whether legal or recreational. use there are 11 states plus the district of columbia where it is legal to buy and consume recreational marijuana and medical marijuana as well. and there are 22 states, plus bc that have approved medical marijuana. totaling 33 states and all that have some form of legal marijuana. senators gardener and merkley have introduced bipartisan legislation that tries to ease some of the difficulties resulting from marijuana is illegal fellow states and state laws. i spoken many times with senator gardner on this bill and appreciate the work that each senator has done on this legislation and look forward to hearing from you soon. our second panel of witnesses will highlight challenges to the institutions face in banking different parts of the marijuana industry. how marijuana related businesses operate. and the complications they have that they have faced in accessing financial services. and finally how the safe banking act will work. we will also hear concerns about advocates pushing to lega

which is legalizing marijuana. you point out the reason that they might kick down on these overdoses is something that they have not talked about there is a synthetic marijuana. although is not marijuana at all. but it seems drugs known as k2 or spice you can buy legally over-the-counter, they mimic the effect of marijuana in the brain but much more powerful and much more dangerous. >> k2 and spicer basically called synthetic marijuana but really it's not the same at all. they react on some of the same receptors but they said the receptors into overdrive so if you get stoned you might get the munchies and might be kind of relaxed, watch a movie but with k2 and spice your hear starts te fast and people overdose and die. the reason these drugs became popular not just because people like them, it's because of drug test like the kind that employers give to employees and parents give to children, marijuana shows up on these drug tests were as k2 and spice do not show up so that's why it became popular. >> you said part

those of the people at the central of the legal order -- center of the legal order. the lands solidify the relationship of the people to government. it is through those western lands, that participation and process that the people are connected to government. land is crucial here. the contradictions and limits with this conception of independence, this new legal order, independent in his vision always needs help. there is no independent person in the early 19th century or late 18th century. independence, the way they are talking about it, does not mean alone. we think about independence as i by myself -- i am by myself, independent. you can't do that in this. in this -- in this period. you need people around you. when you talk about independence in this period, they are also assuming the dependence. the household head is the independent person that directs the labor of all the dependence in the household. dependence include -- dependents include his children, wife, and enslaved people. this requires a labor force. why it's are seen as part of the labor force. they ar

why are the women paying legal fees? the women aren't paying legal fees. really? yeah.s confidential. but in terms of going into the detail of it, i think... i mean, i have to be mindful of the confidential nature of the agreement. it's a secret formula. confidentialformula. it's a confidential formula. yeah, ok. and there are good business reasons and legal reasons for that. unite told us their lawyers had been... as to how the settlements were calculated, it was, they said... this is more than half a billion pounds of public money, remember, and yet they won't tell me where it's gone, how it's been spent, how it's been worked out, because the formula, they keep saying, is confidential. we also asked glasgow city council for the settlement breakdown. it too said the details were confidential. a newjob evaluation scheme is planned, with a pledge to equalise the pay of men and women by 2021. until then, glasgow city council, now run by the snp, will have to continue paying millions in compensation. these are some of the words women have used to describe this. scandalous,

and thus the office of special counsel had no legal authority to take any legal actions. actingay 17, 2017, united states attorney general rod rosenstein appointed robert mueller, former fbi director but at the time a lawyer in private practice to be a special counsel. during the two years of operation, it in panel to a grand jury, issued thousands of subpoenas, indicted at least 33 people and three companies, secured seven guilty pleas and obtained convictions on eight counts in a criminal trial. all of those actions had formal, legal consequences and some of those consequences continue to this day even after the office closed up shop on march i second, 2019. it is therefore in more than academic interest, though also of academic interest, that all of those legally consequential actions were unlawful. robert wheeler's office of special counsel had no legal authority to act. to be sure, this was not by any means the first special counsel unlawfully appointed in the last two decades but hopefully will be the last if the argument that my longtime collaborator steve calabres

