so layman wants to teach computers the sounds of emotions.say for example i'm going to happen and usually in a happy mood you want to use like major chords whereas if you are in a sad mood for it i prefer initially years liner curds and so we'd basically up all of the emotions into a number of different musical features so that we can teach them a. you know how each it should reacts designed with computer games in mind the technology composes unique soundtracks in real time the algorithm constantly learns from existing songs depending on the action of the game and those the player takes it can change the mood of the music from say sad to cheer for. the program will soon go on sale to corporate customers this thing so what will happen to human composers that we set our vision basically it starts we could have artificial intelligence and human beings walking together to create a kind of music which we call like superhuman music because it's music that can be created right now by composers. pipe dream or nightmare scenario andreas layman thinks

pipe dream or nightmare scenario andreas layman thinks ai offer some interesting opportunities. could help in the process of composing as a kind of virtual assistant one that does more than tell you which buttons do what but actually activate certain functions and says i'm here to help you in your work and just it's a shift but an artificial intelligence and your emotions it could be exciting. for now undressed layman still works alone without assistance from either a helpful or menacing virtual assistant he isn't worried ai could one day replace him artificial isn't the same as artistic at least not yet. well that wraps up our special on us official again today good intent but the machines will take it from here goodbye for now join us again next week well we'll see about that and you join us again next week and find out if the machines have taken over or is made to still be made by one of us. the fish fish. fish . cut. into the conflict zone there's been plenty of coverage of the thousands of casualties inflicted by israel along its border with gaza but what's been the role of

for now undress layman still works alone without assistance from either a helpful or menacing virtual assistant he isn't worried ai could one day replace him artificial isn't the same as artistic at least not yet. well that wraps up our special on us official in. good intent but the machines will take it from here goodbye for now join us again next week well we'll see about that us and you join us again next week and find out if the machines have taken over or is made to still be made by one of us. should. the fish. fish. fish. fish fish. fish . take about seventy thousand dollars. in meticulous planning on a profile to change. and a world famous artist. one of you've got a major crowd. the must stop christers latest monumental last one in london's hyde park. your romance. w. . odd a coup you think is going to be bullshit. all the matches all the scores. two thousand eight hundred soccer world cup on t.w. news. stand up today don't miss our highlights. program online w dot com highlights. climate change. waist length. c. isn't it time for good news eco africa people and projects that

how does this technology work in layman's terms? ifi technology work in layman's terms?y was wearing and didn't wa nt to that somebody was wearing and didn't want to ask and took a photo what would i do? it is visual product search identifying products in the picture, so you can identify something on the street, or on instagram you can screenshot it and upload it to our retailer app, or upload it to our retailer app, or upload it to one of our apps and the technology will allow you to identify the product and buy it. when did you start developing this technology and why did you think this would be a good area of business to go into? we started the company in 2012 and i realised, like most of us have realised, the phone has become something of a remote control for your life, you use it for everything, almost like an axillary memory bank, i used the camera library on my phone to remember everything from the parking spot at the airport to what i want to buy my kids for their birthday or christmas. what i realised was if you could give people some additional value and utilit

a problem and i noticed as we were prosecuting in that there was a real problem and before i up a layman to smirch the whole pharmaceutical industry you know tyrrell there are people that are in absolutely. in comprehensible unbelievable pain who use these drugs not to get high but just to just to live i mean they are there i don't want to throw them out and just say everybody uses octagon it's a scam so this is important but you know there was a time in this country where these doctors would be so parsimonious with scripts because the d.n.a. . and you would try getting you know can i get a tylenol three wood coating get outta hair what are you crazy take advil take some aspirin i mean they never even you couldn't get this you couldn't find it then somebody flipped the switch and it went from a code in the lauda going to the idea more phone i did go down and now to know opioids ten fifteen a hundred times the potency people just overdosing there used to be a time. when we were prosecuting and i was defending where people would take some of this time release stuff and chew it and it would

that will hide you but it is not the layman the young that would give a tug and he added but what. was it. as i think it. you. are living. their lives. for. the to cut. the window that the. dutch.

