leonid kuchma found himself in total international isolation.was actually a continuation and a very logical and very... from the point of view of moscow , a reasonable continuation of the discrediting of kuchma, why? well, in order to completely take him, so to speak, under informational, political and any other siege, well, and then do not forget tuzla, there was a very, very logical, again, logical step after all this, when, when it would be necessary for kuchma, in fact, to be covered from all sides. gave in leonid kuchma without came to prague in 2002 by invitation. the organizers of the summit were confused. they didn't want to put him between british prime minister tony blair and us president george bush. although according to the protocol, the names of their countries in english begin with the letter y, as well as ukraine. then they decide to seat the guests according to the french alphabet. and kuchma found himself at the very end of the table next to the turkish president. and putin's political avatar, medvedchuk, was already sitting be

so remember how leonid kuchma's rule ended in 2004 . he signed an agreement on a common economic space with russia, belarus, and kazakhstan. in fact, ukraine already had one foot there. it was the final. and why lyanvit kuchmo signed this agreement, because there was a successful special operation to isolate him in the west. he understood that he would not be able to hold a pro-western one. by the way, here i completely agree with you that early kuchma and late kuchma are slightly different things, kuchma is in the middle and very late kuchma, yes, who left russia, went west, maneuvered, and then came to the kremlin again, but this is all thanks to zlubyanka's special operations, if it were not for the maidan of 2004, i assure you, we would have been like belarus a long time ago , well, it's one by one. now let's remember the minsk agreements, the minsk agreements were our last such moment of resistance to this russian attempt to destroy our subjectivity, because ukraine did not sign these agreements, the same kuchma, who did not hold a

leonid kuchma came to prague uninvited in 2002 .rganizers of the summit were confused, they did not want to put him between the prime minister of great britain, tony blair, and the president of the united states , george bush, although according to the protocol, the names of their countries in english begin with the letter u, as well as ukraine. then they decide to seat the guests according to the french alphabet, and kuchma ended up at the very end of the table next to the turkish president. and putin's political avatar, medvedchuk, was already sitting behind him. literally in a few... months before the summit, he was appointed head of the presidential administration, and the solution came. after the release of these tapes, kuchma became ungovernable. the entire european and american community stopped all contact with him. and he just like a billiard ball, went, hit the side and returned to the right pocket. and the pocket was covered with medvedchuk. in july 2004, shortly before the historic elections, after which the first, actua

vladimir putin and leonid kuchma together launch the updated hydraulic unit of the dnepro-hpp. russian generators and ukrainian turbines operated on the same shaft here. and then we had to stop all this with missiles when square took the path of terror. today, our enemy is already descending to outright terrorist attacks in the same crocus. and to expect that we will continue to, so to speak, turn the other cheek all the time, well, it’s not worth it, it’s time to solve this issue, while we have military-technical capabilities to reduce the enemy’s potential, we must use them, in kiev they recognize the existence of a disaster, but they don’t understand how to solve the problem, people abandoned by the regime to the mercy of fate are fleeing the cities, in this video the traffic jam from the de-energized kharkov is busy. even the oncoming lane, forced de-urbanization against the backdrop of de-electrification of ukraine. evgeniy tishkavets de-energized ukronazism. now there is a short advertisement, here is what will happen next in our broadcast. ukraine is crying about the lac

another 3 years later during the presidency of leonid kuchma a charter on a special partnership between nato and ukraine was signed. under him, in 2004, ukraine approved a strategy that included abandoning its neutral non-align status. provisions on euro-atlantic integration and accession to nato were introduced into the military doctrine. this line was continued by the third president of ukraine, viktor yushchin. under him, ukraine requested to join the action plan to prepare for nato membership. but at the summit in bucharest that same year, this issue was postponed. germany and france. in july 2010, power changed in ukraine. the verkhovna rada, at the suggestion of the new president, viktor yanukovych, adopts a law on non-bloc status. from all government documents, as well as from the fundamentals act, the internal externally. politicians removed words about striving for nato membership. all that remains is the annual cooperation program with the alliance, the participation of ukrainian aviation in the transportation of goods in kosovo and afghanistan. and iraq, after the coup in 201

vladimir putin and leonid kuchma together launch the updated dneprags hydraulic unit.rainian turbines operated on the same shaft here. and then we had to stop all this with missiles when square took the path of terror. today, our enemy is already descending to outright terrorist attacks in the same crocus, and he is counting on us all. we will continue, so to speak, to turn the other cheek, well, it’s not worth it, it’s time for this, it’s time to resolve this issue, as long as we have military-technical capabilities to reduce the enemy’s potential, we must use them. in kiev, the existence of a disaster is recognized, but how to solve the problem do not understand. people, abandoned by the regime to the mercy of fate, are fleeing the cities. in this video, a traffic jam from a de-energized kharkov is busy.

