i would tell them to make sure that the legal education is a quality legal education. it is the first of to have a monopoly, so you can control the lawyers, and make sure they are acting in an ethical way. i think there was a third part of the question, what would i tell them not to do. by the way, before i get to that, in vietnam, i recently met with the president of their bar association, similar to the american bar. in most countries, they have a government bar association that is part of the government, in effect. then they just have an non-club federated are. the person was a 70-year-old viet cong that was the chair. one of the most interesting conversations i ever had. someone who did not told anyanger, -- not hold any anger, but wanted information and help from america. the american bar association has one of the best legal libraries in the world. coaching and has said -- has built a law school that has no books. we're working with those countries to provide them with legal materials because they have been asking. they also ask for lawyers to help them with thei

and that is the perception that we all have about the legal system. it think it fits into a cynical culture where we don't believe in institutions. we feel everyone has failed us. god has failed us, government has failed us and our judges lawyers as well. >> i'm going to see but i cannot do that particular observation. but i think each one -- each panelist as broad a dude that i believe is true. they think by the way, it's a good question that you asked. we have changed as a society. we are never going to be the same. not just because of things like 9/11, but because everything is real-time. and so, you see the underbelly of the problem or a conflict immediately. there is no time to spin it. there is not a lot of time to wait and recast it or do some revisions history on it. it is there. it is right in front of us. people are a lot more -- we say cynical. i think it's just more realistic that this could happen. i think you can draw it. interesting scenario, set of facts, as an people will say, that's possible. i mean, i can analogize in my mind of the

their tyes -- narratives, legal novels, legal dramas are a particularly american cultural touchstone. they are very much like, legal dramas are very much like the american westerns in terms of the public fascination. westerns, as we know, take place in the prairie, and they deal with lawlessness. but they're essentially about the search for good and righteousness and to do what's just. and to make things right. and the legal system is a natural location, trials for, you know, good versus evil. you see, you know, cowboys on horses, and you see lawyers strutting in courtrooms delivering summations. you know, there's even movement in courtrooms, right? john grisham is the master of having people doing interest things including pouring a glass of water. all of a sudden this idea that there is an action that's taking place, but it's an action that really is the same kind of dramatic tension that there's some injustice that's taken place, and the audience can't sit still until some resolution takes place. and it's the courtroom setting does it in a way that is much more closed. but it does

a legal opinion is a legal opinion. it's not statement of facts. its statement of what they think the law is. and that's the document returned to make public. this is a document to the republicans have had for months. in fact, at the very first hearing we had on solyndra, congressman kingery read a portion from this legal memo and asking questions. in the issue at this moment in the committee is whether we're going to make this part of the record, what they were going to make a legal opinion public. and the chairman is like one of those fields when work is going to the movie when i couldn't get the results until you come back next time. it's suggesting we will know about the unanimous consent decision when we come back from these votes on the floor. i'm not going to be able to be here, but if they don't give this unanimous consent, and went to the have a motion to put in the record. i don't understand what it should be part of the record. it's a key document in her investigation. that explains the department of energy's legal explanation for subord

la tomé, y a casi 4 años de relación, y estoy en un batalla legal por los otros 4 años que finalmenteblema. >>> en muchos aspecto. >>> alice por qué se produce este tipo de vosotros lepcio cuales son los causas. >>> no hay excusa desafortunadamente la persona que abusa a la mujer y víctima quiere controlar la vida de esa víctima y todo el aspecto de esa vida y poder controlar, a la amenaza an y golpean y piensan que nada les va a pasar está víctima nunca me va a denunciar y nunca llamará a la policía. >>> ese abusador amenazó a la víctima diciendo si llamas a la policía te voy a hacer daño a su hijos también y no piensa que lr porque en su familia también pasó. >>> hay diñ situaciones. >>> yo no sé. yo no sé. por cualquier razón por muchas razones quizás ellos fueron abusados cuando niños o crecieron así no sé. pero no hay excusa para esas acción. >>> pero hay factores que también digamos fortalecen que la personas se conviertan vio lepts. >>> si. quis quizás, pero de ts maneras nadie tiene el derecho de ponerlo una mano a una persona. >>> qué tanto tiene que ver drogas y alcohol con