was a problem and i noticed as we were prosecuting in that there was a real problem and be before a layman to smirch the whole pharmaceutical industry you know tyrrell there are people that are in absolutely. in comprehensible unbelievable pain who use these drugs not to get high but just to just to live i mean they are there i don't want to throw them out and just say everybody uses oxy gun it's a scam so this is important but you know there was a time in this country where these doctors would be so parsimonious with scripts because the d.n.a. and you would try getting you know can i get a tylenol three were coding get out of here what do you have crazy take advil take some aspirin i mean they never even you couldn't get this you couldn't find it then somebody flipped the switch and it went from a code in the audit whether the idea more phone hydrocodone and now bentonville opioids ten fifteen a hundred times the potency people just overdosing there used to be a time. when we were prosecuting and i was defending where people would take some of this time release stuff and chew it and it wo

part of the family law what does that mean in practice so b s a layman says for women it can mean oppression and poverty . sophia had to start earning money at age seven and married at age thirteen with the mufti's approval. then she began to resist as a muslim woman she wants the same rights other greek women enjoy. a group. that we're almost blindly follow sharia laws because we're muslims if we were somewhere else in other cities we've got not have problems like these with the sharia the face of no women not our grandmothers and our mothers in ourselves know exactly what sharia is this we just follow it as a religion blindly is here to voice when he says. but is no longer willing to follow blindly she started an association to help the casualties of the women's traditional gender based restrictions. all of them had to start work as children and marry extremely young only to be deserted by their husbands the roma community ostracizes deserted women but all too often they can't get remarried because the mufti won't approve a divorce. or take it like i'm innocent us no matter what the man do

a problem and i noticed as we were prosecuting in that there was a real problem and before i up a layman to smirch the whole pharmaceutical industry their entire world there are people that are in absolutely. in comprehensible unbelievable pain who use these drugs not to get high but just to just to live i mean they are there i don't want to throw them out and just say everybody uses oxy gun it's a scam so this is important but you know there was a time in this country where these doctors would be so parsimonious with scripts because the d.n.a. and you would try getting you know can i get a tylenol three would coating get outta hair why do you have crazy take advil take some aspirin i mean they never even knew you couldn't get this you couldn't find it then somebody flipped the switch and it went from a code in the event of the idea more phone i didn't go down i and now tend to know opioids ten fifteen a hundred times the potency people just overdosing there used to be a time. when we were prosecuting and i was defending where people would take some of this time release stuff and chew it

can you explain just in layman's terms what witness tampering is and why it's a crime? >> yeah, and it's considered a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison because it goes to the very integrity of the court system. it means that someone has to induce or threaten or peuade a witness to change their story, to tell a story that's not truthful. so it's a serious crime that prutors have a lot of discretion to charge which crimes they will and won't charge. witness tampering is one they almost always charge because it goes to the very heart of what the criminal justice system is all about. >> and that goes directly to my next question which is why isn't thisht in th of a superseding indictment, a new set of criminal charges against paul manafort or is this, in effect, a new set of charges against manafort? the way the prosecutors brought was in a filing in which they asked the judge in the case to essentially revoke his bail to not let him be out on supervised release to put him in jail while new allegations and the evidence they gave to the court to support it. should

jessica layman with senior and disability action. i have a couple things that i want to say. one is i want to urge you to grow the add-back pot. that we know it's just not enough to cover the community needs that you're hearing about today. you're hearing a lot about the cuts to costs for the police department, and we urge you to make that happen. we really need to fund subsidies for seniors, people with disabilities, family, and youth. also we're happy that we now from the dignity fund, but this year, we're only adding $3 million. it is not enough for seniors and people with iblt did disab. we need more so they can work, we need to fund group vans for day centers, we need to fund support for seniors and others, and we need to fund activities for seniors and people with disabilities. thank you. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. next speakers. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm david seanz manager for the opera house. college students and high school students learn and gain skills in stage lighting, sound production and stage management. with the skills gained, graduates get to

