. >> to legalize or not to legalize, looking at ballot question 4. ed: voters will decide of recreational marijuana is legalized and our guest is jim borghesani of yes on 4. "on the record. " ed: thank you for joining us on this sunday. massachusetts voters will decide whether to legalize recreational marijuana here in the commonwealth. today, we have jim borghesani, communications director for yes on 4 campaign. emily: thank you for being with us. right now we have four states, colorado, alaska, oregon and washington. here in massachusetts we now allow the use of medical marijuana. along with 23 other states. let's break it down to basics. why should marijuana be legal recreationally in massachusetts? jim: first of all the current system is a failure. it has done nothing to protect teens for marijuana. easy access. drug dealers don't check ids. subsidized by taxpayers without returning anything to taxpayers except more cost in arrests, incarceration and many other law enforcement costs. what we are proposing is a system that would actually start to

but as is determined or legal consequences flow. with that determination in this case, avocation has been. >> but there is simply information about what will happen over different courses of action. >> it doesn't say anything about this property. and to trigger the requirement is to go through this laborious and cite specific. >> is also why people go to the treasury department for tax letters and to you that sec for advice on what they can or cannot do. >> i am not aware of those examples with the appeals process that results in death final agency action with treatment or regulation with the binding conclusion. >> the army corps of engineers does this side of the goodness of its heart this is a law of work for them but they just want to be nice to landowners why they set up this process. may be that is correct grey understood but you said that is not how you see the process. they do this for because that enforces the powers of they have a question what the status and hophead with that jurisdictional determination as a practical mat

there's no legalization. there's no amnesty. if somebody wants to go the legalization route. go, leave the country, hopefully come back in and we can talk. >> all of us who covered immigration, there is a lot of nuance and policy around it. there are pillars of it. there are major pillars of the discussion of immigration reform and debate. donald trump is shifting on those almost daily. >> absolutely. jason said it well. the only thing that is clear is it is unclear. i don't think anyone can answer it at this point. what donald trump's immigration policy is except for the wall. that is what he keeps going back to as well. the wall he will build. i almost want to start with ted cruz. i'm not sure anyone in america who is angrier about this. donald trump largely won the primary by going to the right of ted cruz on immigration. ted cruz staked out that ground and donald trump was harder line than that. he was asked many times during the primary if he would soften. he expressed by jeb bush and marco rubio if you get to the general election, that hard line policy will not fly with

you will have to leave the country and you'll come back legally.hat he went on to say is there are many people who are trying to come in legally, they'll have the preference because they're trying to do it the proper way. it's been very clear. >> he said specifically there was a deportation force. that's not a change, corey? >> what he's sayings if you are here illegally, they'll have to identify who they are and they'll have to leave and come back legally. he said he's going to build a wall hundreds of times with a big, beautiful door so you can come back into the country legally. the position has never changed. >> okay. so, guy, go ahead. do you think this is a change in position? c corey is saying it's not, he understood all along what donald trump is saying, it has not changed. >> the only thing has change side some of the rhetoric when he's able to read off kellyanne conway's prompter, he says one thing and interviewed by anderson cooper, he says another. the facts are still the same, donald trump is trying to suede people a sovereign country

no path to legalization. however, he won't commit to the fact that they all should go. >> what he's saying is they have to go back and return if they want any chance of legalization. >> but he isn't committing to forcing them to leave, correct? >> he's committing to removing the criminals. he's starting there. after that, it's a negotiation with congress. that's how these things work. it's a compromise. >> so the criminals will go. the noncriminals, he's not committing to the fact that they have to go. >> he's saying -- his starting point is with the criminals. which is what he's always said. here's the thing with donald trump. his position is one of security. if we want to talk about flip-flop. let's talk about hillary clinton who went last november at a new hampshire rally, said and praised the fact she voted for a bill to put a barrier on the border. that happened at just november at a new hampshire rally. 2005, she said, i am adamantly against illegal immigrants. we have to look at hillary clinton who at

