legal services corporation, payment to the legal service corporation. $350 million. the chair: the clerk will suspend. for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, i have an amendment at the desk. the chair: the clerk will designate the amendment. the clerk: amendment offered by mr. austin scott of georgia, page 74, line 13 theambing dollar amount insert reduced by $350 million. page 100, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert increased by $350 million. the chair: pursuant to the order of the house of today, he gentleman from georgia, mr. austin, is recognized for five minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman. mr. austin: i along with my colleague am offering an amendment to cut funding from legal sore vises corporation. it was established 40 years ago, i have no doubt it was for the right reasons. it hasn't been re-authorized since 1980. at no point in the last 34 years has either party in congress felt this agency was so important it needed to be re-authorized. mr. scott: in fact new york 2012, it was estimated over 94%

which means that a legal education has become less rather than more valuable, if you value a legal education in money, which i obviously do not, and urge you not to do. so things have to change. one solution, the worst in my view, is to shorten law school to two years. that will produce, or ought to produce, if reason prevails, a one-third reduction of faculty size. but if law school is to remain three years, costs have to be cut; the system is not sustainable in its present form. the graduation into a shrunken legal sector of students with hundreds of thousands of dollars of student debt, nondischargeable in bankruptcy, cannot continue. perhaps, just perhaps, the more prestigious law schools, and i include william and mary among them, can continue the way they are, though that is not certain. but the vast majority of law schools will have to lower tuition. a that probably means smaller law-school faculties, though not necessarily one-third smaller. that would be no huge disaster. harvard law school, in the year i graduated, had a faculty of 56 professors, 9 teaching fellows, and 4 lecturers

drug czar, is flatly opposed to legalizing pot.f marijuana were to become legal, do we run the risk that young people would start down a slippery slope? >> we know that if an illegal substance becomes legal, it becomes more widely available. i've seen the devastation that drugs, including marijuana, can cause in neighborhoods with young people. and i think we need to be smart about how we handle it. i think we need to be as least punitive as possible. but i don't think we want to see it legalized at all. >> recent findings from the national institute on drug abuse show a rise in marijuana use among american teens, with one in three high-school seniors reporting that they'd used pot within the previous year. >> "yes" on 19. >> on the street, the debate rages. >> that's "yes" on 19, november 2nd! >> in california, the birthplace of america's marijuana movement, there's a push to become the first state to legalize pot beyond medical use, to recreational use. >> so, do you think we can count on you to vote "yes" on proposition 19 tomor

if some form of legal status.hen you say, and i think this is the problem of a political agenda or a want to our a feeling, it's not legal ambiguity if you are here and would talk about a group of people that are undocumented and not to properly. that's not a legal ambiguity. so it concerns me that we take this conversation, and like i said, you've answered a lot of questions on both sides, very concerned about that we can't define a secure border. that's a different issue. i will be submitting questions for the record it to you on the. but just a moment ago, we would not be having this discussion in a large since it these 11-point whatever million were here and there was legal ambiguity on their status. there's no legal ambiguity. one side wants to different. another side which we think, work toward resolving this issue. i want to go do something else, but i just don't think it's been very honest with the committee to say that there's legal ambiguity here. if there were this would be a whole different discussion.

the other purgatory issue we've heard a little bit about is when it goes to legal or when it goes to city attorney. and again, same thing with us. we say well, we sent it to legal committee or we sent it to city attorney and those things could also take a very long time with no response. and then usually we say well, we can't talk about it because it's in legal or we can't talk about it because it's at city attorney. again, very frustrated some of the citizens who are involved in those issues so i want to, again, note those things. and even if we have to go into closed session to talk about the legal committee cases or if we need to talk about -- get a report from the city attorney in closed session about those cases, i'd be happy for the bic to agenda those items, but somehow we need a more timely response in those purgatory issues. >> we've taken suggestions from jerry there, but unopened complaints we're looking at -- we're looking at open novs we're actively working on, inactive novs, and category of open at planning department, which is a category so we can categorize those noti

graduation into a shrunken legal sector

we raise money to keep our legal program going. i spend lots of time reading the old letters of thurgood marshall. in many ways he ruined his health just riding around the to raise money to keep this legal program going. i would like to stay healthy. to support like you us at any level that you can. you can go to our website, www.naacpldf.org. there anyway go because we've assembled a plethora of resources about brown. from charlayne hunter-gault, if we are going to teach our children, we have to learn ourselves. yourself how much do really know about brown. you know the name. you maybe know what it stood for. maybe read the case in law school. but how much do you really know about this case that is the most important constitutional moment of the 20th century and literally transformed this country? we also ask you to make sure that people know about our work. and you can do that by telling in your network about the legal defense fund. we are all about social media. to go tou >> the work at the legal defense lawyers fun lawyers did