not necessarily in languages, or phrased in ways that people would understand, you know, your layman or your every day people would understand. the whole purpose around this is to get people to participate. but they have a lot of challenges this year, for many reasons. the first time in history the census is going to be a digital census. they haven't tested the technology out thoroughly. they are underfunded, and you have an administration that, frankly, probably doesn't want us to be counted. our populations that are hidden, they are non-- in nontraditional housing and they live in parks, cars, people live on people's so says. it is hard to find them and hard to figure out how you reach them. that is why it is so important we have funding to provide to our community-based organizations who really know where to find people. they did a great job in the 2010 census. san francisco was the only county who came out ahead. >> how much did we spend for that? >> we spent $650,000 in community-based grants. it was like, the total budgeted, including my staff was 850,000. we estimated, i asked

candidate john cox is 20%, rounding up the race, former la mayor antonio villaraigosa has 13%, gop is a layman travis allen has 14%, and john chiang is pulling at 7%. -- travis allen has 12 >> i know gavin newsom is probably measuring the oval offi drapes, but my messages he's not going to have to worry about the -- about that, californians will go in a different direction. >> i think that antonio villaraigosa woody -- would a mutougher candidate for gavin newsom.>> reporter: spending some time in california, they are all saying don't count them out just yet, because it could be like 2016, the polls are not always reliable. >> all about the turnout, paul, thank you.>>> casting ballots in many places, because of early voting, by mail, including san francisco, one of the candidates, jane kim, cast her ballot today, at the going by mail and receive their ballots a month ago. >>> we will have coverage on ktvu plus at 7 pm, and mpte coverage right here on ktvu fox 2 news at 10:00 11:00.>>> -- 10:00 and 11:00. >>> bill scott, was thought to get the job for the finalists for the position of the la po

i'm not a scientist, for a layman like me, how‘d you make carbon dioxide and how complex and specialistt‘s also used and produced in the production of hydrogen which is used to produce ammonia and a 20 shortage is really hitting. the ammonia this is to do with packaging and preservation of foodstuffs in particular, isn‘t it? preservation of foodstuffs in particular, isn't it? in the case of foodstuffs, yeah. it‘s a give that fizz like you said. drink like champagne are naturally carbonated and drinks like soft drinks or beer and drinks like soft drinks or beer and lager need to give it that combination. how short-term is this? we keep hearing about plants coming back online but we are and eight how to spell and people are using a lot of what the carbon dioxide goes into. they have said it will be back online early next week, but obviously that‘s why they come back online there‘ll be a time for restarting the plant and that means will be a shortage. it really is a short—term shortage in selling it will resolve itself in a few days if not weeks. one of the nurses who worked at the gosport

can you explain just in layman's terms what witness tampering is and why it's a crime? >> yeah, and it's considered a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison because it goes to the very integrity of the court system. it means that somee has tried to induce or threaten or persuade a witness to change their story, to tell a story that's not truthful. so it's a serious crime that prosecutors have a lot of discretion to charge which crimes they will and won't charge. witness tampering is one they almost always charge because it goes to the very heart of what the criminal justice system is all about. >> and that goes directly to my next question which is why isn't this brought in the form of a superseding indictment, a new set of criminal charges against paul manafort or is this, in againsmanafort?charg the way the prosecutors brought this to the court's attention was in a filing in which they asked the judge in the case to essentially revoke his bail to not let him be out on supervised release to put him in jail while awaiting trial because of these new allegations and

. >> can you explain in layman's terms what this means for women diagnosed with breast cancer?e have known for several decades when people have an operation for breast cancer or radiation that they are still at risk for cancer in other parts of their body. we have discovered we can give drugs to reduce the likelihood of problems later o. endocrine therapy blocks the effort general receptor. many patients with breast cancer and negative lymph nodes, it means they are free of cancer, have been receiving such treatment. what this shos i by taking the tumor and analyzing the dna, looking for the combined action of 21 genes, we can tell that a very is high percentage of these patients don't need chemotherapy to achieve a very good prognosis. think how wonderful this is. we can look someone in the eye and say therein lies the tumor. your odds are good. the endocrine therapy alone, which is much milder and easier to take, will accomplish that. this is just terrific news all around. >> it is terrific news. it is huge news for women. we all know how debilitating chemotherapy treatment c

