for people to work legally. just keep spending more and more money on the same thing. i hope some of the facts presented in the paper help us continue on a path where we can think about no longer having a policy where we just keep spending more money on the same policy. thank you. [applause] >> i am dennis frank sharry with american voice. stuart has done a capable and admirable job laying out the facts on this the date. he is one of the top thinkers and researchers and policymakers, complex area for many years and i have to say it is nice to be working with the cato institute. it is nice to see dan griswald who works on trade and immigration studies and has done some brilliant writing and research on this. back in the day comprehensive immigration reform with a bipartisan effort. there was a time in 2006 when the so called mccain kennedy bill got 23 republican senators to vote for it. just to give you a slight contrast in december of last year when a small measure called the dream act was presented only three r

>>chhajer: the indian legal system and us legal system, y read. they are very similar, the lawsare very similar and the structure is very similar >>reporter: meanwhile, indian law firms are watching the booming outsourcing industry from a distance. since lpos take up only foreign cases of foreign clients and practise no law in india, indian lawfirms don't see them as competition. but they do object to foreign law firms setting up shop here, as indian laers have a tough time getting work permits in the west. >>bhasin: we are getting a lot of work you see from the multinational companies directly, without the intervention of any foreign law firms. so who needs? it is essentially because of the negative growth particularly in uk, that they want you see, to capture india - the legal profession - and china. these are the green pastures for them, you see. >>wheeler: it's not for me to say whether they should do it or not. i think that they'll suffer in the end. they're not going to get nearly the sort of experience, the global experience, the global dea

ina legal a a grim myself -- i am a legal immigrant myself. to the moral concept of the violation of american law. not being able to pay in-state tuition is punishment, essentially. the children's problem is they have to speak to their parents. it is a punishment for them and their parents, morally. most of the time they're parents are part of a cash economy that don't pay taxes. you also said that in-state tuition covers tuition and does not cover more than the cost of educating the student. yet every year, in state colleges come to the legislature and ask for more money because otherwise they will have to raise tuition essentially, you are asking for more money for taxpayers prepare accept the punishment. the u.s. people to pay $10,000 fine to become an american citizen or green card holder, there'll be hundreds of millions of people who would want to do that. obviously, we cannot do that. the punishment has to be real. not necessarily monetary but if you are here illegally, those people never become american citizens. they say they came her

he is a truly brilliant legal mind. i have every confidence in his intellectual fireporks his integrity and his even-keeled demeanor and believe it will make him a fine judge. let me tell you a little bit about his background. he was born in august starks georgia. he is the son of taiwanese immigrants who were recruited to america for provide medical services in rural areas. he attended public schools in clewiston, florida, in sacramento, california. he first struggled to learn english and master vocabulary but ultimately he graduated covaledictorian from rio americano high school in sacramento. he was admitted to stanford university, my alma mart. he graduated phi beta cap pavment he received numerous awards for his contributions to the university and he was elected copresident of the student body. prit pretty good. he received a rhodes scholarship. he grads waited with a master's degree from oxford university. he attended yale law school, once again he was at the top of his class. he was editor of the "yale law journa

their details straight when it comes to this attack on top of that many are also questioning the legality of in-laws stats so we'll look into that issue with reasons jacob sullum them to death of all as leaders also raising questions about the u.s. relationship with pakistan as pakistan complicit are they incompetent and at the end of the day do we have no other option except for to be allies then julian a son speaks out and this time he's talking about facebook so could the popular site really be the most valuable tool intelligence agencies can use and more importantly what facebook ever agree to share user information with the government then the department of justice seems to have done a complete one eighty when it comes to mint medicinal marijuana reports are saying that the government sent letters to state employees who run state legal medical marijuana facilities threatening them with prosecution so we'll find out what this change means for the future of the industry and grab a cocktail because we're celebrating happy hour artie's lauren lyster and lucy confidential join me to hash

