i would tell them to make sure that the legal education is a quality legal education. it is the first of to have a monopoly, so you can control the lawyers, and make sure they are acting in an ethical way. i think there was a third part of the question, what would i tell them not to do. by the way, before i get to that, in vietnam, i recently met with the president of their bar association, similar to the american bar. in most countries, they have a government bar association that is part of the government, in effect. then they just have an non-club federated are. the person was a 70-year-old viet cong that was the chair. one of the most interesting conversations i ever had. someone who did not told anyanger, -- not hold any anger, but wanted information and help from america. the american bar association has one of the best legal libraries in the world. coaching and has said -- has built a law school that has no books. we're working with those countries to provide them with legal materials because they have been asking. they also ask for lawyers to help them with thei

i don't have all of the details around each of those -- not legal settlements, sorry, legal fees around there. and i just -- and i was surprised. i was very surprised to find out -- >> who authorized them. >> -- that that had occurred. >> who authorized them? >> they were done, as i understand it, in accordance with legal counsel and the strong advice -- >> i didn't say who advised it, who signed off? who at news international agreed to -- who signed the checks? who agreed to pay -- make those payments? >> i do not know who signed off those -- >> you know -- you talked about the managing editor. would the managing editor have made that decision? >> it would have been the management of the legal cases, i would think, but i think we have to -- you know, i'm happy to go back and look at that. but it ca-- >> it would certainly not come before having to do with the managing editors. >> would it have been above the managing editor or below? >> it would be above. >> above. >> this would have been on legal advice, payments made about how to handle litigations, and again, i don't have direct kno

>> the chief legal officer. signing checks, it could be an assistant c.f.o., but on the instructions of the chief legal officer. >> whose decision was a to get rid of the -- tom crone? >> the chief executive, mrs. brooks. >> senior level personnel decisions would have been made by her. >> allegations were made in "the guardian" and he left soon after. how did he leave the company? >> that i don't know. at the time, that would have been a "news of the world" matter. >> why did les hinton resign? >> he resigned, sadly, last friday following rebekah brooks' resignation saying he was in charge of the company during that period. he said he felt he must step down. >> were either les hinton or rebekah brooks asked to leave? >> they asked. >> why did you not accept rebekah brooks' resignation the first time? >> i believed her. >> she insisted. she was suffering extreme anguish. >> can you tell us how much of these characters have been paid off? how much they have been given in a financial settlement following their depa

it's not even all the way legal. i mean, it's legal in our county. >> montgomery: johnson used to bust local pot growers; now, he's working with them. >> 'morning. >> good morning. >> montgomery: matt cohen is one of the new breed of growers in the county. >> how's everything going? >> busy, busy, busy. >> montgomery: for years, he says he's tried to run his medical marijuana operation like a legitimate business. so, when the county announced a new program to license pot growers, he was one of the first to sign up. >> right here, you can see it says "mendocino county sheriff" on it. it's upside down, though. >> montgomery: these zip ties mark the plant as legal. cohen paid $50 for each of the ties, $1,500 to join the program, and $500 for every inspection. in return, cohen gets to grow a lot more plants than otherwise allowed-- up to 99 of them, which can generate several hundred thousand dollars a year in income for his farm co-op. and he gets to do all this without any fears of getting busted by the sheriff. >> and

in many americans' eyes, his survey of these legal travesties offers more than a simple history. it presents a very compelling case for reform in american jurisprudence. taken together you might think that the themes of these two books are too tragic for consideration. but in the course of the conqueror and muscogee daughter offer vivid testimony to counter the cultural stereotype of native people as vanishing americans or someone at the end of the trail. please, help me welcome susan supernaw and walter echo-hawk. [applause] let's begin with a question for susan. susan, this is, your book is much more than just an account of how you came to be miss oklahoma and compete in the miss america contest. it's really about growing up with cultural confusion sometimes and a lot of stress, navigating the world between your native culture and the larger american culture. if you would, tell us a little bit about those themes. >> all right. thank you. i, um, in growing up i started out in a very rural area north of hominy, oklahoma, and be we lived there -- and we lived there. and there is,