marijuana, the legal issues. >> they turned in the signatures, michele reagan notified governor ducey the mesher had enough to put it on the november 8 ballot. they got the total number of valid signatures, 177,258. they needed 150,000. they are doing great on the signature front. but the polling shows today. do you have a theory as to why? as soon as well, no not really a theory. my understanding of the most polling it's about 52% against, 39 in favor. and it may just be a situation where the state of arizona and the voters here are not ready for it yet. the campaign that run these recreational referendums typically will run them off of states where the medicinal marijuana have been in place couple of years. >> we are too early in the game on medical pair within a to let everybody catch up and get used to it. >> that may be the case. in the united states we have 25 states that have some form of legalized marijuana use and five of those so far have recreational use. so you know there has to be a timing strategy between how long you wait for the medicinal marijuana to work in terms of

nevada gaming control legalized olympic betting last year. local sports books say people shy away from betting on the games because the american athletes are too good and you can't make much money off it. more americans are using marijuana according to some brand new research. in fact, the number of people admitting to smoking pot has doubled in the past three years. fox 5's mike doria joins us with the results of this gallup poll conducted last month to put some numbers on this -- 13 percent of americans admit to using marijuana regularly in this latest poll. that's that would larger than the population of the state of texas and slightly smaller than california's. president obama's daughter malia may end up being among this percentage...this video of her appearing to be smoking pot at a festival is now all over the internet. the number of people admitting to smoking pot could grow even bigger in november. five more states including nevada have a ballot question asking whether to legalize marijuana for recreational use. when gallup co poll in

he said no legal status. no legal status, if you have no legal status you have to leave. be deported. it was completely incoherent. i think i should shut up and just play the tape. >> scotty, as a trump supporter, do you feel you know his immigration policy and i'm not talking about the wall or going after criminals and people that committed a felony, about people that have been law-abiding and who have had jobs and been here for 10, 15 years. do you know what he dolled as president? >> unlike the liberals and i feel sorry that you are confused. i feel bad for that clarification. >> you're not confused? >> so what happens to those 11 million. >> we have a problem here in the united states and donald trump is the only one that's offering solutions. >> what happens to the 11 mill on. >> we did not import these illegals to the united states. it's very hard to say you will mass deport them and we have a deportation group already and it's called i.c.e. they need the strength and support to carry through. we have a problem. >> so donald trump early on in the primary said they'v

>> there is no path to legalization. unless people leave the country -- when they come back in, if they come back in, they can start paying taxes. there is no path to legalization unless they leave the country and come back. >> reporter: that is what he told anderson cooper. he made other conflicting statements in other interviews. >> they'll pay back taxes. they have to pay taxes. there's no amnesty as such. we work with them. now, okay, when i look at it and everybody agrees we get the bad ones out. when i go through and meet thousands and thousands of people on the subject and i had very strong people come up to me. really great, great people come up to me. they said mr. trump, i love you. to take a person that's been here for 15 or 20 years and throw them and the family out. it is a tough thing. it's a very hard thing. >> you have to send people out. >> i would get people out and have an expedited way of getting them back into the country so they can be legal. >> how do you do it in a practical way? >> they have to l

they went so far as to discuss legal fees. >> koplik: legal fees will be substantial, albert. correct me i'm wrong-- $50,000 to $100,000. >> kroft: koplik also suggested conducting a test in which a portion of the suspicious funds would be sent into the united states. >> koplik: a million dollars. >> kayser: a million dollars, so, as a test? >> albert grant: yeah. >> kayser: because i said, probably you would start with around, $50 million, probably, i could imagine? dollars. >> kayser: a million dollars. >> koplik: if anything goes wrong, it'll be painful, but it won't be life threatening. >> kayser: right. exactly. >> kroft: john jankoff and his partner, lawrence gabe, who is off camera here, also seemed willing to go forward. >> jankoff: we would orchestrate it. one legal fee to cover everything. >> kroft: however, gabe did express some concerns about the transactions. >> kayser: who can set up this structure? could you do it? >> jankoff: yeah, your brother- in-law does it all the time. >> gabe: well, okay. but i-i-i don't think he does it questionable. and that we have to