how are we going to meet all those legal obligations? >> because of the recovery act of investments, will -- we will be meeting our legal obligations in the next couple of years after that there is a concern, i will be honest with you, but there is also -- the president put in a large increase in the energy budget in part because of the nuclear security issues but also in large part because we think the investment in the research and development activities will position the united states for future prosperity. we don't have legal obligations there but we have to make these calls. you could say how we cannot meet our label -- legal obligations but we will increase funding elsewhere. >> because of the recovery act -- >> we are talking about f. white well then be on. >> i think we will be meeting our obligations. it depends on what the budget will be. the legalalso ssay obligations of our ways legacy -- our ways to legacy is the third largest government liability -- our waste legacy is though third largest government liabilities. this could

i've written several books about the litigiousness of our legal system and in more cases than not that can be traced back to the academic origins. if you have a beef with the tort system you should take it up with the professor of berkeley. if you think that our system of sexual harassment law is less than ideal, your problem is with professor mckennon. so it is with class-action law employment law and many others, and this can be traced a big and small. he told the it story in my book about the work place all of the then all of idea for those of you that are not out on looksism is the body is by which employers are constantly hiring great looking people and taking them more and promoting them further. in preference to the rest of us who are more homely. [laughter] yes it is on a fair but not until around the harvard law review ran if interminable i shouldn't say that and 80 or 90 pages didn't note on the need for all to come about homely. not until around them had been thought that it was much of an issue for the law. but, they're in i believe the year 1999 there appeared to be an ext

it's enforcement and legal channels so that we create a legal system. we end the black market in myimmigration that serves only the smugglers and the bad-actor employees and the folks who break the law and bring it under a regulatory regime to make sure that there's a line people to come in with the same legal rights as other workers. that decent employers are not being undercut by unscrupulous subcontractors. and we add to the tax base. a legal system that grows the economy that's fairer and creates greater growth. so when people say, oh, you guys are open borders and don't want control, wait a minute, you think the other guys who think we're going to drive 11 million hard-working people who have been here, most of them for longer than a decade live -- you think that's realistic? you think that's going to end illegal immigration or is it just going to drive people further underground? you hear about the arizona law, very controversial. the proponents say a lot of people left arizona. do you know where they went? utah. they went to new england. they've

they are not legal. their kids are getting, and they are, food stamps, handouts, medicaid, you name it. that is part of the equation, but what do you think -- i think that the law of regulation, whatever you want to call it needs to be shortened so that if bill gates says i can't find people to work for me, he gets them here with a green card, but the lower level folks come here, and we send them back to the border, but they are hard working. what would you do to make, like you mentioned utah or other states or get such a divided congress to jump on board and start thinking outside the box to make some of this happen. >> well, i think the things we didn't get into before, and we've seen the numbers increase dramatically from maybe around 4 million more than a decade ago to over 10-11 million, and even though we saw somewhat of a drop in the recent recession, i think that those numbers, i think recent numbers showed they stabilized, and really what's happened is when we've increased the border patrol, it

the units or legalize it -- excuse me. revert back to commercial or legalize the residential use. whatever they chose to do is up to them but they just needed to take some action. commissioner romero: so the extra time and the reduced cost on the fine was to get in there and tear out the existing kitchens and bathrooms and bring it back to original use which was commercial use? >> if that's what they chose to do they could do but the main thing was to get moving and put -- file an application. if that's what it lead to. commissioner walker: so this was instigated with a police department responding to a complaint? >> i believe that's true, yes. commissioner walker: this is one of those that i will probably ask the landlord. i'm trying to figure out how long this has been going on that people have been living there. i need to know that. president lee: hechanova and then romero. commissioner hechanova: of the pictures that are shown it also looks like to be an upper bunk with a ladder going up to it. and is that condition es