>> certainly the top legal officer. >> they were not the top legal officers. >> who was the top legal officer? >> chapman at the news international and mr. crone with of the head of legal affairs of the news papers. >> by the findings of your son, mr. murdoch? >> i expect it was my son. i was in daily contact with him. >> okay. when were you informed of the payment made to tayler and max clifford? >> no. >> you were not involved? at no point you knew that they were made payments? okay. from the chiefs executive of news corporation a payment of half a million -- i want you to tell me whether you inform your father that you had payments to the goldman taylor as a result of him being a victim of the crime. estimates of the settlement with mr. taylor, and i'm happy to address the matter of mr. taylor in some detail of you would like, my father became aware after the settlement was made in 2009i believe after the confidential settlement had become public as the newspaper report on the subtle and afterwards, but please understand the settlement an out-of-court settlement of that nature and

>> no, they were not the top legal officers. >> who were the top legal officers? >> mr.was the top legal and mr. krone was the head of legal affairs at news group newspapers. >> were you informed about the findings by your son, mr. murdoch, or by rebekah brooks? >> i forget, but i expect it was my son. i was in daily contact with them both. >> okay. when were you informed about the payments made to gordon taylor and max clifford? >> no. >> you were not informed? >> no. >> at no point you knew that taylor and clifford were made payments? >> no. >> okay. >> you never informed the chief executives of news corp that you authorized payment of half a million dollars. >> can i answer the questions now, mr. watt stone? >> i'd like you to tell me whether you informed your father that you authorized payments to gordon taylor as a result of him being a victim of a crime? >> the settlement with mr. taylor -- i'm happy to address the matter of mr. taylor in some detail, if you would like -- >> first just let -- >> my father became aware after the settlement was made in 2009, i believ

you asked the question are we paying all of his legal fees. >> have you been paying legal fees during the course of the civil actions? >> i don't know the details of the civil actions but i do know that certain legal fees were paid for mr. mulkhair by the company and i was as surprised and shocked to learn that as you are. >> can you understand that people might ask why a company might wish to pay the legal fees of a convicted felon who's been involved -- intimately involved in the destruction of your reputation if it were not to buy his cooperation of silence? >> i can understand that and that's exactly why i asked the question. that's exactly what -- when the allegations came out, i said are we really doing this? is this what the company is doing? on legal advice, you know, and again i don't want to be legalistic and i'm not a lawyer, but these are serious litigations. it's important from all of the evidence from all of the defendants to get to court at the right time. and the strong advice was that from time to time it's important and customary even to pay co-defendants' legal fees

>> certainly the top legal officer. >> they were not the top legal officers. >> who was the top legal officer? >> chapman at the news international and mr. crone with of the head of legal affairs of the news papers. >> by the findings of your son, mr. murdoch? >> i expect it was my son. i was in daily contact with him. >> okay. when were you informed of the payment made to tayler and max clifford? >> no. >> you were not involved? at no point you knew that they were made payments? okay. from the chiefs executive of news corporation a payment of half a million -- i want you to tell me whether you inform your father that you had payments to the goldman taylor as a result of him being a victim of the crime. estimates of the settlement with mr. taylor, and i'm happy to address the matter of mr. taylor in some detail of you would like, my father became aware after the settlement was made in 2009i believe after the confidential settlement had become public as the newspaper report on the subtle and afterwards, but please understand the settlement an out-of-court settlement of that nature and

justice and legal justice system yesterday casey anthony the mother of that little two year old girl caylee who guide three years ago was found not guilty by a jury of her peers closing the book on a three year long saga that's gripped america here's some of the reactions of people around the country to the verdict. i'm shocked and i'm absolutely shocked. personally i think the whole family is guilty if. i think she got away with it at least. manslaughter yes murder i can't be sure that's a pretty harsh crime it's crazy and i paid them when a does being a mother you know inhabit it and never went down there i don't think any mother around here really wants you know they're going to be in a different state of mind if you lose your theater something's missing if anything even if you say your make believe babysitter something to come i mean you're searching for that person twenty four seventh's it's really sad to disclosures that backwards at that at that age do you know the lady is guilty as the day is. the visceral outrage across america this trial is telling and it begs the question

