go ahead he was able to manage their friend yeah well let me let me finish their french navy and their russian said that paris club sent a lot of dollars to cuba that doesn't work because cuba misuses that money you know for the benefit of the cuban people ok i'm a go go ahead yeah he is one thing where i will agree with frank believe it or not i do not at my feet ok astral i have as much problem with the paper ships of the left than i do of the head of ships of the right. i believe that people do want change i believe that cuban americans also want change the difference is that i believe change will happen when you have people exchanging ideas when you have people seeing democracy in action the problem with frank is that he believes that change will occur by maintaining a fifty plus year old policy that has been has narrowed actually to cuba if anything it made things worse i mean people will still not have what i believe cities of life but that's not how life when i have a look i don't know if the ninety miles maybe i'll make you tell me that when i got better i don't know you know w

ok well i don't know i mean that's a quote that any historian will tell you but let me go let me say this is. well i'm sure every story and i don't walk around town i had thought ok frank ok you know i'd like to point out i'd like to point out frank that mcgill's analogy even though it is with mexico still does apply to cuba go ahead frank go ahead that's a that's a very famous quote about mexico and i don't know if it applies to cuba that his view well he percentage did as have five quote about cuba and as iranians as mistaking as it is mistaken to say that the way of dealing with this is to centaurs to cuba my friends think they should all know their fire speak for themselves millions of canadians millions of spaniard and many other people have gone to cuba sending tours to cuba means giving money to castro's banks to the cuban people the idea of blaming the victims of blame in their refugee i'm sorry a blaming the refugees that's a line of a cuban government that calls people like me traitors cia agents warmish. the spanish war for embargo is embargo it's not broke a blockade is a

that wants to capture you if not physically at least economically and you cannot deny history of us let me know what i'm going to control on. all of its resources all right frank i had jump in front. of you first of all let's get the facts straight to quote that the professor just about close to the united states and god that's a quote about mexico let's let's get the facts straight that's number one to the killing all right if you would well. ok well i don't know i mean that's a quote that any historian will tell you but let me say this. well i'm sorry i'm sorry i don't walk around town i have a lot ok frank ok you know i'd like to point out i'd like to point out frank that mcgill's analogy even though it is with mexico still does apply to cuba go ahead frank go ahead and that's a that's a very famous quote about mexico and i don't know if it applies to cuba that his view well he percent at that lasted five quote about cuba and as erroneous as mistaking as he it is mistaken to say that the way of dealing with this is to send tourist to cuba my friends think they should all know their fire

s if i'm playing that kind they let me finish are you going frank you're going to let me finish go ahead. their friend yeah well i mean let me finish their french canadians their russian said that paris club said a lot of dollars to cuba that gulshan work because ms users that money you know for the benefit of the cuban people ok go ahead yeah here's one thing where i will agree with frank believe it or not i do not at my feet ok astral i have as much problem with the taters ships of the left than i do of the ships of the right. i believe that people do want change i believe that cuban americans also want change the difference is that i believe change will happen when you have people exchanging ideas when you have people seeing democracy in action the problem with frank is that he believes that change will occur by maintaining a fifty plus policy that has been has narrowed actually to cuba if anything it made things worse i mean people will still not have what i believe assess the needs of life but that's. the ninety miles maybe i'll make you tell me that we're going to go to bed and i d

now, let me give you the very important direction -- there is food over on the other side. please help yourself. hang out with us a little while longer. god bless you. go in peace. thank you. >> the mayor, the office of workforce development, kick off a new program which is to engage some of the artists in reinvigorating the streetscapes. organized in partnership with neighborhood based economic development organizations, the art in storefronts taps into the incredible creativity of the artist community to help improve the quality of life and the business climate in poor neighborhoods. the tenderloin, central market, they view, and the mission's 24 st.. at the launch party, the mayor released the first of 13 projects located on taylor and market street. we were there to capture the celebration and to get a closer look at the newly transformed storefront. >> we have an analyst at saying, you know what, we get it. if we close out and we put some plywood, we know it will have graffiti on it. we know that people will not respect this space. they are opening up their businesses,