on the olc memo -- >> the office of legal helpful -- the office of legal counsel. >> legal memo that at least agree in war. the united states government recognized that the, quote, and continued existence of the united nations as an effective international organization is of paramount united states interest. thaw and people recognize that. congress is not in this. i remember years ago i was on a panel and someone in the executive branch said my remarks to not reflect those of the united states. what kind of mind is that where on other days you are speaking for the united states? that is what you do on the executive side. i think john would agree what the memo does is a typical one realist and use congressional research report the good will 150 -- none of those have anything to do with libya. how any of them have anything to do with the security council resolution. here's an example. olc quote robert jackson legal former attorney general and justice of the supreme court bigger still saying the president's authority has long been recognized as extending to the dispatch of law enforceme

i would not say that in many instances, legalizing -- "legal" is a strong term. in our business and sales business, we try to avoid that term. it has many implications. to say something illegal is -- to say something is legal or illegal has a lot of implications. we cannot really say. we can say it does permit it or not permit it. what is or is not authorized is a different statement. we have to be mindful. one thing i wanted to say about jeremy pose a question was, there are quite a few very good people in san francisco to go to if you want to legalize something that had been done without a permit in the past, or you want to get a permit for every model that was done or a bathroom that was added downstairs without a permit, and you feel like your uncle maybe was -- may have done it properly. oftentimes, it is no big deal. it is a good thing to do. there are many companies that specialize in doing just that. you can do that. it depends on your goal. if your goal is to sell the property or to avoid neighbor complete -- there could be two different goals with two d

of legal history, education law and the supreme court's equal protection jurisprudence.her scholarship has appeared in some of the foremost law journals within the legal academy. in february of this year, oxford university press published professor brown-nagin's first book, "courage to dissent" atlanta and the long history of the civil rights movement. is socio- legal history about lawyers, courts and community-based activism during the civil rights era. this highly anticipated work has already garnered widespread complaint. most notably from members of our community. the book features some of the lawyers who were integral players in the legal odyssey that ultimately led to the desegregation of the university of georgia and this will be the subject of her talk today. if you have questions at the end of her talk, please use the microphones down at the front to ask the questions. and at this time, please join me in welcoming professor tomiko brown-nagin. [applause] >> good afternoon. thank you so much for that kind introduction, and to all of you for coming out. it is an h

is also it is legal you know whether that's right but. on the other hand i should say that approximately nineteen ninety percent of all the appeals are. finally become in miscible in the courts so there then lots becoming a process of all this appeals but at the same time that doesn't mean that we do not see the problem and i would try to answer your question to begin our conversation today that the moving of the standards all of your place and close look closer to the standards of the european human rights court is so important that one of the ideas that is becoming true and reality already is an opportunity of the russian people to get the compensation for non efficient jittery in this country right now . the reform of our penitentiary system which you are pushing forward there is being criticized by some experts by many journalists they say that the liberalization of the panel per would would create favorable conditions for further rise in the number of crimes so what do you personally expect from this reform of the pension system a fi

that is the legal definition of debt under the state constitution. supervisor farrell: it is because of the legal structure? >> that characterization. if we undertook an agreement today to pay in a subsequent fiscal year a third-party $1, that would violate the debt limit. it is an accounting treatment compared to the legal treatment, if you well. supervisor farrell: legally, not debt, but for all intents and purposes -- fair enough. absolutely a debt.

like it if you want to pharmaceutical lies it takes the fun out of it drive up the costs we have a legal framework to do that but it's not going to reduce public enthusiasm for reforming marijuana laws that process is always going to continue for supports always going to be there and you can you can manipulate state governments you can threaten to arrest state officials people no you're not really going to do that people know that as long as we continue to move forward this industry started in one thousand nine hundred sixty it was valued in a recent report at one point seven billion dollars every dollar of that was technically illegal under federal law and yet it continues to grow so i think the important thing is for first state officials and for the public to recognize that these threats are erroneous they're aimed at intimidating us they're aimed at preventing our further progress and you know we have a lot more progress to make and we're going to continue to succeed every year there are new medical marijuana states there are new reforms taking effect and the polls show more support

