where is the danger lerking. people are crazy in california. >> take it easy over here. take it easy. >> there's danger lerking and it's in the car and going to make it very unbarable. listen for the sound. >> was that a tire and deflated air bag. >> or just finished a mexican lunch. >> what happened is listen up. >> oh no. >> a container of beer stray and someone shifted it back and think of this like pepper spray for a huge bear. imagine the burning that these guys are feeling it. >> pulls over to the left hand side and they realize it's a great place to breathe. >> everybody lucky in this situation. >> we have another one for you and coming from tie wine over the weekend. there are all kinds of in credible footage and check out this dash cam. start out following and then the interaction and the small is already on the side and that's the exact same thing. >> all the way over and this tour bus was busy. if you're sit nothing the car and it's like oh my gosh. i am in trouble. you see people out there on bikes. this one here is a construction crane and swinging out of co

jim and i both went to your mercy of chicago, we both .lerked for clarence thomas where we disagree here, and disagree rather strongly, is what the intent of that clause meant. i thought it was very telling that jim said in his first's of this, that all were subject to citizens. he then later went back to the actual language, where it said, "subject to the jurisdiction," not "subject to the laws." he claims that the supreme court president and executive branch position is that that is synonymous to law. and that the only people intended to be excluded from the second element of the citizenship guarantee are those who are children of ambassadors. i would add, because he did not add it, but children of invading armies. there is one other category, children born on a ship while docked in u.s. port. the question for us is is that all that the citizenship clause was intended to convey? on every one of these points, i think the argument is exactly the opposite of what jim has laid out. for the people who drafted the 14th of mimic, after those that ratified it, there was agreement . that is sub