vladimir putin and leonid kuchma together launch the updated dneprogs hydraulic unit.ators and ukrainian turbines operated on the same shaft here. and then i had to. today our enemy is already descending to outright terrorist attacks in the same crocus and count on us all the time... we will continue, so to speak , to turn the other cheek, well, it’s not worth it, it’s time for this, it’s time to resolve this issue while we have the military-technical capabilities to reduce the enemy’s potential, we must use them. in kiev, the existence of a catastrophe is recognized, but they do not understand how to solve the problem; people, abandoned by the regime to the mercy of fate, are fleeing the cities, forced de-urbanization against the backdrop of de-electrification of ukraine. a meeting took place in brussels today. strengthen support kiev weapons of the kiev regime, however , they still cannot agree on what this support should be, because if some propose not to invent anything new and limit ourselves only to the supply of weapons, then others are looking for ways to send

the authorities that do not want to... still make the necessary compromises, but remember how leonid kuchma'sle ended in 2004, he signed an agreement on common economic space with russia, belarus, kazakhstan. in fact, ukraine already had one foot there. it was the final. and why did lyon wid kuchno sign this agreement? because there was a successful special operation to isolate him in the west. he realized that he would not be able to conduct a pro-western course. yes, by the way, here i completely agree with you that ... the early kuchma and the late kuchma, this, kuchma in the middle, and the very late kuchma, yes, who left russia, went west, maneuvered, and then again came to kremlin, but it's all thanks to these special operations of the villains, as it were not the maidan of 2004, i assure you, we have been there for a long time.

after visiting buenos aires the then president of argentina, carlos menem, came to ukraine with leonid kuchma. miley's visit will actually be a response to volodymyr zelenskyi's arrival in buenos aires for his inauguration in december. during. with which, says the ambassador of argentina in ukraine, lila roldan, the leaders started warm relations. as far as i understand, he promised. zelensky to visit ukraine. apparently, they had a very, very good meeting when president zelensky was coming here. it was very warm with a lot of support for ukraine's position from president miley. and i i think one of the goals of zelensky, who came here for the inauguration, was also to get an opportunity to meet with other leaders of the region. he was able to meet with the presidents of uruguay, chile, and ecuador. we hope that this can help the region's position regarding ukraine. it would be appropriate if president miley paid a visit, if he demonstrated to other countries, set an example for other countries to follow this initiative and be more involved in public and practical support of ukraine. despite

remember how leonid kuchma's rule ended in 2004, when he signed an agreement on a common economic spacewith russia, belarus, kazakhstan. in fact, ukraine already had one foot there. it was the final. why did lyanvit kuchmo sign this agreement? because there was a successful special operation to isolate him in the west. he realized that he would not be able to conduct a pro-western course. yes, by the way, here i absolutely agree with you that the early kuchma is the late one kuchma, these are slightly different things. kuchma in the middle, and very late kuchma. yes, who left russia, went. maneuvered to the west, and then came to the kremlin again, but this is all thanks to special operations from lobyanka, if it were not for the 2004 maidan, i assure you, we would have been like belarus a long time ago. ok, that's just one illustration of the deal. now let's remember the minsk agreements. the minsk agreements were our last such moment of resistance to this attempt by russia to destroy our subjectivity, because in... the country did not sign these agreements, there the same kuchma signe

remember how leonid kuchma's rule ended in 2004, when he signed an agreement on a common economic space with russia, belarus, and kazakhstan. in fact, ukraine was already one foot there, it was the final. why did leonid kuchm sign this agreement? because there was a successful special operation to isolate him in the west, he realized that he would not be able to conduct a pro-western course. yes, by the way, here i absolutely agree with you that early kuchma and late kuchma, that is, kuchma in the middle and very late kuchma. yes, which left russia, went west, maneuvered, and then again came to... the kremlin, but it was all thanks to these special operations of the zlubyanka, if it were not for the maidan of 2004, i assure you, we would have been like belarus, well, this is one, one illustration of the agreement, now let's remember the minsk agreements, the minsk agreements were our last such moment of resistance to this attempt of russia to destroy our subjectivity, because ukraine did not sign these agreements. there, the same kuchma, who did not hold any positions, signed it again w

the people who manage the administration of the president, they they said, no, get a visa, and leonid kuchmaerson who said no without a visa to the ministry of foreign affairs, i will not sign anything, but this, listen, but this is because kuchma was not... kuchma wanted to maneuver all the time, and if he was would be yanukovych, everything was signed in general in russian, and for me i remembered how i myself was present at the negotiations on the demarcation of the sea of ​​azov, in other times, when he came to moscow, our deputy minister of foreign affairs, anton buteyka, this was before sovalyuk, and we did not have sea borders with russia at all, as you know, and they never appeared, and he brought to these negotiations such maps of the general... headquarters of the armed forces of russia, the soviet union, i apologize, because on these maps, unlike the others, the maritime border was drawn, and the deputy minister of foreign affairs russian federation, i told him, and what is the significance of the map of the general staff, what kind of map is it? and i see that they are simply moc

