john layfield, this is for you.ld you consider this a long-term hold given the possibility of regulatory hurdles in the near say year or year and a half? >> yeah, that's a great question. i agree with jonathan. that is the biggest worry i have with google and facebook which i also own. the politicians always tend to go after someone they think has less approval rating, the banks, lenders, big tech companies. i think they will end up going after google. google so far has avoided that but they have 50 of the top 100a.i. scientist ins ts in the working for them. their future growth comes with waymo and what they are doing other than search. that's what they are using to fund it. that's why i like this company so much. david: "the washington post" and its owner jeff bezos now under fire from the inside. why one reporter is crying foul over the paper's super bowl ad last night. media buzz host on the fallout, next. sometimes, they just drop in. cme group can help you navigate risks and capture opportunities. we enable yo

kristina partsinevelos, liz peak, john layfield. first, back to new york city, where amazon's second headquarters would have been built. connell mcshane, new polls show locals wanted amazon to come in. what are you hearing? reporter: in the end it was really that local pressure from the likes of congresswoman alexandria ocasio-cortez that you brought up that amazon says led into the decision to pull out. remember, there were a lot of jobs being promised. amazon said it was bringing more than 25,000 jobs here, high-paying ones as well. $150,000 average salary but again, that local political pressure got the best of the company. in a statement earlier today it said wow, the polls show that 70% of new yorkers support our planned investment but a number of state and local politicians made it clear they oppose our presence and will not work with us to build the type of relationships that are required to go forward with the project we and many others envisioned in long island city. among those who envisioned it, the governor of the state,

john layfield, thank you so much for your time this morning. thanks, lauren. lauren: have a good one. cheryl: here are other headlines this morning. former massachusetts governor bill weld heading himself as a gop challenger to president trump's 2020 bid. he spoke on abc's this week about the president's fiscal policies a and political demeanor. >> i think the president is reckless in spending. they're spending a trillion dollars a year. they don't have that. he's going to crush generation xers and millennials in the country. he wants to divide the country and hold up scary boogiemen that everyone else think only he can save us, it's part of a plan i think on his part to make himself seem indispensable. he's not indispensable at all. cheryl: hsl.cheryl: hundreds s left stranded without warning. bmi filing for bankruptcy saturday, citing uncertainty over britain's exit from the e.u. passengers will not be reimbursed. apple iphone rumors piling up as the company's set to release three new phones this year. the 10r predicted to have a longer batte

well, the party is over. >> betsy, this is john layfield. this seems insane to me.k to the 1%. it is coming from a democratic governor who may be running for president. the world's in a paradox universe right now. it certainly appears. >> you have a good nose for hypocrisy. that's exactly what it is. the democratic party doesn't know what it is right now. we've got aoc and elizabeth warren saying we want more equality. we want social justy. and -- social justice and then we have a congresswoman and governor cuomo begging to restore this tax break which only hopes the very rich. >> isn't this just the free market working? people are going to a state that's fully funded as far as schools and police, no state income tax, isn't this the free market movement though that people are trying to mitigate? >> clearly people are losing new york state in droves. new york lost more residents than any other state in the nation because it is tax hell. >> well, okay, the point was, yes, you know, the state and local taxes may have been capped, but i think originally in the tax plan

. >> john la layfield, my questio, is there a way to get us here in u.s.subsidizing the rest of the world in terms of the drug prices, but still preserve the spirit of u innovation to en sen -- incentie companies. >> right, you get rid of the bafoons that charge of dog and pony show in congress, they are going after the end user, have you drugmaker, whole maker, pharmaceutical benefit manager, and pharmacy, and insurer, they are all takes pieces and taking huge profit, they all have lobbyists who bought off congress. congress is bought and paid for, until you do something with congress, this dog and pony show about throwing rocks at these guys could say you better fix this, how about congress being brought and paid for. david: johns and joh johnson & r point -- your point said 77% is money paid to middle man. they help guide people, they take a huge church, they are going to be grilled in coming week, but price control, this is to john month a points, -- jonathan's point, price cold col always lead to shortage. we'll see a shortage if we try price control.

i want to get john layfield in on this. two deals we are talking about.ey both look a little dicey. obviously the fear of another government shutdown if we don't get a border deal and of course, the china trade thing that looks like it's getting pushed back or concerns that the tough talk has resumed with the president saying, for example, he wants all chinese telecom companies out of our 5g push in this country. a lot of nastiness developing all of a sudden again. what do you think? >> yeah. i think the problem is you don't know what defines success. when you go into any negotiation, you have to be able to say this is what we get if we win. the president constantly has a moving target. i'm not sure the government shutdown is not going to cut back or the national emergency isn't going to be declared. the president had two years of white house, senate and house control. i think this is a manufactured crisis. the problem with china, the chinese, it's up to them if we will get a deal or not. if they can get the president to declare victory, we get a deal, we

