as all of us were late persons, no one questioned that -- laypersons, no one questioned that statement. no one spoke at that time the elimination of a baseball field, which was also part of the plan. also the friends of joe dimaggio keep pushing for a change of the playground that ends up reducing the joe dimaggio baseball field and actually making the playground smaller. joe's friends would never have allowed the baseball field to be eliminated. these so called friends are not really the friends of joe dimaggio. i would call them the ebbmies of joe dimaggio. any of the three neighborhood meetings, the public has never been told that the park did not have any money for phase two. all of this has all been done with smoke and mirrors. the library has millions of dollars and a large staff for public relations to keep pushing for a 500-foot development, and as you can see, it's effective. but the truth is you can build a 20,000 square foot building and they can only use 6,000 square foot of that building. if we were to build the building on the present site that goes all the way to lombard

depending on what the particular physical environment impact is, whether just the opinion of the layperson, an individual, is something that would be taken into consideration, or kind of things like traffic, where more experts, or people who are certified. there, it also depends on the particular setting. there are some instances -- for example, there is a recent case in berkeley where some citizens felt the aesthetic impact on the environment in berkeley were inappropriate. that was their position. the court did not accept that as a basis support a finding of visual impact. but there is another case where there was a shed in a rural watershed area where hikers observed there would be visual impact. sometimes, it is the setting that depends on the relevance. supervisor elsbernd: what i am trying to get at is the testimony received on the issue of whether or not these boxes can be placed underground. respectfully, it does not meet my standard of expert testimony. you are a great guy, but i would not call you an expert on this issue. i would think if we are going to make any findings on this

for a layperson like me, it seems that an extreme dedication of resources for one individual. >> it just to run through that -- when someone calls 911, we try to get the chief complaint or mechanism. it may not be the person in need of medical attention. typically, we will dispatch an engine company which has a basic support trained person. many companies also have a paramedic on board. our philosophy is when we respond to the call, we want to make sure we have the appropriate amount of resources. we would rather pilaf resources that have to apply resources in that have to apply resources in critical, lifesaving situations.

for a layperson like me, it seems that an extreme dedication of resources for one individual. >> it just to run through that -- when someone calls 911, we try to get the chief complaint or mechanism. it may not be the person in need of medical attention. typically, we will dispatch an engine company which has a basic support trained person. many companies also have a paramedic on board. our philosophy is when we respond to the call, we want to make sure we have the appropriate amount of resources. we would rather pilaf resources that have to apply resources in critical, lifesaving situations. you may say an inebriated person is not a critical response, however, there is always situations where we get called to a scene and there could be additional mechanisms. instead of being inebriated, they could have fallen struck their heads and are in need of immediate intervention. we would dispatch an engine company to get basic life- support rolling and on board, followed by the transport unit that comes to assist and takeover of the care. supervisor kim: why is the track necessary? i hear this a

the would be gymnast is actually a verger which is a layperson who assists in church services. >>> princesskatherine gave the world a look at her fashion style today. the royal couple changed out of their formal wedding attire and into evening wear. cate wore a white satin gown with a white skirt and white valero. the newly titled duke and duchess left their new home for the reception at buckingham palace. >>> watchers got up very early or in some cases never left bed to experience the royal wedding. these are some of the 100 or so people gathered at the britania arms pub. they watched the festivities on flat screen tvs while enjoying an english breakfast. those who watched said that william and kate are much different than charles and diana. >> they know each other, they were friends first and became a couple after that. >> i think we're going to see huge change. i think kate is going to make a big impact on what happens in the future. >>> the british consulate will hold a party, it's a dual celebration. the wedding of william and kate and the queen's 85th birthday. >>> a little deer stuck

is there any indication when all this great stuff trickles down to the layperson? [applause] >> i'm just going to say one thing about that, and then i'll pass you to the economist, but i bought my prius secondhand, and it really was very cheap, i promise you. [laughter] >> i keep forgetting to turn my off because you couldn't hear it, but -- [laughter] i think there's a very large issue there. you know, when you talk about $10 a gallon oil, and you said that's the first thing, what came to my mind is how are you going to operate a fishing boat? a dollar for water, i'm constantly pointing out that fish has to be more expensive. people like mike talking about making produce more expensive where solving the world's problems by completely excluding court people, and at some point we have to come to terms with that, so there's two pieces, and mark, i'm surrounded by good debaters. a key question, imagine if we had kahn's $10 gas and $7 was tax revenue. the state of california has billions of extra dollars in tax revenue. the correct question is what do we do? we say giv

for a layperson, it seems strange that there is a divide between what you do in court and in terms of practice. we think the attorney general possible guidance is very clear. until either congress repeals section 3 or there is afforded of a judicial caught -- termination, if there is a change, we are ready to implement the change as well. >> thank you very much. we're going to break right now. there is food. i will be asking you to move back into your spot in 15 minutes exactly. thank you very much, all of you. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] >> up next on c-span, a conversation on china's foreign policy. on "washington journal," we will talk to the former head the federal aviation administration about the current challenges that the airline industry faces. "washington journal" begins at 7:00 eastern. and later, the jan mickelson show. that is live at 10:00 eastern. today, virginia is republican governor of mcdonnell will talk about the fiscal condition of his state and the challenges the country is facin

for a layperson, it seems strange that there is a divide between what you do in court and in terms of practice. until either congress repeals section 3 or there is afforded of a judicial caught -- termination, if there is a change, we are ready to implement the change as well. >> thank you very much. we're going to break right now. i will be asking you to move back into your spot in 15 minutes exactly. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] >> up next, a meeting of the commission of wartime contacting in iraq and afghanistan. a video documentary on internet regulations. after that, part of today's white house briefing. later, at a discussion on same- sex marriage. on tomorrows "washington journal blakey.n after that, marc rotenberg will talk about cell phone software. we will talk with their student camera out winner. "washington journal," each morning at 7:00. c-span will simulcast on radio programs from iowa. wednesday it is the exchange. i will radio live this week on c-span -- i what radio live this week on

our guidance is quite clear although i think for a layperson it seems strange there is this divide between what you do in court and what you would do in terms of agency practice. we feel the attorney general's guidance on working with justice is very clear. until either congress repeals section 3 of doma or authoritative judicial determination it is unconstitutional we have no discretion given the president's direction to change policies. if and when a change by virtue enactment of congress or final judicial determination we're dread did i to implement that determination as well. >> thank you very much, mr. gross man. we are going to break right now. there is food but i will ask you to move back to your spots in 15 minutes exactly. thank you very much, all of you. [inaudible conversations] >> former pennsylvania senator rick santorum outlines his vision for u.s. foreign policy today at 1:30 eastern. we'll have live coverage here on c-span2 mr. santorum has formed a presidential explore committee. he will be at

although for a layperson, it seems quite strange, the divide between what you would do in court and agency practice. it is very clear, until congress repeals section 3 as unconstitutional, we have no discussion given the