and then following up on that, going to professor lemley's point about rule-based regulatory system and given the slight mismatch in speed between which legislation is passed and technology develops, how can legislation be developed that is flexible enough to address some of the issues we've talked about? and others that will arise in the future? >> look. and i think this is a very hard problem and as richard suggested in his answer to the last question, it's a hard problem any time you have to intervene and you can't avoid intervening at some level. to me, by and large, and i think this is in line with what richard is saying -- we're just agreeing all the time. >> i disagree with you on vaccines, but that's a different issue. >> it seems to me for the reasons you suggest we are generally speaking better served with common law and flexible rules than detailed legislative set parameters in part because congress can get them wrong because they don't understand or congress can get them wrong because they have a vested interest in doing particular things that might not be efficient. in part