>>> clearing the air on legalizing the air from marijuana as more and more put pot on the ballot, we look at what's really the truth when it comes to the drug's dangers. and michael bloomberg takes on the gun lobby with his controversial new ad about child deaths. but to the numbers and statements ring true? the so-called google buses in san francisco. they're really destroying the city a way of life. >>> and -- >> does the current capitol hill class really deserve to be compared to the famed do nothing congress? here's nbc bay area's sam brock. >> thanks for joining us. we'll be exposing the realities and facts behind some of the most hot button controversial issues of the last few months. "reality check" is about understanding what's really going on in the world by using data, research and expert analysis to vet claims. >>> they argue smoking pot is dangerous. but is it more dangerous than alcohol which is widely consumed and has long been legal? the reality may surprise you. the topic is kind of out of the bag. cannabis supporters say it's improving lives and at the national foref

we raise money to keep our legal program going. i spend lots of time reading the old letters of thurgood marshall, and he ruined his health just riding around the country trying to raise money to keep this legal program going. i would like to stay healthy. i would like you to support us at any level that you can. you can go to our website. i want you to go there because we have assembled a plethora of resources about brown. as you heard, if we are going to teach our children, we have to learn ourselves. how much you really know about brown? you know the name, you maybe know what it stood for, you maybe read the case in law school, but how much to you know about this case, the most important constitutional moment of the 20th century? we want to ask you to make sure you know about the work, and that means telling people in your network. we are all about social media. we ask you to go to brownat60. i am on twitter. i ask you to join me. we ask you to be partners with us in our network. we want people to still know there are people who

abortion and gay marriage has become legal. lawmakers hope in marijuana is legalized, it will be a matter of time before it's loggal cross the rest of the country. it's hard to tell if it's a political reality or a pipe dream. >>> a sole beneficial which of an art collection valued at $1.4 million has been discovered. it include work by pablo picasso and others. it had been amassed by adolf hitler's art dealer. a gallery will have to deal with claims from people saying their art was looted. more on that and the rest of the day's news can all be found on the website aljazeera.com. >> nigeria is africa's most populous country, a major oil exporter and struggling to cope with lethal religious-based violence, boko haram, kid snapped girls, and a divided nigeria. that's "inside story." >> hello, i'm ray suarez. maybe yo h

in oregon, legal aid serves only about 20% of the legal needs of eligible oregonians. i was proud to work at legal aid early in my career. i spent many years there. and i will never forget the people we were able to help. they desperately need legal assistance at a time in their life when they can least afford it. not low-income by choice, and that was the most poignant message about helping low-income people, most had unexpected medical bills, had lost a job or spouse. legal aid helps real people. so today i'm here for people like beth who thought she had escaped her son's abusive father only to have him turn up, kick in the door, and threaten her all while she was pregnant. legal aid was able to help her get a restraining order and custody of her son who has asthma and only one kidney. now they are building safe and stable lives free from abuse. i'm here for people like jennifer, stage four cancer survivor and oregon health care member who got a bill from a medical center from a procedure performed years earlier. they threatened to shut her off from seeing her doctor

it's perfectly legal exercise of persecutal of the law. i think things like that and the legalization of the dreamers that the president did, i think that leads to the perception that this administration has a very different approach. >> just before we go to a break, since you know this world so wall, you also know that a lot of people who were classified as quote/unquote criminals, their crime was entering or reentering the united states after deportation. these landscapers, bus boys, guys who did dry wall, they're not felons in the way that we think of armed robbers. they came back to live with their families, aren't they? >> the policy prioritizes individuals with criminal felony convictions, and most serious for removal. that's a justifiable channeling of enforcement resources. but the perception when you put individuals who's only crime was to enter the country illegally, you do have a perception that these individuals will not be removed. there were a lot of administration cases that interest clowereclosed. but they were also taken f