counsel. >> they absolutely have legal counsel and secretary com ppomp had a legal counsel and he was on the ukraine phone call and now he says he was on the call. he's in hot water. >> i don't know that he was denying it. he just gave a sort of strange answer to martha raddatz where he pivoted and talked about something else. i hadn't heard him deny that he was on that phone call. >> well, that's fair. he wasn't forthcoming. he was asked a clear question. he wasn't forthcoming. now he is saying that he was on the phone call. he hasn't given the american people an explanation about why he hasn't taken any action after that phone call, why he didn't try to alert congress and say something was wrong. we have to get back to the basic facts which is that the president tried to get dirt from a political opponent from a foreign country on a rival and that's the abuse that we're looking into, but everyone is going to have counsel. the concern is that they don't get skiquelched from the state department to be testifying clearly. to be clear, no one on your committee contacted a state departme

that is that the legal courtroom is outside your control.ross—examined by the best qcs in the land, the best lawyers, you outside your comfort zone, and disclosure may well go into parts of your life you don't want to go. so if you had been pa rt don't want to go. so if you had been part of the team advising them, what would you have told them, in terms of how to handle this?” would you have told them, in terms of how to handle this? i think you have to look at these cases holistically. 0n the one hand, you hurt as an individual. i have seen that with many of the clients i have represented in phone hacking cases. you feel that intrusion. you feel that somebody around you must have betrayed you. so there is all sorts of mixed feelings which are going on. and of course that heady mixture is even worse for prince harry, even what happened to his mother. but of course you have also got to think about the long—term, and the long—term here is that the royal family, and particularly harry and meghan, need a positive outcome on their lives. they nee

it wasn't a particularly legal or even legal ish argument. but that is being put forward as the official position of the white house. and that crazy letter from the white house has now been used and cited by other government agencies in their efforts to try to block witnesses from those agencies from testifying when they've been called to testify before the impeachment committees. for example, the department of defense referred to this crazy white house counsel letter this week when they warned the defense secretary laura cooper she shouldn't show up to testify to the impeachment proceedings this week. telling their own officials they shouldn't show up and testify. the white house says the impeachment isn't real. it's a little bit nuts. i should say, federal agencies have not had great luck in trying to. have not had great luck in trying to. already seen eight witnesses that we know of show up to give depositions or transcribe testimony including a bunch of current administration officials who went and gave that testimony despite the stern le

it's legal. it exists. she says, "contrary to the doj's position, an impeachment trial is, in fact, a judicial proceeding under rule 6e." the reference to rule 6e there means that one of the major consequences of this ruling is that all of the stuff that is redacted from the mueller report as grand jury material, that is all going to be given to the impeachment proceedings now. that is all going to be given to congress. the actual redacted words from the report, what's behind the black boxes, and also the underlying transcripts of grand jury testimony and exhibits that underlie those redacted portions. you might remember from watergate, the way the watergate investigation evolved, right, was that there were special prosecutors for watergate, and then ultimately, the judiciary committee in the house drew up articles of impeachment on the basis of what those special prosecutors found. well, how did that work? how did the evidence get from one place to the other? well, in watergate, the justice department famo

implications or legal review? >> so, on that question, we propose to do in future is to remove the ambiguity by striking it and referencing the statutory basis for that cause. so there's direct reference to that reference. >> that statutory reference does not supersede the constitution, so it seems to me the investigation revealed ya'll just completely ignored the serious legal and ethical questions here and your response to the recommendations was not to follow the recommendations, but strike the president and vice president and say that just applies to congress. thank you and my time is up. miss miller will be recognized. >> thank you, chairwoman titus, and thank you ranking woman meadows. i spent most of my time on the oversight committee in hearings designed by my colleagues across the aisle with only one goal, to impugn and impeach our president. and now, instead of being productive in this committee, we are subjected to another display of political theater. and listen to what the left thinks about what the p

