governor pamela harris and the treasurer and former mayor of los angeles has been talked about and that leaves out steve leslie and other nonelected officials who have been speculated they could run for public office themselves so it is a long list and it will be interesting to see how a crowded democratic primary will play out in two years. >> does it feel like whoever doesn't run for senate will run if governor? >> that is the expectation the two big seats that are open. the governor's race is not for four years but a history the speculation between those two in san francisco there will be some shifting and one will presumably one for one and one for the other. >> that will keep you busy to come and talk with us. thank you. >> all of us. >> be sure to stay with abc7 throughout the day for most on boxer's decision and her legacy and we are also setting -- sending the latest developments on twitter. >> authorities in france are on high i letter still looking for the armed machine, brothers, accused of opening fire at a satirical french newspaper yesterday. a dozen people were killed. this is a look at the eiff

the military people, leslie groves, were predicting 20 years before the soviets got the bomb. politicians like harry truman very famously when asked when would the soviets get the bomb, said never. that asiatic comment gives you an idea of what he was thinking. then the intelligence agencies, they had a different view. so they had some -- i'll go through this quickly. the first estimate of when the soviets would get the bomb in 1946. soviets would develop an atomic bomb sometime between '50 and '53. the next estimate was the joint nuclear energy intelligence committee, same prediction as before, by july '48 they acknowledge it's impossible to determine when they're going to get the bomb but maybe by 1950s, most probable date mid 1953. all that changes here. june '49 report same as above. july '49 report, just a month before. the office of scientific intelligence said information now available substantiates the date already estimated in the '49, '48, '47 and '46 report earliest date mid '50s, most probably mid '53 but new information says not before mid 1951. my favorite was 1949 predicted a first so

the military people, leslie groves, were predicting 20 years before the soviets got the bomb. politicians like harrytruman very famously when asked when would the soviets get the bomb, said never. that asiatic comment gives you an idea of what he was thinking. then the intelligence agencies, they had a different view. so they had some -- i'll go through this quickly. the first estimate of when the soviets would get the bomb in 1946. soviets would develop an atomic bomb sometime between '50 and '53. the next estimate was the joint nuclear energy intelligence committee, same prediction as before, by july '48 they acknowledge it's impossible to determine when they're going to get the bomb, but maybe by 1950s, most probable date mid 1953. not a lot of changes here. june '49 report, same as above. july '49 report, just a month before. the office of scientific intelligence said information now available substantiates the date already estimated in the '49, '48, '47 and '46 report, earliest date mid '50s, most probably mid '53 but new information suggests it would not be before mid-1951. my favorite was 194

the military people, leslie groves, were predicting 20 years before the soviets got the bomb. politicians like harry truman very famously when asked when would the soviets get the bomb, said never. that asiatic comment gives you an idea of what he was thinking. then the intelligence agencies, they had a different view. so they had some -- i'll go through this quickly. the first estimate of when the soviets would get the bomb in 1946. soviets would develop an atomic bomb sometime between '50 and '53. the next estimate was the joint nuclear energy intelligence committee, same prediction as before, by july '48 they acknowledge it's impossible to determine when they're going to get the bomb but maybe by 1950s, most probable date mid 1953. all that changes here. june '49 report same as above. july '49 report, just a month before. the office of scientific intelligence said information now available substantiates the date already estimated in the '49, '48, '47 and '46 report earliest date mid '50s, most probably mid '53 but new information says not before mid 1951. my favorite was 1949 predicted a first so

@bbìáhp &hc% the military people, leslie groves, were pre÷by3 that asiatic comment gives you an idea of what he was thinking.) then the intelligence agencies, they had a different view. so they had some -- i'll go through this quickly. the fircnw q%5q erq' the soviets would get the bomb in 1946. soviets would develop an atomic bomb sometime between '50 and '53. the next estimate was the joint nuclear energy intelligence committee, december '47 same prediction as before, by july '48, they acknowledge it's impossible to determine when they're going to get the bomb, bought maybe by 1950, most probable date, mid 1953. ñt not a lot changes here. june '49 report, same as above. july '49 report, just a month before. the office of scientific @ intelligence said informatq cç now available substantiates the date already estimated in the '49, '48, '47 and '46 report, 0@ earliest date mid '50s, most probably mid '53 but new information says not before mid 1951. my!éáixf%d report of september 1949, predicted a first soviet bomb in mid-1953. this is 23 days