>> well, the court's decision in the dissenters in lenton discussed this. but we think it is clear in our cases that that is congress' equalization power. >> just looking and trying your memory, does something come to mind the opposite way where the court did go into a long exige sus into the law and saying you are not entitled to a remedy? >> if this is is going back to remedy, i don't. >> thank you. you have four minutes remaining. >> thank you chief justice. the rationale that the solicitor general's office offers is further assumptions can be made that even after men do the things that courts said were required of them, that they leath and have an opportunity to form a relationship with their child, that further gender-based assumptions should be put into place and say you are not going to be the real parent, whereas in the case of women, we are going to assume that when they have the non-marital child, they are going to be in charge. and when a father legitimates and does whatever is required, we are going to assume the mother is involved still. the ve