it is not legalized pot. one of the other demands to formally acknowledge an extraterrestrial presence, is that 10,300 signatures and gaining on ganja fast. everyone seems to be for humans and hemp, 100 agreed that red pandas should not be on ecstasy. >> who could blame them? who could blame them? how shocked are you by the poll on marijuana? >> i thought that was exaktsly what it would be. i am not even remotely shocked. >> no? >> no. i want to say something, i am pro legalization, but i think it is possible to be anti-pot and pro legalization. >> i agree with you on that. but explain. >> i smoke pot, but i do it for horror movies, "curb your enthusiasm" and love making. it should not be in the workplace. it should not be out socializing. you shouldn't do it when you go out since someone slaps your girl and you have to fight. it is bad for those 18 to 25. you lose your ambition and can't get up in the morning. though it should be legal, it is bad. >> it is a good point. i know a lot of people that i went to

opinion and a legal opinion is a legal opinion.ng to make public. this is a document that republicans have had for months. in fact at the very first hearing we had on solyndra, congressman gingrey read a portion from this legal memo that i asked a question, and the issue before us at this moment in the committee is whether we are going to make this part of the record, whether we are going to make a legal opinion public and the chairman is in like one of the cereals when we were kids going to the movie we are not going to get the results until you come back next time suggesting we will know about the unanimous consent decision when we come back from these votes on the floor. i'm not going to be able to be here, but if they don't give us unanimous consent i think we ought to have a motion to put in the record. i don't understand why this shouldn't be part of the record. it's a key document in our investigation. it explains the department of energy's legal explanation for the subordination of taxpayers' debt. it was produced in our co

some folks in hearing said just legalize and the legalization from the consumer protection. >> i think you have to build in the strong. >> again let me ask you do you think the legislation in particular i gather from your testimony this legislation was some would be beneficial in terms of the problem of adolescent gambling. to respect it would put in place the kind suggested because the internet is a place where you can alert people to the problems while they are gambling you can cut them off and we could also examine the law for the bill that is proposed suggests we can make public the records of the gambling companies so we can see are they making disproportionate profits. stomach to go back to mr. eggert's comments he wants to see that on the front end of not retrofited on the back and do you think such legislation would have that sort of transparency built in on the front end? >> i think consumers ought to know what their chances are of winning on a particular site and if it's difficult they ought to know that. they ought to know the odds. >> okay, so i don't -- i haven't read this

policy what is the legal policy of this administration and let's cut them. a quick what's the big question here this this hour we was not wearing a uniform and fighting in a war zone he was in yemen so the facts that characterize him as effectively an enemy battling the united states and presenting a threat to the united states need to be put forward why is it did he present such a threat and then secondly the u.s. has got it because he was not in a war zone or certainly not what's called a hot theatre the united states has really got to come forward and explain why is it that he couldn't simply be indicted arrested and brought to trial somewhere there may very well be good reasons why you couldn't do it maybe because of the collapse yemen but this needs to be explained because otherwise if the u.s. can do this in. russia could do it with the chechen terrorists and the england or austria trying they could do it with the weaker terrorists in turkey or greece and so on and so on than we know of course iran and israel both are also working on drone systems righ

rationale the legal policies that were settled upon could not be secret this had to be they had to be published it had to be known and i think frankly most people who look at the assassination of our it's not that they have sympathy for him i think the attitude of most people is good riddance with respect to him but i think there's a lot of concern about the precedent that's been established here a lot of concern about what's the legal reasoning that stands behind this and why is the administration keeping it secret why couldn't a very thing where they're not actually in a play you a clip of an interesting exchange exchange here from a.b.c.'s jake tapper and of course carney white house spokesperson it seems to me like they also have been completely unaware or unprepared that they might have to answer questions about this please take a listen. can you show us for the american people or has a judge been shown. where you can take i'm just i'm not going to. go any further than what i've said about about the circumstances of his death and. the case against them which again you're winking

and then a lawyer should the legal opinion. the legal opinion is a legal opinion. it is not a statement of fact, it is a statement of what they think the law is. hence the document we are trying to make public. this is a document that republicans have had for months. at the very first hearing we had on solyndra, congressman gingrey read a portion from this legal memo and ask you a question. the issue before us at this moment in the committee is whether we are going to make this part of the record. whether we are going to make a legal opinion public. the chairman is like one of those it is serious when we were -- those serials when we were a kid going to a movie, you not going to get the result the next time. if they don't give us unanimous consent, i think we ought to have an motion to put in the record. we have documented the investigation, and explains the department of energy's legal explanation for the subordination of taxpayer-. it was produced for our committee. -- pikesvilletaxpayer-debt. it was produced from our committee. the republicans alleged that relea

