spare you some of the details about the -- [inaudible] >> -- whereas basic aid districts are not -- lcff is kind of irrelevant to them. they're funded at the levels of their share at the local property tax. lastly, i did want to point out that we -- aside from property taxes, we did receive funding, as you know, from voter-approved measures involving the city and county. so the public education enrichment fund is very substantial funding stream for us, and in the current year, it's about $75 million, and that's prior to this current situation with this excess eraf. and the rainy day reserve has a balance of about $44 million prior to the 26 million that's going to be fed, so to speak, by the eraf windfall -- the excess eraf windfall. so that includes the crash course in property taxes that we wanted to convey, and we'll be happy to try to answer any questions. >> president cook: we have speakers signed up for this item. alita fisher, i see you making your way. julia roberts. later, some people may not be here anymore. cassandra curio, and mary wayne, and alison collins. >> i'm impressed

well, so -- so in order for it to change -- well, but we have a sense of how the lcff is going to go up and how that would affect the revenue limits. it would have to go up a lot, which would be the good thing, and then, the excess would be less. but we would be getting more money because our revenue money would be going up in that sense, and that would lead to less excess summicoming back t city. or the property taxes would have to go down, which we think is unlikely. or the state would have to basically say thanks, san francisco. you're going to subsidize everybody else's -- yeah, all of those things sound unlikely. well, last thing i'll say, it seems to me that, you know, this is a inequity that, you know, we're getting screwed here as a district, and it's a fu fundamental challenge for a district that is in a city that's growing tremendously with revenue, and we're not getting any additional funds as a result of that to address the cost of living challenges that our educators are facing that comes with living in a city with growing inequality. so it seems to me that whatever happ

if you notice, back in 2009 and 10, all the way through almost 13-14, when the lcff was implemented, most of our revenue limit general purpose funds came from property taxes. in fact that one year, we almost received 100% of our property tax -- of our revenue limit purely from our property taxes. and then in 13-14, when lcff provided more revenue and started providing funding to education, the property tax amount, proportionate share started leveling off, and we started getting more in state aid. so it looks like we get a huge amount of our funding through our local property taxes, but if you looked at the share that -- of property taxes that sfusd receives in comparison to what the statewide average is, we actually get a very -- a relatively smaller share of property taxes. our property taxes makeup about 33% of the total collection from the city, compared to other california school districts, which they get about 54% of the -- of the share of property taxes. and these proportionate shares or ratios was set for different -- all the different school districts by a state legislation,