by letter. abigail's call for women's rights seems easy today to see as a policy prescription for a lawyer's brief. she was serious about her concerns. she was also taking a turn offering polished remarks that would have been welcome in his sophisticated salon. john and abigail showed off, entertaining and impressing each other. each offered a polite, literally polished contribution for broader conversation they knew was essential to their relationship. before one of his trips to europe during the revolutionary war, john gave abigail a locket for training a woman sitting on -- portraying a woman sitting on the shore as the ship sailed away. at her feet lies an anchor, a symbol of hope that the long not -- that belonged not to the ship, but the friend aboard, a connection she might've said held fast by their correspondence. you bid me burn your letters john had responded to abigail's request, but i must forget you first. abigail's final statement on women's rights in early may 1776 concludes by e

one of the letters contained an interesting clue. it was a snide reference to the school superintendent as colonel klink, a character in the "hogan's heros" television series. a teacher in the school was once overheard referring to the superintendent in this way. her name was paula nawrocki. like joanne chambers, she also taught first grade and had worked in the school district for eight years. >> i was totally surprised. i was positive that it wasn't anybody in the building, that it could be explained in some other way. >> the letters continued, but soon there were other incidents. the first was something joanne chambers found under her desk. >> i went to start my lesson with my children and sat down at a chair and had a dress on and put my hand underneath to straighten my dress out. i was covered with feces. i couldn't even tell you what i felt like. i felt sick to my stomach. it was like, this could not happen. >> just a few days later, a hidden camera captured several teachers entering joanne chambers' vacant classroom. one remov

it's on the bottom part of the letter. >> i didn't write the letter. he wrote to me. >> he wrote that to you. this is garcia, she's a class officer here, she'll be monitoring you from this point on. any reports of gang-related activity i'll remove you from inmate worker status. you are not part of any gangs? >> no, sir. >> do you understand you're monitored for gang member activity? you are not a gang member? >> no. >> go back to your unit. >> thank you. >> thanks for your time. >> officer rodriguez and corporal garcia will continue to monitor perales and for now, would like to see her pen pal relationships continue. >> one reason why we're not jumping on that right at this point, we don't want to expose the fact that we know she's receiving mail. once we expose that they'll cut her off and this may be something we could potentially use to learn information. so, so far we'll go ahead and give her the benefit of the doubt that she's not doing anything, however we did warn her if anything comes out we'll take appropriate action. >> perales has no intenti

once again i was holding that letter. that could very well have been the last letter he wrote. in the course of the letter he was saying, he sending money home. that is what triggers, it goes to the pensions office and they turn the files over to the archives. that is when some of these things surfaced. and they are really awe-inspiring. thank you for the question. any other questions? >> [indiscernible] >> they -0-- an excellent question. sometime it took years and not only the pension request -- not always the pension request was given. again, it was not based on military service which was an automatic way of sending out files to fill out and compensation forms. they had to request it and basically saying that they, either the soldier themselves survived the war or seek survivor pension -- and again, they would have to document why. or if they died during the war the family would have to say we need this, the pension, and they would have to have a link to have the soldier sent money home and with his loss, their financial distress would warrant them to appeal and apply for a

3 letters if members of the public the first one is a letter if the san francisco chamber of commerce dated december 8th urging the board to uphold the surveillance if any one of you wish i ask read from the letter. >> if we have copies. >> i'm sorry. >> we have copies of the letter. >> no, if you look at your packet you have them. >> i also have copies second we received a copy of the letter sent other board by the golden gate restaurant association urging the board to support the variance third a copy of the letter by fran sin perkins the manager the property stating she's received no noise complaint about the kitchen fan from the tenants or anyone else finally, we have learned since the last hearing that the appellant ms. huh-uh mat appeared at the planning commission a year and a half ago despite her saying she's suffered she appeared to oppose the permit for a patio she opted the patio and no time did she say anything about the noise in the light well or anywhere else so this statement she's been suffering from the noise of the fan is in contradiction to her statements she never

