letters but this may be guided to months by by emotions and by and successful well let me ask you this and i want to put this to all three of you if you could please answer as quickly as simply as possible is it too late for dialogue could they really start talking and what would that look like for do you expect would be in a stronger position now to make the first move and say let's stop let's talk to you first on that and i'll get all three of you to answer that please. the spanish government considers. but it's in such a strong position it doesn't really have to dialogue it considers its try to not understand the catalan government in. cell fags i'll i don't know how to put it considers that. it has done everything it could by its own self acclaimed legislation to possibly accommodate the spaniards so it continues to be. a standoff neither will go look will they talk it doesn't look good yeah i don't think so look ahead to that we'll have to talking in the long run because dialogue will be the only way to get out of the situation between need an agenda for the dialogue and the way i

so let me ask you this. it's clear that they want -- the administration wants a little bit more in this deal in order to get these payments back to the insurance companies. so what are you willing -- are you willing to do more? >> this is a good compromise. it took months to work out. it has a majority, 60 senators supporting it. we have 12 republicans. i urge senator mcconnell to put it on the floor immediately this week. it will pass by a large number of votes. that will put pressure on the house because let's not forget what this bill does is prevent premiums from going up 20% even more in some states. that falls on everybody's back. and if republicans think that if premiums go up they are going to avoid the blame he is wrong. for the substantive reason preventing premiums going up, but because the republicans are in charge and should be coming up with the solution and senator alexander did we should pass it. and pass it now. you can always say i won't pass it unless this happens and democrats says i won't

let me ask you with the minute they finish with so let me ask you then so when the u.s. or these other countries say it's not that we're against a separate kurdish state just not now are you saying that you don't you don't even believe that when they say another time. when they seem to keep pushing it off and delaying it there they have their reasoning the. very reason for saying not now is because there is the war against isis the only benefit for them in this forum in relations with the kurds is that because the kurds were good good fighters against the war in the war against isis the minute that finishes they will just hand them back over to iran to to iraq and to baghdad and to iran and to everyone else they're just not interested in the kiddush issue anywhere in the middle east and this is the woman big lesson i think the kids should learn out of this. the idea the dream the goal of a separate kurdish state is that a realistic one either financially or politically or both. well the dream lives on i don't think you can sort of take a dream away from kurdish people but

now we're moving on to tax reform. >> dana: let me ask you something about tax reform. there's a group. i'm curious what you think about them. called the tax policy center. this is a group that basically has said, without even having details yet, saying that the president's plan would be a giant tax cult for the rich, it does nothing for middle income people. have you seen that report? >> i have. >> dana: how do you plan to push back against that and help the senate pass what you want to get done? >> i have seen it. it's very predictable coming from this group. i think wall street journal got it right. this is an anti-reform propaganda group that is anti-tax reform. they are literally making up detail, assuming what congress will or will not do in order to come up with these talking points. we're talking about cleaning up the tax code making it so that nine out of ten taxpayers can fill out their taxes on a post card. getting a tax cut for middle income workers who are struggling to raise families. getting our tax rates down so they can compete in this global economy. we

this will not be the only indictment. >> matt, let me ask you this question. this indictment is coming in a little over five months since bob mueller was appointed. and we kind of went back, checked the history books. in the nine previous indictments or independent or special counsel investigations dating back all the way to the carter administration, the average for first charges filed was about 17 months. so, this is considered by anything lightning fast. does that tell you something there that the indictment has come down so quickly, within five months? >> you know, it tells you a couple things. one, i think anyone that's ever worked with bob mueller knows he's one of the most aggressive prosecutors in the last 50 years to work inside the justice department. so this follows a pattern of his time at d.o.j.. the second thing i think we can draw, we'll see tomorrow when the indictments are unsealed, is it's likely the core indictments are not going to be -- are not going to answer this big question about whether any americans helped the russians or coordinated

