i know you are not on camera. >> thank you, member ledbetter. i assume you are referring to shelter-in-place hotel rehousing? yes, i can update you we have housed over 700 people in the shelter-in-place hotels. we are de mobilelizing those hotels between now and it started over the summer through next september with a strong focus on ensuring people do not return to unsheltered homelessness and that they move into stable housing. we have been making steady progress towards that goal. we de mobilized seven hotels, rehoused 23% of the people out of those hotels. 66% of folks have been moved to vacancies to consolidate people as we are able to bring the hotels down. i believe it is less than 2% have returned to the streets after having multiple offers of housing. we are proud of the work we are doing. we want to speed up the process. that is a focus of ours. we have been implements new policies to try to get those housing places moving as quickly as possible. >> for your other question, member ledbetter, i will return to jessie for updates on expen

i know you are not on camera. >> thank you, member ledbetter. i assume you are referring to shelter-in-place hotel rehousing? yes, i can update you we have housed over 700 people in the shelter-in-place hotels. we are de mobilelizing those hotels between now and it started over the summer through next september with a strong focus on ensuring people do not return to unsheltered homelessness and that they move into stable housing. we have been making steady progress towards that goal. we de mobilized seven hotels, rehoused 23% of the people out of those hotels. 66% of folks have been moved to vacancies to consolidate people as we are able to bring the hotels down. i believe it is less than 2% have returned to the streets after having multiple offers of housing. we are proud of the work we are doing. we want to speed up the process. that is a focus of ours. we have been implements new policies to try to get those housing places moving as quickly as possible. >> for your other question, member ledbetter, i will return to jessie for updates on expen

lane ledbetter with parents screaming at school board meetings. the center of the political conflicts and the jobs are on the line and you see how difficult to respond, to calculate to bring both sides of the charged conversation together and my takeaway is not that he didn't know the answer but knowing how to answer the question is the challenging part. >> it is so interesting, mike. considering the fact he was brought in to impose diversity to root out racism and to be resistant to answer that question like that there is really also kind of a sense of fear amongst people like ledbetter. >> i think the important context to keep in mind is at that point this was a few months after conservative school board, city council mayor candidates won local with 70% of the vote and ran on a platform of opposing the school district's cultural competence action plan and what you hear is the reaction to the political forces in his community. one of the reasons to focus on southlake is along this whole time southlake is about six mofts ahead of the rest of the c

kim ledbetter say. because it has happened. kim ledbetter who _ say. because it has happened. and he gave me his reflections.— evening and he gave me his reflections. , ., , ., , reflections. i should be, at this very moment. _ reflections. i should be, at this very moment, on _ reflections. i should be, at this very moment, on my— reflections. i should be, at this very moment, on my way - reflections. i should be, at this very moment, on my way to i reflections. i should be, at this - very moment, on my way to southend to speak— very moment, on my way to southend to speak to— very moment, on my way to southend to speak to the local conservative legislation. as an organist for months — legislation. as an organist for months and i got an e—mail from the deputy— months and i got an e—mail from the deputy chairman of the association about _ deputy chairman of the association about half— deputy chairman of the association about half past 12 telling me what had happened. they did not know the e>

just for the record, member ledbetter has arrived. >> i'm with the adult probation department. as a formally incarcerated, formerly homeless, i am always grateful to share our work and the impact we've had on lives and as community members, we're asking for support. i'm joined today by members of the community leaders from west side community services, dr. jones, from positive directions people's change, fred johnson, cedric atbar, from west side community services. and as most of you know, chief fletcher retired, and i'm glad to introduce our interim chief, sharon jackson. i'm going to turn the meeting over to sharon briefly, and then we'll get started with our presentation. >> good morning. i'm sharon jackson, and i'm the interim chief officer for san francisco. i have over 40 years of experience in working with community corrections, and i have implemented and managed re-enter tree y programsthat were designed to address those needs for quite a long time. for my last 11 years, i have worked with san francisco adult probation in a variety of rules. i worked with chief steele

we saw that with the civil rights restoration act in lili ledbetter fair pay act. so the department welcomes this tint to work with you to update the coverage formula in response to the court's shelby ruling. >> because conditions have changed since 1965. >> conditions have changed. but we know voter discrimination remains -- >> i understand. at the risk of going off on a tangent here, because i think we can apply that more strongly when it comes to the electoral college, but that's a conversation for another day. back on this topic, from a resource and a timing perspective, i'll call it a damage done perspective, can you spend just a minute on the benefits of a preclearance requirement versus a post-enactment litigation? >> well, senator, the burden on voters is undeniable. discriminatory voting tactic may have taken root and infect the election ral process that is playing out in a community. we know that states have spent millions of dollars defending suits. in texas they spent $3.5 million defending the discriminatory law. in north carolina $5 million defending