there are any reports. it was said that something wrong is happening. they are committing a crime. the vice president of prevention , the respected prosecutor gol kashre , prevent those who can be prevented and if a crime occurs. prosecutor we will quickly check this. mr. mohseni ejhe also asked the lawyers' center to introduce the characteristics of a level-headed lawyer to the public in order to be a model for other lawyers. to do better. judicial affairs, tell the people that a good lawyer has these qualities, has these conditions , has these qualities, and then every year on the occasion of lawyer's day , introduce lawyers who hav

these lawyers, who are in the crowd , attended the ceremony on behalf of all the country's lawyers, and they say that their most important duty is to uphold public rights. one of the missions of the lawyers center it is public rights and we must create a mechanism in the lawyers' center to make it easier and more accessible for people to refer to lawyers . every lawyer may be present several times a year in judicial meetings , and in the matter of providing advice to the people, no iranian person should be deprived of having a lawyer to defend himself in court due to lack of financial ability and paying attorney's fees. we have implemented the rights that the head of the judiciary has many times the judicial officials emphasized to follow it up. restoring rights: it's not a one-time thing, it's not like saying, well, the work done last year is over, no , many issues are ongoing, but the things that are being done are often not enough. mr. mohseni ajei now, in the second meeting of the board of directors of the center of lawyers and experts of the judiciary , states that the most importa

is there anyone else besides lawyer isan?ant thing is still his security. because the trial is at the stage of completion, and he must give testimony alive and well, we understood, that’s right, by the way, where is he, who, sable, is in our office, wait, i just met him in the corridor, he’s going to the toilet let's go. he's gone, so fast, he couldn't have gone far, so what are your thoughts? max, you last talked to him, what mood was he in? he was depressed and clearly frightened by something, this is quite understandable in his position, he also felt that we ourselves were confused, this means that now he feels completely defenseless, well, where could he go in such a situation, well not to a hotel, and it looks like he doesn’t have any friends here, but what if he just took off, yes, it’s possible, but there is another place where he could show up, and well, let’s go. alexander sergeevich, and we are behind you throughout we’re running around the city, we thought something happened to you, i’m fine, maybe i’m just nervous

apparently, it was then that rogauskas decided to eliminate the lawyer.se has been accepted for production by the first department for investigation of particularly important cases, an investigation is underway. it’s hard to believe that there were explosives, grenade launchers and other weapons found in the garage. are needed to punish a lawyer, it is possible that during the investigation details that go far beyond the boundaries of a suburban area with luxury real estate will be hidden. fyodor aleseev, maxim movchan, lead, duty department. society dead theatergoers in moscow began to be tried for hundreds of millions of rubles in cultural fraud. according to investigators, swindlers cashed out preferential cards in the thousands, holding fictitious concerts and performances; all supposed costs were offset by government assistance. word to alexandra mostova. they wanted to build a business on dead souls, but in the end they ended up in the dock. the defendants in the case of fraud with the pushkin card were essentially brought from the pre-trial detenti

congratulations to you one of the lawyers today.s to do is to be in that bench with nine justices. so congratulations to all of you. two questions. i don't know if you want to answer both of them. but given what he went through today, the whole thing is so fast and complex, is there any part where you would want to do it over or exchange remarks or build on an answer, because that can happen in any part of life. i'm curious if that happened at all, and would you share that with us. and second, we discussed today on this panel, and it was clear in the courtroom, that there was bipartisan skepticism about one of your key points, which is that the insurrection was this unique and rare event, and i wonder, is there a way that through your arguments that the brief that sometimes matters more than the oral argument that you could better to phrase it differently to a different legal stand-alone insurrection is one you know what when you see it and we're not going to have a ton of frivolous made up insurrection claims if some bananas offici

his campaign lawyer got subpoenaed. trump paid for his lawyers. host: you can pay the bill but not the find? guest: that's right. host: florida is next. caller: good morning. i have to respectfully disagree with the guest in regards to the fairness that he alleges toward donald trump. i'm in my mid-70's and i have never seen the kind of political persecution going on towards an individual that's going on against donald trump. there are a lot of people who are above the law contrary to what you say. they are all democrats. a good example is hillary clinton and the 33,000 emails she destroyed that had already been subpoenaed. 33,000. i may also point out that barack obama took with him close to one million documents after he left the presidency. may i say justifiably so. as a former president of the united states of america. why shouldn't he be able to have those documents and review and digitize them as he took much too long to do, yet he was never persecuted for that. donald trump did essentially the same thing. he did give back numerous documents

