what ledo you to it? >> in 2014, when dianne feinstein, the california democrat in the senate, she was sharing the energy and water subcommittee, she did a report accompanying her spending bill. it was one of the most alarming, eexcuse me, reports i've ever seen come out of congress talking about thousands of sites, even here in the u.s. university and medical facilities that have radiological materials and about 80% of them, them, the report said, were not secure. i started watching the threat and i started watching how, despite rhetoric, both obama and trump, to the effect of this is one of the greatest national security threats that we face, et cetera, et cetera. there were some good reasons for it to go down. the united states and russia are no longer cooperating on the programs. in addition, some of of the efforts of international efforts to control and safeguard nuclear materials were not being very efficiently ran. funding was kind r of backing u. there was a bottleneck. the argument was, we can't