>> pretty close, yes. >> legomsky.i want to make sure i pose questions to you in a short period of time because i think you elevated us to a level worthy of commentary. this is a hearing that contributes to political security and not national security. in this hearing, the backdrop, we are not funding dhs. that is a horrific tragedy in the midst of the crisis of isil and we're doing it on untoward and police directed arguments that really are not accurate and i think that's important. i would say to my good friend from nevada that we have documentation that nevada would be severely hampered by the presence of your lawsuit but more particularly not funding dhs. i may have the opportunity to present that into evidence sort of looking for my documents right now. but there are documentation that grants that you would warrant and need would not be generated and ski you to review the impact of not funding dhs that you would ask me well, i'm not at a dhs hearing i just came from one, that's why i stepped away, but you are eng