the union, that is, president leonid kravchuk realized this historical responsibility.resident yushchenko obviously because when he started talking about the holodomor for more society was well, why go there ? this is all the past, now it has become a part national self-awareness, his understanding of russia's danger, let it not be implemented at the institutional level, because it was very difficult for you to do it, it was also like that, i would say ahead of time, yushchenko is not where goi is, i don't want to reproach him. alcohol was a general who went to the second world war, he was not afraid of anything, and yushchenko was a politician who tried to act by political methods in a country that perceived these political means of struggle in a completely different way , it was very unbalanced, it was very unbalanced of course so in this sense i think one more point is very important in this in these czech elections victor robin will not have his partner he really wanted him to become the president because they are sitting this is your greek group and so there was no

supported euro-atlantic integration, but he began to iron it out, i will tell you that even when leonid kravchuklogized in babyny yar on behalf of the ukrainian people for the participation of certain of its representatives in the holocaust , the majority of the population did not notice that it was not perceived or noticed, but these foreign delegations who came there. i saw the impression it made on them that ukraine had become independent. he was the head of the verkhovna rada. independence and is taking such historic steps that it would never have taken if it were in the soviet union, that is, president leonid kravchuk realized this historical responsibility, president yushchenko obviously because when he started talking about the holodomor for more society was well, why go there? this is the past, everything is now. became a part of national self-awareness, his understanding of the danger of russia. let it not be implemented at the institutional level , because it was very difficult for you to do it, it was also like that, i would say ahead of time, just yushchenko is not where goy, that is

. who writes next december 8, 1991 writes bush yeltsin called me to announce his meeting with leonid kravchuknd stanislav shushkevich, the president of ukraine and belarus in fact. he was still with them in the room of a hunting lodge near brest today - yeltsin said a very important event took place in our country. and i wanted to inform you personally, before you know him about this express, yeltsin seems to have read something like a prepared statement. it seemed to me that he set out the provisions of the signed agreement, as if specifically worded in such a way as to get the support of the united states they directly stated the conditions for recognition that we advocated i did not want to prematurely express our approval or not approval, so i just said, i understand this is very important reacted there mr. president he added to tell you in confidence that gorbachev is not aware of these results. we hope for your understanding, dear. george i will finish, established between us by tradition and i couldn't wait 10 minutes without calling you. so the country is destroyed and how? the crown

from the western ukrainian regions, by the way, among whom was the first president of ukraine, leonid kravchuk why in 1991, even before belovezhskaya pushcha, the military registration and enlistment offices of ukraine began to call people of insane age and officers who were supposed to sign documents that they are ready in the event of a war with russia with russia, just imagine the tasks that were before the fall and he was in front of the bandera, which they performed openly. during the great patriotic war began to be performed. from neatly imperceptibly under bolshevik slogans. actually, what i wrote about was vasily zastavny, but this seemed not enough to khrushchev, he should have had powerful active protection and support for his power, and he gives crimea to ukraine well, then it seemed. well, what is here, crimea is not here, crimea is ukraine but it ’s the same as shifting from one pocket of a jacket to another into a notebook, it seems to be nothing special, but later it turned out that all this had deeper roots more sinister roots. and we all these years, as if we had not seen anyt

war, it was the first country to recognize the independence of ukraine on december 2, 1991 , leonid kravchukving the ussr, the first foreign visit was a trip to canada by the next president , leonid kuchma, 31 years later, both countries significantly strengthened diplomatic relations presence ukraine has its embassy in ottawa and two consulates general in toronto and edmonton, by the way, the first building for the embassy of ukraine was purchased by a philanthropist of ukrainian origin once. but canada, in addition to the embassy in kyiv, also has the consulate general in lviv welcomes canadians. one of the first to return to the ukrainian capital after the start of the full-scale invasion in may, this flag was lowered on february 13, and we are very happy to raise it again over the canadian embassy. canadians in canada are one of our largest diasporas according to one of the latest censuses . almost one and a half million citizens recognize their ukrainian origin among them and the current minister of finance and in in the past, the head of the canadian foreign ministry, khrystia freelant

washington university, according to which yeltsin complained about the then president of ukraine leonid kravchuktrongly influenced by nationalists, but they do not have a majority in the verkhovna rada, however, yeltsin said the most important thing , and then his quote: 11 million people live in ukraine of ethnic russians they live in the east of ukraine on the border with russia russians also make up the majority in crimea they could vote for joining russia so with that in mind i don't think ukraine will make any sharp u-turns from us well now you understand why this country will constantly be haunted is built against us and why should we fight this country and in the end, i don't know, for it to be divided into pieces, to disappear from the world map , for something to happen, because we will never have peace, friends of ukraine met in latvia today the ministers of foreign affairs of estonia, latvia, lithuania and poland talked about further assistance to ukraine, as well as closer cooperation and coordination between the governments of their countries in providing this assistance, they agree

proclamation of independence of ukraine dmytro vasylyovych pavlychko, he had a great influence on leonid makarovych kravchuke is characterized by the such foresight, and who knows if they had not insisted on vasylovich. would we have gained independence in 1991? march-bro, this is where to reprint well, they ran there, they ran, yes, maybe they were still going there, everyone was thinking, pondering, and they were already running back , who was kravchuk, as i was sitting in the priziden, they gave him this er-er this text and said that everything was agreed to be put to a vote but no, they say he was still faltering. or maybe we will delay a little. dmytro vasyliovych told him he stood up for the vote or for his soul. he was a people 's deputy and ambassador of ukraine in poland and slovakia and, first of all, he remained a poet . in recent years, he almost did not appear in public , however, he continued to write until 94 th year dmytro's life is in paradise, they don't make such people anymore, the best days were calm with children, the war took 11 months from us and it 's the hardest to survive these da

others states, the russian president describes his relations with ukraine and personally with leonid kravchukg factor for us is ukraine, noting the nationalist pressure on kravchuk, the main destabilizing factor is ukraine 90 second year yeltsin well, here i want more mark. uh, firstly, why boris nikolaevich says that there are only 11 million russians on the territory of ukraine, with the exception of the crimea of ​​crimea to be honest, it is completely incomprehensible to me. this is the first. the second he promised principle, yeltsin's russia was indeed very sensitive to the problems of other states. as a result, this led to the emergence of a large number of problems of the most respected russian federation, but finally. here is the lesson of what we are now reading in these quotes in these documents, even if yeltsin saw that ukraine was a destabilizing factor, and if nothing is done. then the problem will not resolve itself, so the courage of a politician lies in the fact that if a threat is visible, it must be resolved, the issue must be resolved, and not passed on to the next generat

other states the russian president describes their relations with ukraine and personally with leonid kravchuk factor is ukraine, noting the nationalist pressure on kravchuk. let's leave out the fact that this national security archive released the facts and made public a dialogue that was off the record. yes, nevertheless he is devoted to publicity, but the essence is important. well, strictly speaking, let's remember that boris nikolaevich yeltsin came from the communist party, therefore, naturally , he was aware when he said that ukraine would be for russia, and probably the most important destabilizing factor in the first place, because he understood how and by whom ukraine was created in the first place, because he knew, er, the history of the cpsu. and, of course, he would have understood if he was alive, he would have probably noticed it before anyone who knows history, and the cpsu cannot fail to notice a direct correlation between what is being carried today, but carried by our oppositionists in brussels yes, and what the bolsheviks wrote when they they said that the oppressed nations