kennedy: should weed be legal. >> yeah. kennedy: what else? >> should be legal? what a question.: i know. you can fill it in. >> expansion to your house without a permit. kennedy: absolutely, do do work without begging local government. >> i guess. kennedy: people send marijuana through mail. >> no, no. kennedy: should marijuana be legal. >> um. it -- some sort of medical aspect. kennedy: should weed be legal? marijuana? >> in -- >> yes absolutely. kennedy: what else, mushrooms. >> no, i don't like mushrooms, i hate mushrooms. >> what is wrong -- >> prostitution. >> why not. >> yes. kennedy: prostitution? >> live your truth, ladies, where ever you are. live your truth. kennedy: should weed be legal. >> dow want some. kennedy: can you hear me now. should weed be legal. >> i don't know. >> i think he knows. i think he knows. >> what if people just use a little bit. >> i, i, i am a vice person. >> what does that mean, you like vices? >> no, i do and don't, if i get stuck for example i used to smoke cigarettes. kennedy: you quit? >> no, i deferred it. deferred it fo 20 years. kennedy

just legalizing marijuana will help mexico with its drunk on tell and drug go ahead you have. i mean there are there is some basic economics in this and now argument which which my 2 colleagues will already know marijuana has long stopped being the cash cow that it was the cartels 20 years ago you know as we've seen state level legalization happen in the united states a black market continues to exist and mexico used to be the biggest supplier of illegal marijuana to americans but as you can now buy your illegal weed of all strengths and sizes and flavors in the u.s. the demand for matt meagher up for mexico has gone down i took a brief look at the customs and border patrol see just before we came online in 2013 i was teasing or going to 1000000 pounds of marijuana at the u.s. borders per year and that's dropped to a quarter of a 1000000 this year so you know as you mention these are wholly drug trafficking organizations and increasingly we're also seeing a drop in the in the demand for heroin paste and there's been a sperry very important switch to synthetics both in terms of

to tackle many issues and the legal team were fired up.ut the iraq war on trial. that is what you wanted to do. guess. and we wanted to demand the attorney general ‘s legal advice. elizabeth grant has said herself that if she had to go to court on oath and swear on oath that there was a difference of opinion she would do so because viewers may remember she resigned before the invasion of iraq. she was a senior legal officer in the government and she resigned over her grave concerns. principally because the attorney general ‘s advised if it from hers when he went to the us and came back with a different opinion. let me ask you, when you now look at the whole film today, do you, in any way, feel you should have done things friendly? are you absolutely convinced 16 years later that you got it right? —— have done things differently. all i got it right? —— have done things differently. alli might got it right? —— have done things differently. all i might have done differently. all i might have done differently which is what the journalist hope

ifelt i could offer legal representation. language that might have been more effective than you could? well, i‘ll say this. she did have an afghan lawyer, and this was frankly routine, that the afghan lawyers would often if there was a rape victim, try to broker a deal with the rape victim and marry the perpetrator. and so that‘s what her attorney was trying to focus on. whereas i was trying to focus on the law. the fact that she should not have been charged, or, and frankly convicted of adultery by force. and so i argued the semantics of the case and i argued the law. the afghan law. and that‘s what i do there. i don‘t come in from this morality perch and judge, i use the law with my clients. that‘s interesting. you have to have an extremely detailed knowledge of afghan law, you would have had to have dug deep into it yourself? absolutely. that is part of myjob. that‘s the job of a litigator, to represent their clients and argue the law as it relates best in the interests of your client. you‘ve said in the book and you say r

ifelt i could offer legal representation. language that might have been more effective than you could? well, i‘ll say this. she did have an afghan lawyer, and this was frankly routine, that the afghan lawyers would often if there was a rape victim, try to broker a deal with the rape victim and marry the perpetrator. and so that‘s what her attorney was trying to focus on. whereas i was trying to focus on the law. the fact that she should not have been charged, or, and frankly convicted of adultery by force. and so i argued the semantics of the case and i argued the law. the afghan law. and that‘s what i do there. i don‘t come in from this morality perch and judge, i use the law with my clients. that‘s interesting. you have to have an extremely detailed knowledge of afghan law, you would have had to have dug deep into it yourself? absolutely. that is part of myjob. that‘s the job of a litigator, to represent their clients and argue the law as it relates best in the interests of your client. you‘ve said in the book and you say r

