for lenin, the choice was stark. either you have reaction defined by capitalism and imperialism, or you have revolution. there was for lenin no third way. and this is the slide i used to represent wilson's conundrum abroad, the kaiser on the one hand representing unaccountable power, lenin on the other hand, representing the inevitable revolutionary response to unaccountable power and wilson coming into the war and then coming to paris to try to hold the fort against both of these threats. okay. so what were the main components of this wilsonian third way? in the context of the paris peace conference. put simply, they were the league of nations and the principle of self-determination. let's take each of them in order. i know you have heard quite a bit about each of them, but let's take each in order and examine them in the context of this framework that i have set up for you. first the league. the crucial point here is that in wilson's original conception of the league, it was not simply to be a body that would coord

states to the soviet union you know the the poor all comparisons to will start in years more to leninism but in fact for me. my historical knowledge of russia and their due to their servatius that they may obey american public and he's got wife right now the perilous up all of us you know they're not just the best asked for a king you know i think that the reason for the paradox is that we'd have basically 2 to tell if they're doing his most here which have a lot of things in common you know trump is unable to discern this certainly tearing it from you know the 3rd after nazis and corman years which is now basically ruined the hated steitz you know instead of he and elected president this is that i do always your how to liberalism there's root in the united states and trunk anoxic united so he just traces it back to you know solve it by all should be examined and the marxist. well there are parallels but these are different and you're just paradox are you ready because you know the technology is seen you find a certain group of individuals a social group you declare them to have been opp

this is a village its previous name is a lenin village and it's close by again jed the reason why i'm here and the reason why i'm standing in front of a graveyard is that you also wish them who were killed. after the attack after a missile hits ganja city center yesterday they were buried right behind me a couple almost half an hour ago it was very crowded here people left already and when you look at the civilians of course the atmosphere is not so bright because everybody is full of emotions almost most of us are big chance it is and are angry and they are mourning for their people who lost their lives whether they know these people or not for instance those put the 2 for people who are very it were a couple they say they're children but they couldn't save their lives so emotions are through the pain that they have been suffering not for the last couple of weeks but for all 30 years when you look at diplomacy when you look at what's being told in baku of course there are talks on the way it has been relatively quiet in terms of official statements so far and we are waiting to see wh

that's why lenin named the russian newspaper pravda. it means truth.shington post" is not liberal. et cetera. they are left and they -- the truth is what they say it is. sow they really are closer to pravda than they are to newspapers of 50 years ago. that's the reason this brazen lie which is not verified, which russian collusion was verified? something they spent three years on? if we don't understand the bigger picture, it's useless. the left does not value truth, it never has. jesse: it's interesting you use the word -- the language -- they are taking language and weaponized it. and if you bring a charge they say it's debunked. and they leave it at that. it's only been debunked by them. and they are deburninging it by denying it. -- and they are debunking it by denying it. joe, are the emails real or are they fake? that's the question he needs to answer. >> the president basically said that. he said this is russian disinformation. jesse: is the computer made in russia? is the decorated naval veteran russian? where is russia here? >> i will reverse

to comment on the interdiction thing and the media and their reaction, lenin said this was the story. what everyone is talking about and like you mentioned, hollywood files on, this is called an outrage and unconscionable. this was a q&a the president at the same time as a q&a the nomination candidate for the vice presidency and there's no gas left in the tank if that's unconscionable, if that is an outrage in an era, in a day and age when there's dvr and recording and playback and upload and streaming and pirating on your phone and watch and computer and television, the elevators in this building even, if that's unconscionable, what is next? that's why no one listens to these people, they are screaming from their gated communities. their hangnail is like our equivalent of amputation for being burned at the stake. their alternate reality literally has zero actual pain. that's why i don't listen to them. [laughter] greg: they are, but not to me if you have them. interesting. it is true. next, whose lockdowns are bad? yes. (ominous music) - [narrator] what's your hair trying to tell yo

that's why lenin named the russian newspaper pravda. it means truth.t liberal. et cetera. they are left and they -- the truth is what they say it is. sow they really are closer to pravda than they are to newspapers of 50 years ago. that's the reason this brazen lie which is not verified, which russian collusion was verified? something they spent three years on? if we don't understand the bigger picture, it's useless. the left does not value truth, it never has. jesse: it's interesting you use the word -- the language -- they are taking language and weaponized it. and if you bring a charge they say it's debunked. and they leave it at that. it's only been debunked by them. and they are deburninging it by denying it. -- and they are debunking it by denying it. joe, are the emails real or are they fake? that's the question he needs to answer. >> the president basically said that. he said this is russian disinformation. jesse: is the computer made in russia? is the decorated naval veteran russian? where is russia here? >> i will reverse roles and ask you a