medical marijuana is legal 25 states and washington d-c... half the country. but while the d-e-a this week denied any medical benefits of cannabis... states are moving forward. nevada is one of five states that could legalize recreational marijuana this year... joining 4 other states and the trying to get kids more involved in drugs, and i think it's probably the wrong way to go." annette magnus (off camera): "oh alan...")) ((patrick walker)) our politics now faceoff panel weighed in on who would benefit from a legal weed industry in nevada. ((alan stock/kxnt radio host: "they're praying on people's desire to have it legal, again, big businesses are going to be the ones who make money on this thing.")) ((annette magnus/ex. dir., battle born progress: "but also the state makes money on this alan, and we've talked about this before, just like colorado and washington, the state will make a lot of money if this is taxed and regulated the way so is there any indication of how the vote will go? recent independent polls show the initiative passing by a margin of 8-9

people who want to smoke it will get it legally anyway. kevin says exactly how will it be regulated like alcohol? if individuals are allowed to grow their own plants who is going to be checking on how many they are growing i'm fully against legalizing it and there are more reasons that i don't believe the rhetoric from the pro pot side than i can count. we like to know what you think. join in the discussion. log on to our facebook page, send us your feedback. we would love to hear from you. individuals states have legalized some forms of marijuana use. the federal government considers pot to be dangerous. and it is not softening its position on lighting up. william tonight with more on today's announcement by the dea. >>> the drug enforcement administration standing firm on marijuana. the agency deciding to not reclassify the substance and still considers it among the most dangerous drugs. consulting with the health and human services agency. the announcement reading, hhs concluded that marijuana has a high potential for abuse and has no a

the last legal use is a pdr use. they are converting it to office use, maybe allowed under the zoning district but it's not allowed under the moratorium. they're very clearly in violation. some of the arguments the appellant puts forward would encourage illegal conversions because you would say, right now the tenant in there is office, they didn't displace anyone because it's an office use now, it doesn't matter, there was no one that is being displaced by this. i don't see the arguments or the reasoning behind the appellant's statements there and i think this is a pretty clear-cut case, i don't think there was any abuse of discretion of reviewing this, i don't think there's any wild precedent that could be set here other than compliance with the code which i don't think is that wild at all, it's something we should be striving to achieve, so with that, i'll be available for any questions, i think this is very clearly a matter of illegal conversion to office space and i'll yield for questions. >> so, your point in re

, i think many of them are not legal. the practice regarding foster children were foster agencies are taking the children's funds there is a legal question that has not been addressed across the country that is a breach of fiduciary obligation. the state is taking on the fiduciary role as guardians in their state roll in the system but then they take on the represented to manage the children's money that's a fiduciary role much like a viewer to minister of an estate. if you have an estate that takes that fiduciary obligation and says we are going to take the child's money and apply it to pay back the child has no obligation to pay for it how is that not a breach of fiduciary obligation? it hasn't been decided yet but i hope people will bring attention to that fact. who regarding some of the other common practices child support enforcement when the government is taking child-support from children hopefully it's a law that will change rates a failed effort is what is called welfare cost recovery and one of the past legal jo

review, which was further bolstered by the legal brief we have submitted to the united states legal department of justice in the white house counsel this summer. here today.ves are professor charles ogletree of harvard university law school and the garvey family. we are so very honored to have representing here dr. julius garvey. the youngest son of marcus garvey. during the proceedings, 30 years since the congressional hearing garvey has been honored internationally as a leader and thinker in the field of human rights. the organization of american states has designated a hall in its main building. marcus garvey hall. additionally, garvey has been named as the first national hero. recognition of marcus garvey's lifelong contribution to society. marcus garvey should be exonerated. by way of a posthumous pardon. president obama should take appropriate measures to clear marcus garvey's name. showing it is never too late to write a wrong. right a wrong. it is time to exonerate marcus garvey, and let history reflect the true nature of his legacy. god bless the united states of america, g