. >> ahora otra controversia, ¿fue legal el asesinato de bin laden?errorista. el procurador general dijo hoy que el ex-presidente bush tendrÍa que tener parte del crÉdito. luego le pregunta es si desde su punto de vista fue legal matar a osama bin laden. >> me preguntaba si pienso que fue legal matarlo, pues una vez mÁs no estaba allÍ, no tengo todos los hechos pero en cuanto a lo que me han dicho y lo que se ha reportado me parece que fue legal matarlo. osama bin laden era un enemigo del estado, era un objetivo militar y por lo tanto fue legÍtimo matarlo durante nuestro conflicto con al qaeda. si alguien se pregunta que quizÁs tratÓ de rendirse, entonces desde luego el derecho internacional prohibirÍa matar a alguien que se va a rendir. el hecho que pudo haber estado armado o no, de hecho si se resistiÓ a la paz dura hoy hizo cualquier movimiento peligroso recuerden pretendemos a los efectivos militares en una situaciÓn tribasa, tiren que tomar decisiones en fracciones de segundos. segÚn entiendo yo no hay dudas que fue legal. >> hay reportes que la

i am joshua izzard soul and legal guardian. my american-born and race daughter of an only child who has taken almost eight bits ago to russia. whose voice i haven't heard for many long months now. i have been living for nearly eight months with a hole in my life while some like mr. tom sylvester in cincinnati ohio whose testimony read during the preparation of my own and his daughter and others like them have lived with that whole for many years. our great country must stop the constant bleating of its most important resource, its children. in the interest of others more tangible or natural resources. as a nation we need to construct legal mechanisms to facilitate resolution of existing parental kidnappings and put in place effective preventive mechanisms to assure that our citizens are not subjected to this daily unbearable sorrow that comes in the wake of international parental kidnapping. .. afternoon light filtering through the dead silence of our living room gently touched the circle as my daughter's favorite toys left exa

justice department advised the white house of the torture of al qaeda terrorist suspects might be legal if asked ross was called to testify before congress about those than us but he refused requests to make the memos public and wouldn't discuss any possible involvement by the president to a rather lively exchange between ashcroft and the late senator ted kennedy. cheney where ninety thousand two signed by john you know you august two thousand and two justice department. amendment. memo and the march two thousand for the working group those are three memoranda where you provide those to the committee. no i will not like faces. i know what they say on the basis of a long standing established reasons for providing opinions provided the executive branch. ashcroft also proposed the domestic security enhancements act of two thousand and three was often called the patriot act two because it expanded the powers of the government to fight crime and terrorism with little or no judicial oversight now luckily the measure was never introduced in congress outcry by civil liberties groups what's the

that allows and as a matter of fact mandates that if you do make money is from selling marijuana legal or otherwise you are obligated to pay taxes on it and as i said so far nobody has voluntarily paid a dime additionally when you legal ice cubes excuse me let's meet you yes sir let's be clear the states of oregon colorado new mexico have taken already tens of millions of dollars in taxes from legally sold marijuana products currently they have already done to them have already violated federal law they have what got three hundred or so he that are against the expenses that also generates additionally by legalizing it again as i was saying you will open up the door to the free market the prices were lower goodies if you are going to tax the wait a minute if you are going to tax that now an individual who is selling it again on the black markets is going to be able to sell it less than the so-called lead sure oh look he's a look at your minute and we're going to spend more with the states more you are residing in the do reside in the prime example right now in new york you have an illeg

that's a legal debate. but it will put pressure on the decision to stop if the legal line is here to stop down here. and there is this space between the legal line and the pursuedential line that is really quite broad and i think clearly encompasses some or many of the techniques that the c.i.a. is using whatever one thinks about them as a policy matter. and i think there will come a time when we will have to face that question again of whether we do or don't want to live in that space. >> john, you wanted to? >> yeah. a couple of semi-minor corrections, factual corrections having been on the scene at the time. but i think as you know the president's executive order of january 23, 2009, basically made the army field manual, the standards applicable a f across the government so it applies to all federal agencies. >> but absent further guidance. >> i'm getting to that. again, i'm at a disadvantage here because i was actually there at the time. so let me give you the best i can give you about what we were thin

