it was called r f c management council where the tenants were to the trained to be managers and layperson's all of the departments that were able to have the tenants to run and operate public housing themselves there was 20 tenants trained as managers 12 was hired i don't know what happened to the rest of them let me say this to you you know the tenants should have had a say i went to all the tenants meetings that was being held and the developer who was representing that area alice griffith was named after a commissioner and that's the reason why it was named alice griffith because that area most people didn't know that it was building built as i stated in 1962 so you know because of the landfill water come into the 30 story building and they tore those 3 buildings 94 down my daughter lived in one of the building i stated to the tenants don't let them come in here and build temporary housing they brought in an office building on a barrage if there's an earthquake he everything is going back into the bay and i know the church, i told them when it rains water comes into the bottom of the chu

but i, as a layperson more or less, am attempting to screen psychological counseling records in my chambers, on the road without expert assistance and the like. i know now that i could have appointed an expert to assist me in reviewing those records and making sense of the medical and sociological notations that were in the record. but i think we, as a community need to realize that judges' discretion is key and judges are not only -- only nish -- may not be all knowing. if we're to be properly sensitive to protecting the right of the privacy interests of the victim and ensuring that potentially exculpatory information is released to the defense counsel. >> i'd like to go back to 412. first of all mr. bartow, you talked about the relevance of sexual predisposition of the victim. why is that a standard? >> ma'am it's a standard that was taken from the federal rule of evidence, i believe. >> would you point out where it says "predisposition"? >> i would have to investigate that and look at where that language came from briefly. but -- >> let me just suggest it's not in the federal rules. the

. >> so those are the kind of questions that the layperson is asking and they require clear answers. first, sneezing and coughing are not part of the symptoms of ebola, and you conspread it by conspire at -- respiratory. you have to have a sick person, and i wouldn't call her sick, and you have to have contact with bodily fluids. the inanimate environment is a fierce virus in the body, but wimpy outside. as soon as it gets outside, it days off, falls apart. if i-on the plane, sitting next to that nurse. i wouldn't lose a moment's sleep tonight. i would not at all be concerned that i was at risk. >> let's talk about a nurse who, at the dallas presbyterian hospital who came out and spoke about what was happening at the hospital, they didn't directly treat thomas eric duncan, but she did help with nina pham, the first nurse diagnosed with ebola, let's listen to what she had to say. >> knowing what i know, i would try anything and everything to refuse to go there to be treated. i would feel at risk by going there, if i don't have ebola, i may contract it there, is how i feel. i would do

sure layperson has seen video of a person with this virus. can you talk about what we saw the video? >> i'm not so sure what you saw because i've was waiting for the patient in the lobby. what was it that you saw that me to describe? she seemed very frail in that video. >> i didn't see the video but she had a you that long trip, a trip that was quite tiring. you can see we assisted her. she was in a stretcher with a kind of it. it's the thing that's optimum protection for the people in the ambulance her one of our intensive care physicians in the protective equipment which brought her out. -- went from the plane ask and she had to walk off the to get her. but when we took her we wheeled her in and put her right in bed. asking, the video that the texas video offered it in bed in her environment. at this stage in her virus, how doing compared to other people at this stage? >> it is impossible to say how others.oing compared to this is an individual patient that you treat each individual an individual patient. and that's what we're nterested, no

. >> a layperson has ever seen video of someone, the presentation right now typical for this point in her virus. we talk about what she saw in the video last night. >> i'm not so sure what you saw because i was waiting for the patient in the lobby. what was it that you saw that you want me to describe? > obviously able to -- >> i didn't see the video, but i can tell you she had a long trip. a trip that was quite tiring. as you can see we assisted her. she was in a stretcher with a tent over it. it's the kind of thing that is optimum protection for the people in the ambulance. we had with her one of our intensive care physicians dressed in the appropriate protective equipment which brought her out. when she came out she went from the plane and she had to walk off the plane because they wouldn't get her. when we took her from the ambulance to the room, we had her on a stretcher and we wheeled her in and put her right in bed. i was asking the video -- just in her environment. at this stage in her environs, how is she doing compared to other people? >> it is impossible to say how she's do

i served as a chair of the coal caucus and i have the endorsement the layperson endorsed by the united mine workers and i promised i was aboard the agriculture economy of our district that they mean the dead doctor once a year and undertaker once in your life but farmers three times a day. i have the endorsement deal layperson as i received support from the soybean association in miami also have the endorsement for the federation of teachers and i supported business that is why i have credit unions of america and i have fought for social security to protect medicare that is what i have the endorsement of the alliance of retired americans. but representative bost by the way you heard right have done for veterans during the course of this debate he voted against veterans he refused to go for a bill that would expand beds that the veteran illinois homes and voted against the minimum wage increase, and he turned around to vote to raise his own pay nine .6%. i don't know how many people in this audience are in the broadcast audience received the nine .6% pay raise recently. i ask for your s