carnegie middle east center welcome to you all let's talk first about what we know about the deal you see if you represent hamas you know what's in this deal let me ask you possibly the most difficult question under this deal who is in control of your weapons who will be in command of your fighters the rest i'm a to some but something like twenty five thousand fighters and commanders tell me that key question. with the good intentions that we have right now between fact and have this kind of fair indorsement by the president we vote we should be told the palestinian would mean that one who are a part of the government should be under that footage of the palestinian government and that would be an if you are talking about. resistance within this is something is not on that even for discussion right now but if you are talking about that we've been for the people in. the guard the palestinian guard and national palestinian police and something like this it's all there gun and that enough. i thought it team of palestinian government. specifically i'm asking specifically about what you describe as the resistance weapons because the palestinian authority p

situation cannot last much under spanish government will need to return things to the approach let me ask you you know as an attorney how do you see this after tonight's speech in the move to delay independence is one sign on a more legitimate legal footing then the other i mean based on what you've been saying is madrid on the right side of the wall tonight. well the efforts always been let me say that this is not a company between madrid i understand that this needs to be portrayed in that way easier for the media and i'm not blaming you because this isn't some catalytic i mean remember that this guy an independent in a normal election referendum and never normal elections you know lections they've never gone beyond thirty eight percent so this is a country beaten got i am a catalan this is not good barcelona this is this is a bad part of the catalans taking hostage the other part and trying to impose a solution i think he has out from spain now legally yes of course the judiciary system will starting to put itself in motion it's been put in after now as in any of the state governed by the

let you go at some point. you have work to do. let me ask you about what the president said in terms of the uranium one deal, looking to be the watergate effectively of this generation, what are your thoughts on that, and what needs to be done to get to the bottom of just exactly what transpired? >> i think we need, we need all the information. this is just been bubbling up in the last little bit. there is more than just this. what about the first part that i just woke up this morning, when you have our own fbi, our department of justice, not providing all information here to congress, when it came to the dnc and hillary, paying to create something fake, a dossier against president obama? i mean president trump? who was involved in that and why didn't congress get that information? and then the whole part of what is going on with the president talking about, well the safety of america, what's happened within russia? there is a lot of answers here that we need an investigation to know exactly what happened, who knew it, and when did it take p

. >> let me ask you this, robert, let me play you this clip from my sit down interview from wilson. take a listen. >> this is going to be trump's benghazi, trump's niger and they need to concentrate on what happened and what is happening. >> so we know how much of an issue benghazi became. it became a political issue during the campaign in 2016, obviously investigation after investigation. do you agree with her assessment that this is being characterized or could potential become a benghazi-like situation for president trump? >> i think possibly so because we don't have all the answers. can we step back for a minute and remember that americans lost their lives and can we also recognize that we as a country are having this country on a sunday evening about the president of the united states getting into a twitter fight with a member of congress? this is just beyond the pale. i thought we couldn't get any lower but here we are getting even lower. if i was in the white house and frankly even if i was a member of congress and i had the ability to talk to my colleague from florida i woul

let me ask you this. was the president getting bad information before? that was an issue when you said the flow of information. was it bad info? >> it wasn't bad information, it just wasn't ready for the president. >> contradictory? >> not contradictory, folks would come in, there was an open door policy, and they could wander in and talk to the president about anything. that's probably not the most effective way to get information about very, very complex issues in front of the president of the united states. what john has done has really refined that flow of information so that we know before the president sees it. it's right, it's accurate and it's ready for him to act on. >> you just said you were shocked and that expressed a lot of confidence in john kelly. does the president have that same confidence in rex tillerson? >> he does. i talked to rex this week. i spent a good amount of time with the president, and the topic never came up. i look back and say, rex said it isn't true. the president said it's fake news. you ran the story because nobody els

tragedy a wave like a like a tidal wave and that is what do we do about the human richard operation let me ask you. richard let me ask you what's the nature of the lawsuit that you're handling on behalf of the family tell tell me what you've alleged what is it you're trying to accomplish in this lawsuit and who are you going after certainly the the first filing that we had in this matter which was i think the first court filing in the case was we elected to file in the clark county which is and nevada and las vegas clark county probate court and the probate court we were pursuing the court's order to appoint the public administrator to gather the assets find them and to protect them and hold them subject to the distribution ordered by the court we don't know how wealthy the shooter was the result a geisha is that he won five million dollars two years ago gamblin his brother on television said he's a multimillionaire we took the steps to protect those and are awaiting the confirmation of that with the court system clearly these are assets can be recovered from the shooter that's your most direct an