to comment on the interdiction thing and the media and their reaction, lenin said this was the storyryone is talking about and like you mentioned, hollywood files on, this is called an outrage and unconscionable. this was a q&a the president at the same time as a q&a the nomination candidate for the vice presidency and there's no gas left in the tank if that's unconscionable, if that is an outrage in an era, in a day and age when there's dvr and recording and playback and upload and streaming and pirating on your phone and watch and computer and television, the elevators in this building even, if that's unconscionable, what is next? that's why no one listens to these people, they are screaming from their gated communities. their hangnail is like our equivalent of amputation for being burned at the stake. their alternate reality literally has zero actual pain. that's why i don't listen to them. [laughter] greg: they are, but not to me if you have them. interesting. it is true. next, whose lockdowns are bad? yes. they just shut down the lockdown after previously thing countries should

and the coming of leninism in 1917. those three books which i read over the last spring vacation and early summer had a very definite impact, because what former president nixon and senator richard lugar were talking about is a foreign policy as we move towards the 21st century and the historical book of the downfall of the czar, coming of leninism combining those three books together gave me a better appreciation of the challenges that we have ahead of us. and senator lugar's book, he talks about the advancement of hume's rights around the world. he talked about his leadershipest in the philippines and south africa, where we have now seen human rights and advancement in the reagan agenda. former president nixon talked about what we're going to do after detente and arms control. and how we're going to pursue new arms control with the soviet union. talked a little bit about how we deal with the soviet union and this is one of the differences between george bush and michael dukakis. because george bush understands to deal

the historical book about the coming of leninism, combining those three books together gave me a better appreciation of the challenges that we have ahead of us. senator lugar talks about the advancement of human rights around the world. he talks about his leadership efforts in the philippines and south africa where we now see human rights advancement on the reagan agenda. former president nixon talked about what we are going to do about arms control and how we will pursue new arms control with the soviet union. he talked a little bit about how we deal with the soviet union into this is one of the differences between george bush and michael dukakis. george bush understands you must deal from a position of strength. the governor of massachusetts does not understand that. i understand it and the george bush administration will pursue that policy. judy woodruff: senator bentsen? readingtsen: i think guns of august, that really shows you how we make the same mistakes too often over and over again. it seems to me that the senator is beginning to do that one. when i look on the progress done t

and the historical book of the downfall of this are, in the coming of leninism combining those three books together gave me a better appreciation of the challenges that we have ahead of us. indian senator lugar's book, he talks about the advancement of human rights around the world. he talked about his leadership effort in the philippines. in south africa, where we have now seen human rights in advancement, on the regular agenda. former president nixon talked about what we're gonna do after -- and arm control. and how we're gonna pursue new arms control with the soviet union. he talked a little bit about how we deal with the soviet union, and this is one of the differences between george bush and michael dukakis. because george bush understands the deal of the soviet union to get the progress you must feel for position of strength. and the governor of massachusetts doesn't understand that. i understand it. and of george bush administration will pursue that policy. >> senator bentsen. >> why i think reading -- pardon, i think reading once a bore, i think that really shows you how we m

the lenin. and a letter to. the actor to be on hand. but not the alamo so clearly on an ohio. started few looked a lot of young couldn't tell you what sort of show in the uk and i thought another one as if from a half a saddam a war how going to happen here and not as if $90.00 of mine are solved and i said if me where you alamo stow among you and sort of come on how bad it all took of him selene timing was of my own sort of how this article oh no not but not how there's always deed now anyhow luckily. alamosa lederman lada me on and i'm going to have a mum think i'm through with all when mom and shia much of the new lies obama. called on. does it mean libya members are like body are they behind locked up out of facility it on a much mark nasty area and i bought a 5000 little some the bloody blown up muscle behind a load of office a 120 as a bonus why. no one from my by then had been ashore i don't say it was a no no no zone a 100 yards as it us mr denia seconded to the house or hot by the hottest in the uk last with a dumb of the 0100 percent of time a short war of their labo

