italy, where gambling is legal.ve had, you know, enormous matching fixing scandals and often revolve around not so much whether somebody is betting on somebody but to try to figure out what teams will get into a playoff and what teams will get relegated. there are lots of reasons to fix matches. legalizing gachlling, i don't think, will is the linchpin on that. there's money to be made somewhere, whether legal or not. >> just enjoy the games, i say. who are these people putting money down. an interesting topic. >> that will do it. >> "30 rock" is next! f i hate getting less. but i love getting more. i'd trade a lot less for a little more. or a little less for a lot more. either way, when it comes to having more, i want a lot more of more and a little less of less. ♪ and that's exactly what you'll get at embassy suites. more free breakfast, more for my money, more deliciousness, more hearty guffaws... [ guffaws ] because more than enough more is never enough more. more coffee? what do you think? [ female announcer ]

narrative, legal novels, legal dramas are particularly an american cultural touchstone.they are very much like, legal dramas are very much like the american westerns in terms of the public fascination. westerns as we know take place in it. they deal with lawlessness, but they are essentially about the search for good and righteousness and to do what is just and to make things right. and the legal system is a natural location, trials for good versus it evil. you see, you no cowboy some horses in you see lawyers strutting in courtrooms, delivering some nations. you know they are are even movements in courtrooms like john grisham is the master of having people to interesting things including pouring a glass of water. all of a sudden this idea that there is an action that is taking place, but it's an action that really is the same kind of dramatic tension that there is some injustice that is taking place and the audience can't sit still until some resolution takes place. the courtroom setting does it in a way that is much more closed budget desert with the same kind of drama

la tomé, y a casi 4 años de relación, y estoy en un batalla legal por los otros 4 años que finalmenteblema. >>> en muchos aspecto. >>> alice por qué se produce este tipo de vosotros lepcio cuales son los causas. >>> no hay excusa desafortunadamente la persona que abusa a la mujer y víctima quiere controlar la vida de esa víctima y todo el aspecto de esa vida y poder controlar, a la amenaza an y golpean y piensan que nada les va a pasar está víctima nunca me va a denunciar y nunca llamará a la policía. >>> ese abusador amenazó a la víctima diciendo si llamas a la policía te voy a hacer daño a su hijos también y no piensa que lr porque en su familia también pasó. >>> hay diñ situaciones. >>> yo no sé. yo no sé. por cualquier razón por muchas razones quizás ellos fueron abusados cuando niños o crecieron así no sé. pero no hay excusa para esas acción. >>> pero hay factores que también digamos fortalecen que la personas se conviertan vio lepts. >>> si. quis quizás, pero de ts maneras nadie tiene el derecho de ponerlo una mano a una persona. >>> qué tanto tiene que ver drogas y alcohol con

it's not even all the way legal. i mean, it's legal in our county. >> montgomery: johnson used to bust local pot growers; now, he's working with them. >> 'morning. >> good morning. >> montgomery: matt cohen is one of the new breed of growers in the county. >> how's everything going? >> busy, busy, busy. >> montgomery: for years, he says he's tried to run his medical marijuana operation like a legitimate business. so, when the county announced a new program to license pot growers, he was one of the first to sign up. >> right here, you can see it says "mendocino county sheriff" on it. it's upside down, though. >> montgomery: these zip ties mark the plant as legal. cohen paid $50 for each of the ties, $1,500 to join the program, and $500 for every inspection. in return, cohen gets to grow a lot more plants than otherwise allowed-- up to 99 of them, which can generate several hundred thousand dollars a year in income for his farm co-op. and he gets to do all this without any fears of getting busted by the sheriff. >> and

students are taught to achieve the correct legal result.hey are not taught to think about fundamental distinctions between right and wrong and common human courtesy and decency. that is the atticus is about. i guess you did good at university of alabama law school. he went beyond what you taught him he says no, i understand what the correct legal result is that it's more important for me to do what's right. i think that ideas would try so much of the fiction. the john grisham characters when you think about what my favorite books, the rainmaker amid these are people that are tireless, energetic crusader's. maurice dees of real-life people who just do the right thing. they just do the right thing and we don't teach law students to do that. it's about asking them to go beyond what the law is and fight for the right things, the most righteous crusading cause. at his latest characters stand out in my real-life heroes stand out because they are not doing what everyone else is doing. you go beyond what everyone else is doing. >> i do think it is