kevin kelly, robert wolfe and john layfield. god to see you all. glad you are all here.hat did you make of the president's speech? >> bears the foreign-policy talking about venezuela and the political aspect as well. i'm a lifelong floridian. the hispanic voters in florida are generally very can earn. during 18 limassol the rest of them turning blue, florida again went very red. i don't know that they understand the mistake some of them made or if not all of them because there is bipartisan support to support guiado. it is a mistake to be on the side of maduro, whether cuba, venezuela for the lack american countries, most of them have lived with some sort of tater ship firsthand. it's the right foreign policy move and politically abyssal play into the larger theme going into 2020 that he stands against socialism. many democrats refusing to stand during that line. >> he did have lots of cheers, but many from puerto rico but then relocated right after hurricane maria to florida and presumably they will vote democrat. we don't know. what do you think? >> i think this speech

john layfield joins us now.ent viewpoints an analysis, especially from the wall street journal about whether or not lighthizer is going to paint that rosey of a picture about the deal we could be crafting with the chinese. what are you expecting? >> i think he's going to lower expectations is what i think. i don't think he's going to try to cross the president. the president would fire him on twitter if that happens. i think that he's probably going to diminish expectation as best he can. i think he realize that's we're not going to get a good deal with the chinese. the president negotiates exactly opposite of teddy roosevelt. the president speaks very loudly and settles for a deal that's worse than he could have got in the first place. the government shutdown, he could have got $1.6 billion before the shutdown. he had two years of the republican control of the house and senate. he didn't do anything to get the wall funding then. he shuts the government down and takes $1.3 billion. i expect the same thing from t

kristina partsinevelos, jonathan hoenig, john layfield and gary kaltbaum.the american dream? >> well, look, i would like to say that yes, it's a war on wealthy but more, it's a war on people who are trying to get wealthy. when you raise taxes and they are going to

. >> john layfield here, you glossed over global trade war, and shut down. the trade war worries me that president is now engaged in. it is disrupted global supply chains, it seems to be a bigger deal than what you are saying, are you not concerned about this. the way you made that statement, it soup sounds like you are not. >> respec respectfully, i did nn to come off that way, despite of time something happens these predicttion come out about how unemployment or employment and the economy will come to a screeching halt, it has not happened. i share your concern. we need to balance fighting for your workers and getting better deals, so far you look at south korea and renegotiates deal with them, and nafta, they are deals that at end of day's little bit of churn in the water they came out to benefit u.s. workers in the end like the president said. with respect to china, he is holding their feet to the fire. everyone wants this wrapped up sooner rather than later, i think we are making progress in terms of talks and commitment that china has seemingly made. n

connell: take it to the market panel, john layfield and michael an mike antonelli.eople read between the lines, xi xinping is meeting to meet the u.s. delegation, we're getting close to getting something done. what do you think? >> i don't think that is necessarily a good indication because president trump did this with their delegation as edward lawrence pointed out. i don't think that is an indication. president trump is indicating he is wants a deal. he basically taking any deal. we'll not get a good deal to work on intellectual property. if we get ownership structure changed, tesla factory that will deal a lot with intellectual property i think as far as we can go. what the market he is seeing president trump seeing to push some type of deal, won't be a great deal but a deal the market wants. connell: market prices that in, michael, in the process of doing that so if we get a dole like the one john is expecting or talking about, maybe some selling on the news, what do you expect? >> so look i think what people need to understand about stock markets in the very,

john layfield is with us, fox news contributor. service later this year, i believe, and you think that is going to be a big winner? >> i do, yes. i own disney for that specific reason. they are trading at about a multiple of just under 15 which is just about the market right now. you look at the competitor to streaming, netflix are trading at a forward multiple of 52, over three times that. i don't think any of the streaming is priced into what disney's current stock is right now so i think there is significant upside. most of their profits this past quarter came from the parks that they have which leads to the strength of the american consumer so that makes a lot of sense. they started up the espn plus app which is a fantastic new sports app, has over a million subscribers. they are very good at streaming. but they are much better at building franchises, like the black panther, like avengers, that they can build billion dollar sub-companies around. i think that's why disney is such a force to be reckoned with. stuart: if it's a fo

john layfield come in please. fox news contributor. john, content is king.> absolutely because it is their first foray into original content. like house of cards with netflix. disney getting into streaming business. they will have their own original content. big three, amazon, apple, netflix, they have to up their game. sports is the next domino to fall but i think "lord of the rings" will be big. stuart: if i'm an investor, i look into the streaming business, i want to pick a winner, who should i pick? >> apple. apple to me is not baked into the price of apple's stock right now. they have so much money right now, they can buy the nfl rights, buy the epl rights, nba rights. apple's services business will get to $50 billion in two years. i don't think that is priced into the stock. they're looking at the lagging sales of iphone but apple is a buy because of streaming. stuart: cheap on earnings per share basis, 172 at the moment for apple. you're a sports guy, john, i have a sports question for you. the baseball player manny machado signed to the san diego pad