let me just, since you brought it up, let me just ask governor richardson about that. are you surprised by that, governor? >> bob, no. i think that immigration is a very hot button issue. it's divisive. but i think what that officer said shows that that law is unworkable. i'm pleased that the obama administration filed a lawsuit for these reasons. one, it is going to lead to racial profiling. anybody that looks hispanic is going to be racially profiled. it's as simple as that. secondly, it preempts federal law. this is... immigration is a federal responsibility. lastly, it's going to hurt our foreign policy with central america, with mexico. six mexican governors have refused to attend a border conference in arizona. we're now going to hold it in new mexico. it hurts america's image abroad. but, look, bob, we need comprehensive immigration reform. i think those same people that are in your cbs news poll, want to see the congress tackle immigration reform, which they refuse to do because it's such a hot issue. and then i think if you present a plan that says, yes, we ha

let me show you how. take the slide hammer, go all the way through the back, go around. >> got you. >> during the real rainy season, how does that change the way dealing with this job? is it a lot more stuff in there? . >> what we do, charles, we do this quarterly. every four months we go around and clean all the heat exchangers so we don't have a large build up. . >> go around? . >> yeah. (sound of hammering). >> what i'm trying to do, charles, is always pull it out on the low stroke. >> right. so you are not, like, flying out. now talk about clean up. . >> then where does this stuff get deposited? . >> we're going to dump it in a debris box and it will go back to the plant. >> if you think back, the romans came up with a system of plumbing that allowed us it use water to transport waste away from the hub of civilization, which enabled cities to grow. . >> you have a large bowl, a drive motor and another motor with a planetary gearbox with differential pressure inside there. the large mass up there spinn

let me thank supervisor combos -- campos for his work on it. if your reliance on the bus or happen to be a progressive member of the board of supervisors, that is apple pie, and i think in this sense it was created to deal with a couple of rounds of reforms in an attempt to create an independent agency. what we have succeeded in doing is transferring power in terms of decision making on budget, on service, on fares, etc., to the mayor, because of how the government works with the appointments, and i think with a high-profile removal after the mayor's reelection, it is clear that politics can be played in commissions, and when riders go to there additional supervisors, it is frustrating to refer them to the mta where there is little to no responsiveness in terms of the commission, so i think this makes a lot of sense. the only question i have is which one of you are going to throw in your sword to kill it. i believe supervisor avalos and either the only ones who are not listed as co-sponsors, -- supervisor avalos and high are the only ones not l

s if i'm doing that and they have let me finish will you finish your point frank with me but i'm a gal let me finish go ahead but it's going to manage their friend yeah well i mean let me finish their french that canadians their russian said that paris club said a lot of dollars to cuba that doesn't work because cuba misuses that money you know for the benefit of the cuban people ok michael go ahead. yeah here's one thing where i will agree with frank believe it or not i do not at my feet ok astral i have as much problem with the pater ships of the left and i do it because ships of the right i believe the people do want change i believe that cuban americans also want change the difference is that i believe change will happen when you have people exchanging ideas when you have people seen democracy in action the problem with frank is that he believes that change will occur by maintaining a fifty plus policy that has been has narrowed to cuba if anything it made things worse i mean people are still not having what i believe cities of life but doesn't really have a life where i have lived

let me explain what i mean by that. this is a single most important issue in my home state of louisiana, the people of louisiana are facing job loss. in addition to a failed economic policy, a failed stimulus, president obama's ill-conceived and unwarranted and in the words of a federal judge, arbitrary and capricious ban on offshoring drilling is galvanizing residents along the gulf coast like i have never seen before. the long-term implications of this, mr. speaker, are real. real leaves are affected by this. because of this policy, thousands, tens of thousands of good paying jobs along the gulf coast are immediately at risk. it doesn't have to be this way. unfortunately, the elites in this administration and the president himself refuse to understand this. six weeks ago the louisiana delegation, entire delegation, democrats and republicans, house and senate, requested a meeting with the president in writing. and we have not even gotten a response back. frankly, mr. speaker, that's just unacceptable and irresponsible.