, we have watched china become one nationalistic, authoritarian and committed to the marxism and leninism over time. standing up to china and its forms. president trump refused and instead imposed tariffs on the chinese goods to compensate in part for the course of technology transfer, intellectual property theft, massive subsidies on state owned enterprises and other tactics that slant the playing field dramatically when they trade with the united states. the president brought up to the table in january and we signed a phase one trade deal that prohibits china from forcing u.s. companies to transfer their ugtechnology. it opens up to tens of billions in agricultural sales and financial services and partially addresses the chinese manipulation. so far, china seems to be abiding by the deal. now the pandemic is limiting the impact and enthusiasm for the trade deal but the exercise shows that it was only byta standing up to the prc that the united states could achieve a improvement in this sphere. the administration is working to prevent companies to answer the chinese communist party and i

to comment on the interdiction thing and the media and their reaction, lenin said this was the storyat everyone is talking about and like you mentioned, hollywood files on, this is called an outrage and unconscionable. this was a q&a the president at the same time as a q&a the nomination candidate for the vice presidency and there's no gas left in the tank if that's unconscionable, if that is an outrage in an era, in a day and age when there's dvr and recording and playback and upload and streaming and pirating on your phone and watch and computer and television, the elevators in this building even, if that's unconscionable, what is next? that's why no one listens to these people, they are screaming from their gated communities. their hangnail is like our equivalent of amputation for being burned at the stake. their alternate reality literally has zero actual pain. that's why i don't listen to them. [laughter] greg: they are, but not to me if you have them. interesting. it is true. next, whose lockdowns are bad? yes. hi, i'm dorothy hamill. as i look toward 65, i'm thinking about med

to comment on the interdiction thing and the media and their reaction, lenin said this was the story day. what everyone is talking about and like you mentioned, hollywood files on, this is called an outrage and unconscionable. this was a q&a the president at the same time as a q&a the nomination candidate for the vice presidency and there's no gas left in the tank if that's unconscionable, if that is an outrage in an era, in a day and age when there's dvr and recording and playback and upload and streaming and pirating on your phone and watch and computer and television, the elevators in this building even, if that's unconscionable, what is next? that's why no one listens to these people, they are screaming from their gated communities. their hangnail is like our equivalent of amputation for being burned at the stake. their alternate reality literally has zero actual pain. that's why i don't listen to them. [laughter] greg: they are, but not to me if you have them. interesting. it is true. next, whose lockdowns are bad? next, whose lockdowns are bad? yes. wow, i wish i could get a de

who's he going to grab next, resurrect lenin and maybe khrushchev and have them run the economy? get more for the radical left agenda? is whatever you think he is. that's his deal. >> sean: i don't think is a con man. i might disagree with you. i think this guy -- i don't think even knows what he's saying half the time. geraldo, you're one of my best friends. you are sharp, you are tough, you are with it. bernie sanders, you know what, the guy has got stamina, strength, and he's articulate. joe, he doesn't have it, geraldo. i'm trying to be nice in saying this. the guy is struggling cognitively. how else can i put that? >> well, bernie sanders will be the budget committee chairman if joe biden's president, so i think that everybody should put that in there pipe and smoke it, that the only about socialist independent in the united states senate will be the head of the senate budgetary committee, so that should scare -- >> sean: do you think joe is fit for this job? do you think is up to the job? >> i don't know what he has. can i talk about our friend donald trump? i mean, tonight

liberalize was wrong and we have watched them become warm mercantilist, authoritarian emitted marxism and leninism. they have to become more like us. the free world is standing up to chinese aggression in all of its forms. present trump refused to except the status quo on the trip trip bedroom imposed tariffs to compensate for their forced technology transfers, intellectual property theft massive subsidies and other mercantilist tactics. they brought the the president brought the prc did five january we signed the phase one trade deal that prohibits china from forcing u.s. companies to transfer the technology, opens chinese markets to ten civilians of those to the u.s. agricultural sales and financial services firms and partial addresses chinese currency manipulation and so far china seems to be abiding by the deal. the covid-19 pandemic has limited the impact and our enthusiasm for the trade deal but the exercise shows it was only by stand up to the prc that the united states could achieve a real improvement in the trade sphere. the top administration is working to prevent companies the answer th

dismissed a national health insurance proposal as "not essentially different from that conceived by lenin and stalin in the russian five-year plans." others compared to the slavery. i will not develop that in my talk but i will answer questions about. they treated new deal totalitarianism something different. from the binary point of view from the anti new deal enterprises, it mattered little as all collective to some's -- hoover and other free enterprise are's employed road maps before the 1944 manifesto the road to surf them to describe the slippery slope to which the weakening of free enterprise in this capably led. by stifling progress in a straitjacket of government control, the new deal has started the nation on the road to totalitarianism. -- employing alarmist rhetoric and depicting freedom when exposed to state-ism, as voluble and evanescent, critics of the new deal feared that the system they celebrated was on its last. lakes advocates of free enterprise ponder the same question throughout the new deal order. we may be the last generation of americans to receive and cherish the