the state department has never provided any legal basis, any legal basis whatsoever, for its continued stonewalling of this investigation. so following mr. chuang's nomination hearing before our judiciary committee, i asked him several questions for the record about why the state department refused to comply with its legal obligation to respond to subpoenas. mr. chuang, who was in charge of coordinating the state department's responses, couldn't come up with a legal basis. instead, he cited only -- quote, unquote -- "institutional concerns." now, mr. president -- and i hope all my colleagues in the senat senate -- that ought to not be a good enough answer for what is a legitimate role of the congress of oversight, trying to get answers to legitimate questions. in other words, abstract -- quote, unquote -- "institutional concerns" do not permit the executive branch to toss a congressional subpoena into the garbage. benghazi raises questions of vital national importance that to this very day remain unanswered. they remain unanswered because this administration refuses to honor its legal

welcome to "legal view." just days after a young man with a long history of mental illness killed another half dozen adults and then killed himself, some california lawmakers want to make it easier for police and for the courts to think ahead and anticipate blood shed before it happens. thereby preventing it. classmates, friends and families of the murdered uc santa barbara students gathered late yesterday in their honor. by now, you know, three were fatally stabbed in the killer's apartment in the community of isla vista last friday. two others were shot to death at a sorority house. a sixth was killed at a convenience shop and deli. that student's father has channeled his all consuming anguish into a passionate demand for new and tougher gun laws. and contempt for politicians who do little but offer their regret. >> i've had congress people call me and express their condolences and sympathy. and when that happened, when that's happened, i've told them, don't call me and tell me you're sorry about my son's d

that is not to say that this is legal under bahamian law.

current legal units. this was a live call in radio show and director huey got plenty of questions about situations and provided helpful advice so thank you for taking that on the road. he had also been invited to do a channel 26 chinese tv interview with annie chun, the president of self help for the elderly. we expect this interview to be scheduled in the next few weeks which will remind viewers about the rapidly approaching september 15 deadline to submit [inaudible]. dbi had alsz been invited to be part of the june 21 home buyer and investor expo, which will be held from 11:00 to 5:00 pm on the 1300 block [inaudible] respond to questions about plan review, inspections and code enforcements. this concludes my announcements. thank you. >> is there any public comment on the president's announcements? seeing none, item 3, general public comment, the building inspection commission will take public comment not part of this agenda. >> good morning commissioners. my name is theresa, i'm the building manager at

we raise money to keep our legal program going. i spend lots of time reading the old letters of thurgood marshall, and he ruined his health just riding around the country trying to raise money to keep this legal program going. i would like to stay healthy. i would like you to support us at any level that you can. you can go to our website. i want you to go there because we have assembled a plethora of resources about brown. as you heard, if we are going to teach our children, we have to learn ourselves. how much you really know about brown? you know the name, you maybe know what it stood for, you maybe read the case in law school, but how much to you know about this case, the most important constitutional moment of the 20th century? we want to ask you to make sure you know about the work, and that means telling people in your network. we are all about social media. we ask you to go to brownat60. i am on twitter. i ask you to join me. we ask you to be partners with us in our network. we want people to still know there are people who

snowden ever communicate any concerns about the nsa's interpretation of its legal authorities? >> now about that last point there about the paper trail that snowden says exists within the n sarks.

it's a record of legal reasoning and policy positions that are far outside the mainstream of legal thought. professor barron's record is even outside the mainstream of typically left-wing legal thought that we see in so many of our law schools. it's a record that reveals professor barron's judicial philosophy. and while that judicial philosophy may be appropriate for the ivory towers of academia, it has no place on a federal appellate court. and it's also a record that reveals professor barron's embrace of an approach to judging that is flatly inconsistent with what federal judges are called upon to do under their constitutional responsibilities. professor barron has been very candid about his view on the role of the federal courts in our nation. so from that standpoint, he's intellectually honest it's fair to say that he appears to view the federal judiciary as a political branch of our government, not the judicial branch, interpreting law instead of making law. so let me recount some of the evidence that leads me to this conclusion. professor barron has written that the courts are -- quo