y creo que en nuestra gran mayorÍa apoyamos la inmigraciÓn legal, pensamos que la inmigraciÓn legal esema mÁs difÍcil que enfrentamos por la siguiente razÓn: por una parte hay que reconocer que son seres humanos, que no son estadÍsticas. estas son personas, madres, padres, hijos y muchos que han venido a este paÍs... >>muchos de los hijos nacidos en estados unidos. >>si son nacidos, obviamente, son legales, pero... >>no, los hijos, pero los padres no. >>ah, los hijos, ya entiendo. pero al final del dÍa son seres humanos que estÁn buscando una vida mejor, que en su propio paÍs se les hace imposible. yo siempre le digo a las personas, si usted estuviera en las mismas circunstancias, harÍa la misma cosa. si usted vive en un paÍs donde hay violencia, donde no hay oportunidades econÓmicas y sus hijos estÁn sufriendo, usted harÁ todo lo posible para mejorar su vida. y hasta cierto punto la ilegalidad, la falta de documentos es parte de este proceso legal que tenemos que no funciona. >>exacto. >>por otra parte, este no puede ser el Único paÍs del mundo que no cumple con sus leyes migratorias.

probably most legal experts say there is not a legal conflict because she donated time and energy for a charity. we encourage judges and federal judges to be involved. >> could that be a personal conflict listed under the reasons that people would recuse themselves. >> absolutely. we want to avoid a legal conflict and have them avoid the appearance of impropriety or a conflict. clearly this may fall under the umbrella and wise for a judge to announce to the litigants and the prosecutor and defense attorney of their involvement in such a charity so that either side can make a motion that they felt a judge cannot be neutral. >> i will bring you in on this and we are waiting to hear from the judge and a website, the law firm she is associated with in her bio. it listed under her accomplishments that she was volunteering for this charity. if that turns out to be the case. it is another chchl of how so many people in high ranking positions are associated or tied into either the university or this charity. >> that's really the bigger point and i expect you will see more examples of this as

we have to understand the legal context in which this is happening. the u.s. supreme court just granted cert on the federal health-care legislation that president obama and the congress passed. we are now, therefore, facing the very real possibility that a very conservative supreme court and a very conservative court system will take a very different approach to the issues that are underlying this legislation and the issues which the ninth circuit decided in our favor, so we have to tread lightly, but the problem that i have is not only that there is legal risk that is created by this amendment but that ultimately, the legal risks do not actually address the underlying problem, that in fact, a loophole remains if this amendment is passed. under supervisor cohen's legislation, there will continue to be a loophole because employers will continue to have an incentive to limit the type of services eligible for reimbursement by health reimbursement accounts. we will therefore continue to see employers preventing employees from using their hra's for essential servic

we aren't anti-immigration we are pro legal immigration.what the republicans party is b but we need a legal immigration system that honors our heritage both as a nation of immigrants but we are also a nation of laws. if we focus on that and what we are for it will bode well. on the economic issues we should be winning the votes of the americans of hispanic decent because this president has made everything worse. >> tomorrow we will hit the $15 trillion in-debt mark. we are burdennening future generations with that debt. the super committee, maybe they will come up with $1.2 trillion in cuts but they aren't dealing with baseline budget. even the fed said the chance of a new recession tops 50 percent. what is the answer? how do we get congress really to adopt bold responsible programs instead of basically playing the old washington insider game and just punching around the edges here? >> there are two fundamental things. number one we have to win an election. people that believe in limited government and believe government should be making it

it is legal tender. secondly, erases some really interesting questions about the direction of dollar. if cash is not good anymore what are we going to go to? that is a long winded way of saying -- >> that is louisiana you're talking about. >> let me from a question out to both of you to start out with. some specific questions about the books. we are in the middle of what everybody seems to agree is an economic crisis around the world and part of that crisis is the place of the dollar. the chinese currency or the euro is in any better shape obviously hasn't done very well in 20 years since the japanese collapse. we just had this incredible crisis over the debt crisis which you would say is not what everybody thought it was. where exactly considering where you're coming from from the history of debt and the history of the greenbacks were we getting into in the twenty-first century? is there a placement for the dollar? is this debt crisis going to blow the entire economic system? >> hard to know where to st

this is a private legal matter. to the restaurant association to decide what to do if one of these women violates the confidentiality agreement and i see absolutely no possibility of the restaurant association taking action. >> well, let me just say in my 25 years as an attorney i represented many, many sexual harassment viction victims. the agreements are different never case. i've negotiated many of them. sometimes there's a liquidated damages clause which means not only would the women give back the $35,000 that we heard reported, the one-year salary she got, but maybe in addition maybe $50,000 penalty. she may also have to pay attorneys fees for the national restaurant association and go to arbitration which would also be confidential. so there are a host of expenses she could be looking at. i take what you say as a political matter, maybe they would never do it. but as a legal matter, she would be in j some jeopardy. >> this is pure politics. i'm hereby guaranteeing any and every one of them that i will persona