this is eric montero from the legal division. he is in a similar boat that i am in that i provided him with the spread sheet and the department's initial response, he did review, and i believe he has been in charge for about a month. who worked on these because there are a couple of recommendations. i have questions about why we came to that conclusion, what you wanted to move forward with that in a different way and why we thought it was not the best path to follow to fall on that recommendation. supervisor chiu: from my perspective, it is just surprising that you cannot figure at in your department who was working on this before. >> it is just a short time line. i focused on the documentation to be prepared to answer questions about the recommendations today, which was the more significant issue that i was looking at, and whether the failure in the process, who the individual was that prepared the reports, a secondary issue. i was more concerned about being able to answer line item questions, they burn out who worked on this in

in 2008, gay marriage was legal in california. couples rushed to tie the knot before the ruling was over termed. prop 8 is now tied up in court with appeals. people we've talked to say the wait will be worth it when and if same-sex marriage is made legal here. their hearts are full with the news coming out of new york. >> i think it is a great step in the right direction and i'm sure hoping that the good news will reach our coast some time very soon. >> i'm happy for new york. and getting ready for california is so obvious, it is time for it to happen. >> i don't think california is as open as some of the other states. but i think it is due. so, i'm hoping within the next year that it will be something that you know, is acceptable. >> many people say it is frustrating being in limbo for the courts to hammer out the legal issues. they continue to wait hoping to see same-sex marriage legal in california and in all 50 states. it is likely maryland and rhode island will be the next battleground. but for today people say they are focus

mulcaire's legal fees. >> have you been playing glenn mulcaire's legal fees during civil actions. >> i don't know the civil actions. i do know certain civil fees were paid for mr. mulcaire by the company and i was as surprised and shocked to learn that as you are. >> can you understand that people might ask why a company might wish to pay the legal fees of a convicted felon who has been involved intimately involved in the destruction of your reputation, to buy the corporation's violence? >> i can't understand that. that's exactly why i asked the question. that's exactly what -- when the allegations came out, i said are we doing this? is this what the company is doing? and on legal advice, you know, and again, i don't want to be legalistic, and i'm not a lawyer, but these are serious litigations, it's important for all of the evidence from all of the defendants to get to court at the right time. and the strong advice was that from time to time it's important and customary, even, to pay codefendants legal fees and i have to rest on counselor's advice on some of these serious litigation

are we paying all of his legal fees? >> have you been paying legal fees during the course of the civil actions? >> i don't know the details of the civil actions, but i do know that certain legal fees were paid for him by the company, and i was as surprised and shocked to learn that as you are. >> can you understand that people might ask why a company might wish to pay the legal fees of a convicted felon who has been involved intimately in the destruction of your reputation, if it was not to buy your corporation's silence? >> no, it's not. i can understand that, and that's exactly why i asked the question. it's exactly when the allegations came out, are we doing this? is this what the company is doing? on legal advice, you know, and again i don't want to be legalistic, and i'm not a lawyer. these are serious glaglitigatio. it's important to get to court at the right time and the strong advice was from time to time it's important and customary and even pay legal fees. >>. >> i don't know the precise status of that now. i k

the planning code since this was issued has changed in order to legalize this unit. >> understood. the policy has also changed. >> thank you. before you sit down, can you speak to the fact? >> i cannot speak to that with any level of expertise at oall. >> is there any public comment on this item? you have three minutes for rebuttal. >> i'd just want to mention the fines have been paid. >> can you tell me about the process you and your wife underwent? >> kofi unisys -- both units were occupied when we purchased it, so the only way we thought we could move in was to do this. to protect the tenants, they have one year to vacate, and one of the tenants of vacated early, so we moved in to the upstairs unit. the downstairs unit decided not to vacate after one year, and we reached a settlement agreement, and they have been living there for an expanded nine months rent-free, but they leave tomorrow according to the settlement. >> did you have to do file certain documents and with -- i do not know which agency. >> it goes to the red board, and it basically says this property will no longer

there were some legal issues and legal wrangling.after that in 2008, the california supreme court made it legal and affirmed that same-sex marriage was allowed in san francisco. however that same year, voters changed that with proposition 8. which now changes california state constitution to allow recognized marriage between a man and a woman. since then, there's been a lot of legal haggling over the legality of proposition 8. some people say, even though gay marriage no longer exists in california, they're still happy about what happened in new york. >> i think it's one more drop in the bucket. yeah. it's like one more country in the world that is giving people equality. >> it means a lot to california, because it's something that we can lead, something we can talk about, and we can say, we want this. because it's something that is in new york and it's a breakthrough. >> reporter: meanwhile, supporters of same-sex marriage say they're now trying to gather enough signatures to put another proposition on the ballot next year, that cou