authority. >> i satisfied myself that there was sufficient legal authority to move forward. and i felt that the president was not a lawyer, and that it was my job, if i felt comfortable that it was in fact lawful, to provide that signature. i did it because i wanted to protect the president. that's why i signed that document. >> narrator: but the white house wondered, "would general hayden go out on a legal limb and

i happen to be very pro-legal immigration. and there's no reason for most americans not to give their head up high and lift their head up high when we actually understand that our country admits more legal immigrants annual than all the other countries of the world combined. totally roughly a million legal immigrants every year. and while our immigration system certainly needs reforming or making it more effective and more he efficient in what it's doing, this controlled and open process of legal immigration has worked well for america and demonstrates the capacity for our people to have compassion and generosity towards other human beings, other people who would like to come here to be part of the american family. coming here while obeying the rules. coming here not thumbing their nose at our legal system. coming there with respect towards the rest of us by obeying the laws and the regulations that are necessary for someone to come here legally. those folks have been a wondrous and in fact we all trace our roots back to peopl

the potential legal fallout. whether she's got the right to to this or whether she needs to sit on the sidelines and watch the whole thing slip away. that's coming up next. ♪ honey, we need to talk. we do? i took the trash out. i know. and thank you so much for that. i think we should get a medicare supplement insurance plan. right now? [ male announcer ] whether you're new to medicare or not, you may know it only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. it's up to you to pay the difference. so think about an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, they help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. i did a little research. with a medicare supplement plan, you'll be able to stay with your doctor. oh, you know, i love that guy. mm-hmm. [ male announcer ] these types of plans let you visit any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. and there are no networks. is this a one-size-fits-all kind

or not legalized after the eir is finished i don't see where we should be doing anything at this point but talking to the staff and academy to make sure this process motives i have a question for chelsea now on the environmental document i understand atkins has been doing it and there's problems, in fact, i've been told it on the transportation impact study atkins has submitted it but it's deemed incomplete; is that correct. >> for this type of complex project we go through rounds of reviews this method doing was adapted for aa you this the unusual so there's a higher burden on the transportation study to have it prepared. so we have gone through more drafts than normal but for context projects like this it is the normal course of business not the long delays between jobs >> there are part of things atkins were doing not meeting our standards. >> sorry to interrupt. >> i understand the academy as asked a portion of this be handled by the consulting and i'm not sure staff has agreed but they've agreed to allow them to do that part and fold it into the entire eir. >> yes. we made a recom

unit plus so if someone is trying to remove a legal 4th unit it's easier to certify.he second point we've clarified when the illegal units are being when people are seeking to remove a illegal unit in the directive they can feasibly be legalized we're working on a policy to deny legal and at the last hearing the units remain a live ability we're structuring our approach to determine the legalization on the report we counter have in place for residential occasion they're looking things from two lens their analyzed within a given you are talking about and actually, we have our first case filed with the planning department you'll see that in the next two months. lastly in the directors bullet we're hoping to clarify the point before your accident a few weeks mergers of twel unit monst monsterable unaffordable and this isn't a reverse even if course but we heard you guys want to continue down the path. the late update on the mrechlgs of the mayors project is task 3 our cooperation with the rent board i want to give you guys we've established a policy whereby the departmen

welcome to "legal view." barely a day after the islamic terror group not only admitted to kidnapping but vowed to sell off more than 200 teenage schoolgirls from that school in northern nigeria, reports have emerged those heavily armed seemingly fearless attackers may have struck again. a villager in borneo state where the first kidnappings took place 22 days ago tells cnn that gunman raided several homes late sunday, making off with money, livestock and eight girls who were aged between 12 and 15 years. my cnn colleague isha sesay is following these developments. what's the latest on the fate of these late eight girls who have been taken? >> ashleigh, good to talk to you. we have no word on what going on right now in attempts to find these eight girls. almost too much to bear, to think that having seen that video just a couple hours ago, the video of the boko haram leader, talking about what he intended to do to the previous batch of girls he took some three weeks ago, that boko haram has struck again, takin