into one legal unit. much of the permit has already gone forward from the city on this so it would seem to me

we know we will be heard from from our experts on a legal side. a lot of them can really add up here this gentleman again had heard about a situation where someone had already racked up $40,000 with of legal fees. became an issue. we are not talking about what it costs to fix up which in itself would be excess of, but also the legal component. your word of mouth and the people you know will really help. and, of course, to our media folks, people will read your articles and understand that they can really do a lot to protect their businesses early on. >> i just want to add one comment about getting our association involved. we put together a really great training. we have a panel available to you. it is only going to cost you $35 for a 30-minute conversation, and that might be the best $35 you have already spent to avoid something that will be happening in the future. that is just part of the collaborative process with supervisor chu's office, and i am very grateful to her. there is a panel of lawyers that have all attended training and know-how to

using drones or other legal means.er if you could share your thoughts on that and explain your views and the administration's views on that subject? >> nice to see you again. and let me know when you're ready to leave private practice. anyway,. >> is that a job offer? >> not quite. in general, and the courts have said this, supreme court has said this, those who are part of the congressionally declared enemy do not have immunity if they are u.s. citizens. as i'm sure you know, in the query? no, 90 for two i believe it was, and much more recently, 2004, the courts essentially endorsed detention in the case, of someone who was a u.s. citizen. there are special consideratio considerations. i believe when it comes to u.s. citizens, and particular care, that should be taken, if we encounter somebody who has u.s. citizenship, i am satisfied that the military is conducting itself in full compliance with the domestic legal authorities, and international law. >> and i believe, by the way, i believe that at some point we will pr

a minority of 46% continue to say marijuana should not be legalized.f almost 40 points since 1969 when 84% were absolutely certain that pot should never be legal iized. now, in a democracy, we should expect such a dramatic shift in public opinion to be reflected in our public officials, but in the united states senate, which would have to vote to legalize marijuana nationally, support for legalizing marijuana has gone from 0% in 1969 to 0% today. even though the united states senate now includes some admitted former pot smokers who now have no intention of making legal what they once got away with. president obama, himself, a former pot smoker whose academic and professional achievement was obviously unhindered by the occasional high, appointed michelle leonhart as head of drug enforcement administration. the obama administration in the person of the head of the d.e.a. insisted marijuana remain classified a schedule 1 drug which means the obama administration officially considers marijuana to be just as dangerous as heroin. now, we know that no one, no

citizens except legalization of drugs. the government is saying no, but public opinion in california and now the united is for legalizing the reagan and now >> the views of the former president, and i should say we did reach out to philip calderon. we asked for an interview, and he turned us down. lawmakers voted for more spending cuts, but protesters stood as police fired. >> outside the greek parliament rocks rained down on riot police of the country began a two-day general strike. the police responded with volleys of tear gas and stun grenades, but perhaps the most significant part of the day was the sheer number of demonstrators taking to the street to protest austerity. resistance is spreading. this is inside the finance ministry. if is now occupied a. dionysus is an unemployed sports writer and his wife and a teacher. cuts have changed their lives. parks are lost my job, and the taxes have been going top year- ago -- going up. we check the prices on yogurt and milk and everything. >> stores are closing in record numb

a certain set of its money there's going to be problems especially with all the legal costs there are all the trouble with protecting their servers and just the traffic on the web site it costs a lot of money to run it so i think by. kind of censoring. corporations the government knew it might take you know it would be overnight but eventually we saw for us well exactly how much money do you think that it takes i mean you know are they using the majority of their money to deal with some of these legal troubles that they're having because of julian assange said that they were getting what was it ten million pounds a month in two thousand and ten that's a lot of cash. yes definitely a lot of cash i'm not sure exactly how they spend their money but i do know that they are losing a lot i think it was a couple months ago when they actually found kind of a loophole in the way fisa processes payments and they ended up having a twenty four hour window where people could donate and that's where we really saw how much donations they're using i think within twenty four forty eight hours for. res

legal counsel to homeland security and explained the legal basis for his assassination. >> the obama administration has not been clear about its legal basis, but there are quite a few justifications under the law for the action that was taken today. first of all, the united states is at war without qaeda. as a result of the joint resolution of congress back in september of 2001, the united states and the president are authorized to wage war against al qaeda and anwar al-awlaki was in charge of al qaeda in the arabian peninsula. what is troubling to many of the people you cited was that he was an american citizen. the justification is twofold. he has joined the enemy. just like in world war ii, is an american citizen donned the uniform of not his, american troops would not have to take that person into custody. the second issue that the aclu and others often cite is that actions like this violate international law. this case today is not that. from the present to the secretary of defense to yemeni officials themselves, they said the cooperation between the yemeni government and the un