they're injected here into two high-tech machines that frankly -- >> this looks to a layperson like a big giant mess. >> intimidating but highly advanced equipment like this. >> reporter: through this web of complex steps come purified proteins, a critical building block for a cure sent back out to a worldwide system. it's a constantly moving target. sapphire is mapping it constantly mutating. if you do not have a map, you are blind, completely blind. >> yeah, in fighting that virus. >> reporter: that's why she used battle terminology. >> we solve the structures of the proteins of the virus that's like enemy intelligence and understand what the pieces are, how they work and how to fight them. >> reporter: because this is a war and it is exhausting. they're up until midnight back at dawn. sapphire a lab helped develop the drug zmapp. more antibodies are coming in as doctors search for an even better drug. across san diego biotech laboratories researchers are pushing any idea that might work. thomas duncan and ashoka mukpo were given another drug discovered at u.c. san diego's school of

. >> in other words, for the layperson who is not a physician like you are, you would not actually be using the real ebola virus in the vaccine? >> correct. we actually develop and design all of our products using you the computer, use the dna code or genetic code of a viral target, like ebola. and then we make manufacturer, synthetically scale them up and test them in animal and also in clinical testing as well. >> okay, so we know that when vaccines are being made and being tested, it can be a long process, it usually is. where are you in the process of this being done and approved and for use in humans? >> using your football analogy from the previous segment, we will be just entering the first quarter of the game in terms of human testing in january of this year. the coming year. we have, as i said, accelerate our development, because it's just synthetically made and designed and we can quickly test them. >> okay. >> in animal tests which were finish and actually published in a medical journal last year, we are able to protect 100% of the animals vaccinated with our vaccine and th

it doesn't give someone like me, a layperson, a high degree of confidence. >> it's such a difficult story to tell. we know it's hard to catch because we can look at the family of thomas eric duncan exposed to diarrhea and vomiting in his house didn't catch it. similarly, the man who brought ebola to nigeria did not infect the people on the plane. but equally we see health care providers wear all of their health care gear and thil catching it. in the early stages, dr. spencer's viral levels would have been very low. in the end of the stage, very easy to catch. >> thank you so much for you time. we appreciate you being here. i want to turn to a doctor who's trained to consider a lot of these questions that we've been asking. did dr. trying skrag spencer behave unethically? should he has self quarantined? let's dig into that. you've heard my conversation with this doctor. what do you make of it? >> there's two viruses circulating right now. one is ebola. that's hard to catch. the other is fear and that's easy to catch and a lot of americans are getting it. do i think for medical reasons he n

>> it is really difficult to learn how to navigate the process just as a layperson in general.u add in he is man of limited means it will be hard to go up against the government to win in this case, even though the law may be on his side, there are procedural problems obviously the way this is being imposed on him. it is very clear this guy is being treated unfairly. hopefully the state will reverse the ruling, the court will reverse the ruling and exonerate this man's judgment. jon: it is really clear to us he is being treated unfairly but judges are persisting in trying to collect this $30,000. unbelievable to me, since he has got prove proof he never fathered the child and never got process, never got papers served because he was in jail at the time but the state persists. we'll let our viewers know what happens. diana and dan, thank you both. >> thank you. >> thank you. shannon: well, if you ever heard the saying milk does a body good, you might be surprised to hear the results of a new study. we'll have the details. there is also this. >> four, three, two, one. shannon: a

but fou layperson, yes, it can be transmitted through air.borne is actually a different term. >> last question, this comes from kim. great e1question, why is ournb military not beingt(jf provided mandated v!vspá wear while they're in africa?lp this is a national disgrace, in my view. who agrees? anybody disagree? you disagree? >> ion't say i disagree. i actuallyÑpps not familiar wit they're being provided with. >> well, they're hanging out with liberis building tents and we don't know if they've had contact wee1 bowxdjf la. >> they're in jungle areas, which means an environment with bats and bat feces and we know it's possible took get it -- lu% safe, they have no business being there. we agree on that? real quick. >> fighting ebola over there in africa, 100% without ever anyone getting sick, they are heroes and let's continue that. >> let's give them the >>jf coming up, more of the stuo audience after this quick break. i'm angela, and i quit smoking with chantix. people who know me, to this day they say, "i never thought you would quit." yo