worth of push-approved interrogations' legal? will they be approved hour after, and article 3 of the geneva articles applies to terrorists? with respect to what reporting and other forms of aggression of interrogation methods, water boarding is the most troubling. you are as close to the wind as to possibly can it was done in three cases to three individuals. whether in any of those cases it crossed the line, i am not sure you can make that decision without knowing how it was done in any case, but it could have. whether that would result in a war crime or war crimes prosecution is a much more complicated story, because you have to look at intent and knowledge and lots of issues that are not necessarily clear. with respect to other methods again, the question is are they severe event to be tortured? are they severe enough to be cruel or degrading for such treatment? we have new definitions of those since the original authorizations were given some years ago. congress has to find better both cruel and degrading treatment, as well a

my clients want something that is legally defensible, legally permanent, and they can force themselves. not some sort of voluntary thing from the hotel. the biggest problem is it does not satisfy you on the findings for the streets and highways code, that is the biggest problem from the city's perspective. supervisor mar: can you explain why hunt street is necessary for public use as well? >> my client are members of the public. that is one reason. also, it is -- there " i am wondering -- supervisor mar: i am wondering. grex there is a lot going on. all the vendors that access the w and moma use that area but it is a thruway to this block for pedestrians. i am not on the overhead. the area between the w and moma is pedestrian access. apac -- connects to natoma. that pedestrian access way is part of what moma is relying on when they see their opening -- they are opening up that area. that is one of the areas the would be available to the public for access to the museum. supervisor mar: can i follow up with what is being opened up. it seems like a hotel's loading and valet loading requir

and the legal infrastructure was not there any longer to allow newcomers to come in and come in legally. >> how is the guest worker program been developed and changed over the years? and when did it begin? >> okay. well, the earlier programs begin in 1917. and in the 1920s, but they're small. but the large scale program began in -- during world war ii, and it was a program. it was -- it was binational program to help the united states during world war ii because at that time the united states is a big hero in our history. they're helping the allies fight nazism in europe. and they have to feed a great number of people. and so a lot of the young men that are taken off to work -- that before were doing labor, you have an undersupply of labor of men when they left europe so the united states annex this labor program to bring workers from mexico -- for a temporary period of six months so that's when it begins. the problem -- it's not terminated at the end of world war ii. it's renewed because large scale growers wanted to continue, and it's not terminated until around 1964. >> was there bac

is it legal? and then -- >> the night national that li wood vanished off h her yacht wilt say they heard cries for help. why wasn't she rescued? plus, the energy secretary chu takes the blame for solyndra. is he covering for someone higher up? and one of the biggest boondoggles in america is eating up millions of your tax dollars. john stossel and i are ready to rant. coming up tonight on "justice." a double standard in washington. members of congress engaged in congress that would land the rest of us in jail. but for them it is perfectly legal. peter schweitzer is the author of "throw them all out." it is based on the premise that members of congress are making a lot of money based upon their power inand poured concreter washington. how is that happening? >> they use it for favors or to get access to inside information. committee that deals with healthcare issues they may be privy to knowing whether the fda is going to approve a drug. they are free to trade on that information and do trade on tha

there is a difference between a legal gun and an illegal gun, and this bill is dealing with legal weaponry. i'm asking you, as an expert witness as a sheriff, am i wrong with that? >> no, i'm not. you know, the issue is the action that you utilize when you have, ether it's a handgun, a shotgun, a butter knife or whatever, it's the actions that you take that commits the crime. it's not the handgun. it doesn't act on its own. it's the person that has it. so to take your assumption, i guess, is to say that you want to eliminate all weapons -- any shotn, any rifle, any pistol in america. that's the next leap. >> no. i just said that increasing the number of firearms, in my judgment, will not reduce the crime rate. >> does this crease -- my question then is, does this increase the number of firearms manufactured in the united states? >> it inreeses the number of people that can be carrying them from all over the country. >> well, if they already have a permit in florida or georgia, how does that increase it? >> if they could not get a permit in their home state. you could have a situation where

miley cyrus. >> miley cyrus. >> miley cyrus. >> but a legal miley cyrus. >> but a legal one, yeah. >>s the most memorable thing you have ever done together? what's the best memory you have of each other. >> kind of when we first got together we had a little chihuahua, her name was ti-ti and she got out late one afternoon and i was sitting on the couch with the dog, had her right up here with me. and when she came walking out of the bedroom i said there she is like we were waiting all day for her, you know what i mean and she was just like -- she loved it. like i was with my baby like our baby daughter and we're like there's mommy, you know what i mean? >> that's cute. that's really cute, man. leaving it up to me, right? >> totally. >> i think -- i would probably just have more fun with this probably writing a poem for you. we'll make a fun poem about chihuahuas but keep out miley cyrus. >> no, she's a legal one. >> i'll put together a poem for you and have it for you by the end of the morning. >> what can i get you at the store, a couple items. >> yeah. >> honey buns? >> honey buns ar