indefensible. -- legally defensible. i appreciate the work of supervisors farrell and elsbernd. supervisor kim: thank you so much. i wnaant to that supervisor elsbernd and farrell. this was not something that we have been paying attention to. to directly address the question of why waiting to address a supreme court ruling in separate legislation, our office thought it was strong that we have levels of accountability for public financing. including supervisor mirkarimi and many of the advocates that worked on framing that issue. we spent some time doing outreach which is why it took us time to come forward, examining multiple options. it includes supervisor farrell and elsbernd's amendments. exactly as the supreme court ruling had indicated. we want to couple it with other amendments that will continue to address the original intent of public financing without this incentivizing candidates -- disincentivizing candidates. we also wanted to become a public finance candidate as well. this is something that the ethics direct

i understand that people who believe this was legally, or that this was legal, believe that it was legal under the authorization of use of military force. that this was part of the war on al qaeda. does citizenship afford any meaningful distinction for that as a legal justification for killing? >> under the authority to use military force passed right after 9/11, no, there's no carveout. there's no mention of american citizenship. it's an exceptionally broad mandate from congress giving the president pretty much any power he wants to wage war anywhere around the globe. it's battlefield earth. and there's no really been any pressure from congress to restrict those powers in any way. the courts decided in the case you mentioned that they weren't going to sort of step in and say who the military or the president can target, so there's nothing to stop the president from deciding unilaterally who he wants to target. >> how important is it to know exactly what role a lwlaki had al qaeda and the franchise model we think of al qaeda as an inspiration for lone wolf terrorists or small cell-based

legal expert sorry. in this case a whistle blower blew a loud and disturbing whistle the military is violating international law and the directors of the israeli supreme court in carrying out assassinations in situations in which they are required to try to make an arrest and so the state attorney's office prosecuted the soldier but failed to seriously investigate the conduct revealed in those documents conduct which raises serious questions about rule of law in a democratic system that pattern of behavior of violating orders by the supreme court because of the supreme court said that if that said you must try to arrest is part of a pattern of practice within the israeli system and it's something that's very disturbing because when the army does not obey orders by the supreme court the supreme court is actually more reluctant to issue those orders because no court wants to issue orders that are going to be ignored and then of course you have a serious threat to the rule of law because in a democratic sys

they are legally questionable.we have a man who was not what we assessed him to be, larger than all of those things, still, i started to question the premises and assessments of our frame work of the threat we were trying to perry. what was the nature of al-qaeda and the threat? i had initially accepted the conventional view which was that al-qaeda, and therefore jihad was centralized global, there was command and control, growing worldwide, targeting the united states, and even possibly existential threat, and each of the points as i knew the issues first hand, literally, through my case, and then subsequently, but i restribt me book to the perceptions at that time in the case. the thet is not -- threat is not pervasive or dramatically growing, certainly not existential. now, they can kill thousands of americans, trying to, they probably will. this is a terrible thing. we must stop that. all of that is true. it's not an existential threat to the fabric of american society or the functioning of our government or in

citizens accept legalization of drugs. government is saying no, no, no. people, public opinion, calif., and now in the whole united states is for legalizing. >> there have been violent protests and the greek capital. >> the latest clashes came as the greek parliament voted in favor of more spending cuts. protesters threw stones and bombs. one of the largest protests marked the start of a 48-hour strike that will bring most of the country to a standstill. >> outside the greek parliament, of bombs and rocks came down on riot police as a country began a two-day general strike. the police responded with teargas and stun grenades, but perhaps the more significant part of the day was the sheer number of demonstrators taking to the streets to protest austerity. resistance is spreading. this is inside the finance ministry. it is now occupied. even in the courts, magistrates are operating. an unemployed sports writer and his wife the teacher. salary cuts in the public sector have changed their way of life. >> we lost 5000 a year. i lost my job, and taxes have been

deciding whether to prescribe a drug that is legal under state law but illegal under federal law. the california police chief association is one of the cma's critics telling the "new york times," quote, given everything we know about the physiological impacts of marijuana, how it affects young brains, the number of accidents associated with driving under the influence, it's just an unbelievably irresponsible position. but deangelo, who is now in the fight with the irs over a $2.4 million tax penalty because of the questionable legality of his business predicts that once the science is proven, he has no doubt how the conflict between the state and the feds will end. >> i know the science about cannabis, and i know this is an incredibly medically effective substance. i know that it's very safe. and ultimately that truth cannot be hidden. >> by the way, 35,000 physicians belong to the california medical association, and again, it is the largest medical group in the u.s. to support legalizing marijuana. >>> donation are pouring in to the occupy wall street moovlt in new york. just a f