. >> i don't want to minimize the risks at stake for some here, but as a layperson, lacking the expertise of either of you, i say to myself, there is one known case. nobody has ever died in the united states as a result of ebola. i'm aware of the fact those two health care workers who returned to the united states have apparently made a recovery. and this is not exactly the sierra leone. so does it warrant that which we are placing on it in terms of attention? >> i think people need to understand, and i know it's been said 1 million times, but you can't overcommunicate. this disease is not spread through the air. you get this disease when you come into direct contact with someone's bodily fluids who is infected and actively ill, symptomatic. people need to understand that. >> dr. gregor skinner and elizabeth cohen thank you so much for being here. >> thank you. >>> joining me to talk about the legal aspects of all of this is cnn senior legal analyst, jeffrey toobin. great to see you. there are so many different facets of it that interest me. let's talk for a moment about the hospital wher

but for layperson, yes. it can be transmitted through air.airborne is actually a different term. yes. >> last question. this comes from kim whitehead. great question. why is our military not be provided the mandated hazmat wear while they're in liberia? this is a national disgrace whom. agrees? anybody disagree? you disagree? >> i don't say i disagree. i actually am not familiar with what they're being provided with. >> they're hanging out with liberian, building tents, and we don't know if they had contact with people with ebola. >> and in addition they're in jungle areas as they're building the tents which means they're in an area with bats and bat feces which means they're not 100% safe. >> if they're not 100% safe they have no business being if there. >> fighting ebola in africa 100% without anyone ever getting sick. they're heroes and let's hope we continue that. >> they are heroes. >> absolutely. >> all right. lots more coming up right after this quick break. huh, fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

or developed a pilot program to allow the administration of this medication by a professional or layperson to reverse the effects of an opiate-related overdose. we are also working with states to promote good samaritan claws so that bystanders to an overdose will take appropriate action and help save lives. we are heartened that 17 states plus the district of columbia have now adopted good samaritan laws. while it is critical for us to save lives, we also need a comprehensive response to prevent overdose deaths. a smart public health approach requires us to catch the signs and symptoms of substance use earlier before it develops into a chronic disorder. we've been encouraging the use of screening and brief intervention to catch risky substantial abuse before it becomes an addiction. and, since only 11% of those who need substance abuse disorder treatment in 2010 actually received it, the administration is dramatically expanding access to treatment. the affordable care act and federal parity law are extending access to substance abuse disorders and mental health benefits for an estimated 62

but i, as a layperson, more or less, am attempting to screen psychological counseling records in my chambers, on the road without expert assistance and the like. i know now that i could have appointed an expert to assist me in reviewing those records and making sense of the medical and sociological notations that were in the record. but i think we, as a community, need to realize that judges' but i think we, as a community, need to realize that judges' discretion is key and judges are not -- may not be all-knowing. if we're to be properly sensitive to protecting the right of the privacy interests of the victim and ensuring that potentially exculpatory information is released to the defense counsel. >> i'd like to go back to 412. first of all, mr. bartow, you talked about the relevance of sexual predisposition of the victim. why is that a standard? >> ma'am, it's a standard that was taken from the federal rule of evidence, i believe. >> would you point out where it says "predisposition"? >> i would have to investigate that and look at where that language came from briefly. but -- >> let me ju

. >> this seems to go rather significantly further than what layperson may describe as a mere fresheningtoday is the caricature, the stereotype being out there constantly saing, no no no. they've heard me say often and popes, john paul 2ii and benedict xvi xvi, this church isn't about knows. it's everything these good and liberating in the human person. that's the message we're trying to get across. the nurses and some nag, some skoel always saying it. we're here to emphasize it and strengthen it. >> cardinal we'll see you. thank you. >>> how some of the biggest names in entertainment are coping with a >> announcer: this morning's "eye opener" at 8:00 sponsored by walgreens at the corner of happy and healthy. >>> have you ever had this job perk? two major companies are paying for women to freeze their eggs. we eek loot at the changing demands and benefits offered women in the workplace. that's next on "cbs this morning." a party? hi. i'm new ensure active clear protein drink. clear huh? my nutritional standards are high. i'm not juice or fancy water. i've got 8 grams of protein. twist my