you're inside chinese legal jurisdiction. the cops can show up at your facility until you to shut it down if you're not complying. you can say, this particular group on the chinese version of facebook needs to be shut down. these users need to be taken off line. this particular blog that needs to be taken down or deactivated can be. i did a test on this recently. a chinese gentleman got the nobel peace prize. a couple of different things happened with that, right? overseas websites that talked about him in the news and him getting the nobel peace prize for of course blocked. you could not access them. >> you could not go to the new york times. >> the new york times in english they are not worried about. they're really worried about the chinese staff. bbc chinese and so on. on the chinese platforms -- let's say i was on the chinese social networking service. took an article about him, pasted it in, pushed and i got an error message saying i could not publish the material because it contains sensitive words. certain content you

they were legal. if we legalize heroin tomorrow, we will use it. i don't want to use heroin, so i need these laws. >> i never thought heroin would get applause in south carolina. >> the last time there was a wide open race on the republican side was four years ago. four years ago this week, ten candidates, john mccain, mitt romney, ron paul, mike huckabee and a lot of others all turned out for the first debate. four years later, it is ron paul again, also herman cain and johnson, that's it. he may have stolen the show to legalize heroin, he was not, it should be noted, the biggest hit of the night. take a look at who won the focus group afterwards.

the legal argument you are making to argue this legal agreement is invalid is the same one you should be making to all other projects, based on the city attorney's opinion. it was the exact same costa- hawkins question. not only is it comparable to trinity. it is comparable to any other project anywhere in san francisco that includes bmr units. you were sent to an -- you are saying to any tenant in those units that it is legally questionable. i hope you continue forward with any other project that includes one bmr unit or thousands. it is the same law. to supervisor avalos, i assume you know the value of the rent control subsidies already offered is $160 million. i am betting you do not know the value of the amendment you are offering care. i do not think any of us know. but it is not going to be $160 million. it is going to be significantly more. i think we also know the developers are not going to say yes. it is a nonstarter. it destroys the entire project. let us not put on a sure way that this is an amendment that is coy to help move the -- not -- let us not put on a sure raid --

probably just say -- we talked about that -- legalize drugs.ay i have my point of view and there is no sense that mexico do that alone, and even with that, i think that is not a solution, but i am open to debate. so i want to talk with them and to find out solutions. >> charlie: that's possible. you're the president of the country. >> that is possible. >> charlie: if you say that here, and you have said that before, and it would seem to me it could happen tomorrow. it could happen next week. >> yes. yes. it did. >> charlie: and you consider it significant. >> actually, i made already that. i'm the first president ever in mexico who responds to questions coming from the people -- the leaders. i open public debate with leaders of civil society about security. i have heard not only governors or legislators or judges but also mothers who lost their child, leaders, academic -- actually, i want to do so because for one president is very difficult to listen to people. all the time, you are listening to voice of your advisors. i want to listen to voice

so add legal immigrants into medicare costs and that figure roughly triples. in addition, those costs will rise geometrically if people in this country illegally are granted legal status as the obama administration and pro-immigration groups propose. >> well i believe that in immigration reform we must be tough, practical and fair. we must be tough in terms in of enforcement and make sure that employers are compliant with the law and that we have enforcement at the borders. yet at the same time we have to be practical. there are 12 million undocumented immigrants and they are not going to go away, they are not going to be deported, they are here. they are in fact a large part of our economy and so the best thing is to bring them out of the shadows so they can be even more productive. and in order to bring them out of the shadows i think we should establish a system so that they can have a path to legalization but they should be able to earn it. >> one immigration research group estimates that if or when people in this country illegally are granted legal status