we post letters of determination on our website. we don't post variance of decision letters. i don't know why exactly. i can speak with the building administrator and we can report back to you as to why we don't get -- >> it doesn't have to be a major i.t. projoekt. we can sepd send it out to those on the original notice. >> a bbn would not have helped in this situation, correct? >> no, not necessarily. >> an issue for me is an expectation was created but there was no requirement. i guess i'm a little confused about this e-mail. as i read it there are two questions. will you also be sending the notice, to which mr. smith responds yes. second question, we would also like the notice from the permanent issue. aren't they one in the same? >> i believe it's two second requests. >> right. he doesn't answer the second request. >> no we're talking about the first. >> with respect to the variance. >> do you have another comment mr. tigue. >> i should have worn my purple tie. i have reviewed the e-mail chain and if my recollection is correct michael smith stated that he would notify th

there are some condescending aspects to that letter, but the fact that jefferson had exchanged letters with banneker sent off alarm

>> the letter was never intended >> can you talk to me a little bit about the letter? >> the letter was never intended to be found. you know. i wrote it probably about a month ago. just haven't heard from nobody or nothing and you know was just feeling pretty down and so i wrote it. unfortunately, they found it. >> mcdaniel says part of his despair is from missing his two daughters who are 12 and 13 years old. he has spent almost half of their lives in prison. >> they had it rough not having me around. when i was out there i chose drugs a lot of time. so that deprived them. you write them and don't get a response, you know. >> mcdaniel's daughters live with their mother and her husband. he has only seen them once in the last two years. the last time was soon after he swallowed a handful of pills in his cell. >> when that happened and my family got told, you know, i got a visit, like, the following week from my kids and everybody started writing letters and i think it was more to open their eyes up too that i was, you know, pretty down, you know. from now hearing from t

>> i was wondering, there was a letter and i know you are working closely with the letters now, and i cannot remember the date of it, but it was abigail to her youngest son thomas, in which she is commiserating with him at some level because he is afraid he is going to be an old bachelor, he has not married yet. and in commiserating she says, you know i married too young. now, was she really meaning that she married too young, or was it just trying to make him feel better? >> she possibly was reflecting. that is a good one, jim. you know, she was concerned about all of her children's marriages, and she did lots of meddling, and she did lots of meddling, and it is to her credit that she meddled, because she was trying to protect them and she was looking for ways to ensure that they would have good lives. she knew very well that who you married was her destiny, and how your life would unfold, and happiness in life very much depended on what marriage would be like. nevertheless, she was always promoting it, so she was always on the lookout for a match for thomas, yes, and he donald in --

the calls go up and newly letter you have in your packet the calls were lower this year in terms of that confusion you however we make up for that this last monday when we hit seven hundred and 12 calls usually, we're looking at one hundred and one hundred and 20 seven hundred was a lot about the skipped pay period those retirees know we're moving first page a pay in advance to a pay as you go that information was if the on enrollment in the guide and in the section is it fair to say on our voicemail system that went out if the e news and printed in the letter but people were still spriept they are more money in their checks than normal there feeling were a lot of calls they got the information off the voicemail system i'm going to ask we met with ann to plan the sutter rate audit you'll recall the land use limited the calls that sutter could make we're in the process of doing that and we worked with finance on the e e rp summary you'll take action on today when we - i also met with kaiser research along with stephanie you'll hear about that in terms of communications i already ment

these letters. i will accept that but here's what i'm crossing out and he uses red ink to cross things out. switch to henry raymond for a moment. all of a sudden henry raymond the chairman of the rnc, goes off the reservation and writes a letter to lincoln saying everyone says you can't win. maybe you should put emancipation back on the table. so now the two most important republican editors in the country are telling him to abdicate the emancipation cancel freedom or a least make a negotiating chip. lincoln has always been able to control raymond center personal persuasion and by force of personality. he never tries with greeley or he knows it doesn't work from his congressional days days. he calls raymond to washington with the entire national committee, put his big hand on raymond's shoulder. i imagine raymond is about 5 feet 1 inches. the hand crashes down on the shoulder and he says you know i think it's better that we lose an favor freedom then that we win and cancel. as he later put it if i s