. >> and so for the layperson out there, would it be fair to say that, for example, when software opens a portal on a particular piece of equipment, that that can create a vulnerability, and one type of hardware, that it wouldn't in another. that that's the type of thing that they actually have to look at the type of hardware they're using, what it interfaces with and so on, is that right? >> to include looking at the fire walls and routers and switches that support it, as well as the operating systems and how they're being configured, yes, sir. >> and i presume any remote access to devices, vpns, all of that would be part of it. as i understand it, one pc that has a vpn connection that isn't in the software, that once you put it in, it can create a separate vulnerability, right? and that's what you're looking for. so if i saw the heads nod, and i like that, the two of you -- one of you is going to come back to the ranking member and myself if this agreement that you're going to do this by november 15th doesn't happen, is that right? maybe both of you? >> i would be willing to work with

for the layperson you see elements of i.t. ec windows operating systems, but the communication protocols and the types of processors and audit memory and the segmentation is often wholly different. for a standard i.t. hacker, it would be a very strange landscape requiring a lot of special knowledge. another aspect about would-be attackers on the electric grid and usually in shorthand has to say someone can take down the electric grid, the u.s. created. but the grid is not all one thing. it's many different pieces designed to be resilient in the face of natural areas. it's not as simple. it's not nearly as simple as saying one very intelligent hacker can come in and take control of things. there's a lot of layers of protection. even before computers came to the floor to serve the process on idaho national lab, this is one of the dozen or so department of energy national labs. we focus on energy security matters and because we are way in the desert and idaho with the huge test range on the we don't just model what happens on the

but i, as a layperson, more or less, am attempting to screen psychological counseling records in my chambers, on the road without expert assistance and the like. i know now that i could have appointed an expert to assist me in reviewing those records and making sense of the medical and sociological notations that were in the record. but i think we, as a community, need to realize that judges' discretion is key and judges are not -- may not be all-knowing. if we're to be properly sensitive to protecting the right of the privacy interests of the victim and ensuring that potentially exculpatory information is released to the defense counsel. >> i'd like to go back to 412. first of all, mr. bartow, you talked about the relevance of sexual predisposition of the victim. why is that a standard? >> ma'am, it's a standard that was taken from the federal rule of evidence, i believe. >> would you point out where it says "predisposition"? >> i would have to investigate that and look at where that language came from briefly. but -- >> let me just suggest it's not in the federal rules. the federal rule ex

or developed a pilot program to allow the administration of this medication by a professional or layperson to reverse the effects of an opiate-related overdose. we are also working with states to promote good samaritan claws so that bystanders to an overdose will take appropriate action and help save lives. we are heartened that 17 states plus the district of columbia have now adopted good samaritan laws. while it is critical for us to save lives, we also need a comprehensive response to prevent overdose deaths. a smart public health approach requires us to catch the signs and symptoms of substance use earlier before it develops into a chronic disorder. we've been encouraging the use of screening and brief intervention to catch risky substantial abuse before it becomes an addiction. and, since only 11% of those who need substance abuse disorder treatment in 2010 actually received it, the administration is dramatically expanding access to treatment. the affordable care act and federal parity law are extending access to substance abuse disorders and mental health benefits for an estimated 62

i'm going to comment as an informed layperson.i am pleased with the rigor of the cdc's approach, and the rigor of the approach that our clinicians and our hospitals take to that. i think that was evidenced by the way they handled the two cases this past weekend where ebola was raised as a possibility. protocol involves how you handle the patient, the establishment, the isolation around the patient, the documentation of contacts and the contact that those people might have contacted so that you can toidly traced back any risk a broader population. and then document whether the disease is truly present or not, and then at that point, bifurcating to treatment of ebola or some other disease that might be present and then falling back to a lower level of threat. before we get to phone calls, tell our viewers what sort of research is being done at rutgers and what sort of grant you get for that research from the federal government, and the amount. ofst: we are doing in excess $700 million worth of sponsored research here at rutgers ever

. >> so for the layperson out there, would it be fair to say that, for example, when software opens a portal on a particular piece of equipment, that that can create a vulnerability in one type of hardware that it wouldn't in another? that that's the kind of thing that they have to look at. the actual hardware they're using, what it interfaces with, is that right? >> including looking at the firewalls and routers that supporter and the operating systems and how they're being con figured, yes, sir. >> and i suppose any vpns or any of that would be part of it. all it takes, if i understand right, is one pc that has a vpn connection that isn't in the software but once you put it in, it can create a separate vulnerability, right? and that's what you're looking for. so if i saw the heads nod, and i like that, the two of you are -- one of you is going to come back to the ranking member and myself, if this agreement that you're going to do that by november 15th doesn't happen. is that right? maybe both of you? >> i'd be willing to work with your staff to do some follow up work. >> i think th