a president under pressure — democrats issue a legal demand to the presidents‘ chief of staff for documentsating to an impeachment inquiry. thousands join unplanned protests in hong kong and defy a government ban on face masks. prince harry launches legal action against the owners of two british newspapers over alleged phone hacking. and... the revolutionary technology that's allowed a paralysed man to move again. hello and welcome to bbc news. the white house has been ordered to hand over documents relating to the impeachment investigation of president trump. a statement from the heads of the democratic—led inquiry committee said they sent a letter to acting white house chief of staff demanding evidence related to allegations that mr trump pressured ukraine for political favors. they accused him of defiance, obstruction and cover—up. our washington corrrespondent, chris buckler has more about the demand for documents. we have a development from the democrats themselves. so these are the chairmen of three congressional committees, and they have all written together, demanding that the white

it was legal for men to own women. it wasn't until the 1970s a woman could apply for a credit without a man's signature. it was legal to drown hundreds of dogs in a river in new york when they were overpopulated. in some countries, it's legal to kill a woman who was seen in public with a man she isn't married to. so i repeat, legality has never been synonymous and i ask you to forget about what is legal and considered normal and consider if what is happening to animals is moral and whether what my friends have done is moral or immoral. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker. >> hi, thank you all for being here. my heart is beating so fast and so grateful for you listening. i've never done anything like this before but i want to say we're at critical time in history, where our governing bodies, choices and voices will determine the future of not only our species but all species. , as science now agrees. commercial animal operations is part of this climate emergency and it's due to the nature in which we treat animals and

so essentially unique things, legalizes marijuana.ut it, actually sanders will sign an executive order getting the government to declassify marijuana as a controlled substance legalizing it at the federal level and do it within 100 days. the second thing it does, it tries to take steps to essentially repent or take back some of the stuff that damage has been done by the war or drugs. expunges records and states pushed to do this and invests money into communities hit hardest by the war on drugs using some of that marijuana tax revenue to that end. >> and the latest from a gallup poll shows from this week 66% of americans support legalization. as you know, a lot of candidates have been ruling out their plans to legalize marijuana. i should say. is this becoming a new litmus test? >> it could be, but i commend the senator for taking a very bold and aggressive position on this big issue called criminal justice. one thing you can say about bernie sanders, he is the phil jackson of politics. no matter what people are saying he's going to s

hi i'm femi oke a and you're in the street and i'm really going to today can legal marijuana put an end to mexico's drug cartels join our conversation you can tweet us at 8 a street only if your comments and i live you to chat and you may well be in the story. mexico is set to fully legalize marijuana that some proponents of kind of this believe will help rampant gang violence but critics say drug cartels would start trafficking of the drugs or move on to known drug related crimes like human smuggling and fuel sext regardless mexico supreme court has ruled the prohibition of marijuana violated the constitution and ordered lawmakers to come up with and let you slip the framework and the deadline to do so is this week so joining us from mexico to discuss this and can current one i asked her as landau is a lawyer and secretary general for mexico united against crime in mexico city deborah up another low she's a journalist and founder of mexico reporter also in mexico city you know i'm grillo he's a journalist and author of a lark oh inside mexico's criminal insurgency welcome everyone to t

and this john spakovsky, senior legal fellow for the edwin meese center for legal and judicial date at the heritage foundation. and you very much for being here. we're looking forward to your testimony. without objection our witnesses statements will be included in the record and is with the previous panels since your written testimony is included, we would ask you to please limit your comments to five minutes. we will now proceed with the witnesses, start with mister proctor. >> writing member meadows and members of the subcommittee, my name is michael foster, legislative attorney in the american law division area you for inviting me to testify today on behalf of crs to provide background information on the monuments clause of the u.s. constitution and recent litigation in certain those provisions in brief other what i'll refer to as foreign and causes of the constitution, any person holding any office of profit or trust under the united states is prohibited from accepting of any present emoluments office or title of any kind whatsoever from a foreign government unless congress consen