kevin cirilli, let me ask you about george papadopoulos. the one we know the least about. at have we learned about him in the role he was playing in this investigation? lost kevin. let me put that question to craig. that wase information released by robert mueller suggests that mr. papadopoulos is required -- is cooperating with the fbi. there -- they are outlined in a dramatic or document where he is talking about being first approached by a professor than by a female russian connected person. and then ultimately by someone from the russian foreign ministry. it sounds like mr. papadopoulos did not tell the straight story they first time, thought better and went back to the fbi. he faces charges. it does suggest he is cooperating. what he said was the russian government was eager to speak directly to donald trump and his campaign, that there were senior people inside the trump campaign, not named, who were interested in taking the meeting. when we are talking about collusion, cooperation, it sounds like mr. papadopoulos is saying there was a attempt on both sides to make th

don't just need centrifuges those of longer -- >> sunset is a good deal, i don't. >> dickerson: let me ask you this about senate colleague, senator corker, he has sketched a view of the administration, do you agree with it? >> yes, i like what corker are doing. they are saying we're going to put triggers in. congress is going to say to the iranians if you ever try to get within a year of a break out time less than a year we're going to reimpose sanctions, we're going to look at your missile program anew, inspect anyway, don't allow us we'll impose sanctions if you're still sponsoring terrorism down the road we'll reimpose. >> dickerson: also a view about secretary of state says the president is castrating him? >> no, i don't agree with that. dickerson: unpatriotic in suggesting that case? >> bob corkier? dickerson: yeah. >> i think he's wrong. i like one corker, breaks my heart that he's leaving he's one of the most valuable members. he and the president have gotten into this twitter war, at the end of the day i played golf with the president yesterday he's not a man under siege, he beat me ag

me is jeffrey gundlach. you have got assets under management at a record. $116 billion. you have got to put that money to work. let me ask you about this idea about interest rates moving higher. do you expect tonight december? jeffrey gundlach: yes, i do. the bond market expects it too. the things the fed seems most of focused on are the level of the stock market and the shape of the front part of the treasury market. from comparing yield on t-bills, you can divine a probability that the bond market thinks the fed is going to raise rates. the fed never raises rates when the probability is below 70%. the treasury market certainly believes the fed will raise rates. the most of recent inflation numbers, and the core cpi, it was looking weak for five months in a row, the last one that came out was at the level the fed wants to see it. the ppi was .4. and commodity prices have been rising. gdp was pretty decent in the second quarter. my guess is for mid-2s or so, even with the hurricanes. the fed has a lot of momentum towards raising rates. we went from the environment where the fed needed the data to get better. they said th

black women, to black win general is, is showing that, that if it is not good to be black. >> let me ask you? there was also another woman. a third woman who was a little darker come lex, dark hair, what do you think? offensive or not? >> i yes, i think it is offensive. i think dove has a lot more work they need to do. they need to foes can on administration perhaps and from the top town and adding more diversity to the team. >> are you not going to buy dove soap now? i do. i do use dove products but again this is a learning lesson for them. they node to reevaluate the way they sell the products to us. are they showing their rod ducks to diverse companies? diverse groups? >> if they reversed the order would people be as phoned? >> no. i don't think they would ever think of reversing the order and that is the problem. >> do you think the ad marketing people to put this together were racists? >> i think it is subconscious boy as and that is the problem with corporate america and is you have to look at who is in the suite. it tells me. will go g out on a limb. in that suite, there was not a lot

it's getting worse. >> let me ask you very personally about you.lived four years without a passport when you were in jail. you weren't able to travel but now you're able to travel to 23 countries. what was that personal experience for you? do you take for granted the fact that today you have the ability to travel on a moment's notice where these refugees and where you once yourself couldn't even move? >> my experience, growing up, my father was exiled. that teaches me we have to give our voice to the people that never have a voice. in art i do have some ability to make a film, make installation in new york city and to speak out, to really act on those issues. want just watching it. so i think that is responsibility. >> there's always some criticism about whether art goes too far in the way it expresses its views on poll titics or policie. you were criticized on recreating the image of the young boy who washed up on the shore there. does art ever go too far when it captures these moments or tries to push the envelope? >> so say art has gone too far