an open letter. >> it was claiming responsibility for the bombing. >> the letter is full of misspellingsnd bad grammar was written on a label maker and photocopied. it seemed to be a military trained contract killing who had been hired to kill roberto over a mexico deal gone wrong. >> it was ms 13 behind it. it's a violent el salvador criminal street gang. >> roberto is supposed to be a target? >> the letter implied that he messed with a drug cartel . and ms 13 had been contracted. >> the author of the letter taunted the detectives, writing that lab results would find the powder, but no dna. that was true so far. the point of the letter was a warning. roberto's brother eduardo was next on the hit list. the writer said he turned down the job to kill eduardo, but a second assassin would be on the way. >> did you think it was real? >>. >> i didn't know what to think. i never had seen anything like that except on something similar on tv. >> the one thing about that letter was all too obvious. whoever wrote it had inside knowledge. nobody knew about it. >> we hadn't known it was a bomb. for s

i guess the question is what's the difference between that letter and the following letter that's signed by the members of the committee, which is totally permissible under florida law. dear joe, as an attorney frequently appearing before the county court we're sure you're concerned with the quality of the judiciary. judge jones personally asked us to serve on his campaign committee. and we're writing to ask you to contribute to his re-election. as you know, florida law per mits judge jones to thank contributors. i think once those things are permissible, who makes the solicitation really doesn't make that much of an incremental difference. >> well, that's what you think. i can actually see how receiving a signed letter from the judge saying give and/or a telephone call or a personal meeting has an incrementally graeter impact than a letter. i get even today i get a whole lot of campaign committee letters. and i just throw them out. if a candidate calls me or reaches out to me i tell them i can't talk to them and i can't give. okay. but i have a reason. and an excuse. a lawyer doesn't ha

an open letter to the cops. what did that letter say?laiming responsibility for the bombing. >> reporter: the letter, full of misspellings and bad grammar, had been written on a label-maker, then photocopied. its author claimed to be a military trained contract killer who'd been hired to kill roberto over a "mexico deal gone wrong." >> and that it was ms-13 behind it. >> reporter: what the heck is ms-13? >> mara salvatrucha. it's a violent el salvadorian, criminal street gang. >> reporter: and that roberto was supposed to be a target of this group? >> the letter implied that roberto had messed with a drug cartel and that ms-13 had been contracted. >> reporter: the author of the letter taunted the detectives, writing that "lab results" would find military grade powder but no dna. which was true, so far. but the point of the letter, wrote its author, was a warning. roberto's brother, eduardo, was next on the hit list. the writer said he'd turned down the job to kill eduardo. but a second assassin would soon be on his way. did you think it

he was a person and still write letter after letter after letter after letter calling for a stronger national union that led up to a constitutional convention. he could do all those things and he was not a waxman. he was very much a living, breathing able, vibrant human being with hopes and dreams and visions. and a vision for this country that he -- he was not a great speaker. but john adams said he was the greatest political actor he ever saw. he could -- he conveyed an image and power with his resolution with his letters certainly. he was a good writer. but his dignity and his sense of purpose, he was a -- he was an amazing human being. at any party he would talk with all the men and dance with all the ladies. he knew, he was a human being. and he could balance all these things. so he was very active here. changing the crops that were grown, bringing in new livestock. he was very active here. and so he was -- these were exciting times. this i always regret that in the great biographies of washington including how a six, seven-volume one by free man and then the five-volume one by

this is definitely a suicide letter. >> hey, vera? >> what?tleman we just took to ccu we just found a suicide note in his drawer, and he's saying bye to his mom and children, so put him on suicide watch. make sure that gets to evidence. >>> coming up -- >> the letter was never intentionally to be found, you know. >> martin mcdaniel speaks out and is then surprised by the consequences. >> that's bull [ bleep ] and you know it. >> and more from the kokomo slayer. >> i seen it like she done something to me. so therefore, i'm going to do something tenfold to her. ...the getaway vehicle! for all the confidence you need. td ameritrade. you got this. hard it can be...how ...to breathe with copd? it can feel like this. copd includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled... ...copd maintenance treatment... ...that helps open my airways for a full 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder does not replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor i