fauci, i'm not sure a layperson has ever seen video of someone -- >> right. >> -- in this phase of thist now typical for this point many her virus -- in her virus? we talk about what we saw on the video last night, what she looks like. >> i'm not so sure what you saw, so i was waiting for the patient in the lobby. what was it that you want me to describe? >> you know, awake, good spirits, seemingly, you know, obviously people -- >> she also seemed very frail -- [inaudible] >> okay. all right. so i didn't see the video, but i can tell you that she had a long trip, a trip that was quite tiring. as you can see, we assisted her. she was in a stretcher with a tent over it. it's the kind of thing that is optimum protection for the people in the ambulance, and we had with her one of our intensive care physicians dressed in the appropriate protective equipment which brought her out. when she came out, she went from the plane, and she had to walk off the plane because they wouldn't get her, but when we took her from the ambulance to the room, we had her on a stretcher, and we wheeled her in and

how they got time to do all these degrees i don't know, but i as a layperson in attempting to screen the psychological counseling wreck or it's in my chambers on the road without expert assistance and the like. i could point to an expert to assist me in reviewing the records and making sense in the medical into the sociological notations that were in the record. the judges may need to enlist the help of mental health health practitioners who screened this as well wait for word in the future. if we are to be properly sensitive to protecting the right of the privacy interest as a victim and an shortening of in shortening the potentially exculpatory information is released to the defense counsel. >> i would like to go back to 412. first of all, you talked about the relevance of the sexual predisposition of the victims. why is that a standard? the >> is a standard that was taken under federal rule of evidence. >> what you point out where it says predisposition? >> i did have to look at where that language came from briefly. but -- let me suggest it's not in the federal rule. the federal

it's extremely disturbing as a layperson to hear the world view of district attorneys and what they consider serious and non-serious offenses. the non-serious are the ones they're not going to prosecute, such as stealing a car. now, i submit, if your car is stolen, that's kind of serious. but in the district attorney's eyes it only becomes serious if you actually use a gun to steal it. in other words, hijack it with somebody in the car itself. the fact of the matter is is that the vast majority of people in prison are there for violent and property crimes. the increase in prison population for at least the last ten years has been exclusively from violent and property crimes. and i would also just bring up something as a -- prophylactically, the other element of this is the idea that drug laws are racist and that they are -- they are responsible for the disproportion of blacks in prison. well, blacks are 37.5% of the state prison population, which is where the majority of prisoners. 88% are in the state prison population. if you remove all drug offenders from the state prison population, the

missouri plan and i believe florida has the same plan is that a nonpartisan commission composed of laypersons law educated persons licensed attorneys interview applicants and based on the applicant's professional qualifications, their integrity and character, choose the three most highly qualified individuals and those names are then sent to an pointing authority in the iowa. it's the governor and the governor has 30 days to appoint the person, appoint the new judge from among those three nominees. the intent is to take politics out of the appointment process. and then the retention election is a way to involve voters and give them an opportunity it was startling because it was unanimous. and the individuals who opposed same-sex marriage felt you know, we have to stop this now. and the only way we're going to do it is to intimidate other judges in other states so they won't do what the iowa supreme court did by removing us from office, that was the message they intended to send. obviously, you can see from the videos that the internet, youtube, media all that made it easier for them to sell t

. >> i'm not sure a layperson has ever seen video of someone in this stage -- >> right. >> -- of the virus like we did last night. is her [inaudible] at this point in her virus talked about what we saw last night? >> i'm not sure what you saw because i was waiting for the patient in the lobby. what is it you saw that you want me to describe? >> a way to -- >> right. >> obviously able to -- >> she seemed she [inaudible]. >> ok. >> so i didn't see the video but i can tell you that she had a long trip, a trip that was quite desiring -- tiring. we assisted her. she was in a stretcher with a tent over it. it's the kind of thing that is optimal protection for the people in the ambulance and we had with her an intensive fair physicians dressed in the appropriate protective equipment. when she came out she went from the plane and she had to walk off the plane because they wouldn't get her. but when we took her from the ambulance to the room, we had her on a stretcher and we wheeled her in and put her right in bed. >> i was asking, the video the texas hospital released last night of her in be

i'm going to comment as an informed layperson. i am pleased with the rigor of the cdc's approach, and the rigor of the approach that our clinicians and our hospitals take to that. i think that was evidenced by the way they handled the two cases this past weekend where ebola was raised as a possibility. protocol involves how you handle the patient, the establishment, the isolation around the patient, the documentation of contacts and the contact that those people might have contacted so that you can toidly traced back any risk a broader population. and then document whether the disease is truly present or not, and then at that point, bifurcating to treatment of ebola or some other disease that might be present and then falling back to a lower level of threat. before we get to phone calls, tell our viewers what sort of research is being done at rutgers and what sort of grant you get for that research from the federal government, and the amount. ofst: we are doing in excess $700 million worth of sponsored research here at rutgers eve