top level legal work as a judge being extremely respected well paid with a great. interest of the side to do work it's a deal it works everywhere i think we also. realize thank you very much for the thank you thank you very much for having your. nation. couldn't take three. three. three. three stooges. free. download free blogs just plug in video for your media projects and free media oh god harjeet on tom. good morning news today violence is once again flared up the face these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada. challenge corporation the day. soon which brightened. a bad song from constant pressure on some. nice fine stunts on t.v. don't come. on r.t. russia says the unity between hamas and fatah is key to hammering out a future palestinian state the recently reconciled party has managed to further the bridge the differences sort of makes it clear that mosque. protesters in georgia claim the revolution has started threatening to oust president saakashvili shortly the opposition accuses the leader of every day terror against people

. >> muammar qaddafi is now facing legal pressure. over the course of a few weeks, the chief prosecutor at the international criminal court has gathered enough evidence against the libyan leader to submit a request for an arrest warrant. >> the evidence shows that muammar qaddafi personally ordered attacks on unarmed libyan civilians. his forces attacking civilians at home and in the public space. >> the charges include ordering systematic rape and the use of cluster bombs and snipers against the civilian population. prosecutors have also issued warrants for qaddafi's son and the intelligence chief on charges against humanity. >> we want to strengthen the rule of law. you can't say whether an arrest warrant will mean a leader like this will actually end up in court. >> the i.c.c. prosecutor says that if the court issues the arrest warrant against qaddafi, seen here in file footage, it would be up to libyans to implement it, not the international community. the unrest in syria is continuing. journalists aren't allowed in the country bu

i also struggle with some of the legal arguments. that would result in monetary sanctions. the legal cases show for that to be found, the permit holder would have had to misrepresent the use of the property and permit

states in the district of columbia that have either by initiative or by legislation made marijuana legal state of colorado and others tax and control the drug despite the federal probation so. the way that dispensaries if they're if it's an illegal business then they can take tax deductions for granted they click that is the argument that was made in a case four years ago that's called champ and that the i.r.s. ruled against a dispensary for four hundred eighty thousand they litigated it brought it down to four thousand dollars and they got their legitimate expenses if that case prevails then these twenty three hundred dispensaries around the united states will continue to keep growing interesting very interesting david what's so scary about marijuana why are you opposed to this one when these medical purposes have been defined by reasonably good or not reasonably good science have been published by the american academy of science. well i've just approach this from a tax perspective the real concern here is that. legalisation of marijuana will cost the taxpayer an awful lot more than the

education, legal vegetation and public policy in the law journal. let me set the stage for just a moment. roswell was a very influential new deal official sometimes described as the modern -- father of modern propaganda of political slant. at the time he wrote this the law itself had just changed in a tektronix 9.0 richter scale wave because the supreme court had given him -- had decided after all the u.s. constitution did not prevent the government from running the economy. it would agree to strike down those regulatory programs. so we were clearly launched on a school of thought were the government would be doing more than it ever did and yet here we have law schools still teach in the same old curriculum. this was the beginning of the article's argument. in particular the law schools were still teaching mostly about the so-called private lot contracts and property and various other topics that were indeed typically thought of as necessary training for mainstream private lawyers who were going to go out and began arranging business deals that reso

should that be a legal case?thing wrong and you got found out -- >> that's what one is alleging. the misuse of a computer. this case is now going to court. our legal guys -- >> help me understand this. the one who was doing wrong in the marriage is now upset with the one who found out? >> you got it. >> is that right? wow. fascinating. >> now it's a legal case. they're going to talk about it. you and your wife at home will be watching that. >> we'll skip this one. >> you won't have a problem with that area. but it's intriguing to know that you could be breaking the law potentially if you get a little too nosey. >> what time is that one? >> noon, about 12:20. you have to watch the whole hour. they're back at about 12:40. >> okay. >> so twice. at least six cases we're going to delve into. >>> your mom probably gave you great financial advice over the years, didn't she? >> i can't remember any advice she gave me. >> karen lee, our financial expert, will be along to tell us about all the great financial advice that y