the trump team of lawyers includes the criminal defense lawyers representing donald trump's codefendants in the foreign -- press, charging donald trump was to codefendants with illegal possession of classified documents, and violations of the espionage act. those codefendants or both employees of donald trunks,. a filing and the case on friday, by jack smith's team in replied to accusations by the trump team of lawyers complaining, the prosecution has not provided them everything they've asked for an discovery, in that filing a new jewel of trump lawyer incompetence appears on page 58 of jack smith's filing in a discussion of the video evidence in the case, which of course includes video obtained from the closed circuit security video system at mar-a- lago. here is what this filing says. quote. counsel for trump has never reported to the government, being unable to view the footage as produced and as detailed below, whenever the government has received notice from the other defendants that they were having difficulty, it has responded quickly. in an email on october 24th 2023, months aft

they wanted it to look like nine lawyers t doing dry lawyer stuf. to that extent i think they did succeed and i do think they were on generally good behavior. there wasn't the kind of grouchiness or anger that sometimes flashes through the justices in arguments like tis. they all wanted to get to the bottom of the case and they did end up finding consensus in the end. trump will twist that into something ittr isn't. ruling for trump does not mean he didn't engage in n insurrection, and tus means the theories put forth by colorado voters here didn't cut it at the poll. >> joyce, there's been a lot of talk lately about the quality, the poor quality of donald trump's lawyers. but we did not hear that today. what do you think? >> no, he was capably represented today. and h something i noticed asked appreciated is this was not a lawyer pandering to an audience of t one. this was a lawyer who conceded arguments when he didn't have a strong position. he behaved in the way we assume lawyers will behave when they argue in frontll of the supreme court. there'

this isn't trump's lawyers saying it, this is trump saying it. the leading candidate in the republican party saying that i should be, the way i view the presidency, and the role of the president's outside of the balance of the other branches of government. that i literally could kill somebody as president and get away with it. that that is an procreate function for a president of the united states. i think that is the picture. i mean regardless of what would happen in a criminal case, that is where we are in this country. in many ways, this is to borrow from marshall mcluhan, it is the medium is the message. and in some ways, i think it is what we are experiencing, in the course of these litigations, that is the message. and it's sort of, i think we tend to forget that, because we are so focused on where does that, go in the clock, when is he going to have his trial? will it happen before the election? but if you stop to think about what it is that somebody is saying who is running for president, and not just running, but succeeding so far in run

the numbers of lawyers being l this. the numbers of lawyers being guoted _ this.light. i've i quoted to us seem very light. i've -ot quoted to us seem very light. i've got cases. — quoted to us seem very light. i've got cases, individual— quoted to us seem very light. i've got cases, individual cases - quoted to us seem very light. i've got cases, individual cases in - quoted to us seem very light. i've got cases, individual cases in the| got cases, individual cases in the hss~ _ got cases, individual cases in the hss~ i've — got cases, individual cases in the hss~ i've been _ got cases, individual cases in the hss. i've been waiting _ got cases, individual cases in the hss. i've been waiting for- got cases, individual cases in the hss. i've been waiting for one i got cases, individual cases in the hss. i've been waiting for one to| hss. i've been waiting for one to come _ hss. i've been waiting for one to come back— hss. i've been waiting for one to come back since _ hss. i've been waiting for one to come back since last _ hss. i've been waiting for one to come b

arguments by the lawyers, that is not evidence.n done, not evidence, which is why it is crucial, i mean, there's been a lot of criticism, lawrence, about the fact that judge mcafee even had this hearing in the first place. but that threshold was met. the hearing had to take place because it is what the rules of the law requires. but, ultimately, mcafee has to make a decision based on evidence only. it can't be a swayed by any kind of prejudice or biases that he has a judge, and he has to rely on evidence. it is severely lacking, if not nonexistence, for the defense at this time. >> we're going to squeeze in a quick final break here. we'll come back with more on the situation with katie phang and melissa redmon. we're going to be right back. m we're going to be right back. it's smarter, healthier pet food. disrupts my skin, night and day. despite treatment, it's still not under control. but now i have rinvoq. rinvoq is a once-daily pill that reduces the itch and helps clear the rash of eczema—fast. some rinvoq patients felt signific