kagan: it is a mistake that all legal academics have to be writing for the court. i think there --i think that it is great that some legal academics think about the court. sometimes, i find things that are useful and long reviews. -- law reviews. if i were to say to my faculty, this is your audience, and i were to say, you got to be writing to the supreme court or the appellate court, i would think that that would not be a smart thing to telik factory -- --i don't think it would be a fun thing to tell a faculty. some faculty may write legislatures. think about might writing to other departments in the university, which is also an important thing for law schools to be in touch with historians and economists. and to be in touch with sociologist and so forth. differentfaculty have audiences, and i think that is a good and appropriate thing for law schools. that don't think this idea there is this divergence between law school and the legal profession. it is not a new thing. people have been talking about this for 30 years. judge edwards wrote -- 25 years ago, somethin

if it is legal for parents it must be an age thing. we used to think that about booze when i was a kid. the reason that you can't have it, it is a restricted age thing. obviously booz is okay, otherwise our parents wouldn't be drinking it. i think kids are thinking about pot in colorado and elsewhere. >> look, people are already doing this. if we think that people are-this is not pref lentd communities right now with all different generations. my parents are very supportive of this issue. they are in their '50s, they think this is really cool. but at the same time -- >> really cool? >> yeah. i think it is time to do this for so many reasons. it is not that big of a deal. alcohol is actually far more dangerous and police have said far more dangerous in the context of domestic violence all of these different things. when i look at the pitfuls of this. it is already happening. let's legalize it so we don't have black and brown folks, frankly, going to jail for it. >> you can watch the proposal for an etiology test making it a national wil

medical marijuana has been legal here since 2000... but the first dispensaries didn't open until last year. that's a decade and a half later. now... ballot question 2 -- if approved -- would legalize up to an ounce of recreational marijuana. although the d-e-a largely stays away from shutting down state-licensed marijuana operations accross the country right now - it does prohibit pot federally-based services... like banking and contract enforcement. but with the federal policy of letting the states regulate an illegal industry... state senator tick segerblom... a prominant figure behind the effort to legalize marijuana in nevada... was caught off guard by the d-e-a's decision. ((state sen. tick segerblom/(d) las vegas: 0.13 "i'm surprised because they made such a big deal that they were going to do this re-evaluation, and it seems like if they really looked at the current state of the law, and what's going on in the country, they wiould have recognized that there is definitely a medical use for marijuana." 0.28 )) >> the d-e-a says ri

medical marijuana is legal 25 states and washington d-c... half the country. but while the d-e-a this week denied any medical benefits of cannabis... states are moving forward. nevada is one of five states that could legalize recreational marijuana this year... joining 4 other states and the district of columbia trying to get kids more involved in drugs, and i think it's probably the wrong way to go." annette magnus (off camera): "oh alan...")) ((patrick walker)) our politics now faceoff panel weighed in on who would benefit from a legal weed industry in nevada. ((alan stock/kxnt radio host: "they're praying on people's desire to have it legal, again, big businesses are going to be the ones who make money on this thing.")) ((annette magnus/ex. dir., battle born progress: "but also the state makes money on this alan, and we've talked about this before, just like colorado and washington, the state will make a lot of money if this is taxed and regulated the way it should how the vote will go? recent independent polls show the initiative passing by a margin of 8-9

welcome to legal view.is hour, a huge hour in the presidential race that is now 69 days from the finish line. just minutes from now we're expecting to see a big plane with a trump trump emblazoned on the side touched down in a place we didn't expect it to touch down, mexico city. i repeat, mexico city. you bet.

he is ceo of legal and general. he stays with us.omberg. ♪ caroline: this is on the move. germany trading higher and -- munich re and deutsche leading the charge. let's get over to bloomberg is his flash with david ingles. david: thanks. let's have a look at munich re. second quarter profit that is more than doubled. net income declined. 974 million euros. that's even as the world's second-biggest reinsurer had higher claims from natural disasters. have a look at shares. -- trading higher this morning. airlines says the number of flights disrupted by a computer failure is approaching 1000. the carrier expects more than 100 more -- have been canceled. 817 monday. this morning delays and cancellations will continue even as they come back online. at as of anz have closed high in sydney after the company said it had boosted capital and cut low returning assets. consensus for bad debt will remain steady. a region has dragged down every turn in equities. that is your bloomberg business flash. guy? guy: nigel wilson, ceo of legal and genera