>> well, in that particular letter, i was general. there were so many specifics.ted to wake somebody up at least to address the topics. >> it worked. six days after he sent that letter, matthew lee was downsized, let go after 14 years. but lehman executives couldn't ignore the letter and asked their accountants from ernst and young to interview matthew lee. >> and in those interviews we have the notes, which are part of the report. he says very specifically $50 billion, repo transactions moving money off the balance sheet at quarter end. so our conclusion was ernst and young certainly knew it as of that time and did nothing with it. [ticking] >> coming up: where were the government regulators? >> how closely was the s.e.c. monitoring lehman brothers during this time? >> they were on premises. they were talking to the lehman people daily. they officed there. >> more of lehman brothers ahead when 60 minutes on cnbc returns. [ticking] okay buddy what's your favorite kind of cheerios? honey nut. but... chocolate is my other favorite... but apple cinnamon is my favorit

i started receiving letters back. started receiving letters back, i started asking for money here and there and i started building up money in my account. >> jackson says he isn't gay but it is not difficult to write the letters. >> treat them like they're my girlfriend, even though they ain't. but treat them like that. you want to keep them writing you. so you write sexual stuff to them to keep it coming. >> think how fun it will be to be at your house and in your bed with you. i know that boy [ bleep ] is so good and you would love to let me have it. >> jackson is once again looking for a canteen benefactor. he's placed a personal ad. if he gets a response he will send his letter off in the mail. >> $30 per pen pal with 10 to 15 pen pals, i'm banking. i'm banking. >>> coming up -- >> this is your daily visit. >> don't mess with it. >> kenneth jackson takes pleasure in cutting. >> like the best orgasm that you ever had. >> knowing that my mom is still there, everything is fine. >> hey, honey. >> and kendrick morris m

have one further comment as we were talking about what elements should be put into the potential letter not only the issue of diabetes but because we are talking specifically what might be the necessary services of saint lukes and not get into business plan of the cpmc enterprise, to really discuss what the community, what part of services community did need and i think the diabetes issue is important, but i think it maybe only a harboring of what the underlying issue which is how do we meet the needs of the current residents of the mission as well as what would be an expanded need as the city continues to expand. i think that is the underlying concern whether it be just simply a diabetes clinic or should be a gestational program or women's program or what not. so i think there should be not to subvert an overall master plan but understanding how one meets those community needs at the same time as it meets the larger needs of the world center that it is building. and i would suggest that it be part of it along with that cultural competency again is not just simply on the issue of diabet

the letter of support read was noted a letter of qualified support because there were special accommodations made for one particular property that has not been engaged with the other neighbors. we have spoken with the immediate neighbors of this property. you will receive or have received in the last couple of days a number of letters from them but my understanding is they are feeling intimidated because of the character attacks, adhomium attacks directed at the appellant here and mentioned in the discretionary hearing. a discussion about bringing big guns was a discussion about lawyers and for that to be brought up and used again and again simply is not fair and not how we do things in san francisco. there are serious unusual environmental circumstances pertaining to this property. perhaps most notably from the geotechnical report which was not sulfur by the planning report or department and will have impacts on the neighbors. >> interesting enough the only structural engineer is myself. no one from the project sponse or planning has looked at it. doesn't it seem strange that the only perso