let them in. we get them mresh urd at best. >> it's like uncle you don't like but you invite them to thanksgiving. >> that uncle that guy. >> let me ask you do you feel safe wearing these colors? i feel everyone got closer to you once the light came on. >> it's hostile environment about the i feel safe with fellow redskins fans around me somewhere. >> i don't see any around you now. >> we're here. we're here. >> that's all right. >> let me ask you the reputation of the philadelphia sports fan can be obnoxious at time. is that part of home field advantage you keep at bay opposing fans. >> we'll own that. we like that and enjoy it it gives us an edge. sometimes it's over blown. >> i think it's over blown everybody has been super nice wearing a redskins jersey. let me ask you what is your prediction tonight. i think eagles fans are feeling overly confident you're in first place now. >> any true eagles fan is not overly con di gent but we'll pull out a victory and it will be close. >> point spread is is 4 1/2, 5 you think it's between that. you think they can pull it o out. >> we're 3-team and they're 5-1 it's monday night we'll go balls

let me ask you this. maybe it is not true. i think it is. it is there any single thing that donald trump coop say that you be not attack him noon no. no. i want him to see. he want to do what is best another country. if he wants to have this conversation. hates to be more than cosmetic. he had the opportunity here to say, either i made a mistake or here is what said. >> well, isn't this typical politics that the democratic congresswoman who trashes the president anyway taking advantage of a situation over the body of a dead grown beret into i don't think calling the president out for saying something stupid is tanging advantage. think what it is it is calling him to carpet to be account for what he says. i tell you as much as i hate trump physician he said something spart i could give him credit much as long's continues to things that are stupid. >> do you hear the context? >> i will. think that's the fair thing to do. >> let's bring pin dan zarrow with an absolutely fantastic forecast. >> i am meteorologist dan zarrow your local weather fore

. >> let me ask you, lindsey, isn't it a problem if you defamed you could sue. you are sue ago black hole. >> at this point, i feel it comes with the territory. now it is in regards to true journalism to arise and shine through amidst all of the fake news. in regards to the entertainment industry and how you make money. let's go to music distribution. artists like chance the rapper. making millions, donating millions to the education system in chicago going around all of the systems of the world to have a platform. he doesn't need a deal. he jay-z came out with the album, 444 and own streaming service title. all black owned. this is all artist owned. back in the day they would get crunched by the my jor labels, sign 360 deals, rob them of their money and be broke. i believe there is paradigm shift in ownership in owning the integrity of your own art. you have these platforms like social media, instagram, youtube, facebook live, twitter. you don't need a pr agent. you don't need a publicist. i think the paradigm shift is good. takes people who have platforms to s

i can tell you, that's not content that we get on hardtalk too often! well, let me be the first! let me askut the movie industry... they'll probably cut it out! no! i guarantee you we will not. you havejust made a movie and i have seen it. speaking of old people, you mean! speaking of old people... you and robert redford, you famously made three movies in the 70s, that established you ? starting in the 60s and 70s. you were one of the most glamorous screen couples one could think of. barefoot in the park? yes. and you have come back with robert redford to make a new movie. 0ur souls at night. it's beautiful, it's called 0ur souls at night. based on the book by kent haruf. it's a lovely story about two people in a tiny little town in the great plains. they kind of know each other but not very well. it's about friendship and companionship. we're both widows. and i know there is not that much time ahead of me and i don't want to spend it being lonely. and so i have the guts to walk over to his house and knock on his door and say, would you come over and sleep with me? laughter. and he looks sh

so let me ask you this... how does diabetes affect your heart? it doesn't, does it? actually, it does. type 2 diabetes can make you twice as likely to die from a cardiovascular event, like a heart attack or stroke. and with heart disease, your risk is even higher. you didn't know that. no. yeah. but, wait, there's good news for adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease. jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill with a lifesaving cardiovascular benefit. jardiance is proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease and lower your a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, and trouble breathing. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction. symptoms of an allergic reaction include rash, s