it's legal in 26 states. >> right. >> medical conditions are spelled out, but it is only legal as ano on a proponent of prop 64, you would help write some of the legislation for the ballot measure that's coming up. what are your thoughts on that in terms of why legalize it and what are your fears if it is legal in the state of california? >> i don't have any significant fears if it is legal. i think that currently that we will have a $9 to $30 billion cash unregulated business in california. i think that it will be much safer for your kids to have a regulated controlled system. for 20 years in marin county where my kids grew up, it's always been easier for a kid to get marijuana than beer. people just need to check their i.d. hey, nobody checked your i.d. >> we asked scott chipman about prop 64. here is what he had to say. >> prop 64 allows every house and apartment in california to become a grow site. it'll allow advertising. it does a lot to rollback the restrictions that we've had on tobacco smoke and marijuana has all the same carcinogens as tobacco smoke, plus it is psychoactive

>> miley cyrus. >> but a legal miley cyrus. >> but a legal one, yeah. in reality they're not.denture were to be put under a microscope, we can see all the bacteria that still exists on the denture, and that bacteria multiplies very rapidly. that's why dentists recommend cleaning with polident everyday. polident's unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day. >>> inside maricopa's 4th avenue jail, jon antonucci. tends to stand out. >> last name is spelled a-n-t-o-n-u-c-c-i. italian last name, redhead, don't ask. >> never been in jail. it's completely different perspective than i got from the outside. my only connotations of jail were andy griffith style or there's a big guy in the shower named bubba. >> i don't know how they could take a poker game without the best player playing. >> assigned to the same housing unit is joe watson. antonucci is at maricopa awaiting sentencing for manslaughter, having plea bargained from charges of arson and murder. he and three friends burned down

and they're going to have to leave and they'll come back in legally.going to have to build a wall with a big, beautiful door and they can come back in legally. his position never changed. >> guy, go ahead. are you saying this is a change in position? corey is saying it has not changed. >> i think the only thing has changed is some of the rhetoric when he's able to read off of kellyanne conway prompter, he se says one thing and when interviewed by anderson, he says another. he said he's going to build a wall between the united states and mexico and then he's going to deport 11 million people. that's been his position in the primaries and i believe that's his position now. the difference is he's been try in a ham handed way to cover over his racist comments over the last year and a half by using akronisms instead of saying deportation force because he thinks it upsets moderate republicans. i think his position is exactly the same. i think they're trying to sugar coat it for americans. >> will the me as you then more specifically after saying what he said

the department won the lawsuit but the legal battle is not over. the group challenging the expansion says it will appeal today's ruling. >>> and, a valley mother is accused of leaving her baby outside alone, while she was passed out drunk in her apartment, police say and to let little--- little-nashio left her little 1-year-old outside for 45 minutes, when police arrived she was urine, they had to knock on the door for 10 minutes before someone answered. little-nashio was five times over the legal limit. >>> dust advisory until 8:00 this evening. take it easy. and happy friday. >> absolutely. happy friday to everyone. thank you for joining us and we hope to see you back here at 10:00. >> cbs5az.com, your online home >> previously on "big brother": head of household victor made a pig move. >> i nominated you, paulie, and you corey. you still love you as people, but it's a game and this is what we're doing. >> and the house of gunning for paulie. >> i had your back. i don't know if i can say that right now, though. >> with the veto on paul joined the

it was wholly without morality or legality. that's the statement by the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. so this judicial opinion has reverberated throughout history until today. it illustrates how a court and a judge and a legal process can construct a narrative that can suppress, that can over us, and that can be value voices for justice. ultimately, the unjust trial of marcus garvey and the conviction and the deportation that followed was an attempt to silence and suppress his movement for racial justice. so we come here almost 90 years later to show that our resistance still endures come in spite of all the efforts that were made to suppress our descent. we continue to fight, to restore the legacy and the ideas and the memory of marcus garvey. because he was the leader of the largest racial justice movement that we have ever seen in the course of our african diaspora history. so history matters. in spite of marcus garvey's great to come punishments, if i today was to ask a random person who was marcus