and one would assume, i suppose, these legal actions. and one would assume, isuppose, that these legal actions. and one would assume, i suppose, that buckingham palace are supporting him because this is very unusual for the royal family to take the sort of line. this is very unusual for the royal family to take the sort of linem is unusual but i'm not sure we will go as faras is unusual but i'm not sure we will go as far as to say that the whole infrastructure supporting it. we know that when he gave a statement in 2016, another furious statement, he made one about some of the comments that had been made about his then girlfriend, megan marco, the duchess of sussex. there were voices within the palace that urged caution and said that he shouldn't make such an outspoken attack, but he insisted that it should be made. and i am not entirely sure that eve ryo ne and i am not entirely sure that everyone at the palace was on board about what happened on wednesday either with that furious statement he made that accompanied the legal action agai

uscis deals with legal immigration. the other two immigration components are i.c.e., which does removals, and cbp does all the trades and customs and also border protection. this last fiscal year we naturalized more citizens than the entire last decade. and the year before that, under this president, we naturalized over three quarters of a million. this year it's 800-some odd thousand. last year was three-quarters of a million which was higher than the previous five years before that. there's been no slowdown in the -- on the legal immigration side, per se. the president has made no secret of the fact that he believes the american immigration system, first and foremost, is set up to work for america. that means economically and for the people here and to do that, we put out invitations and offerings to people from around the world. along the lines that congress puts in the law. and the agencies make adjustments to those within the boundaries of the law as we go along. one example in the employment space is the h1b regul

mexico is set to fully legalize marijuana that some proponents of cannabis believe will help rampant violence but critics say drug cartels would start trafficking of the drugs or move on to know in drug related crimes like human smuggling and fuel sext we godless mexico supreme court has ruled the prohibition of marijuana violated the constitution and ordered lawmakers to come up with and let you slip the framework and the deadline to do so is this week so joining us from mexico to discuss this and can current one i asked her as landau is a lawyer and secretary general for mexico united against crime in mexico city deborah but now low she is a journalist and founder of mexico reporter also in mexico city you know i'm grillo he's a journalist and author of a lark oh inside mexico's criminal insurgency welcome everyone to this stream now we've got so much feedback on this because emotions are high people have opinions about this but i want to start our conversation with someone who is involved in this intimately this is ali holmes romans razzo he's a professor in mexico and he also adv

>> my legal stuff that went through and tore up. you know, i mean, so i don't know what has been taken and what's not been taken. >> okay. we have no interest in taking any of your legal stuff. you do understand that, right? >> it is taking me out of my -- >> out of your element. >> yes. >> you're here early. your number came up. exactly. exactly. >> i need -- i had deadlines. i need my legal stuff. >> right now it's very clear you are frustrated and angry, right? >> yeah. >> get me an opportunity to get with the booking sergeant and get you your legal stuff. we'll be done with it, okay? >> master deputy steven gray is one of the jail's internal investigators. he knows singletary from his prior stays at the jail. >> what i got here is the paperwork that was confiscated from inmate singletary. and i suspect it's the reason why he's upset. what we got is income tax forms here, you know, we have 1040 ez forms and 4852s that he has filled out all different individuals. they've got all their social security numbers on here. on his little

the same legal potential as others in that state. there's about -- there's a little over a million removal orders already in place for people in the country. those are the ones that i.c.e. operations, you know, go to remove. it isn't that they are starting a case, they are finishing one when you see those operations typically. and i.c.e. has their prioritization which still top of the priority list are criminal aliens and, you know, people not in that circumstance are basically in with the rest of the pool of approaching 20 million people. >> all right. molly o'toole from the los angeles times. >> how do you answer the concerns from some of your asylum officers, the union representatives -- [inaudible] -- many of us have spoken to these sort of rank and file officers, they are concerned that many of these policies being handed down by the trump administration, particularly targeting asylum, whether it's remaining in mexico -- [inaudible] -- whatever we are calling these things these days how do you answer their concerns that these po