they said: no, get a visa, and leonid kuchma turned out to be the only person who said no without a visaign affairs, i will not sign anything, but this, listen, but this is because it was kuchma, not yanukovych, kuchma wanted to maneuver all the time. and if there was yanukovych, everything was signed in general in russian, and for me i remembered how i myself was present at the negotiations on the demarcation of the sea of ​​azov, in other times, when our deputy minister of foreign affairs anton buteika came to moscow, this is what was before sovalyuk, and we generally, you know, did not have sea borders with russia, and they did not arise, and he brought to these negotiations such maps of the general staff of the armed forces of russia, the soviet. union, i apologize, because on these maps, unlike others, the maritime border was drawn, and the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation told him, and what does it matter, the map of the general staff, what is it anyway? map and i see that they are simply mocking this unfortunate representative of ours, that is, russia k

yushchenko, because i had two deputies there and that was all, but this position appeared in leonid. kuchmathe first assistant was serhii lyovochkin, who is still in ukrainian politics, and bankova knows him well, he survived, and medvedchuk, who was there, well , the personification of evil, a bad policeman, a good policeman, for example, viktor yushchenko and viktor's dear friends yushchenko communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and this was done for balances, it is obvious that sefir, when he came, as one of the largest... president, he did not take this function in order to somehow balance there with bohdan or with something else , and most likely zelensky trusted him the most as a friend, and therefore such issues as contacts with oligarchs. there he talks about everyone, that is, some very sensitive, intimate issues for president zelenskyi, intimate in quotes, were resolved by the shefir, but the shefir left after that attempt, about which they probably already forgot about him, and in fact, i think this could have been the solution not yermaka, but this should have b

i had two deputies there and that's all, but this position appeared with leonid kuchma, where the firsttant was serhii lyovochkin, who is still in ukrainian politics, and bankova knows him well, he survived, and medvedchuk, who was there, well, the personification of evil, a bad policeman, a good police officer, for example, viktor yushchenko and dear friends of viktor yushchenko communicated with president kuchma through lyovachkin, and this was done for... balances, it is obvious that shefir, when he came, as one of the president's greatest friends, he did not take this function in order to somehow balance there with bohdan with something else, and most likely zelenskyi trusted him the most as a friend, and that is why he talks about such issues as contacts with oligarchs, that is, some very sensitive, intimate for president zelenskyi issues, intimate in quotation marks, was decided by the chief minister, but the chief minister after the attempt, about which he is sure have already forgotten him he left, and in fact, i think this could not have been yermak’s decision, but it should ha

leonid kuchma gives an interview to a japanese agency and says the following phrase: well, i can’t passger has a brother. russia is cain; when a brother becomes an enemy, it is worse than betrayal. you understand what case. it's not even that. he talks about this, but if he really believes in it, if he thinks so, then well, then you need to ask the question, under which president of ukraine was the national security and defense council recognized as a strategic goal of joining nato, his last name was not kuchma, this is about the question , who is cain, who is abel, who wrote the book in 2003, ukraine is not russia, we, of course, will not be judged by kuchma, god is the lord. judges, but these things, they, of course, cause surprise, there is no time to speculate about this, i’m in my telegram for more details i’ll write about this, because this is some kind of very strange thing, the heir’s doll is here on channel one. the head of the german federal intelligence service, bruno kahl, on the day the special military operation began, urgently evacuated, that is, fled as fast as he could

very useful to you in such actions in the future, that's clear. but that's the same, as leonid danylovich kuchma said, that's the same everything happened, and trump, and burizma, and zelensky, the conversation in july 2019, well, it will happen again, i know that they, you know, you can’t think of anything, there is a super new one, they will involve ukraine again, and the most important thing for us here, by the way , few people know that there are conclusions on the 2016 campaign, that ukraine did not interfere in the campaign, that... the conclusions of the electoral commission, where the republicans did not want to publish all this, but they were forced to, that is, there are already clearly reports of the senate committee in the intelligence that a russian operation was planned, already these people sit or run, you saw, under the sanctions in ukraine, they hid in russia, but we all understand that this will not stop even a false, false opinion in ukraine. now ask an average ukrainian, even commentators, ask such a question, yes, ukraine really planned something against trump in the last el

everything in the rating somewhere, well, we have such a country, it has already happened , as leonid danylovich kuchma understood? mr. vasyl, well, we remember the phrase, here we are all presidents, but when it comes to the observance of the constitution, one suddenly forgets who is the president here, and there is only one president, although... now this is a very dubious status, to be honest, even for me it seems that the main and stubborn, so to speak, itch of this government is the destruction of not only the legal field, but in fact not targeted expenditures, but the accounting chamber revealed 61 billion uah of non-targeted expenditures during the war, and at the same time zelensky bank personnel. all the time throws the west: give us money, support us, give us weapons, but if you are spending the ukrainian budget unnecessarily, how to work with you, how to build trust with you, we should thank you very much, mr. volodymyr, thank you very much, volodymyr tsepelko, political scientist, was with us, yes, and now it's time for news azpress, our colleague iryna koval and the news editor have alread