i think i very unclear least to my layman's eye, that this does that. >> any previous president could have easily had a summit with any previous leader with north korea because they've been very eager to be legitimated by the president of the united states. donald trump is the first one to agree o that. >> sean: meanwhile, over at msnbc, the conspiracy theorists choice and cable news, you have liberal morning host, joe scarborough, trashing republicans who support the republican commander in chief. shocking. take a look. >> in the republican party have devolved into a trumpist cult. >> it is at of personality. that's a good description. >> sean: the only cult of the people who watch that ridiculous morning show of yours. doesn't matter what president trump does. it doesn't matter how successful his agenda becomes or how much the quality of life for you, the american people, forgotten men and women, becomes. the media in this country is blinded by pathological hatred of this president, so much so that it's now outweighing their sire even for a robust economy and peace in the world. thi

that's obviously not a legal term, just a layman's term, with michael cohen and effectively with donaldy doesn't get out. that is all part of this and it's also related to the kind of approach that michael cohen and the people in and around donald trump took with karen mcdougal, who had the same kind of situation. so, yes, it is contradictory. the question is how does this play out? does it matter? because so many things that we have seen and heard from this president, from this white house, from his legal team have been contradictory to other statements they have made. does it matter in the court of public opinion? it certainly doesn't seem that way for now. will it matter in a legal setting? that is a bigger question. >> i've read this 15-page statement that was filed, this lawsuit that was filed out in county of los angeles, santa monica courthouse. i'm sure you've read it as well. what is the biggest legal and ethical issue at stake now? >> as it relates to michael cohen, i don't see anything here. why he's advocating for the president, have her do the interview, we need to do the i

no idea what your company does, you can explain it for the layman? polymath is a cryptoproject that we make it easy for businesses to launch their own token, that is tokenized real estate, tokenized bonds, equities, we make it easy for businesses to launch their own token. ashley: basically the access to blockchain is like a digital register which the token exchange is registered through blockchain, is that correct? >> exactly. we think the mega trend in cryptois asset-backed tokens, tokens backed by something real and live on the blockchain, they have benefits to announce they're digitized on the blockchain and we're powering that revolution. ashley: are you worried how volatile it seems. bitcoin is separate to the absolute blockchain technology, but we've seen a lot of value wiped out of that, there is concern that a few people own so much of it, it's open to manipulation and there's the issue of hacking. how secure and how stable is this environment? >> yeah, we're definitely in a correction phase right now, and you're right, it's a concentrated o

trish: i will ask you to really simplify this in layman's terms, if you would, because these people,nd you live in texas, so you have seen it there on the border, they're coming up from the likes of honduras or guatemala, mexico. they're crossing into our country and then at what point are they being detained? how are they getting in over the border in the first place? >> well, they're getting across the border two ways. some are coming through the heel ports of entry. but most of them are finding ways to cross the border, because the border in texas, contrary to what people think is porous. trish: humor me if you would. somebody is getting them once they come to the u.s., correct? there is some kind of operation there that is catching them once they're over the border? >> that's correct. the border patrol is capturing as many as they can. after they have crossed into the united states. and once they are captured, now, if they are children with them, the children are separated from the parents. under the president's executive order and in the legislation that will not be permitted. c

. >> i -- i'm a layman of laymans, but we're not talking about a fibia or a tibia. >> no, we're talking> you know, this is where some people believe the soul resides. >> i know. >> reporter: would brittany go for it? >> was there a moment, brittany, where you said, "wait a second, enough is enough. let my poor mother's spirit rest, here." >> it took me a second to process when he said, "i want to have your mom there." it actually took my dad to tell me, "it's okay." >> reporter: and so, in april 2016, brittany and herunt stood by as da's gra was opened up yet again. >> i'm trying to be strong. you know, i've been wanting this for so long, and for most people it's bringing everything back. for me, it's just anger. i'm mad. >> reporter: the second trial began a few months later. brittany's family and adkins' supporters gathered once again at the courthouse. >> was that tough to be coming up the elevators with them, and seeing them in the hallways? >> it was very tough. but i have to tell you that there were several of them that came over to me, and -- and apologized that we had to go thro