system, you know, and that's reasonable because our nation has intentionally designed a legal center to achieve justice, you know, that's listed in our canons of judicial ethics, you know, justice in our society and we have rules of evidence and civil procedure and criminal procedure, rules of evidence. all designed to achieve a fair trial. are very, very gripping, tell very gripping stories, you know, about epic encounters between two cultures, you know. contending for different ways of life across our great continent here, you know, and, they give us lessons in justice and injustice and i think the role of the courts i think in the winning of the west but there are teachings, you know, by peering into the dark side of the law and looking at some of these forces of colonialism and conquest and discovery up close, you know. i think we can see those parts of the law that need to be discarded and strengthened and more just society i against and a stride towards a more just society. these present i think large questions, you know, not only for our nation because the whole idea of conque

the city has the right to suspend any legal proceedings. there are additional rights to tenants affected by construction impact. there are improved moving benefits for tenants. additional appeal rights at the san francisco board. in addition to the attendant benefits. there is also the additional tenant protections against passthroughs associated with project cost. you heard these when the d.a. came before you. the primary recommendation of the grand jury report is that the city about legislation that would mandate application of the city's rent ordinance to replace an units built on property within five years following in the demolition of rent-control units on the property. similar to legislation that the grand jury found in l.a. city attorney has confirmed at that language existed before the issuance of the grandeur report and references the san francisco ordinance was already included, although not included in the earlier draft that the grantor reviewed. the grand jury also questioned the general waiver of the cost of the act. without a

>> ca is not a legal organization. we do not have any legal representation from the organization. we what have access to understanding what the voting rights law is and ensuring the rights of san francisco -- that would be my personal perspective as well as my ability to serve on the committee to understand how we are implementing within the law. supervisor farrell: to follow up on that, does the organization take positions on redistricting or advocate for certain policies within that? >> we have, yes. in 2002, we were involved in local redistricting. we currently have not taken any position in redistricting on the statewide level. much of our focus last year was insuring there was a thorough and massive grass-roots effort in the count. supervisor farrell: you say the organization took positions. what positions might they have been? >> they were looking at ensuring that the various communities were represented in a way to protect certain interests of various populations throughout the city. supervisor farrell: as an example? >> looking at various lines being proposed within the so

our legal guys are here to talk about that next. tt>> new york's same-sex marriage law goes into effect tomorrow. and thousands

is not out of war in pakistan and so i don't take it as fact that it is legal for the u.s. to be operating within pakistan i actually think that the u.s. it is operating extra legally by carrying out these drone strikes in pakistan in yemen in somalia and in terms of it being disproportionate you know we have numbers coming out of pakistan that indicate that you know for every one suspected militants being killed one hundred forty innocent civilians are dying as a result of these strikes and so if those numbers are correct you know we have people on the ground who are who are gathering information who are doing the investigation and trying to collect the information so that we can bring a more transparent more honest picture to the public about what's happening in pakistan. the u.s. clearly the drone strikes to last despite what you're saying there bring success with a minimal amount of collateral damage but you're talking about all they still an effective tool to strike a target for more conventional weapons. you know i don't think so and i think that if the u.s. is going

they were not the top legal officers. >> who were the top legal officers? >> mr. john chapman was the top legal officer and mr. crowe was the head of legal affairs. >> were you informed of that by your son or rebekah brooks? >> i forget. but by expect it was my son. i was in daily contact with them both. >> when were you informed about the payments made to gordon taylor and mike clifford? >> no. >> you never informed the chief executives of the payment i want you to tell me whether you informed your father you authorized payments to gordon taylor as a result of him being a victim of a crime. >> the settlement with mr. taylor i'm happy to address the matter plaintiff taylor in some detail if you would like. my father became aware after the settlement was made in 2009, i believe, after the confidential settlement had become public as a newspaper reported on ought out-of-court settlement afterwards. the settlement in a civil claim that nature is something that normally in a company our size the responsible executives in the territory of the country would be authorize

