completely free, that is the most worrying part, regardless of whether you are a tory, laybourne lib dem are in talking about a 200 overall majority, it seems to be slipping back recently that kind of thing she can do what she likes, she can have an idea in her head and teddington into legislation. people say a landslide, 1—party government but we have had landslide governments before. not like this, if you talk of over 200, it is more than margaret thatcher would have got, more than tony blair ever got in 1997 landslide so you are nudging i—party state 1997 landslide so you are nudging 1— party state and 1997 landslide so you are nudging i—party state and i think the voters ought to think twice about allowing something like that to happen. what about labour in 1945, massive majority. 0k, long time ago. tony blair had some big majorities. but if the polls are right, she will outstrip tony blair is 1997 majority. i do not think a huge majority. i do not think a huge majority is a terribly good idea. it is something voters ought to be wary of and also some of the promises she has made have