let's take it to better legal minds.ve are the questions and concerns, if any in cuomo's court next. i work hard and i want my money to work hard too. so i use my freedom unlimited card. even when i'm spending, i'm earning 1.5% cash back on everything i buy. earning on my favorite soup... with freedom unlimited, you're always earning. got it. ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ this melting pot of impacted species. everywhere is going to get touched by climate change. is just like our originalhn sandwiches...only littler...so we bought a little ad...on lil jon. little johns, yeah! $3, what?! >>> now let's being very clear. mr. giuliani's explanation to this point is that his push for investigations in ukraine is all about defending mr. trump, our president. but as federal pr

they deal with legal immigration. the other two legal immigrations are ice and cvp, which does trade customs and border protection. this last fiscal year we naturalized more citizens in the entire last decade. that, under this president, we naturalized over three quarters of a melian. this year it's 800 and some odd thousand. last year was about three quarters of a million. which was higher than the five years before that. slowdown onen no the legal immigration side per se. the president has made no secret of the fact that he believes the american immigration system, first and foremost, is set up to work for america. that means economically and for the people here. to do that we put out invitations and offerings from around the world. along the lines that congress puts in the wall. the agencies make adjustments to those within the boundaries of the law. space ise employment the regulation change that took affect before i came into the administration. oft has upped the percentage master degree candidates. not candidate

our top stories: donald trump under pressure — democrats issue a legal demand to the president's chieff staff mick mulvaney for documents relating to an impeachment inquiry. thousands join unplanned protests in hong kong and defy a government ban on face masks. the duke of sussex is to take two british newspapers to court over the alleged illegal interception of voicemail messages. and the revolutionary technology that's allowed a paralysed man to move again. hello, and welcome to bbc news. we start with some breaking news, and that is that the white house has been ordered to hand over documents relating to the impeachment investigation of president trump. a statement from the heads of the democrats led enquiry committee said they sent a letter to acting white house chief of staff mick mulvaney demanding evidence relating to allegations that trump pressured ukraine for political favours, and they accused him of defiance, obstruction and cover—up. we can speak to the bbc‘s chris buckler in washington. this is moving quite quickly. we spokejust washington. this is moving quite quickly. w

the outline is clear, but the legal details need more work.asking — will leaders have a brexit deal to sign off on during the two—day summit? details emerge of a threatening letter president trump sent to his turkish counterpart, as the us house of representatives votes overwhelmingly to condemn his decision to pull american forces from northern syria. after a third night of protests, the pro—independence leader

is that even possible legally t. is not the parent anymore. but a sister. career also married the entire situation as it is under the ugandan system where. do you. abuse the processes. information to give. all grounds now because we are hungry it's close to what i know you're saying. we have to all legal guardians living in a 0 misrepresented. periods all the channel was. who will know who the woman a. good years you know was granted was this is why when you look at there was the mother is with us today mr smiley because i know you've been following this case for a long time i just wanted now can you get your child back. if there hasn't been some detail work that's gone over why there's been some forward involved can this mother become the mother again or were the adoptive parents who are legally the guardians will they at some point be out to get their child from your dad that their child where legal guardians group you are an adoption order it didn't become grounds for telling you all for learning through vocation that their ground when i'm not really goi

the legal n.p.r. we'll continue our facebook has released audio fired by the verge shows the company's c.e.o. is preparing for a political battle over regulating take tech and potentially breaking up the 2nd biggest name international regulatory attorney edwards is on hand to give us a legal view on what could be in store for the tech giant we're about to bring you a world of business news in just 27 minutes let's go. a resignation at the top of the global banking elite in the wake of a spying scandal leads our global report today as the chief operating officer at credit suisse steps down after admitting he ordered surveillance of a former employee the c.e.o. appear all of a release news of his intentions on tuesday the executive was forced to move on after he admitted that he ordered surveillance of chris was his former head of wealth management. mr blaize use of the company's invest a go was inspired by his suspicions that mr khan was poaching credit suisse talent and clients on behalf of his new bo