>> let me see your balls. >> what? >> let me see your balls. >> what are you talking about?your balls. not your balls! the balls on the shoes. >> what? dude, dude. lay off. >> come on. karate boy, let me see your [ bleep ] balls. prove to me you're wearing runtones. >> i got the runtones. >> you don't got runtones. you got those from [ bleep ] chinatown. >> yeah, i got them -- >> look -- we in the same club. we got a lot in common. >> no, we got nothing in common. we got shoes in common. >> [ bleep ]. look at this guy's calves, man. would you look at this muscle-bound [ bleep ] -- no wonder. runtones. he's got on runtones. you must wear those all day. you [ bleep ] them shoes. do you [ bleep ] in them shoes? are you [ bleep ] in them shoes? [ bleep ] you, man. i'm working out. what up, man? tell me how you got them legs? we work out together. let's do this. >> what the [ bleep ] just happened? >> jimmy: very good. ralph macchio and j.b. smoove, everybody. we'll be right back with runner runner. you know, my brothers and i got our families together at olive garden the other n

let me suggest a couple more things. this would not have been possible without the leadership of gen chapel. the day i was important or reject i was appointed, he was in my office talking about this. if you could give a day could round of applause to spur and jim. here is the problem. two years ago we were half a billion dollars short in funding. we had some bad to plant, and are not the work being done. i think the final eir was done in 2008 of the did not have the money. it was because -- and this is never acknowledged, and it deserves to be. especially now with the governor supporting my opponent, i do not need to promote him, but you have to support his appointee -- i get it. governor schwarzenegger deserves an extraordinary amount of credit. because of dale and his leadership -- susan kennedy on his staff. this was not always on the top of the list. you were sending money down south. at the last minute, the bricks were put on by susan, the governor, and with you, we directed $405 million through the shop program. so

let me explain why. the nature of public safety communications is that quite often -- most of the time it is not used. god forbid when there is an emergency we need a lot of spectrum. it is intensely used then. the issue becomes how do you provide that a particular time and place the amount of spectrum needed in times of an emergency. >> 9/11? >> katrina, and the other big of miniatures -- any other big emergency in the future. the fcc deals with that simply. it deals with it by allowing what i have been calling preemption. the way the plan defines it is ambiguous. let me speak for myself. i believe preemption is a proper word. by that i mean given that an emergency occurs at a particular time and place, the public safety organization, to some agreed upon administrative procedures, should have the right to preempt the d-block and other spectrums to get the amount they need. i mean if the spectrum is congested, commercial users get dropped and band with gets allocated to public safety. that way you take c

let me let me disclose something here i am not an atmospheric scientist i am not an atmospheric scientist that is an international panel it's the who is who of international atmosphere scientist ocean ocean scientist natural scientists and international panel it's the who is who of who has something to say ok and they come to very clear reports and i just want people who watch this program to look at these reports as very good summaries easy to understand summaries those are not all i miss though this is mainstream science ok number one and number two. in the last fifteen years there hasn't been one single. pete this one single article out there that that made it past by a peer review board that's actually doubting two things either that it's the temperature is warming and that this is recorded and secondly that human cost greenhouse gases are the main culprit for this that's not going on and article i explained i was right to know about you is like i mean like like me like scientist but a filmmaker in the los angeles thinks that he can change the sizes stylings i don't want to call you a

bothers me so much people know i'm sorry let me jump in here with really bothers me and i'm not pointing any fingers on this program here but there is a lot of finger pointing at each other and i still it really befuddles me i mean if we really care about the planet why can't we find some kind of consensus why do we have this kind of arguing when we know i mean if it isn't global warming how do we just deal with climate change ok that's kind of a compromise here because it sounds like i get on my pointing fingers on this program but each side of this debate says the other one has all teary or motives that are very very bad alexander you to address that because it seems like the discourse is just for a. we're not getting anywhere. well i mean you know. let me let me disclose something here i am not an atmospheric scientist i am not an atmospheric scientist that is an international panel it's the who is who of international atmosphere scientist ocean ocean scientist natural scientists and international panel it's the who is who of who has something to say ok and they come to very clear rep