i'm a layman legally. i'm curious watching that interview tonight, watching these interviews, what did you make of it? >> look, it's hard to know what he -- he didn't actually come out and say it, right? so even when he was asked, is he cooperating by lawrence, he said -- arnold said he's on the right side. but then when he asked about the exact words, the words were about "i'm with you." cohen saying to arnold "i'm with you," which doesn't say anything about what he's doing with the government. but it doesn't answer the question that lawrence had asked, which is, is he cooperating with the government, right? so, you know, there's a lot of sort of -- it's good tv. there's a lot of different things that arnold has said. one thing i know for sure, and this is not the point of what he's saying. but i know for sure that cohen's new lawyer, guy petrillo, and the prosecutors and the fbi do not want tom arnold out there doing what he's doing right now, okay? because if michael cohen is headed in the direction of

. >> look, the layman's way of saying this is the president can do whatever he wants. mark preston, that sounds sort of dictator yal and tyrannical and the basis of what that revolution was all about. >> the idea that the -- the onl resolution and i leave this up to jeffrey when you get to the legal matters but the only resolution to this could be what does congress do. that's the way the government was set up in a way for congress to have oversight over the administration, oversight over the white house, but you have to step back and think to yourself, all the things that we've heard rudy giuliani say over the last couple of weeks, specifically in the last couple of days, in some ways they're almost acknowledging guilt. by saying that, they're trying to take any responsibility off of their backs, saying that in fact, they cannot obstruct justice. listen, we have a mid-term election coming up and if the american people do not think that the republican congress is doing enough, then they can weigh in. that's what our first yardstick is going to be about where the americ

in my mind, a layman's mind, all i saw was a threat against my life and a threat against people who were working for me. they felt, however, in their professional opinion, that the evidence wasn't there. so, you know, we had to follow whatever their advice was at that point. could we have done more? perhaps. we could have taken out a restraining order, but we felt, again, that that would only antagonize things and make it worse. quite frankly, and looking back at it now, had we taken that course and become more agressive, i think it would have just provoked him to take action earlier than what he did. >> it's shocking -- go ahead. >> it is, and wolf, the point here is once we sensed something was amiss here, we took the precautionary role of making sure the staff was aware of what was happening. it was a common discussion in the newsroom. we gave them a photo of mr. ramos in case he would enter the newsroom. again, this is in a different building, so it's not the same building. and also we had given a photo to the front desk with my personal instruction that if anybody that resembled him

just reading it as a layman and seeing how good the prosecutors are at making their case, at least theye today in front of this judge. and again, i'm no pro. the other really striking thing that happened today in addition to this hearing is that the president publicly made a statement that this was -- he called it a sentence. it's not a sentence. but he called this very unfair. and then the president's attorney, rudy giuliani, started publicly musing about how the president might clean this all up with pardons. could a pardon be a get out of jail free literally card for paul manafort here, and is the president's lawyer, mr. giuliani, or potentially the president himself in trouble for sort of publicly dangling that today? is that something that you're not supposed to do? >> it's something you're not supposed to do as a legal matter. and we saw the president -- excuse me, we saw the president's lawyer walk that statement back to us within hours. so i think -- but look, in intelligence terms a dangle is a dangle. you throw the idea out there. and that's alarming certainly to law enforceme

come on up to take a layman has been found guilty of terrorism. he is therefore sentenced to death. who pray during sentencing seemed ready to continue his role as a martyr to the cause. message to me before the trial was to arrange his execution as soon as possible. it was clear that he didn't want any delays in carrying it out. the cleric ordered his followers to carry out attacks from his prison cell a church on the island of borneo was targeted and there were also two attacks in the capital jakarta and one at a bus terminal three police officers died while eight people including four militants died in a shoot out and bomb attack on a starbucks restaurant. security experts say harsher penalties like that received by abdul rahman could trigger retaliatory attacks this could make it harder for the world's largest muslim country to rein in homegrown militancy. that's been i'll bring you up to date with among the stories making news around the. police in india say five women rights campaign has been gang raped and abducted at gunpoint the women were staging three plays in the eastern