now aside from the glaring legal concerns of the us government assassinating one of its own citizens without any means of due process we actually examine some of the other claims that have been made about well locky and his role in al-qaeda here's what president obama had to say about that. this of all it is a major blow to al qaida as most active operational affiliate alike he was the leader of external operations for al qaeda in the arabian peninsula. in that role he took the lead in planning and directing efforts to murder innocent americans. now in the past the government is using state secrets privilege to hide any real evidence that they may have about iraqis alleged operational role so why now is it being true to this fact or earlier i got the jeremy scahill national security reporter for the nation magazine and author of the book blackwater the rise of the world's most powerful mercenary army i first asked him if he had the same reaction that i did to the media coverage today about the lack of questioning about the due process for the killing of an american citizen. i mean fo

pero a pesar de la aparentemente victoria legal, los demandantes han entablado un nuevo pleito. >>> loan ar reemplazar con un pesticidas que causa cÁncer directamente en los seres humanos >>> de acuerdo al propio gobierno, el yoruro de me tÍlo l nuevo pesticidas es un potente can ze rig quÍmico que provoca cÁncer. la decisiÓn que tomen los tribunales, pro dodrÍa impactar una vez y por toda la manera cÓmo se cultiva la fresa. el estado no tiene muchas alternativas. california cultiva casi el 90% de las fresas que se producen en la naciÓn, lo que representa una industria de mÁs de 2000 millones de dÓlares para el estado. la representante de la comisiÓn reconociÓ estar al tanto de los peligros de yoruro de metÍlo y asegurÓ que los encantarÍa encontrar una soluciÓn menos peligrosa. afirmÓ que lo estarÁn usando con mucha cautela. este asambleistas estatal trabaja junto a otros en la bÚsqueda de soluciÓn. >>> eso que le estamos pidiendo ahorita al gobernador jerry brown, que todavÍa se pare porque todavÍa no se han echo los anÁlisis de este pesticidas nuevo, y muchas familias, organizaciones

two, legalizing the production, distribution, and consumption of drugs. all together, for all drugs, all the way. >> you have been very critical of american policy. you have said that america is tipping mexico with $500 million and that mexico is paying in the blood and dead bodies. >> 50,000 killed, 15 to 25-year- old. >> and you hold america responsible? >> of course. either we legalize consumption and we can move out of the enforcement and dedicates the money, the efforts, and the public policies to attending a health program like this nation did back 100 years ago. that was until provision was eradicated. then the solution came. >> mr. fox, aren't you being unrealistic? america is not want to legalize all drugs. >> this nation, contrary to what you're saying, is about to change. there is a gallup poll, national, that just came out of days ago. now 50% of u.s. citizens accept legalization of drugs. one who is blind is the government. the government is saying commendatory commendatory, but -- saying no, no, no. people in the whole of the united states a

the government isn't paying lawyers free public legal services so there are some who have been doing it for years for free the courts cannot be reduced to canonical entities to solve problems of large corporations they must play the role of providing legal services for citizens and promoting social pressure. and this is cutting corners in education and the legal system is not enough the government spends years are hitting the portuguese. where it hurts the most in their health care. what you are compelled to. do in two thousand and so good is very good and most people. who made. you there will be a lot of people but a lot more because we know that at the same time we've got even we've. reduced. it and it's more pain no gain these territories failing to stop portugal's economy plummeting with the poor in the front line prime minister has said that he wants to keep the lower income families away from the cuts not really sure that's possible portugal now has a really big budget problem for child needs money and needs at now so they are going to have to cut like time services slashed tax

again, this is all legal under our california state law prop 215. so far the obama administration has been taking a laissez-faire attitude toward states who have legalized medicinal marijuana but this past june, the department of justice sent out a memo that indicated they were thinking about cracking down and now looks like that's materializing. >> thank you, anne. >>> apple officials reportedly knew for some time that the end was near for cofounder steve jobs. bloomberg reports the company's security officials met with palo alto police in the days just before jobs' death. the purpose to make sure things were secure in the area around his palo alto home. dozens of people gathered there to pay respects after the death was officially announced on wednesday. >>> we have learned that three women have just won this year's nobel peace prize. the names were announced in norway just a few hours ago. all won for their work to secure women's rights. the winners are ellen johnson sirleaf the president of liberia, [ foreign language ] a peace activist from the

