also for the layperson. as you all probably understand, this is a big challenge with the rfp. the first place that was changed regards the oil interview. it will be directly tied to the same areas that are being scored in the written areas. the second is related to the use of recs. in terms of allowing you to provide the portfolios, there are benefits associated with this. there are some policy perspectives on that, so we limited those with a standard amount, which, right now, is currently 20%, with a goal of 51%. as you recall, the state requirements do not allow the use of these, so that 20% would be about them, and the difference between the 20% in the 15%i(.&m8zu2zÑi, half of thg from it, at most 15.5%. a figure that way, we can split the difference and it the value of the reduce costs for the portfolio but also giving a clear message that we're trying to seek the development of new resources. commissioner vietor: could i ask a question? >> the difference, 15.5%. is a 31% gap that could be made up. . we have limited that to 15.5%. >commissione: that means -- >> that is a n

also for the layperson. as you all probably understand, this is a big challenge with the rfp. first place that was changed regards the oil interview. it will be directly tied to the same areas that are being scored in the written areas. the second is related to the use of recs. in terms of allowing you to provide the portfolios, there are benefits associated with this. there are some policy perspectives on that, so we limited those with a standard amount, which, right now, is currently 20%, with a goal of 51%. as you recall, the state requirements do not allow the of

also for the layperson. as you all probably understand, this is a big challenge with the rfp. first place that was changed regards the oil interview. it will be directly tied to the same areas that are being scored in the written areas. the second is related to the use of recs. in terms of

that laypersons on known directly after that you can crash the kron4 news and nine. 60 degrees getting into the 90s this afternoon. we will be right back. 0 she suffered from jellyfish stings. we hope by the have and this time. another break, back with more headlines than just a moment. outside, a quick look the there's a spirit the air alert in effect for today a live picture of the san mateo bridge, clear conditions, and a little wind. that used balloons kind of hang around the bay. carpool if you can. in a man back, top stories at 5:00 another day of hot temperatures. a second step the and they in effect for the summer. philip the forecast coming of. as shooting of a man less than in oakland is under investigation details straight ahead let's begin of the weather center we broke were records yesterday mayor on tap for today. >> it is almost like for taking all summer and cramming into three days. this amateur searchers diving up there we're going to see temperatures in the triple digits widespread. >> san and says there temperatures in the '90s. >> it is hot when you see temperature

. >> i know there's more behind it, but if you're the average layperson, you think this guy has to leavee may have done a good job, but how is he able to still walk away with $40 million? >> right now by the way we >>> just ahead, it is a remarkable new development in the battle to prevent always i'mer. >> dr. ashton has details on a new test that can accurately predict whether or not you'll get the disease. that's coming up here on "the early show" on cbs. [ woman ] it's the greatest merger in dishwashing history. the best of gel and powder join forces in one pac to create... cascade complete pacs. to obliterate grease and annihilate tough foods. [ man #2 ] cascade complete pacs. combine and conquer! concierge claim centers. so i can just drop off my car and you'll take care of everything? yep, even the rental. what if i'm stuck at the office? if you can't come to us, we'll come to you in one of our immediate response vehicles! what if mother won't let me drive? then you probably wouldn't have had an accident in the first place. and we're walkin'! and we're walkin'... making it all a bi

. >> but would a layperson would consider to be an approval that this particular chemical is safe for use in these circumstances? never anywhere in this process that i can see actually gets done. there are three steps. the first step is the filing by the manufacturer that provides tocks -- some toxicity data. then there is the selection by e.p.a. which based on only on effectiveness. has nothing to do with toxicity. then you have the r.o.t. preapproval so-called but in that case there was no examination done of which might be better or worse. they took the entire list and said you are all in. and so if you're looking at, for instance, corext 7526 or the product, it strikes me that to use the word approved about it may be technically true because it technically was in the rot preapproval process, but what a regular human would think of as something having been approved never actually happened. nobody ever actually looked at that and said that is too toxic to use in these circumstances or is more or less toxic than the other -- that's why after the fact you had to do the relative toxici