for the legal defense fund. she serves on many boards here in washington, d.c., and has been a tireless advocate on behalf of young people, particularly through the thurgood marshall summer law internship program. but we know her best for her work on the l.d.f. board where she has served since 1994, getting on the amtrak train and coming to new york for those board meetings, serving and convening dinners for us at her beloved georgetown club with our supporters and donors, and being a welcoming arm for every director counsel that the legal defense fund has had, including me. i have been privileged by just the joy of her friendship, her laughter, her counsel, and her tremendous support. ladies and gentlemen, we present the spirit of justice award to mrs. se sleela m. marshall. [applause] >> thank you, director. i believe i can only prove half of what you said about me. not even half. 60 years ago, on may 17, after the supreme court handed down its landmark decision on brown versus board, i was at the offices of o

it's legal. we are under emergency, emergency conditions. extraordinary, extraordinary means are required to deal with the threat. we just need the data." and then the most chilling... i don't often have said this part of the conversation: "don't ask any more questions, mr. drake." >> if he came to me, someone who was not read into the program, right, and not a part of what we were doing, and told me that we were running amok, essentially, and violating the constitution, and it was in that time frame when there was an awful lot going on and we were all worried about the next attack, there's no doubt in my mind i would have told him, you know, "go talk to your management. don't bother me with this." i mean, you know, the minute he said, if he did say, "you're using this to violate the constitution," i mean, i probably would have stopped the conversation at that point, quite frankly. so i mean, if that's what he said he said, then anything after that i probably wasn't listening to anyway. >> narrator: "the program" was continuing to grow. in s

how that would not be legal? because right now the flsa says that over 12 if you have your parents' permission. >> and what you're suggesting is that government take primacy over a family. that the government has a better understanding than parents, than the mom and dad. i hope we don't go into a situation in this country where the federal government things they can better raise the children than us. that is a fundamental different of philosophy. but to those who believe the federal government is solution and there are those of us who think that the federal government because of the one size fits all attitude or standard is the problem. >> we're in northern kentucky. we've heard about a family that picks tobacco. some of them are under the age of eighteen, meaning they're old enough to work in the fields but not old enough to use the finished product. >> this family is getting ready for a day in the tobacco fields. they would prefer we didn't say their last names. tobacco has to be cut when it is very dry to avoi

the legal view on that just ahead.aw this red, blistery, rash and i felt this horrible pain on one side of my back. i had 16 magic shows to do. i didn't know how i was going to be able to do these shows with this kind of pain that i was in. i told my wife what i had. she went on the internet and said "i think you have shingles." i could feel the shock in my back and it was like "wow its got to get better than this or i'm in big trouble." those little cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment is right. cialis is also the only daily ed tablet approved to treat symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for

that was perfectly legal. to deprive them of citizenship was perfectly legal.nd, the system worked from the perspective of maintaining united states is a white country because unlike the asians, generallygration was circular migration. that is, mexicans came, worked for a season or year or a couple of years, and returned to mexico. borderhistory migrations for 150 years was one of circular migration sets were basically either completely unregulated or, for example in 1942 and 1964, extended to 1967, government-sponsored program, but migrations that denied citizenship and denied rights to the mexicans who were in the country. illegalitytion of and starting to call this migration illegal happens in 1965, really, when mexican migration is, for the first time, considered to be immigration and is legally restricted, that is, a quota is put on mexican migration as it is on every country of the world . and in a situation where tens of thousands of mexicans have been crossing the border illegally and recruited and sometimes even coerced, every year, all of a sudden, th

but you legal drugs are cocaine, things like that.ut the merrill went -- the marijuana plant, we need to leave that here for the younger generation. it is too powerful, it cannot be killed. we tried everything and we cannot kill it, so we should just leave it alone. it is a holy plant. it cannot be killed unless you can stop it from coming, which we cannot do. when will we realize that that plan is more powerful than america and its allies put together? thank you for the call. some figures according to drug policy.org. people arrested in 2012, the most recent figures on nonviolent drug charges, a number of states allow drugs for medical marijuana use. 21 states, in fact. dave humphrey has this point on our twitter page -- host: the next call comes from charles in cincinnati. please turn down your set, otherwise we will hear feedback. caller: [indiscernible] go ahead with your comment. is charles and my comment is simply that america needs to realize first that the start of all drugs and addiction to cigarettes, for that to be legal, p