let me move on then. if i may. if i can keep on. one of the things you said today really concerns me. and let's see if i got that. you are being asked a question and you said in other cases original intent is unlikely to solve the question. and that might be because the original intent is unknowable or because we live in a world that's very different from the world in which the framers lived. in many circumstances, precedent is the most important thing. is the precedent more important than original intent? >> senator coburn, let me give you an example. i'm not sure if it was an example i used before or not. but in the first amendment context which is a context i've written about a good deal, it's fairly clear that the first amendment doctrine that's been established over 100 years departs significantly from the original intent of the framers. and here's one example is that i think the framers would never have dreamed that the first amendment would in any way protect people against libel suits, the first amendment had anything to do w

let me ask him a very straightforward question. does he think those policies are more likely to make crime go down or go up. >> the point is after the last government violent crime and gun crime went through the roof. the honorable lady, they almost doubled. yes, i think it's time for honorable members -- there's going to be a rush of new labour memoirs coming up. perhaps they should start with their spin doctor who worked for the last prime minister. >> no, we went bother with that i say to thee, mr. prime minister. harriet harman. order, order. i'm very clear what is in order and what isn't and that's the end of the matter. harriet harman. >> thank you, mr. speaker. from the conservatives it was all about tougher policies and more police. now all that seems to have sailed off with those prison ships he was promising to buy. now, we were very clear. we said when we first came into government, we would bring crime down and we did. will he promise that under his government he will keep crime coming down? will he make that promise. i

let me give -- let me step back and maybe just give a little overview of where we are on our audit program. as you know, as part of our budget and legislative analyst contract, one of the functions that we do provide for the board of supervisors is audit services. these generally, as requests from the members of the board. to date this year, we have conducted the mta, the first phase analysis of that, the revenue analysis, and concluded the small business audit. we have approximately 4500 hours each year to dedicate to audit services. we have expended to date about 1500 hours on the, so this applies to both this audit and the earlier one that i will not go into detail right now, but we have more than sufficient capacity currently between now and the rest of the year to all the audit assignments that are before us. this is within the scope of our existing contract. in fact, even if both of these audits were assigned to us, we still have sufficient capacity to move forward with other audits. i woul

let me give a bit further background. there has been a group of senior organizations and add it -- advocates and activists that have been working with my office, so a lot of the questions and framing of the previous report by the budget analyst office and then these new questions and research issues and areas have been driven by activism of senior organizations, but also people like me that our baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, the 72 million people in the u.s. that came about after the end of world war ii and that will be entering a very rapidly the senior ranks and demographic group within the city and around the country. the data that the previous report shows that 20% of the city put the population as people over 65 years old, but i think within 20 years, the population will increase, i think, 60%. the senior population will increase by about 60%. that is why it is critical to understand the housing needs and to develop stronger policies and to implement other task force recommendations of different offices of

as they say, let me fly where the eagles fly. you could fly with the eagles, and you would not gethem to get past the political schism that they have. let me share with you some numbers that i want to put into the record. 1994, 6.9%, 1995, 5.59%, 1996, 5.41%, 1997, 4.94%, 1998, 4.5%, 1999, 4.22%, 2000, 3.97%. u.s. department of labor unemployment figures. i was a ranking member of the immigration subcommittee during that period when republicans were in charge under newt gingrich and under the subsequent speaker of the house. we could not move immigration reform, and we had the lowest unemployment that we could ever have. it bothers me now to use the excuse of unemployment for that. could i ask the crgy quickly to -- and if i could start with president land, what do we do about senator mccain and senator graham, who committed to us to work together in a bipartisan way? i don't think this should be a single-party issue. it should be an sue for america. and let me remind everyone that the idea of immigration reform is to take care o