. >> there is no path to legalization. unless people leave the country -- well, when they come back in, if they come back in, then they can start paying taxes. >> reporter: donald trump struggling to clarify his immigration stance, now telling cnn's anderson cooper he's ruling out a pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants in the united states. >> there is no path to legalization unless they leave the country and come back. >> reporter: this after indicating earlier this week that he was open to the idea. >> they'll pay back taxes. they have to pay taxes. there's no amnesty as such. there's no amnesty. but we work with them. >> reporter: trump sending mixed messages. >> there certainly can be a softening because we're not looking to hurt people. i don't think it's a softening. >> but 11 million people are no longer going to be deported. >> it's a hardening, actually. >> but 11 million who have not committed a crime with no path to legalization. is that right? >> you know it's a process. you can't 11 at one time

opponents of a campaign to legalize recreational legalize a campaign to opponents of opponents of a campaign to legalize recreational marijuana in arizona will urge a judge to bar the initiative from the november ballot. attorneys for arizonans for responsible drug policy will make their arguments friday in a phoenix courtroom. they argue in part that the citizen's initiative should be blocked because the 100-word explanation on petition sheets doesn't fully explain the effects of the proposed legalization.the suit was brouby county attorney bill montgomery and yavapai county attorney sheila polk.backers call the lawsuit a desperate attempt to keep voters from having the right to vote to legalize small amounts of marijuana.election officials on thursday certified that the campaign to regulate marijuana like to regulate marijuana like alcohol submitted enough valid signatures to make the ballot. to the university of phoenix. the arizona cardinals returnfootball... team 12's jen wahl is at university we're we're finishing up our remains unstoppable. this morning.. we top the scoreboard with 38

supreme court-- legal maneuvering over voting rules has intensified.for example, 17 states have laws now in effect requiring photo identification in order to vote, all but two of those states led by republicans when the laws passed. the number of lawsuits nationwide over voting practices and results has also dramatically increased, from only 80 cases in 1999 to more than 300 in 2014, a trend ohio state university professor edward foley calls "the voting wars." >> the voting wars is to use the tools of the legal system to try to get one side or the other a little bit of an advantage on election day in the counting of the ballots. and it can be through lawsuits, or it can be through creating new laws that you think might be favorable to your side. >> reporter: foley says both parties are constantly fighting over what he calls "the margin of litigation"-- legal skirmishes that could change outcomes in close races. >> in battleground states, the chances are that the election could be really close-- 1,000 votes could tip a state. so the rules for how you co

the legal help you can count on. legalzoom. legal help is here. hey how's it going, hotcakes?otcakes. this place has hotcakes. so why aren't they selling like hotcakes? with comcast business internet and wifi pro, they could be. just add a customized message to your wifi pro splash page and you'll reach your customers where their eyes are already - on their devices. order up. it's more than just wifi, it can help grow your business. you don't see that every day. introducing wifi pro, wifi that helps grow your business. comcast business. built for business. kennedy: companies are pulling out of federal health exchanges. obamacare originally promised more options. so ways happening to obamacare and what can we expect? there is no one better to talk to than jonathon hon hoenig. the president set this as a healthcare marketplace. but when you are down to only one choice, how is that a marketplace? >> it was marketplace in name only, kennedy. whole purpose of obamacare had nothing to do with healthcare. it was to establish healthcare as a right, and by that measure they succeeded.

marijuana legalization is once again on the nevada ballot.. but according to a new study.. 20-16 may finally be the year it passes.. mike doria joins us.. with the gallop poll resuls. the little girl who turned a "lemony" situation into lemonade is at it again. see who she's raising money for this time. good morning i'm jason feinberg and i'm monica jackson welcome to fox5 news this morning. with a quick look at the fox 5 weather 24-7 forecast. still a lot of moisture in the atmosphere thursday morning that is expected to allow for some cloud development. as the day wears on drier air will begin to move in. high pressure will begin through the weekend driving daytime highs well above normal starting sunday. the uv index for thursday is 10 or very high. here are the accidents to watch out and alternate routes you can use listed on our maps here are the construciton areas to look out for and alternate routes listed on our maps back to the news desk. hours after a man was killed on the east side of the valley... a second person was killed in an a