we welcome legal immigration.a party that loves legal immigration. >> mitt romney talking immigration during last night's republican presidential debate saying he supports offering green cards to college graduates in an effort to keep immigrant minds trained in the united states here in the united states. if you want to sound smart today, tell your friends more than 1 million people were granted green cards or permanent residency here in the united states last year. that's according to the department of homeland security which points out that 54% of those recipients were already living in the country when they were issued that document. >>> enough of the real news. let's huddle up to acquaint ourselves with a man who goes by the name of blitz wolfer. herman cain at last night's republican debate renaming moderate errands super well-known guy with an unforgettable name wolf blitzerç >> is it okay for muslim americans to get more intensive pat downs or security when they go through airports than christian americans

telemundo enlace legal y holaciudad.com.do desde 1878 por la decimocuarta enmienda, incluye que una persona nacida en estados unidos sin importar el estatus migratorio de sus padres. la segunda opción es el proceso de naturalización es para las personas que tienen un estatus de residente permanente y que cumplan con el requisito de tiempo mínimo para solicitar el beneficio, esther de cinco años pero residente permanente y de tres años para los que están casados con un ciudadano americano. para naturalizarse el interesado deberá presentar una aplicación al servicio de la tercera alternativa es la ciudadanía por derivación, será automáticamente sin necesidad de solicitar la oficina. sin embargo, el otorgamiento de este estatus es complicado y se terminaba con los requisitos de la ley de ciudadanía de menores del 2000. según la ley, desde el 27 febrero 2001 pasan a ser ciudadanos estadunidenses de manera automática todos los menores de 18 años de edad con residencia permanente cuyo padre o madre lo cobró naturalizarse antes que

crone was authorized to make a 10,000 pounds legal some of the mr. myler would've been 50,000 pounds, and other members of the executive committee, the chief operating officer, chief financial officer would've been authorized i believe up to 500,000 pounds. >> did they go through any of those? >> i can find no record of those authorizations being sought or given. and we have looked and tried to find out exactly how that escalation occurred during that period. spirit as far as you are what it really was tom crone and mr. myler show? >> i think very much in the documents given to you, you know, we're very much driving the agenda around the litigation but i think that's also what mr. chapman testified to as well spent i will come to mr. crone and mr. meyerle, but the matter of tom crone, wrote to -- on a saturday which was a very busy day for "news of the world." the following tuesday where he is clearly expecting colin myler to the meaning within, which he said he can't be advocacy group are in for a holiday. when did you first see that name of? >> i d

what legal obligations-- not suggestions, ethical obligations-- but what legal obligations come into play at that moment? >> well, every adult in this scenario has a legal obligation to report any suspicion of sexual abuse. any suspicion of those trained to investigate. that is to trial protection or law enforcement. and the failure of the individuals to do that is a failure of their legal obligation not to mention their moral. >> suarez: in this case, the young graduate assistant reported to his superior, joe paterno at that point is becomes as here story. what's mr. paterno's responsibility at that point legally. >> well, first, reporting it up the line or down the line doesn't make it. you report it to police. and they investigate it because that's what they're trained. joe paterno's responsibility once he received the report was to do the same thing. turn it over to law enforcement, let them investigate it. and joe paterno failed in his obligations both moral and legal. and that really leads to the larger question here. this is institutional failure as well as individual failure

infrastructure was not there any longer to allow newcomers to come in and come in who legally. >> how is the guest worker program developed and changed over the years and when they began? >> the program, the earlier programs began around 1917 and in the 1920's but they are small. the large-scale program begins during world war ii and was to help the united states during world war ii because at that time the united states is a hero in our history that they are helping the allies fight nazis in europe and they have to feed a great number of people and a lot of the young men taken before they were doing leader you have a number supplies of the united states and act as the program to bring workers from mexico for temporary period of six months so that's when it begins. the problem is it is not terminated at the end of world war ii. it's removed because the large scale want to continue and it's not terminated until around 1964 >> was there a backlash against the immigrants coming to texas? >> 1960s? >> any time in the last 80 years or so was there any incidents that stand out? stand yes. i