have already legalized such use. my colleague of serve the public support for pop legalization now was greater than the approval rating of president obama, the u.s. congress, the u.s. supreme court, and every gop presidential candidate. [laughter] one of the reason is that americans are rethinking the current approach is not just because of its utter failure in its cost in terms of increased crime and violations of civil liberties. i believe that mexico is planning a large role in changing opinion. it is not far away country, like colombia or peru. is not an abstract concept. if americans are very familiar with mexico and have a great if any -- great affinity with mexicans. it is one of the most important relationships that the united states has. mexico is now on display as exhibit a on the effectiveness of the drug war. americans are seeing violence spilling over the border, and the drug war that is working at cross purposes. mexican and u.s. policies, including the promotion of liberal democracy and civil society.

counsel, existing litigation of the defense -- conference of legal counsel, anticipated legal obligation as a plaintiff, conference with legal counsel, existing litigation for the existing litigation for the county of san francisco. >> we are now back to open session. the announcement is item 15, no action. 16, no action. 17, no action. 18 failed. may i have a motion whether to disclose? >> motion not to disclose. >> second. >> all those in favor? oppose? motion carries. asking our there's any additional business -- asking now if there is any additional business. >> i would like to raise now in the event that we discuss it in more detail later. i see a letter here from larry mazzola jr. regarding matters surrounding leaves of absence and policies. while i do not believe it is within our jurisdiction to deal with the personnel matters at the distribution yard, and i want to be kept in the loop on how we resolve those issues. there are also questions we would have as well. i just wanted to ask that we would have a conversation about that. >> ok. any other business? seeing none, this meetin

counsel to make sure this is a piece of legislation that passes legal muster and i will defer to the judgment of the city attorney's office who was really involved in the crafting of this legislation. with respect to how much evidence of an injury or harm is needed, i think we do have a responsibility to consumers as a whole that when we see language that is misleading, that we take a position and make sure that information is correct. in fact, accurate information is provided to consumers. i don't know that we have to wait until there is an actual injury to make that happen. in terms of the injuries that could come because of this information, i think it is something we have to be mindful of. i can tell you even in progress of san francisco, we still see efforts to intimidate women who are trying to exercise their legal right to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. i know that in my district, in district 9, one of the most progressive districts in the city, there have been a number of examples in the planned parenthood clinic that open their where individuals have taken u

two, legalizing the production, distribution, and consumption of drugs. all together, for all drugs, all the way. >> you have been very critical of american policy. you have said that america is tipping mexico with $500 million and that mexico is paying in the blood and dead bodies. >> 50,000 killed, 15 to 25-year- old. >> and you hold america responsible? >> of course. either we legalize consumption and we can move out of the enforcement and dedicates the money, the efforts, and the public policies to attending a health program like this nation did back 100 years ago. that was until provision was eradicated. then the solution came. >> mr. fox, aren't you being unrealistic? america is not want to legalize all drugs. >> this nation, contrary to what you're saying, is about to change. there is a gallup poll, national, that just came out of days ago. now 50% of u.s. citizens accept legalization of drugs. one who is blind is the government. the government is saying commendatory commendatory, but -- saying no, no, no. people in the whole of the united states a

informes y protéjase, para telemundo enlace legal y holaciudad.com les informó el abogado.ivia para su debut en las eliminatorias rumbo al mundial brasil 2014, la novedad que el combinado de leonel Álvarez contó con la visita del presidente colombiano juan manuel santos, el mandatario les dio suerte y dio apoyo también. mañana martes en la paz el técnico Álvarez debutará como técnico en las eliminatorias mundialistas y se especula que radamel falcao no sea titular isa teófilo gutiérrez. - bolivia se prepara para su partido, mañana la selección boliviana cumplirá dos años sin ganar como local estará en partidos amistosos, después de entrenamientos el técnico quintero afirmó que todavía no se sabe si estarán sus jugadores recuperados de las lesiones musculares, baca será el titular. se rumora que carlos arce esté. llegamos a nuestro marcador mcdonald: después de la concacaf al esnob y 30 de la noche el salvador estará en amistoso también aquí se mide ante su rival a las 9:30 de la noche. - pasamos al amistoso entre estados unidos y honduras, después de 90 minutos aquí logró s