legalization of marijuana. washington and colorado broke through first. now other states are considering green lighting marijuana for recreational use, including here in california. they argued smoking pot is dangerous. is it more dangerous than alcohol that is widely consumes and legal. the reality may surprise you. the topic is kind of out of the bag. cannabis supporters. even the president is weighing in telling the new yorker, i don't think it's more dangerous than alcohol. is this true? >> he's closer to telling the truth than what the government has been willing to do about marijuana. >> reporter: this doctor is an addictions psychiatrist and author of the book "marijuana, what's a parent to believe." consuming alcohol, just like marijuana, using chemicals from the outside to stimulate the reward center in the brain as demonstrated in this human relations media, making somebody want to repeat the actions that led to the reward. most people handle both substances fine. only 15% of drinkers become addicted compared to just 9% of marijuana smokers. tho

pot may be legal in colorado -- but it is still a federal crime. the federal reserve has to sign off on the plan. >>> meanwhile. synthesized marijuana is the target of a nationwide crackdown by the drug enforcement administration. the d-e-a has arrested more 150 people in 25 states since january -- including a big bust yesterday. natasha ghoneim explains why the pressure is on to take man-made marijuana off the streets. >> synthetic drugs have been a staple of the clubbing scene for years in cities like miami. the most popular are known as k-2 or spice and bath salts. the amphetamine like drugs are mostly made in asia and often sold legally in stores in packets like this, as herbal incense or potpourri. >> patients come in combative, psychotic, hard to control. many times they have to be intubated or put on life support to control them. >> according to a federal government report, between 2010 and 2011, visits to emergency rooms due to synthetic drug complications, more than doubled, to 28,500. one of these so-called designer drugs-- synthetic mari

potential players in this legal battle -- the nba.commissioner adam silver banned sterling, the league says it will begin a search for a new clippers ceo. >> his legal defense would be that by trying to force him out, that the league has violated the contract. >> reporter: it may not stop with the leak. there's also the nba owners. 3/4 of the current owners must agree to force sterling out. he could then sue them for unfairly ganging up on him. potentially the most powerful player in all of this -- his wife, shelly sterling. in a statement, mrs. sterling says of the commission's ban of her husband, "i fully supported his recent swift and decisive action. while it see-- action." while it seems to undermine her husband, don't be so quick to bench this player. >> in one sense, her interests are very much allained with donald. that is the one winning play for donald and his heirs which would include shelly would be making this litigation so protracted and complex that the court case outlives donald sterling. >> reporter: why? for the lucr

those legal strips are legal in kentucky and maryland.york, the home of the belmont stakes, they're not normally allowed. so when we're talking about the triple crown, we had an instance in 2012 where the horse named "i'll have another" also won the first two legs of the triple crown. his neighbors were told the strips were prohibited in new york. the horse couldn't run anyway because of a leg injury. his owners may have not let him run at all. the co-owner talked to chris cuomo this morning about just how special this horse is. >> i saw him when he was a day old. i saw him in a dream prior to that and he was exactly like my dream. i told my wife, i said, this horse is going to do big things. i don't know what yet, but he's going to do big things. he's proven us right so far. we believe in our horse. we believe in our trainer. and he is proving to america right now he is america's horse. >> well, he just might be. that triple crown winner. he's going to wear those strips during the race. i want to bring in cnn correspondent richard roth w

department records there is no permit but the process was never completed and to date there is no legal permit for the spray booth at that address. >> i'm sorry, i think i miss our authority what's our background all i'm what i'm retired from the san francisco fire department for 14 years and managed the planning definition. >> so your statement there's no legal permit from the fire department did you do a review. >> that was part of the scope of my work i managed. >> you recall from 1994 there was non-existent. >> we looked at he history. >> i - >> i wasn't directly involved only through the history. >> okay. thanks. >> i'm pat i'll be quick i went through every permit all the way back to the permit to build this building no permit was had and there's no permit from the 20s and the building department said they issued a notice of violation telling them to get a permit which will require a mechanism review so putting in the proper filters. >> raining an paertd son there are two appropriate course of action to revoke the permit that's appropriate if the board didn't want to do that the a