let me be clear.i think that we should be there, in a combat role or in significant numbers, in five years' time? no, i do not. this is the time to get the job done, and the plan that we have envisages our ensuring that we will not be in afghanistan in 2015. we have already been in helmand for four or five years, and, obviously, we have been in afghanistan since 2001. it is time to maximize the pressure now, and then to bring our forces home as we train the afghan army and police force to do the job that needs to be done, which is to keep the country secure. that is our goal, that is in our national security interest, and that is what we will do. >> hear, hear. >> park home owners are often elderly and vulnerable, and some suffer greatly as a result of the actions of a small minority of site owners. they suffer threats, intimidation and neglect. will the prime minister meet a small delegation, and me, so that we can discuss how park home owners may be better protected? >> hear, hear. >> i have every s

let me start by making some acknowledgements. we have some speakers who i will introduced in a moment, but i am very pleased to welcome to the event, dan representing the speaker's office. i would also like to have very much thank christine from senator feinstein's office, as well as mega miller, a field representative team for senator boxer. in that knowledge and then come i want to the knowledge and leadership of both senators and their vision for how important this project is from the first moment, they have been a steadfast force in washington, d.c. for us. together with the speaker, they have been a formidable set of champions for this were the project. i also want to it knowledge the chief operating officer of the presidio trust. a major comeback indispensable partner in the product -- execution of this project. we have had the pleasure of working with him for several years and look forward to working with them and the future until the project is completed. i also want to acknowledge the first vice-president of the golden g

seeing none, let me invite back the mta staff. if you have any final rebuttals. >> thank you. >> thank you very much and yes, we're continuing to work with the property owners and their representatives and we look forward to successful negotiations. thank you. president chiu: thank you. colleagues, any final questions to the mta or any of the property representatives? okay. at this time these hearings have been held and closed. items 44, 46, 48, 50 and 52 are hereby filed. items 45, 47 and 49, 51, 53 are the resolutions of necessity to acquire the three easements and the two parcels by eminent domain. these items are now in the hands of the board. colleagues, before we proceed, i understand from the city attorney's office that that they are asking us to make some technical amend manies. they have been provided to the members and first can i ask, is there a motion to accept these technical amendments? is there a second? second to the technical amendments? any objection to look moving forward? those amendments are made. is there a m

. >> chris: let me bring in governor dean. >> let's be blunt about this. i don't think newt gingrich is a racist or you are a racist but fox news had an obligation to find out what was really within the clip. they have been forcing the theme with the black racism with the black panther cra crad sotomayor. i think the party has to stop appealing. and fox news put that on. >> chris: wait, wait, governor. >> i know the obama people. >> chris: i know facts are inconvenient things but let's try to deal with the facts. the fact is that the obama administration fired or forced shirley sherrod to quit before her name had ever been mentioned on fox news channel. did you know that, sir? >> what i do know is that video came out -- >> chris: did you know that, that her name, she was fired before her name was ever mentioned on the fox news channel? >> what about the video? where did that play. in what about the incomplete video? >> chris: the video had never played on the fox news channel before the white house fired her. it was on andrew brightbart and the government.

hia chi let me introduce myself. my name is goto motimoshi and 8 years ago my wife and brother will were killed and i've been searching since for the man who did it. fortunately, i found him. congratulations! where? here. here? the man next door and i'm going to kill him. tell him to come here now. go tell him to come here now. [crying] excuse me. [singing] come on in and listen to this story! is it the story about gatomoshi. how do you know. because the samurai next door is him. he's going to kill you. kill me? no. listen, it wasn't me. it was somebody else. i just hear that story. i'm sorry. last month and i thought that's good story but actually it wasn't me. it was another man. it wasn't you? oh, no. someone else. go tell samurai, please! okay. i'll try but, i don't know if he'll listen. he's very, very angry. please! please! samurai - where is he? bring him to me! wait. let me explain. he said actually it wasn't him. it was somebody else and he just told the story. i'm sorry. it wasn't him. it was another man. a