arguments by the lawyers, that's not evidence.t evidence, which is why it's crucial. there's been a lot of criticism, lawrence, about the fact that judge mcafee even had a searing t in the first place, but that threshold was met. the hearing eshad to take place because that is what the rules and laws require. all timidly, mcafee, has to make a decision based on evidence only. it can't be swayed by any types of diocese that he has as a judge, and he has to rely on evidence. it's severely lacking, if not not existent for the defense at this. time is >> will squeeze in a quick, final break here. we'll come back with more naon the situation with katie phang and melissa redmon. we'll be right back. redmon. we'll be right back. shingles. the rash can feel like pulsing, electric shocks and last for weeks. a pain so intense, you could miss out on family time. the virus that causes shingles is likely already inside of you. 50 years or older? ask your doctor about shingles. ♪i'm hearing different ways for me to screen for colon cancer.♪ ♪it

the lawyer's driver died in the hospital, investigators meanwhile.were actively digging up the past of an active lawyer, who was the real target of the killer. viktor patrushev is known in narrow circles, he handled dubious matters, was put on trial for about fraud worth billions of rubles, but how... every time he got away with it, he is also known for solving other people’s issues and pulling off his own combinations, one of them is connected with a serious legal dispute over a luxury house in an elite area of ​​st. petersburg, which belonged to his wife. the house was listed as collateral, the rights to the property were bought by the same alleged customer of the murder of ginterest alfansa ragauskas, but patrushev bombarded the courts with papers, preventing the decision from coming into force, apparently, then rogauskas decided to eliminate lawyer criminal case. to the production of the first department for investigation of particularly important cases, an investigation is underway. it’s hard to believe that the explosives, grenade launchers and

the lawyers for alexei navalny? they need to be the lawyers for alexei navalny?ers for alexei navalny? tte: need to be released immediately. three of them in october were detained and they are in prison now awaiting trial on charges of extremism and under international law this is a nonsense. two of his additional lawyers, who are at the moment in exile, three days ago were sentenced to detention and imprisonment, awaiting trial by a russian court. so i think was very worrying, it is navalny �*s lawyers but it is also a number of russian human rights lawyers that are on target by the authorities because how do you dismantle the rule of law question what you silent civil society, you dismantle the independent media, which has been donein independent media, which has been done in russia by the authorities. particularly over the past two years. and the last thing is people could not have a proper defence when they are victims of human rights violations. that's a calculated machine of regression. i am extremely worried. in behalf of navalny, we need to continue. than

the that opening defence from donald trump's lawyer-— trump's lawyer.u trump's lawyer. the decision is wrong and _ trump's lawyer. the decision is wrong and should _ trump's lawyer. the decision is wrong and should be _ trump's lawyer. the decision is wrong and should be reversed. trump's lawyer. the decision is l wrong and should be reversed for numerous independent raisins. the first reason is that president tran was not covered by section three because the president is not an officer of the united states as that term is used throughout the constitution. officer of the united states refers only to appointed officials and it does not encompass elected individuals such as the president or members of congress. this is clearfrom president or members of congress. this is clear from the commissions clause, the impeachment clause and the appointments clause. each of which uses officer at the united states to refer only to appointed are not elected officials. the second reason is that section three cannot be used to exclude a presidential candidate from the b

from the lawyer on the other side. jason murray, and a back and forth with chief justice, john roberts, in which they essentially say to the lawyer that this is crazy that we have to decide something like this. isn't it? the lawyer that essentially responds yes it is crazy, the reason it is crazy is because they are running against a guy who just recently tried to overthrow the u.s. government. yes, that is crazy, nothing like that has ever happened in this country before, at least since the civil war. but yes it is crazy. you do kind of have to clean it up now. >> listen. >> what do you do with what i would seem to me to be plain consequences of your position. if colorado is in a position that is upheld, surely there will be disqualification proceedings on the other side. and some of those will succeed. some of them will have different standards of proof, some of them will have different rules about evidence, although my prediction has never been correct. i would expect that a good number of states will say whoever th

marny was a defense lawyer during a georgia rico trial.has experience in this very set of cases as well as more oa. you're busy. lot going on today. i appreciate you joining us, sir. >> thank you for having me. >> same question to you that maya and i were just discussing. did the defense counsel move the ball on disqualification inside the courtroom here this week? >> i think you have to look at it from the perspective of which defendants you're talking about. jack smith's case, for example, and the federal situation, said that the electors this georgia were sort of duped or schmucks, didn't know what was going on and therefore they wouldn't be charged and were specifically listed in his indictment. in this case, they were charged by fani willis, which is in contrast to the federal court. if i'm one of their lawyers, i would certainly argue that the fact that you hired your boyfriend to handle thi one of the longest, if not the that the feds had looked into it for years more than you had, there's a question there t had, and to me, it doesn