that is the legal definition of debt under the state constitution. supervisor farrell: it is because of the legal structure? >> that characterization. if we undertook an agreement today to pay in a subsequent fiscal year a third-party $1, that would violate the debt limit. it is an accounting treatment compared to the legal treatment, if you well. supervisor farrell: legally, not debt, but for all intents and purposes -- fair enough. absolutely a debt. >> the other thing -- an additional protection is that we again employed outside law firms to basically died as through the debt issuance process, and they render important debt bonds due authorized -- duly authorized and enforceable against the city. and so, i think there is a large history where investors find comfort in this because they do not know what our processes are , that it would be a valid debt. the other thing the council would do is render an opinion of the tax status of an obligation. one of the questions we asked is whether we issue bonds for operating an ex benz's -- expenses. those bo

that is a legal debate. but it will put pressure on the decision to stop if the legal line is here, to stop down here, and there is the space between the legal line and the prudential line that is quite broad and encompasses some or many of the techniques that the cia was using, whatever one thinks about them as a policy matter. and i think that there will come a time when we will have to face that question again of whether we do or do not want to live in that space. >> john wanted to -- >> some factual corrections having been on the scene that time. orderesident's executive of 2009 basically made the army field manual the standard applicable across the government. so it applies to all federal agencies. i'm at a disadvantage here because i was actually there. the me tell you about what we were thinking at that point. yes, there was subject to further guidance -- it was formally suggested was that we come up with a series of interrogation techniques that might be beyond the army field manual in the space you

there was a 1999 permits that authorizeda legal general advertising on his property. but was never finalized, but under a policy resolution provided to foster some time ago, it does not make a difference. the permit is equally valid as though it were finalized. by the end of 2003, that 1999 sinai 19 and not removed, and no general advertising 19 -- the 1999 sign had been removed. after the sun was installed, foster came to the city it -- the sign was installed, foster came to the city with the renewal permit, and in all honesty, we made mistake. we did approve that permit over the counter. as soon as we found that out, we remedied a mistake. had a permit been reviewed appropriately, it never would have been issued in the first place, because the sign was abandoned. between 2003 of this year, the three-year abandonment period had long since run, and the sign had reached the end of its life. at no time were they requiring identifying placards be placed on the sign or submitted to the city. photographs demonstrate no general advertising plans after 2003, and this is cons

how far would you go in legalizing drugs, sir? >> first of all, i would hope that people, we it comes to the drug issue looking at me would look at what i did as governor. which was everything was a cost-benefit analysis. using that as a criteria, half of what we spend on law enforcement, the courts and the prisons, is drug-related. to what end? we are arresting 1.8 million people a year in this country. we have 2.3 million people behind bars in this country. the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. i would ask people to look at this issue. see if they don't come to the same conclusion that i did. 90% of the drug problem is prohibition-related, not use-related. not to discount the problems with use and abuse. that ought to be the focus. i advocate legalizing marijuana. control it, regulate it, tax it. it will never be legal for kids to smoke or buy pot. it will never be legal to smoke pot or do harm to others. when it comes to all otheró4rt drugs i advocate harm reduction strategies which is looking at the drug

top level legal work as a judge been extremely respected well paid with a great. interest on the side to do work it's an idea that works everywhere i think we also can realize it thank you very much for this interview i can't imagine having your. touches that so much in addition to each musician the person on the mark with the arab awakening is often referred to as revolutions in the arab middle east there can be no doubt something in court is a fight to see each other not. the mission of free accreditation free transfer judges just free. range hands free is free. to charge free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects and free media and on the hard t.v. dot com. for. more than a month. in one of the most extreme environments on the planet this is and charge adults and people have to be aware that they are far away from civilization sean thomas discovers flood makes sense articles so special and instructive for many wildlife in antarctica is a boat and fragile. expedition to the bottom of the earth a marksman. the russian foreign minister is