lbe goals were not set up front; if it had folded inside we would have set lbe goals up front. because it is outside of 21, and the reason it is is because leases are excluded. also this is a quasi lease management agreement. focuses on payments to the city for this agreement. the operator will hold revenues and pay the port a fee. however knowing the commission's desires, in the request for responses was said that it is our intention that there will be local business component, and local hire as well. the goal will be determined in concert negotiations very much like a development agreement. it will be at their option to agree with an lbe goal and local hire requirement. >> so hopefully when you come back in september since you are the most qualified to do this job that we will have great news regarding lbes and labor issues. thank you. >> (off mic) >> great, thank you. >> i'm sorry, it's 14b, i don't know why i said 21. >> is in it 12? ( laughter) >> commissioner murphy? >> i would like to say that the numbers speak for themselves as far as mentor is concerned. i would like t

you had other lbes in those projects? >> yes we did. >> director bridges: am struggling with the rebundling, and not signing local businesses. i would think that you would find some contractors. i'm struggling with that fact. >> i understand. let me clarify. on all the other projects that we bid other than the muni metro tunnels; we find that many of the good one already subcontractors are more directed to the building business as opposed to tunneling subway stations 100 feet below the street, heavy excavation, we have chemical routing, compensation routing, piling, only two bids from contractors in the u.s. there is so little competition, in the past we got our strongest minority and local support in building finishes; these stations have a limited amount in building finishes and for whatever reason we got bids and gave of his preference to small business; and believe it or not we try to bring in local business where it was possible but we did try to stay with competitive pricing and low bids. unless they were close, we

it sets a dangerous precedent to ignore chapter 14 lbe ordinance which many supervisors have supported. all other supervisors support it. two, it ignores the impact of the local economy that could be generated from participation in this. can i submit this? >> of course. we would be happy to see it. next speaker. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon oren feldstrom -- the coalition is an umbrella group composed of numerous minority owned trade associations here in seven cisco such as the african american chamber of commerce, the asian-american contractors association and others. we have been working with many years to increase opportunities for smaller, local, minority owned firms the cities 14 lte program and the federal dbe program. local businesses and especially minority businesses are hurting. when the economy goes south it is our members who get first and hardest. we have had a number of our businesses over the last couple years just hanging on, downsizing, leaving the city or going out of business. that is why there was commenced excited about this project, 840 million dollar cont

and the up to date dbe and lbe percentages to date. the first contract we have up for renewal is the contract with the office of the city attorney. the city attorney provides contract advice, general advice, advice on labor matters, as well as advice on projects like van ness brt. the contract amount for if itionv axal year 12-13 is 06,000. we're not looking for any increase but to maintain this level and for fiscal year 13-14, and we'd like to seek recommendation for 60,000 for this coming year. we also have annual renewal for the department of technology. the department of technology provides video production services for the authority committee and board meetings. they're working right now during this committee meeting. the contract amount for fiscal year 13-14 is $29,6 16. we're seeking no increase. we'd like to remain at 29,6 16 dollars. the next contract we have up for renewal is the [speaker not understood] llp. they assist us during committee meetings. we have stan taylor sitting in the audience today. they also assist us in pr

additionally is proven on past projects we are committed to exceeding the port's lbe goals. without i would like to go into the pier 38 rehabilitation concept. in conjunction with our historic architects -- we have thoroughly scoped and research the site to identify the areas of historic significance to ensure that our short and long-term development plans a privately preserve the historic fabric while exhaustingly analyzing the -- remedies. more and more the waterfront is a people place. in addition the tech boom are derivative of the demand for this location. pier 38 is at the epicenter of this activity and we are enthusiastic to play a role linking pier 38 with its surrounding context. outlook access is restricted to the embarcadero promenade with no penetration along the pier to the back. pier 38 redevelopment provides an opportunity to remedy that situation. i'll hand it over to smon for the ultimate vision on pier 38. >> first and foremost in our consideration is pedestrian access. it's the number one priority of our plan and shows the long-term access to the bay. publ

we have been negotiating with our division to come up with an lbe goal for this next entitlement phase of 10 percent so they'll use row cal businesses to help -- they'll use local businesses to help in the rezoning. they've negotiated with the building trade and community organization with a local hire of 25 percent and we think that there there's outreach in the area has been -- the last two slides getting to the analysis. some are a bit hard to take in. the port is looking at total benefit over the 99 life of the project of close to $7 billion. but bringing that back to today's dollars, there's a couple of sources that's going to help the poor in the near team. we're paying for other improvements around pier 70 and that's generated early. i talked about that the generated port and that's $2 billion. and then as we're looking at those parking garages that's a very smart financial play for the park. it can generate close to $3 million over the life of the deal. so you can see the revenues over time. the port isn't going to make money while we're paying for the infrastructure, but it wi

and i believe -- i'm curious to know why there's no dbe, lbe or udbe goals for the city and county of san francisco that relate to the city attorney's office. is it just because it's a city entity? >> yes. >> okay, all right. thank you. >> and if there is thection any other questions, i'll continue on. ~ isn't the cac, this item was brought to the cac on may 22nd and there was unanimous support. [speaker not understood] along with moas established with other city departments. the one i mentioned was tida along with prop k funds. with that i am seeking [speaker not understood] contract renewals in the amount of $960,,116 and modify contract terms and conditions. >> all right, thank you very much. thank you for your brief presentation. are there any members of the public that would like to speak on this item? please come up. >>> good morning, commissioners. my name is jackie sacks. i'm on the citizens advisory committee for the citizens transportation authority. i heard this [speaker not understood] mention, we heard this item last month at our meeting. and having been on the cac as lon

the process, and connect with the city agencies who are doing the programs, what we classify as an lbe, we are only able to classify as a small business, but not a minority or woman- owned business. to talk about what kind of contract you would be able to engage in, we also have a unique feature in that we hear some of the issues that businesses are experiencing and doing business with in san francisco, and so can help work with our policy makers, our legislature and the mayor's office to help change policy that will benefit small businesses as well. with that, i think i will turn it over to budget solutions, but just note that -- i mean, opportunity fund. excuse me. but just know that our office, we are in city hall in the tax and treasurer's office, and our office is www.sfgov.org/osb. we have some information on that. if you did not get one of our small business booklets and you want one, please take my card, e-mail me, and we will mail you one as well. immigrate. thank you, regina. for those of you looking to contact these organizations, you can find their contact information in th

be a great boost to the economy out there and it would be wonderful and one other question about the lbe goals. do you know how they came up with that number? it just seems a little... small to me. >> just a great, huge, project. >> that number, the ten percent number, is equivalent to what the 3317 negotiated with the contractor monitoring division they had actually started higher in that entitlement phase of 13 percent and they realized that was too aggressive and so they lowered it, the contract monitoring division lowered it to 15 percent and that is what it is here for the next entitlement phase. there will be another goal set for the construction phase of the pro-yekt and i think that was 20 percent in the 337 deal and we will be negotiating with the contract monitoring and the consideration before the dea. >> okay. and the one last thing is that i agree with toby and that i think that it will be two to three years out. it will be too much time for you guys to come back and tell us what is going on. so it will be great to get the semiannual updates or updates on the progress of the