i was most intrigued by the response to my intervention by the right honourable and leonard memberfor peckhamd had told the government it had all been approved and that was fine and dandy. when i refer her to paragraph 12 of her own report, which says that the report would have as its guiding principle being transparent, so suddenly we discover in this transparent approach that there was a secret agreement that her involvement was all right. well, i was in the government at the time. i never heard that this had happened. so it seems to me that it is important to examine the position of the right honourable and learn it lady found herself in, which i notice the committee does not do in annex one. annex one purports to answer appendix three. i'm sure you're all listening in following very carefully. appendix three is the letter of mrjohnson in response to the draft report. fascinatingly, although in paragraph six on page 100 questions the impartiality of the committee, annex one ignores that. it answers lots of other points but it brushes over this point, perhaps because it thought that it was