commissioner lemberg said and a long decision how it would be devised. in the building code any permit includeing one that it is in the important perhaps to the entire city but to those of us who live the tiny permit has been revised. reviseed require in the building code if your permit is issued and you need to make revisions apply for a new perit. mr. green's attempt labeling of this permit reinstate side incorrect not consistent with the use of the word, reinstate which is therefore permits that expire because of time. they are allowed be there for a year, year and a half and reinstate third degree permit reinstated is appealable. and what i'm asking to you do if i come become another time i will i doubt the building department will remedy this asking you a direct thing to give me permission to appeal the permit that is incorrectly labeled reinstate when you said, you must revise it. not revive it. revise it. mislabel whatting is done in the department. if a department is changing the permit must be a new permit to this section of the building code on

uh commissioner lemberg, uh, thank you. i initially crafted this as a question to you, but i realized that you were not actually the right person to ask the question to. so my question is actually to miss huber regarding a question i sort of asked earlier, which is regarding the five variance factors that mr. teague certainly did the analysis for in issuing his decision is that do we also have to follow that standard in, in order to grant this appeal? i think it depends in part on on how the appeal is granted. so if this board were to grant a variance, it would be required to make the written findings. and my understanding is what we've typically done is continued the matter so that the written findings can be prepared. okay um, what i understand mr. teague to be saying is that because the deck doesn't require for a variance, it's sort of a very unique situation where the variance could conceivably be you could grant the appeal with a modification that would allow the deck and that would not require the findings is because

algunos tienen que presentar un reclamo al seguro y pagar un deducible, dijo lemberg.ro, porque estamos hablando del vidrio trasero del coche, no del delantero que es. pues no es que no se dé la la situación, pero es casi raro que el vidrio de atrás se rompa por algún objeto que que caiga, no en la carretera. >> y una de las cosas que se me viene a la mente es de que usualmente en la parte trasera por seguridad vienen los menores de edad, vienen los niños en sus en sus carritos. entonces más preocupación no? si esto llegara a pasar, bueno, bueno, hay que estar pendientes de eso, reportar con eso vamos a la pausa porque están divulgando esas imágenes. >> es un tiroteo mortal que

commissioner lemberg. thank you, mr. patterson. i um, it seems uncontested that your clients are lovely people and upstanding members of the community. i'm not doubting that in any way. um, where i'm getting stuck in this case is. is why your clients. and maybe this is a better question for them. were not more compliant with the planning department's asks of them considering the history with mr. santos and the, you know, the i saw that there was a case file, a civil case filed against him. um, you know, considering all of that backstory, which is important, but not necessarily extremely relevant to our decision tonight. um you know what? i just know if i were in their shoes, i would be like, okay. yes planning department. what can i do? please like, let's get this project done. and instead, it seems like the focus has been on adding a whole bunch of new things rather than complying with the planning departments and planning commission's previous orders, which are orders in indeed several times as, um, well, after mr. santos was no

so on the motion by commissioner lemberg, vice president lopez high commissioner trasvina, president swig. hi. so that motion carries 4 to 0 and the appeal is granted with those conditions. thank you to the parties for working together. so we are now moving on to item number one, which is general public comment. this is an opportunity for anyone who'd like to speak on a matter within the board's jurisdiction, but that is not on tonight's calendar. is there any member of the public who wishes to speak on an item that's not on the calendar? mr. bruno, please approach. can you hear me through this or is it okay? i'm ready to start. my name is mark bruno and i live at 15 nobles alley. it's been commented by the board that you all don't want to hear too much about the same issues over and again. if you feel you've decided it. i don't want to come here over and again. and i wanted to point out here, if you can see the screen overhead, please, it's not that important. it's i can show it to you here, but okay, overhead, please. they were wasting time. this is simply a pause. your time. pause

to speak , sinister ruler, yes, they go there en masse, i think they won’t mind if poland annexes lembergt, maybe even very soon, thank you, dear john, for this history lesson, because we need true lessons from it, so that... including the year 1917, yes, about which we argued so much again today, this is life and fate john shinakin, there are places that fascinate, because they are part of the cultural code, because they have power, beauty and history, conquer, the land is ready, explore, nature, mother, dear, simply incredible beauty, you already understand what the vietnamese favorite means of transportation, there are 10 million moped drivers here, taste it, oh, your eyes run wide, how delicious everything is, as my mother says, mind you, this world is worth seeing. snake caster is the oldest profession in india, they say a properly made bukhara knife became a real amulet for its owner. in secret to the whole world, on saturday on rtr. the golden lion of the venice film festival for best actor is awarded to ivan oleshkovsky. you look like a clown, uncle, we accuse him, he is sentenced