let me bring up another big issue. administration filed suit against arizona for the new immigration law, cracking down on illegal immigrants. hispanics back the lawsuit opposing the new law by a margin of 4-1, all the polls indicate that americans overall oppose the lawsuit by a margin of about 2-1. question: are you prepared, are democrats prepared to go to the american people and say this is what we stand for? we are going to oppose the arizona law cracking down on illegals? >> you know, we cannot have 50 different immigration laws in this country. we need one comprehensive immigration law and it should be at the federal level. i applaud president bush for going forward with that. i'm sorry that senator mccain walked off the field and will not help us do a comprehensive program for illegal immigrants. >> chris: we're running out of time. you're prepared to go, all of your congressmen, you're the house whip in the districts, there are districts around the country and say we're against the arizona law? >> we are again

let me try to close up, but there are a lot of people to a knowledge. one of the great things about this project is it builds community -- not just community in terms of the residents of this facility and residents in the area, but we are connecting community-based organizations. we are connecting the rest of the city through this remarkable place. i want to thank all of this community based organizations that have stepped up and step in, folks you never think about like the san francisco zoo. we have a little zoo back there. to the contributions of organizations like jvs, and organizations that do incredible hospice work. they are all partnered with laguna honda. to the volunteers. to the foundation. thank you for your commitment. thank you for your support. finally, and this was a long winded point i wanted to make, it to the residence. the dignity that you deserve. the facilities that you have long before -- you have longed for. to those we have lost along the way, supervisors elsbernd and i had great friends that wanted to be here today that were ho

let me make this perfectly clear. this is not a butterfly that will wander into your pretty garden of flowers. we only have 35 breeding species left, and a great majority have finally moved over and have adapted to the radical alteration of the landscape. the restoration project will help keep people on the trail, reroute and remove trails, and augment the existing habitat for the butterfly, who has lived here a lot longer than any of us. >> is there any public comment on this item? please come forward. >> good evening, commissioners. i am representing nature and the city. this is part of the original san francisco landscape that needs to be maintained by specialists such as people working in the program. many san francisco plants and other wildlife are bound on this space. it is an important connection for the butterfly corridor project. maintaining the main trails and restoring the habitat disrupted will help restore the preservation of this treasured natural area. thank you. >> thank you. >> please come forward. >>

let me create a quick context. in 2008 the middle part of the year the city and county and police department decided to shift gears toward a new approach of governance in terms of deployment of police officers using what has commonly been referred to as a zone strategy. basically saturating the areas and deploying police officers based upon statistical analysis of crime. it was not as sophisticated as it is today. but the effort has paid dividends. as a consequence we have seen over the course not just six months but candidly over the course of 20 to 24 months a substantial decrease in crime in almost every category in this city. one year doesn't necessarily make a trend but two years begins to associate itself with a trend. so, without getting ahead of ourselves, without overpromising, i don't want to leave you though with a sense that this news is new news or good news that may not continue in terms of its pace and its trend line. i want to acknowledge as well that the zone strategy was just recently recognized b

so let me be very clear. first on the numbers that we compare ourselves to, we are looking at the same range of estimates we've looked at in all the four quarterly reports. so that we tie ourselves to the congressional budget office, highly respected forecast -- >> is there a reason -- yours are not in here. you were front and center on what the stimulus would do and widely reported, members of congregated on the house floor and senate as well and now they're missing. >> no, they're the main goals the president gave was that he thought this act would save or create 3.5 million jobs and that's absolutely the marker we are looking at and comparing ourselves with. >> just to be clear, the white house didn't say ever that unemployment would remain below 8%, that you would create $1 37 -- 137 payroll jobs, over 90% would be created in the private sector. you did not -- in the fact it was actually in the first two quarterly reports shouldn't have been there? >> it was not in the first two quarterly reports. that wa