or not legal you don't be you don't have to be the chairman of very constitutional court to find outit is completely legal because it's obstructing treaty it's also against the listen on treaty it's against everything we have a nor be allowed clause in europe everybody is great and furthermore it is interesting how the outcome of this court will be and already the chairman of the constitutional court has said that he is not going to deal with economical issues it's to it is in his words. the task of the politicians to solve this debt crisis and this of course is a very elegant way calling out their responsibility and the question if it is legal or not legal at the end of the day they don't decide about it this is to fear that many criticisms critics have fewer in europe some commentators call this constitutional court and nothing else but as a prosecutor of the german government well germany's been one of the countries least affected by the ongoing financial crisis of course the strongest economy there in europe is this legal review perhaps a sign that taxpayers and politicians and a

it will result in discarding these nefarious legal doctrines that have become embedded in our federaland he and mom and make our nation a better place in a postcolonial world. the u.n. declarations arise from notions of equality, notions of justice, notions of self determination, notions that these political and cultural property rights of native peoples are inherent human right, you know, and they are based on contemporary international human rights, it a much better source of values than the old notions of racism in conquest of colonialism that are the underlying values of federal and emi. so we have the prospect that maybe it in new set of rules that we can perhaps conceptualize the basis for indigenous rights or a more just fashioned this is equally sound and perhaps even more vigorous native rights as indigenous people. why should we do that? i think that our native, cultural survival of our native people, which is set taken the 21st century. and we really offer a great diversity in our human family and their wisdom traditions from some of our hunting, fishing and gathering cosmo

with regard to witnesses, i'm the legal adviser of the state department. the footnote in one of my testimony reviews, times the legal of visor's have appeared before this committee and others -- this is my committee of jurisdiction. you voted my confirmation. so i am here for the conversation. it was our position from the beginning that we were acting consistently with the zero or powers resolution, but we would welcome support because as senator lugar said, it would be -- a president always value a bipartisan support for this kind of effort or mission. finally, you asked whether we have made errors. i think this controversy has probably not played out exactly as some would have expected. i'm sure there are many places where someone have urged, and i would have been among them, coming up with -- coming up earlier for more briefings and to lay out these legal positions. for my part of that, i take responsibility. but i do believe that the end of the day, the last thing we're saying, the thing we're not saying, is that the senate is irrelevant. >> we are mak

marijuana and the referendum confirms that it should not be legalized . as far as the withdrawal from afghanistan is concerned the picture is unclear so far it was said that the withdrawal would start and certain parameters for it had been set. thirty thousand troops by the end of the year but when i was in washington last september they were talking about the need to increase the military contingent in afghanistan exactly by thirty thousand now they're planning to return least thirty and so in fact nothing has changed i think the world community and you can disagree is beginning to consider the situation in afghanistan because several reasons behind the decision to military operation and the decision of the world community to interfere in the fans of this for the country. to put an end to the taliban rule to set up an interim administration and hold free elections. these tasks were supposed to be in six or twelve months but this september we'll see the tenth anniversary of that interference it's longer than world war two but the situation in afghanistan

marijuana and the referendum confirmed that it should not be legalized. why would you. as a third. california. i have explicit information from the u.s. presidential administration that this financier had largely funded the campaign. in europe. in the world what point. yes certainly this example of a global commission reminds me of a global p.r. campaign by trying so much attention but in a respectable agency like the b.b.c. covered the fact that this belongs to the u.n. i mean even serious agencies were confused therefore there are many reasons to believe that this drug lobby had funded the campaign moreover i want to indicate that we've been. various international platforms on may tenth i spoke at the g eight ministerial conference in paris and so did many of my colleagues we said that unfortunately our fight against drugs said both local and regional levels because the global level stays even beyond our understanding this concept hasn't been developed yet i did this context i want to know that the former under secretary general of the united nations an

and in that, it is very much like most of the other ideas i talk about in legal academia. after that .. it just sounds kind of lefty ideas give the government more to do. but it gives lawyers and judges more to do which is not always, was not always fdr's abuse that litigation should have a bigger role in society. it in particular gives them a lot more to do because they're the ones who often, when we decide to resolve them, rather than legislatures or, you know, other ways of doing things. so friedrich hayek i think would've understood the old power of yet another genre of intellectual school arranged in such a way as to make their own preach much more influential. and important, certainly good news for the graduates of law schools is perhaps even better news for the in demand faculty. i'm not so sure that it's good news for all the rest of us. thanks. [applause] >> thank you. i'm going to ask the first question, and then we will let walter choose his own in clusters. but i will remind you all to wait for the mic a phone, especially since we have, we are recording this bo