let me ask you this. may be too early to answer the question, nick. easingly at the hand of the u.s. military. on going some time now. do you have of a better sense of that than i do. >> well, you know, very muddled. from temperature ga from the united nations. he began with an indelicate line how his friend were headed to africa. heading to a luflt the cot of t countries hoping to make a lot of money. he praised a country that does not exist. he said name be yeahibia's heal system was doing great. it may be namibia and zambia. but nambia its not actually a country. beyond that. trump talked counterterrorism. talked about some -- really intractable problems on the continent in south sudan. democratic republic of kongos. difficult to get a read from that exactly what his vision, for africa is. trust his generals. taking the handcuffs off in many cases. he allowed for -- greater authorities for strikes in somalia. we might see the same type of thing happening in niger, mali. we have seen air strikes in libya. so, i think that we are likely to see, even a

that's notwithstanding i know you're not a believer that this creates revenues down the road, but let me ask you, you have been a fan of the corporate tax cut and seeing that come to fruition. do you think it will? do you think by the end of the year these cuts will be reality? >> i think the corporate tax will be. i'm reminded by president trump of the fact that warren buffet, my dear friend has only one book in his office besides books of statistics and that's how to win friends and influence people and mr. trump would be very well advised to read that book. >> neil: yeah, if he will let him but let me ask you, joe you're for stating your mind and you're very frank and might be something a lot of the president finds very very refreshing but can it get in the way of closing the deal? you come from a state where the governor is very in your face, chris christie in new jersey and that's actually hurt him at times, in fact right now it's hurting him a lot what do you think? >> yeah, but i think donald trump has a concerted effort. i may be over thinking this neil but from knowing donald trump for

. >> let me start with the topic i think could consume a lot of your time tomorrow and in congress, and that is -- this iran deal. i know you met with the national security adviser. let me askou this. can you explain what you think the president is going to do tomorrow which is this sort of in between, not quite decertify the deal, but at the same time, trigger a new look at it? explain what your understanding is of what the president is going to do. >> well, chuck, what i think the president will be doing tomorrow is to send a message to congress that he can no longer certify that the jcpoa, the iran deal, is in the national security interests of the united states, but what she not going to do is to urge us to reapply sanctions on iran's nuclear program, or to take action directly to blow up the deal or withdraw from the deal himself. so he's signaling his intense dislike for the deal, but taking no concrete steps to undermine it or to leave it. i'm gravely concerned that this step will be misunderstood by our adversaries and our allies that it will distance us from our european partners in the iran agreement and that it will lead to some mischief in congress as forces beg

there's only -- >> kristin, let me ask you. are they different? what do you through? >> yeah, zach is playing this game democrats have played the last eight years where they point to the trump campaign, allege collusion falsely. dianne feinstein said this was based on rumors and newspapers. that's the truth. zach, i can't let you down play this. for a year, the democrats, hillary clinton, the dnc lied to us. magg maggie haberman said i was lied to by the funders of this dos yeah for a year. they lied. why? we need to get to the bottom of it. >> i wasn't in the room when the decision was made about whether or not to talk about this. i didn't know about the dossier until after the campaign. if i did, i would have advocated for a press conference and hire a sky writer to every line in the sky about it. the underlying premise of the dossier is that. the russians intervened in the election to help donald trump win. this is not a controversial fact. this is trump's own cia director, the director of national intelligence agreed to this fact. >> so collusion -- before i let y

cory: i ask you on facebook. let me ask you about google. gle done everything you want them to do to provide information to your committee? representative quigley: i think this is just the first step, cory: i ask you on facebook. let me ask you about google. acknowledging that we have a problem, turning over the information they have. the next steps will be to have a public hearing with the house and the senate committee to talk about a discussion with the american public. how do we make it more transparent? how do we make sure that we know who is buying these ads? it can't be done anonymously anymore. cory: i will put the same question in a different way. you said it is just the first step. that makes it sound like you want google to take more steps and that they haven't provided everything that you want yet. am i paraphrasing you right? representative quigley: i think they have turned over what they have found. am i paraphrasing you right? i'm suggesting, as they find out information and find additional ads, they should turn those over. but