let me bring you in, e.j.s reacting to a reality, the bludgeoning of mainstream journalism -- what do we take from this? >> that's my column tomorrow. first of all, you asked a good question. can we have a good discussion on race? we can't if the facts don't matter. it's not only that shirley sherrod was smeared, if you look at that speech she was giving a speech about racial reconciliation. she said poor whites and poor blacks have a lot in common and this was twisted into an allegation, false allegation, that she was somehow a black racist. what's going on here? traditional media are so afraid of being called liberal god forbid they be called liberal that they are willing to run with any kind of right wing propaganda and treat it as news. running or taking your time before you run with a story is not liberalism. that's journalism. i think the right has been running the campaign for 30 years. they've had a lot of success. we should worry about it. look over both shoulders and the facts. >> there's a squabble

if a contractor says let me brace your chimney, you would say let me check with my engineer to see whatkind of basis are necessary and you can do the work. okay. contractors do not do seismic design work for the most part. there's minimal things they can do and we'll see that in a minute. here's some kids standing outside of one of his builds where we have a pair pet up there. people hang outside on the sidewalk. it's important to protect the public. >> after the event if you're going to go somewhere, do not g right in front of the building. maybe go to the center of the street although you're going to have to watch for cars, but it' not necessarily the safest plac to be to run out after an earthquake and hang out underth earthquake. we also have something called after shocks, so you want to be careful about where you go. >> so i picked a house in my neighborhood to look at in a little more detail. i think this suz built right after Ñithe 1906 san francisco earthquake. this is a wood frame building, it's basically a soft story building because it has a big garage door and next to it is

let me here you. -- let me hear you. what do we need more of? more hate? every time you repeat it, what are you doing? getting more pathways in your brain. i want you to take this and use it because iw ant everybody to know that if you do this every day, tap every cell in your body and say it is getting healthier, tap your heart and say right here, right now, i open my heart to love -- i was doing a radio show yesterday with jesse jackson's daughter, queen of talk radio. yesterday on the show, we were talking about love, and a gentleman called in and said the only way to have healthy love in our community is to have a no-exit policy in our love relationships so you stay and work it out. we got a lot of flak for that. people said uh-uh, no, no, no, i don't want the exit sealed. i want to be able to get out at a moment's notice. and some of you may remember, what did your mother teach you about men? some of it is unrepeatable in polite company, as my mother would say. everybody's mother who thought they were keeping their daughter safe would say always have

karate, let me see the [ bleep ] balls! to me you're wearing runtones. >> i got the runtones. >> you got those from [ bleep ] china town. >> yeah, i got them -- >> look -- we in the same club. we got a lot in common. >> no, we got nothing in common. we got shoes in common. >> [ bleep ]. look at his calves, man. would you look at this muscle-bound -- no wonder. runtones. he's got on runtones. you must wear those all day. you [ bleep ] them shoes. are you [ bleep ] in them shoes? [ bleep ] you, man. i'm working out. what up, man? tell me how you got them legs? we work out together. let's do this. >> what the [ bleep ] just happened? >> jimmy: very good. ralph macchio and j.b. smoove, everybody. we'll be right back with runner runner. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] degree men responds to increases in adrenaline. from the new adrenaline series, comes degree men adventure. and suddenly i'm the world's greatest dad. oven-roasted beef, fresh lettuce and tomato, a dab of mayo... it's on the value menu -- starts at just a buck! so i bring th

now, let me give you the very important direction -- there is food over on the other side. please help yourself. hang out with us a little while longer. god bless you. go in peace. thank you. >> there has been an acknowledgement of the special places around san francisco bay. well, there is something sort of innate in human beings, i think, that tend to recognize a good spot when you see it, a spot that takes your breath away. this is one of them. >> an icon of the new deal. >> we stood here a week ago and we heard all of these dignitaries talk about the symbol that coit tower is for san francisco. it's interesting for those of us in the pioneer park project is trying to make the point that not only the tower, not only this man-built edifice here is a symbol of the city but also the green space on which it sits and the hill to which is rests. to understand them, you have to understand the topography of san francisco. early days of the city, the city grows up in what is the financial district on the edge of chinatown. everything they rely on for existence is the golden gate.