i see this only as a legal issue. and nothing more.h all respect to the reverend, i don't see this as a religious issue. i can't see it as a religious issue. because as you know we have separations of church and state. and so no one religion can say that this is right or wrong. i am a lawmaker. and as a lawmaker, i can only look at this objectively and say that this is the right thing to do as far as equality. and in answer to your question i'm happy for them. i'm happy for people who want to be in a committed relationship as married couples. >> when you say. mr. mcguire say this is a religious issue and he feels as strongly today as he did days or months ago that this should not be happening, what do you say to him? you have an avenue right now to speak directly to one another. what do you say to him as to whether that sentiment undermines in any way the law that has just been made legal and right? >> well, the law as governor cuomo has said, the law is the law. and i stressed the point that i am a lawmaker. i am not a reverend. i am

it is terribly important in all sorts of areas of real life, legal practice. yale students then as now were so smart, so agile in their minds that they could cram for that stuff when it came time to prepare for the bar exam. in the meantime, think of the time he would free up for philosophical discussions. you know, it truly stimulating and interesting things. and this kind of thing, yale, then, as now, was the most prestigious of all law schools. this was intimately related to the fact that yale was the most impractical and philosophical of all law schools. yale professors, it came to be that they would be adorably clueless. if you had an actual legal problem and needed someone to solve, some money needed to bail out of jail a something. it was as if the professors had the most admired medical schools were the ones who were most at a loss when confronted with an actual sick patient. and this got transmitted to other law schools through the competitiveness that so characterizes the law school world. there is an irony here. as i've vented, they taught this crat

. >>> creo que todo el país o sino todo el mundo estuvo sorprendida pero creo en el mundo legal no tantoena de muerte, desde un principio creo todos incluyendo a mí como madre y ser humano queremos ver a alguien pagar, pero tenemos que mirarlo en términos legales si la fisión cala tenía evidencia para comprobar sin duda razonable que la señora antony mató a esta niña. >>> para en qué falló la fiscalía se en foshgarfocaron e detalles?. >>> la fiscalía se pasó semanas comprobando lo mal y lo horriblemente que estaba mujer actuó después de la mujer de la niña pero bueno que está comprobado sin duda que actuó horriblemente después de que su niña muere, pero lo que no comprobaron es cómo esa niña murió wrshgs a manos de quién murió, o sea tenemos el médico mismo forense de la fiscalía que dijo no te puedo decir con seguridad cómo murió. >>> tenemos evidencia que puede haber sido que el cloroformo habrá ven deseo, y que el olor estaba o no, no había evidencias para que ese jurado pudiera condenar a alguien sabiendo que el jurado que si la condenaban tenían que decidir si moriría. >>> eso hizo

jeffrey toobin, cnn legal analyst in from los angeles. tom mesereau, defense attorney best known for representing michael jackson. welcome. let me tell you folks watching if you ever need a lawyer, call one of these three. they are the best. >> not me. >> all right. >> i'd love to try a case with tom, though, i have to say. >> rikki, let me start with you. were you surprised? if not, what did the prosecution do wrong and why didn't it answer the questions? >> i was not surprised at the verdict when it was only 11 hours over this very short period of time after a long trial, because there was not enough time, if it was going to be a guilty verdict, for them to go through all the degrees of homicide. so in this short a period of time, i consider 11 hours short, that it had to be a not guilty verdict. so the verdict did not surprise me. what the public doesn't understand and what tom mesereau is going to echo without a doubt in my mind is this -- it's called the burden of proof. it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. you may think she's guil

in june of 2008, the state supreme court ruled to legalize same-sex marriage.hen six months later, voters passed proposition 8 defining marriage as between a man and a woman, making same-sex marriage illegal. a year after that, prop 8 was thrown out by judge vaughn walker, ruling it as discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional. then just last month, a different judge denied a challenge by the prop 8 authors who claimed that since judge walker is a gay man, walker should have recused himself from the case for conflict of interest. so right now the ninth u.s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco has the same-sex marriage decision on hold while it considers an appeal from a group called protect marriage whose legal standing to argue the case is under review in the state supreme court. a little confusing. >>> in modesto tonight, a man is recovering from what bee experts are now calling the first killer bee attack north of madera county, and that means that much closer to the bay area. 70-year-old jack mcbride was stung nearly 60 times while he was walking

