again, she was a private leedy. grandpa would tell you if you ask him do you love bess dickerman? is i love her and i think if you ask my grandfather -- my grandmother she would say yes of course i love him. what business is it of yours or i don't want to talk about it. she just -- she kept her emotions in check. she was much more reserved than he was. for a variety of reasons naturally a thing because of her fatherless suicide and all of the responsibility that she had. she was much more guarded. although, you know, you catcher in the unguarded moments when she reports she got up at 5:00 in the morning so she could see her neighbors leave on vacation so she could see them in their underwear. i wouldn't dismiss seeing mrs. smith and her knickers $400. >> host: what was the funniest letter that you read? >> guest: there are little bits and all of them. there isn't one after the other. >> host: and she has a sense of humor. >> guest: it is an almost every letter he is also investigating waste and fraud in the military. the robbery of the united states railroad off investigating thes

the leedy right here, then we will go to the back. >> my name is reagan, in the second year student strategicnse. i'm a big fan of the book. i agree with all of your???? prescriptions. they are very well laid out, but in order to accomplish them, you know coming and reduce spending÷ the gigantic dod budget seems to be a good place to start, and? unfortunately in this time we d ot? of security threats abroad a and also have a great stake in securing our national interest abroad. so if you could recommend one or two areas of reform for the national security strategy and i will buy the book after which, thanks. [laughter] >> thank you. it's a good question.bbbb as it happens, i wrote a book,bb published a book about that verb last year called thebb superpower and i am glad to say this book agrees.bbb [laughter]bbbbbbbb to summarize the indolent pointb êqzzr>r>r>r>z>> there are things we can and should and probably will cut and first and foremost all the post cold war interventions and which we have engaged beginning in somalia and bosnia and currently in iraq and afghani

would like you to bring back to this committee and i would like a copy of it as well was the chair leedy the regulations that you are seeing a duplication that aren't necessary that are no longer needed so that we are saving money for institutions. i want to document how much money we are saving for institutions by erasing unnecessary regulation, and you have come out with "know before you owe" which has received a mountain of applause for taking the complicated documents that no one reads. the fine print is so small no one can hardly even see it and making it understandable so that the consumers can understand the risk, so they can understand the cost so they can make choices appropriate for them. madame chair, i would request additional minutes to respond what i feel was an unfair attack on cfpb. and i think it's important for the public knowledge and important for this hearing so i would request an additional two minutes to respond. >> since no one -- >> take another two. >> absolutely. this is an important hearing. it's important to our economy and our consumers, and i would like to

sherry, all these doctors have researched and have looked into this and they are probably with the leedy was referring to and if henry waxman could see that mercury in the air causes brain damage of course in the vaccine mercury is also causing field some and the increase in the shot's going from 25 by the time they are to no wonder our kids are autistic. >> guest: so, again, let's try to answer some of these. first of all, madam wheatfields and i have personally read all of the evidence of the legal, shall i say the legal issue in the united kingdom. weak field data were entirely false both his clinical data and his lover tridata or false. it could not be replicated, so the of media that he was vindicated is absolutely untrue. i don't know where you got that idea. the other people you mentioned there are of course vaccine physicians who don't agree with what i am saying i don't doubt that but when you say they have evidence, that's nonsense. the have no evidence, they have no credible evidence publishable an acceptable journals that can be replicated by other scientists the opinions, an

of footballers staying at the house hotel to read the were the subject of a complete body of john leedy that she had been sexually assaulted and raped. i acted for the footballers concern. unfortunately for one of my clients he was also staying in the hotel and was probably of more interest and had a higher profile than the others and was the vilified footballer i mentioned a few moments ago and there was i think we're focused by the newspapers to identify him as being the likely potential accused a few light coming and to bring his team into the public domain by inference suggestions by the placing of stories and pictures in close proximity to the articles as they were published and this was a very high profile event that was front-page news for several weeks there didn't seem to be much interest in identifying with or not he was -- it was appropriate for him to be brought out in this fashion and we let it be known that he was not actually present at any yvette about which should be of any concern to him or interest to them that they went ahead and inferred his involvement and we subse

. >> the leedy just behind. >> yes, thank you. jennifer matthews. i was wondering in the npt review conference last year the iranians rea agreed reluctantly to the final document which included a holding of a conference to prepare for middle east nuclear weapon-free or wmd-free zone is a part of the preparation is going on in vienna yesterday and today. the meeting about a nuclear-free zones and iran decided not to participate. so i'm wondering if any of you could shed light on that and what it might mean for the 2012 conference on the subject. if you can't i will ask this afternoon's panel, the next panel. >> we will take this one on the left. >> my question is we've heard some very interesting comments about how challenging it is to affect policy in iran. but could you give us some ideas where are the opportunities that influence of the society that is not monolithic? what are the opportunities for the u.s. and others to actually make some impact? >> great. we will put it to the panel. take part or all of those. >> i think i will talk to her word

back and get a chance to talk with you all with my nine years of experience of the ig office michael leedy joined me, john was the head of investigations while i was the inspector general and he holds a important position at this time. it's rare the inspector general gets a chance to come back and speak in this type of activity but i'm delighted to do so. i must -- i would be remiss if i didn't recognize the former colleagues and served nine years and the great job they did in these investigations. my mission as independent in converse the purpose of bringing a positive change in the integrity, efficiency and effectiveness of programs. that was my mandate and i took them very seriously. during my time as john indicated the number of investigations we did 60 audits in the home programs. by the way, when we're doing this, you might recall we had an enormous amount of mandated congressional oversight involving the reed ifill bet wally after 9/11 disaster which had oversight of fha and the ginnie mae, the effect of gulf states, katrina and rita and quite frankly you can imagine the amount of a