interesting that he has his mothers legal team behind him.e surprised that some accommodation is not reached before it gets that far. i am sure at the moment, the sign owners will say and will be dying to make denying it and fighting as hard as they can but the idea that the duke and duchess of sussex can end up in the witness stand will be quite astonishing. as a powerful legal firm you stand will be quite astonishing. as a powerful legalfirm you got behind him... the beauty of this as she is american so she is willing and able and will get on the stand and givee damn and harry will follow her because if she gets up there and testifies that breaks a bunch of amendments. the press feels hold it, this is our tradition and this is what we do and we print everything we are the tabloid pratt democrats and americans don't understand it because we do not have it. so she would not understand how it works but she does not want to understand how it works and he is with her and thatis how it works and he is with her and that is basically it. do you thi

let's take it to better legal minds. these two believe are the questions and concerns, if any in cuomo's court next. e ful. full of flavor. color. full of... woo! full of good. so you can be too. try our new warm grain bowls today. order now on ubereats. sleep this amazing? that's a zzzquil pure zzzs sleep. our liquid has a unique botanical blend, while an optimal melatonin level means no next-day grogginess. zzzquil pure zzzs. naturally superior sleep. is just like our originalhn sandwiches...only littler...so we bought a little ad...on lil jon. little johns, yeah! $3, what?! unitedhealthcare medicare advantage plans come with a lot to take advantage of. like free vitamins, pain relievers, sunscreen and more. i like the gummies. $0 copays on common prescriptions plus $150 in wellness products. go ahead, take advantage. (vo) the big dogs. the old dogs. the deaf, blind, the different. subaru presents the underdogs. these shelter dogs still love unconditionally. they're just hoping to find their human, who does too. to hel

the code requires that you seek legalization, but if the legalization is denied, then, the unit is to be removed. >> commissioner honda: okay. i'm not an architect or a planner, but looking at the pictures, and a picture is worth a thousand words. i lived at 101 suramonte, and that is way nicer. >> i would ask the appellant why they didn't present this to the zoning administrator? why they didn't present this at the time of the hearing? maybe it was still under construction. i don't know if these photos were available at the time. i spoke with the zoning administrator today, and i didn't ask him if the unit was there -- >> commissioner honda: i talked to him today, too, but he didn't make any mention of that. i don't think any information was made available to the zoning administrator about those qualities of the unit. >> commissioner honda: so looking at the unit, i see lots of light and air in my thoughts. so why would it -- and i'm not trying to be argumentative. why would it not qualify at that point? >> we are looking at the dimensional requirement. that photo is probably taken a

is there some legal loophole that they know that we are not aware of?rustrate the act and that is read as seemingly a commitment to go to brussels and seek an extension if there is no deal by the 19th of 0ctober there is no deal by the 19th of october but we are also hearing that the prime minister thinks he can interpret this quite narrowly and at the same time as he is offering the mac asking for an extension, he is guns blazing want ready to leap on the 31st of october. so we do not know what he is going to get around a failing nail dominic nail down the session. hong kong‘s public transport system has been suspended for the first time tonight to try to quell the increasingly violent pro democracy demonstrations that are taking place. thousands are on the streets again tonight. people are also being banned from wearing face masks in public. masked protestors have been warned they could be jailed for up to a year. rupert wingfield hayes is in hong kong. hong kong‘s chief executive made her hold cabinet stand with her and face the cameras together, vis

but, joey, there's not a legal case here, but because that's your expertise, if there were a legal caseooke, describes a nonconsensual, violent sex act and matt lauer describes not one, but multiple consensual sex acts, how complicated would that be in a courtroom? >> it's complicated but ultimately going back to the reporting, a reporter can only be as reliable and credible as the person who conveys that information. so let's start there. what happens is that you don't only take a he say/she say. you look at what. it's called evidence. if there's an interested relationship between the two, what happens? usually there's an exchange. it starts with text messaging. what are the nature of those text messaging? an apologies? i'm sorry i violated you in any way. i can't wait to see you. any emails. notion that, most of us have friends and we speak to our friends, not perhaps intimately about every aspect but something called recent outcry. i can't believe what this guy did to me. i can't believe how coercive -- >> this would be very complicated because based upon what they're both saying, th