one legal expert i spoke to earlier on 9news now at 5 p.m. says casey anthony may end up a very wealthy woman and a lot of people at the same time will be after her. >> what she will be facing probably is an avalanche of lawsuits against her. >> really who is going to sue outside of the family. >> she could write a book and make $1 million on it very soon. what will happen is you have the nanny suing her. people that will sue her saying she misspoke, she defamed them. and people will be running after her. >> a lot you still with very much to stay about this verdict. i'll have some of your comments later on in mailbag@wusa9.com. if you want to chime in the address is mailbag@wusa9.com. >>> police have nod said if a 17-year-old is related to dye. her husband and son found the woman after they got home tuesday night from work. >>> a laurel family received news today that they had been dreading. investigators have determined that a body found last week in macon, georgia, is that of lauren giddings. she just graduated from law school. her neighbor

i will bring many skills to this appointment -- a legal training in how to read legal documents. i am a team player. i like to build consensus. i have experience of volunteering for various elected officials, local, state and national. i have a willingness to listen to and work with differing opinions and try to build consensus. i am experience that building teams, legal advisers, regular folks, subject matter experts, which will be required as we take on the redistricting task. i have a strong understanding of san francisco's myriad committees -- communities from the most vulnerable to the most financially independent. i am comfortable living in every circle. i want to make sure it's an inclusive process. i'm an advocate and connector. i want to bring people together, and power them and educate them. i would like to address a suggestion i have heard in the past that perhaps if you run for office you should not be selected for this. i would like each person to be considered on a case by case basis. in my case, i did not seek endorsements from a political party. in fact, had no en

staples that we buy at the grocery store. >>> and legalize it? how marijuana advocates are renewing the push to make their drug of choice legal. >>> and look carefully. it was a dream wedding, but you couldn't really tell. a soldier's wife finds a way to tie the knot even without being in the same country as her husband. >>> and good afternoon, i'm chief meteorologist jeff ranieri live in berkeley where the kites are so large you can actually stand up inside. we'll tell you about an event you don't want to miss this weekend. [ male announcer ] brace yourself for the big, bold taste of a subway® bbq pulled pork sub. tender, succulent slow-cooked pork with sweet and smoky barbecue sauce, all on freshly baked bread. subway. eat fresh®. montrose, california. in here, anarchy meets order. working with at&t, doctors set up a broadband solution to handle data and a mobility app to stay connected with their business. so they can run the office... even when they're not in the office. call at&t and see what we can do for you. with unlimited voice plus broa

team that he has clients especially to deal with a steering the new legal team seem to taken on a new strategy that much more conciliatory about this case a much more concerned with european door and specifically the european arrest warrant under which students request to be extradited has been requested the legal team auguring that the european arrest warrant is invalid because the discrepancy the tension between the allegations that have been made and the testimonies over the two alleged victims that a full counts to be considered ranging from coercion right up. on the defense team has said that there is nothing in the victim's statement that amounts to that and that no option evidence so a lack of consent in those statements and three of the full relegations they say wouldn't even amounts to crimes in the u.k. so it's very much the approach that that taking hold so they are during attention to the fact that us almost has not been charged in sweden that he's wanted them merely for questioning and they're saying has the prosecution started has he actually been accused of anything and

entry legal.but you can't stop the entries unless you increase the number of illegal entries and if not you have people flying over the fence or under the fence or swimming across the moat with alligators like president obama said a few days ago. >> jorge castaneda, what are you doing today? >> i spend about one-third of my year at the city i teach at nyu. i've been teaching there now for 14 years and until further i was in government. i spend a lot of time in mexico like during and speaking all over the country trying to put forward ideas. i double in politics, and i write a lot. i'm not sure how well but certainly i write a lot and i would be doing fine. >> maÑana forever is the name of the book and here's the english version to be sold in the united states. here's the spanish-language version to be sold in the united states and finally, here is the version to be sold in mexico. why is there a different cover on the mexican version? >> for two reasons colin quote i like the mexican cover for the