fly made bessie a key member of tva brilliant legal team. to landmark supreme court cases that established the legality of tva's power program and later the tennessee electric power company overshadowed tva's legal work in those early years and bessie researched, prepared witnesses and materially shaped the brief in both cases. in her another tva work, she negotiated contracts and got courtroom experience in condemnation cases despite fierce resistance for a woman lawyer from local attorneys, judges and even witnesses. bessie won the respect of her tva colleagues including herbert f marx, pictured in the top left of the group photo who would go on to serve as general counsel to the atomic energy commission and whose papers researched here at the library. how did bessie feel about her chosen profession? in 1938, she shared her thoughts and her sorority magazine. law is still too greatly restricted for women with considerable prejudice against them, she wrote. she offered this no-nonsense advice: a woman attorney must manage to be accepted and

through a legal process, that doesn't make you a racist. it makes you smart. >> but trump now signaling he might be reconsidering his pledge to deport all of the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants currently in the united states. >> no citizenship. no citizenship. >> everyone agree with that? >> yeah. >> all right. >> we'll go a step further. they'll pay back taxes. they have to pay taxes. there's no amnesty as such. >> reporter: it's an approach that aligns trump with some of his former republican primary rivals. >> we're not going throw them out. i'm not in favor of getting rid of them if. >> they're on a path to earn legal status. >> back then, these candidates were frequent targets of truchs and relentless attacks on their immigration views. >> bush is weak on immigration. in an interview today jeb bush criticized trump on his new tact. >> all of the things that donald trump railed against, he seems to be morphing into. it's kind of disturbing. >> a hard line when it came to those in the count rery illegal saying he will deport

we outline three reasons in the legal brief. first of all, this is the first time that a president has given a posthumous pardon to someone who has passed away. both president clinton and president bush have given posthumous pardons in the last years of their administration. clinton in 1999 and president bush in 2008 so these posthumous pardons are definitely legal. there's definitely president for doing so secondly, marcus garvey is innocent . he's innocent. we've proven that beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt. we were the first persons to prove so. united states congress held a hearing in 1987 and the house to sherry committee chaired by john conyers where they poured in depth all of the evidence. they looked at historical evidence presented by historians like robert hill and tony martin and they concluded that garvey was innocent in 1987. there have been dozens of books written about garvey. currently garvey's quest in the hall of the organization of american states as was mentioned, his face is on the currency of jamaica.

do you agree that whether you like it or not the payment was legal? and what do you plan to do about you can't undo it, but to try to stop it in the future. >> lawyers disagree about the legality, but in the end it's not a question whether it was legal, but whether it was mart and the right thing to do to keep americans safe. again, president obama said we don't pay ransom this week. he said this was not a ransom. it doesn't matter what the president said, but is the matters what terrorists around the world think, clearly think it was a ransom. if they take a american hostage, may they too will get a windfall of $400 million. bev to stands up to iran, chris. i've introduced legislation with several calling the counter-iranian threat act, that we need to act immediately after we go back in session -- question of iran. one of the concern is iran used this as, to support terrorism, but cia director john brennan said that that's not true. let's listen to director brennan. >> the money, the revenue flowing into iran is being used to support its currency, t

our senior legal analyst jeffy toobin is here. that whole legal thingy. how frustration is it not to hear anderson's questions in their entirety and i don't believe the full answers were given because donald trump wasn't hearing the full question. but the question remains, there is a law in place now and there is a policy in place now to "get the bad ones out." what would be different under what donald trump has been saying over this past week about his plan to get the bad ones out and what we're doing now. >> that is the part that i found maddening because this goes back decades. if you are illegally in the country and you are convicted of a felony, a bad one. drug dealers as trump was often saying there. that's deportable offenses. and that's not barack obama. that's not george w. bush. but that goes way back. if you were convicted of a felony and you are illegally in the country. you get thrown out, period. law of the land for decades. i don't understand what his point is there when he says we're going to get the bad ones out. the bad ones, the ones wh