president under pressure, democrats issue a legal demand to the white house for documents relating to an impeachment inquiry. hundreds of protesters join unoffical rallies in hong kong, defying a government ban on face masks. the white house has been ordered to hand over documents relating to the impeachment investigation of president trump. a statement from the heads of the democratic—led inquiry committee said they sent a letter to the acting white house chief of staff, mick mulvaney, demanding evidence related to allegations that mr trump pressured ukraine for political favours. they accused the president of defiance, obstruction, and cover—up. i asked our washington correspondent, chris buckler, what more we know about the subpoena. there had been a request for information, that has now become a demand. and it is intended to put extra pressure on president trump and the white house. and alongside this subpoena demanding all of these documents has come a letter from the chairmen of three congressional committees. leading democrats who, as you mentioned there, say that up to this po

the headlines at four: democrats leading the impeachment inquiry into president trump, issue a legal order, demanding that the white house hand over more documents. much of hong kong is shut down, as demonstrators defy a new ban on wearing face masks. the government indicates it could clarify its new brexit offer after the eu called for ‘fundamental changes‘. a british—australian woman and her boyfriend are released after more than three months in an iranianjail. prince harry begins legal action against the owners of the sun and the mirror — over alleged phone hacking. england reach the quarter finals of the rugby world cup with a game to spare, after a 39—10 victory over argentina in tokyo. a warning that mixing cocaine and alcohol together creates a "deadly combination" which can increase violent and impulsive behaviour — more in ‘victoria derbyshire: week in review.‘ donald trump‘s political opponents have intensified efforts to impeach the president. three congressional committees have demanded legal documents relating to a telephone call by mr trump — in which he asked ukraine p

and they will bring us an expert legal analysis to have a crushing legal blow. a federal judge in new york ruled on the president's attempts to block a subpoena for his tax returns from the manhattan district attorney. he found the trump legal argument to be repugnant to the nation's governmental structure and constitutional values. i have never read a judge's opinion more contemptuous of a league argument presented to the court. we'll see if he has ever read the argument as crushing as this one is. we begin tonight with the second whistle-blower who is represented by the same team of lawyers representing the second whistle-blower. the other has what one of those lawyers describes as firsthand knowledge that supported the first whistle-blower. they suggest firsthand knowledge that might bolster the impeachment case that the accusations are based on second-hand information. the house of the intelligence committee adam schiff thanks him for his patriotism. we hope others will follow their courageous example. today the house foreign affairs committee, the house ove

it's not a -- a legal document. it's a theory of the case, which is, this is illegitimate, this is politically driven -- >> this is talking points. >> right. >> this is stuff, are you a defender of donald trump, read this, grab your favorite part and tweet it. >> but there are many people around the president who feel that a version of that worked to their advantage during mueller, and they're running a portion of the same playbook. obviously the predicate of it is very different, because they're in the middle of an impeachment inquiry. the next part isn't that different. you delay, you call the -- call into question the legitimacy of the investigation, you go after individual people involved in the investigation and try to take them down. >> so, we have a new poll out. we got the political strategists now on this side. i swear we didn't actually organize it that way. the white house team, the political team here. guys, put up full screen two. and this is the breakdown and how we asked, impeach and remove, 24%, cong

legally i thinkthere's a big difference . and we have sued the obama administration in the summer of 2014 says we are suing ministration now i think it's important for us not to buy into those frames. >> last one. >> so you know, there's two things i want to say. one, billy and i think it's belief system and being your values. >> .. >> again some people do not vo vote. there are consequences to that. so you need for the people to stand up for immigrants to have power. and you need that to happen. if those other people you care about. the other thing i would say challenges is a little bit and what is typical if you're on the hill, that we don't think of ourselves as god and we don't know to do, we have to go to the outside and go to the immigrant communities in the ngos to understand what good trade is for good policy, we need the support of the communities. and if they're all over the place or in a no trade mentality, we want to be pure, then it makes it very difficult for us to cut a deal of some kind. i'm just saying that b