so, congresswoman, to a layman, that sounds a little like a word salad. whether you agree with it or not, is it a solid legal argument? >> no -- well, i don't agree with it and i think it has a legal argument that can be rebutted, because first of all, yes, the president has constitutional powers. he has constitutional powers to pardon, constitutional powers that involve the executive privilege. but he's not above the rule of law. what the president has consistently done is raise questions about his willingness to adhere to the law. he has probably documented instances of obstructing justice. and the question has to be, really, possibly, a congressional question is whether the president has abused power. remember, president nixon took to firing any number of his cabinet officers. that could be considered obstruction of justice. ultimately, it was decided upon by the united states congress as it relates to an abuse of power. so, they're creating a narrative to avoid or to say to the mueller investigation that he is immune from prosecution. i'm going to all

when the north koreans say denuclearization of the north korean peninsula, that sounds good to the layman's ear. what it means in the history of negotiations is at some point in the future after the united states has pulled forces off, removed our nuclear braille, they will consider at that point giving up their nuclear weapons. so again, it's a loaded term. but you've got to understand the history to know that it's a loaded term. >> and look, this is not just about the united states and north korea. because you've got neighbors there, japan, china, south korea as well, they all have a shared interest in denuclearization of this peninsula. for a successful summit, does the president have to take into account the concerns and needs of these east asian countries? can he succeed? he goes in with just an america-first mindset? >> it's a really important point. when we used to do negotiations and we got wrapped up in the heat of the negotiations, we always tried to tell ourselves, we can't let our north korea policy undercut our broader alliance policy and u.s. position in the region. particular

in terms a layman would understand, why is methane so exciting and what is so intriguing about this organic chemical or compound that's different than what we kind of already knew that there were building blocks of life on mars? michelle: should we go to chris for the methane question? did you hear that? chris: yes, i would start right away by saying whenever you have an oxidizing at motts fear and see reduced compounds like methane or hydrogen sullfide they're exciting and in particular for the mars methane because 95% of the methane on earth is produced from biologist, it's produced in termites or rice paddies or cows or sheep or termites, etc., because of that, there's always been an interest in mars methane, its potential biological origin. that's true also because we know it only can last for 300 years. so if we see methane in the martian at moss tier that means it has -- something is happening today. it's being released or it's being created. i'll hand over to paul to answer the second part. paul: let me answer that, on earth, like chris mentioned, most of the methane in the at moss t

well you speak now to julian layman who's a project manager at the global public policy institute in berlin and specialised in refugee policy i just go back to that meeting between my horn and called it today is the italian seem to want this idea that refugees should claim asylum in the first place they arrive in to be to be changed how likely is that to happen on a europe wide basis well the negotiations on a reform on the dublin law which is the law that regulates this very rule that you just explain have been gone going on for years and basically on that very question on on whether it's possible to change the rule on first arrival there is a deadlock the proposal is to include a mechanism of solidarity which would foresee that in every time you have an influx of a large number of people there would be a kind of redistribution mechanism but there are obviously states that are not in favor for this and that's not the states at the front line but that's the states in the geographic center of the european union but if we think about how. much quero there is on the issue of redistribut

. >> it does seem here, at least from my sort of layman's perspective when it comes to legal matters, there is a wild card here in what president trump's attorney, rudy giuliani, is saying today about this question of pardons. because he says at one point this whole thing, this whole investigation might end with a series of presidential pardons. then he says it's not going to happen. then he says the president still reserves his right to do it. does that, barbara, from the standpoint of paul manafort and his defense team here -- does this enter into their strategic calculations? do they discern some kind of message being sent to them here from the president, from his attorney? >> i don't know. but, you know, rudy giuliani, it's hard to know whether he's sort of bumbling or whether he's being very strategic and just sort of dangling it out there and letting paul manafort know that that is something that president trump has the power to do and reminding of that and maybe sending him a message. it's difficult to know. i think it's still risky, however, for paul manafort to count on that,