, they're not good lawyers. they're just making political points. and and for those of us to care about the practice of law, it's painful to watch lawyers just descend to treating and treating legal arguments as they're just they're like campaign stops. but but at the at at the base the problem with the argument. the first it would. first misunderstood stands impeachment and the fact that under the constitution civil criminal proceedings are separate from each other and they're from impeachment. impeachment is not the same thing as a civil proceeding or a criminal proceeding. for example, the punishments impeachment are removal and disqualification. they're not criminal sanctions. you don't go to jail like you could in england. you can't be put to death like you could in england so because it's a different process. you can you can go through the impeachment process. and the outcome is whatever the is. but still there could be a separate criminal prosecution or you go through the criminal prosecution and there's

and are the same points his lawyer jonathan mitchell made. here's the problem with chase's lower court ruling. his position directly contradicted his own previous opinion which came a year earlier. and involved jefferson davis, the first and only confederate president who was tried for treason. you see, chase was one of two justices overseeing that civil trial. and he just so happened to discreetly suggest to davis' lawyers that they could short circuit the trial by claiming that davis could not be tried for treason because he was already disqualified upon the ratification of the 14th amendment, which his lawyers argued was self-executing. chase appeared to embrace that argument, which is the opposite of a ruling he would make a year later. these diverging decisions from the same justice are illogical and can't be explained. for today's purpose, the griffin case served as a convenient case for trump's lawyers because they could point to it as de facto precedent and giving friendly justices an convenient off ramp. >> so under griffin's case, w

i won’t mention his last name, but he says that i don’t consider lawyers, except those who graduatedf bsu, to be lawyers at all, this, this is just a question of how this is perceived in society, yes, and i argue, i know what i’m saying, a policeman is a lawyer with a mark of quality, because he is a law enforcement officer, in order to protect the law, you need to at least get to know him, the second story: you know, a lawyer, a classic lawyer, well , let’s not offend anyone, a person comes to him with with his problem, he says , your rights have been violated, where do you need to go, well, it’s clear, where to the police, to the policeman, what to say , we will deal with it, we will, not only do we know that it has not been violated, we know what to do, to restore, the second one is being disassembled, we touched on such a neat moment, oh which many people also somehow say, argue, do we have these university traditions, well, by analogy, like the ivy league and so on. that the law faculty does not recognize anyone except their fellow students there, it seems to me that there is su

you, the trump lawyers are lying.out the state of the law and lying about your own positions. we will say when we use those words that are that strong, we'll show you exactly the evidence because look at the history of, say, andrew johnson, richard nixon, bill clinton, donald trump. they all faced a type of impeachment. no one was ever convicted. the judges pointed specifically to the nixon example who, of course, got that pardon from ford. they describe how the full pardon came in because those two people, they knew and accepted as the obvious fact that a former president could be tried, charged convicted. that was needed, take the pardon to avoid the legal fact that he could be charged. >> it is common knowledge that serious allegations and accusations hang like a sword over our former president's head. i deeply believe in equal justice for all americans, whatever their station or former station. by these presence do grant a fum, free and absolute pardon unto richard nixon. >> that full pardon was to deal with the s

i'm still looking at lawyer. he's not. there's at the lawyer. he's not.s his judge is looking at me, puts his thumb up, of puts his faux thumb up, kind of puts his faux pas, the up. so i pas, picks the paper up. so i said are you sure she said again, are you sure she said, yeah. of the said, yeah. one of the co—defendants me said, co—defendants behind me said, well you're going well done, you're going home. um, that was i to um, and that was it. i had to sit for another two hours sit there for another two hours before could get released from before i could get released from the court. and, uh, and that was it. i was straight to the airport. straight to northern cyprus. businesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm businesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm hereisinesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, swoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, and nan airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, and n'can and i'm here now, and i can finish my book because i've written book when i was in written a book when