we've all watched china become more nationalistic, more authoritarian and more committed to marxist, leninism overtime. they haven't become more like us. under this administration the united states be standing up to china's aggression in all of its forms. president trump refused to accept the status quo on the trade relationship with the drc. he impose tariffs on chinese goods to compensate apart for china's china's course technology transfer, intellectual property theft, massive subsidies instead of in price and other more control tactics that slant the plainfield dramatically in asians favor when they trade with the united states. the president brought the prc did five january we signed the phase one trade deal that prohibits china from forcing u.s. companies to transfer the technology, opens chinese markets to ten civilians of those to the u.s. agricultural sales and financial services firms and partial addresses chinese currency manipulation and so far china seems to be abiding by the deal. the covid-19 pandemic has limited the impact and our enthusiasm for the trade deal but the exercise

while i'm in town is this a rock this is a village or its previous name is a lenin village and it's close by again to the reason why i'm here and the reason why i'm standing in front of a graveyard is that the wick dims who were killed. after the attack after a missile hit again just city center yesterday they were buried right behind me a couple almost half an hour ago it was very crowded here people left already. when you look at the civilians of course the most fear is not so bright because everybody is full of emotions almost what most of john citizens are angry and they are mourning for they are people who lost their lives whether they know these people or not for instance those poor to poor people who were very were a couple they saved their children but they couldn't save their lives so emotions are through the pain that they have been suffering not for the last couple of weeks but for all 30 years when you look at diplomacy when you look at what's being talked in baku of course there are talks on the way it has been relatively quiet in terms of official statements so far and we ar

journal of the chamber of commerce" dismissed a proposal as, quote, not that different as conceived by lenin and stalin in the five-year plans. others compared it to chattel slavery, one i won't talk to in my talk but i would be happy to answer questions about. they traded new deal totalitarianism as a dictatorial and dangerous imposition. while statism came in many states, from the binary point of view of the new deal enterprisers, the form took very little since they all went in inexorably in the same direction. the road is surfdom describes the slippery slope to the weakening that free enterprise led. in a straitjacket of governmental control, the new deal has started this nation on the road to totalitarianism, said one economist in 1939, fully five years before hyack's book was published in the united states. employing alarming rhetoric, free enterprise critics of the new deal feared that the system they celebrated was on its last legs. advocates of free enterprise upon d ponderred t pondered the same alarmist question. we might be the last to celebrate liberty, said glen frank from indi

you have a marxist/lenin group, sandinistas. they have aborted their democracy. they have humiliated the holy father. they have cracked down on the only press organ there, la prensa censoring the press, something that should concern every american. they do not have human rights at all. they will not permit free elections, mr. cruz who was the only viable challenger to nicaragua and found that the ground rules were so unfair that he couldn't even wage a campaign. one country is devoid of human rights and the other is struggling to defend their democracy. we don't like it to export the revolution. for supplies coming for such democracies as north korea, bulgaria, the soviet union and cuba to try to destabilize el salvador. yes, we're concerned about that because we want to see this trend toward democracy continue. there have been something like 13 countries since we've been in the move toward the democratic route and let me say grenada is not related. i have a big difference with miss ferraro. we gave those tiny caribbean countries a chance. we saved lives and most

on the other hand, a big part of their base is the left of lenin, bernie bro, i deserve, you owe me,esting to see what my democratic colleagues do today. the other point i'd make is she's very hard to i attack. i mean, she's a very good candidate, and she's just going to be very hard to attack. they're going to try, and i know we'll talk about this. the centerpiece of their attack is going to be affordable care, but so far you ever seen one of those, those high-powered manure guns that shoots the manure out onto the crop on the farmland? that's what it's been like so far. i don't think they laid a glove on her. ainsley: we had one guest said we shouldn't have these confirmation hearings. this is what one of your colleagues said yesterday during the hearing. watch this. >> donald trump and senate republicans know that the american people don't want this, so they have to act now. they don't trust the american people. >> it must seem outrageous that donald trump and senate republicans are determined to take away their health care. >> president trump is attempting to roll back america's