correct the records as detailed in the packet i initiated 17 outreach between the receipt of the letter and the mandatory discretionary review address 8 outreach attempts after the dr approval 24 attempts in 5 months and as outlined in my packet no direct came back to me with the designing process the way the architect did for the other neighbors the spirit of the outreach attempt was also made to request neighborly and in person meetings on behalf of the building occupants to address the buildings concerns and part of the process my intent was was never to address those in front of of the planning commission or the mandatory discretionary review or in front of the board of appeals, in fact, the only reason i've actually come from the planning commission or the board the proponents refused to engage with me and grant us the same outreach they've provided the other neighborhoods daylight is a critical needs and my building owners fell occupants simply want to sit down with the facilitator and find a solution by the solid height and the open space and daylight again equal outreach in the

she wrote these two letters that she referred to as popping off letters. she met this as if in i die and these letters are read by my family. she wrote one to her mother and one to her father. this one i'm going to show was when she wrote to her father. dearest dad, it was worth it. you know that. i have no faith we will meet anywhere again, but i wish we might. goodbye and good luck to you. some people have interpreted that as your daughter, but she liked to play with words. i think she was using it in the sense of doting as well as daughter. she and her mother argued a lot. they did have a close loving relationship but her mother was very irresponsible with finances. that irritated amelia. she was constantly trying to bail the family out in that area. her father was irresponsible with finances, but he was very charming and that covered a lot of things. he was an alcoholic, which is why amelia avoided all stimulants. she did not drink alcohol or smoke or do drugs. she was adamant she did not want to have any sort of stimulants consumed. this is a folder o

i guess my question is what is the difference between that letter and the following letter that is signed by the members of the committee __ which is permissible under florida law. dear joe, judge jones asked us to serve on the campaign committee and we are writing to ask you to contribute to his election. as you know, florida law permits judge jones solicitors. the solicitation really does not make that much of an __ >> that's what you think. i can actually see how receiving a signed letter from the judge saying __ or a telephone call, or personal meeting, has an incrementally greater impact than a letter. today, i even get a whole lot of campaign committee letters. i just throw them out. if a candidate calls me, or reaches out to be, i tell them i can't talk to them. i have a reason, and an excuse, a lead is not have that reason or excuse. >> i think that's why __ at least one line i think is permissible. a line between written communication and all communication __ either in person, one_to_one, or in a small group. the question in the first amendment context, where he is talking about

are the numbers quadrupling page 2 the person we've been dealing with in planning notes there's 8 letters no mention of the correspondents the professional 86 and 91 and 93 their deceptive page 77 complains there would be an extremely modest impact an charles and barbaras how is it seems not likely it blocks the sun the front and the back page 76 offices a hearsay statement from an attorney they were stone walls by neighborhood quote who could be only satisfied in the home stays as is there is nothing further from the truth i suggest you scrutinize their letters one is from church street and one from a neighbor he's moving and smolg someone that claims to be a neighbor lives one mile away and no verifyable addresses those are oriental letters i'm not the penthouse is appropriate but when we discussed it the woman said it was north of the project that has absolutely no effective in our conversation she said she have biased towards the work saying she have confidence in highs designing design he don't say a lot of work in the city. >> thank you, ma'am our time is up. >> is there any additio

in your packets in total turn we have 330 letters of support, 255 of those letters of support are from the 94112 and adjacent zip codes of proposed location and present a letter from the ky neighborhood association that has represented our location since 1939, it states clearly that the cia support our application due to consistent communication with their board of directors and willingness to work together and sparc does not create negative clustering effects like the other dispensaris and hope it demonstrate our strong support today. sparc is different and how we operate is fundamentally different than other mcds. we adrop thed a street, which is slated to be san francisco's next living alley. over four years' of operation we have never not had one community complaint, code violation or secret threat. sparc is the only mcd in san francisco to be [hro-eupbs/]ed under washington, d.c.-based patient for certification program. sparc is different from other dispensaries in the level of care and service provided to patient and how we relate immediately and to our immediate neighbors. the o