a legal settlement, but an agreement.mber, this happened 12 years ago, so all day in the middle of my regular schedule, i'm trying to piece the pieces together. didn't intend to contradict myself. it's just been difficult trying to recollection many of the pieces that happened 12 years ago. >> just a few hours later in another fox news interview, mr. cain told bill o'reilly that his campaign expected the story to go public. >> my campaign was made aware that this story might break ten da days ago, but we made a conscious decision not to go chasing two anonymous sources and not know wlagt rest of the story is going to be. >> if you were made aware ten days ago that this could have -- could be in place, shouldn't you then have gone over it with your attorneys, formulated a response, they call it a rapid response team, all campaigns have them, so when it did get public, then you calmly went over and said these are the facts. you seemed to be caught somewhat off guard and you just said you didn't recollect. shouldn't you have

what is the legal framework here? >> the legal framework is actually fairly simple. the standards that we publish, for example, for football helmets, that is the best example, because it probably applies across the board to other stores -- sports. we publish performance standards and indicate what helmets are supposed to do to meet the standard, a multi-factored standard of them organization, for example, like the n.c.a.a., will incorporate into their rules of play a requirement that helmets worn by those athletes meet our standard. in terms of the helmet its cell. you cannot wear a helmet for play in the n.c.a.a. unless it has been certified as meeting their standard. >> and then they also change their rules in terms of, like, hitting the quarterback and that type of contact. >> absolutely. the rules of play control, if you will, how helmets are used, but things like using your helmet as a weapon and other things are prohibited by the rules of play. this same process applies to high schools to the national high school federation. although, because it is a federation

or legally endorse a same-sex marriage. it isn't an important step forward. i thank senator feinstein for her leadership. this is an idea whose time has come. >> thank you for always being at the vanguard of the quality. i want to thank senator find guard -- senator feinstein for her leadership. i would like to make two historic point. the first is the inexorable drive for equality that we have here in america. it was said that the thing that distinguishes the young american republic is the inexorable drive for equality. the only people who had fully quality at that time were white male protestant property owners. that would have left up the majority of the american people and the majority of the senate. he is right. the bottom line is that this will happen. this bill will pass. marriage equality will pass. the question is not if, but win. -- but when. we should go forward and do it. there are so many other things we can do, someone said. i remembered martin luther king's letter from a birmingham jail. the leading business

it is legal. leave it be. because of all of that, that's why the federal government got involved. >> if you do legalize it, go to lori, even though you are high right now. >> it would be like the number one cash crop. >> it could be a generator and it was political. the federal government is cracking down and they are saying the pot dispense res are just fronts for illegal drug dealing and whatnot. >> duh. >> yeah, duh. >> bill, isn't the fact that people who do paw papa -- paw petitions are the ones who smoke the pot? >> sometimes they smoke the petitions and then they have nothing at the end of the day. i mean, i am shocked and sick of talking about it because it is so ridiculous. we make really good weed. we make the weed that we can ship it to other countries. it is being legalized across the board, and we should just grow up as a country. here is what will have to happen. a couple more people need to die. when you look at the statistics, 18 to 32, they overwhelmingly need it to be legalized. they need one

can he do that legally? our legal guys weigh in, next. act my age? -why? -why? -why?ll age differently. roc® multi-correxion 4 zone moisturizer with roc®retinol and antioxidants. lines, wrinkles, and sun damage will fade. roc multi-correxion. correct what ages you. >>> a teacher accused of running a porn website from a school-issued computer is on paid leave. our legal guys are back. avery freeman and richard herman in las vegas. avery, this one is all over the charts. she's on paid leave, not solely because she used school property allegedly, because because she violated some ethical standards that all teachers are supposed to adhere to in this district in california. right? >> what she did is absolutely legal. it advances the public concern about affection to teachers and respect for teachers. >> what? the problem -- >> you don't have to laugh -- >> the problem is what she named the site. she named the site "mysluttteachers.com. not a smart thing. they took it off in about one day. >> took it off. >> but at the end of the day, absolutely legal. >> apparently there w

we welcome legal immigration. this is a party that loves legal immigration.r all the points that the questioner raised, which is bringing in people who in some cases they are terrorists and they become burdens on our society and we have to have immigration laws that protect the border, secure the border, turn off the magnets and make sure we have people come to this country legally to build our economy. >> i'll give speaker gingrich a chance to respond. what he's proposing allowing some of these illegal immigrants to stay is a magnet that would entice others to come here illegally? >> there's no question but to say that we're going to say to the people that came here illegally that now you're all going to get to stay or some large number are going to get to stay and become permanent residents of the united states, that will only encourage more people to do the same thing. people respond to incentives. if you can become a permanent resident of the united states by coming here illegally, you'll do so. what i want to do is bring people into this country legally