evan, let me ask you about that.do you make the president's comments, saying he has a good relationship with him, but in the context of everything we've seen this week, including nbc's reporting about the tensions, saying that he would like to see the secretary of state be tougher? some might look at that and say, here's the president publicly criticizing his secretary of state. >> he has a good relationship for now. the president made rex tillerson go out and sing for his supper and and made it into a press conference where it was for an audience of one. i think the president has opinion on rex tillerson, depends on what side of the bed he wakes up on. and i think he's going to be out as secretary of state before the end of the year. >> let me ask you the same thing, if i can, really quickly, adrian. what do you make of those comments? do you see them as a public criticism of the secretary of state, saying he wants to see him be a little bit tougher? because we've reported one of the key sticking points and as the p

this is one simple thing that stops the making of a semiautomatic weapon into a machine gun. >> let me ask yous. give me the slate of laws that if you could wave your wand and have enacted that could have prevented vegas. >> well, i don't know. i would have to take a good look at that and really study it. i'm not sure there is any set of laws that could have prevented it. i do know this, that we have a second amendment. there's been difference over its interpretation by the court, the high court. nonetheless, the high court has held and possession of firearms is legal under the second amendment. now, possession of machine guns is not legal under the second amendment. the national firearms act said they were not legal. ergo, now you have people with american inventiveness inventing something that can be added, an additive that boosts the firing rate to that of a machine gun. and that's what every american saw coming out of those hotel windows. >> so you've heard congressman scalise there. he really outlines, though, a set of reasons why he believes all of these various attempts at gun control i

. >> congressman, let me ask you about that. what i'm hearing actually in both of these answers is that donald trump has presented an opportunity whether you like what he says or don't like what he says where were talking about nasa and even people who didn't want to talk about nasa want to talk about nasa. do you agree there is an opportunity here because? >> i disagree because we had that conversation before hand and i think it was in june of 2016 or whenever he started his campaign thing that mexicans were rapist, murders and if you remember there was an agreement called or an approach that we were looking at called the transpacific partnership and under the transpacific partnership we did nasa two-point oh. everything were talking about except for the fury and fire was done during gdp and the only bad thing is under the third day of the presidency the president got out of the transpacific partnership and the only one that was happy was china because we got out of that itself. trade is very important and i live in laredo and i

let me ask you this. if even leon panetta, tammy, is now saying, yeah, maybe we ought to look at this, does this now take away some of the steam? shouldn't we now recognize that over the last year, all the talk about collusion and trump and russia, not one iota of evidence now the noose is getting tighter and the evidence is becoming obvious. >> real evidence. the thing mr. panetta called "awkward" is when podesta in front of congress with mark elias sitting next to him who was facilitating all of this when he said he had no idea who was paying for it, when the man who was managing it, who was his personal attorney was the manager, so we know and this is where you realize that this is out of the box, that the jeanne is out of the bottle and they've got to be able to do it and there have to be investigations. this is where the real panic sets in, because they realize how sloppy they've been. all the doors that weren't closed because in part i think larry would agree is because they expected her to win. so

let me ask you some factual questions. you can put the bumper stickers away. what do you make of the fact that the podesta group, who i know you are personally familiar with, was taking money from russian interests to advance those in washington? >> i would like to take a look at it, but it is irrelevant as to whether we should impeach donald trump. he is guilty of obstruction of justice. >> tucker: you're not even going to engage in that question? what do you make of the fact that the democratic nationalge committee gave money to the people who wrote the trumpth dossier, whose information came from russian-connected sources? >> that dossier was funded, first and foremost, by trump's's republican opponents. >> tucker: correct, whose names we don't know. >> correct. there is nothing in that dossier that appears to be stolen information.or what we have here -- >> tucker: first of all, you don't know that.o >> i don't know whether martians have landed on this planet. f >> tucker: we know for a fact, because it has been conceded, that that information, some of it