we levenson inquiry in 2012 there was no evidence of hacking.— levenson inquiry in 2012 there was noonly seen unsubstantiated _ no evidence of hacking. we have only seen unsubstantiated allegations - no evidence of hacking. we have only seen unsubstantiated allegations and j seen unsubstantiated allegations and i have seen no evidence to show me phone hacking has ever taken place. this is thejudge phone hacking has ever taken place. this is the judge said was untrue, she had known for years about the practice and turned a blind eye. hacking, he said, had been widespread and habitual at the mirror since 1996. this is farfrom the first hacking case the mirror has lost. prince harry was awarded over £1a0,000 in damages, an amount that could increase considerably as other stories are considered. costs and damages of more than £100 million have already been paid out to many other victims. the company, now known as reach, said we welcome thejudgment now known as reach, said we welcome the judgment that gives the business the judgment that gives the business the necessary clarity to move fo

between them, even went as far as lying under oath to parliament during the levenson inquiry, to thexchange, and to us all ever since. the journey to justice can be a slow and painful one. and since bringing my claim almost five years ago, defamatory stories and intimidating tactics have been deployed against me and my family —— at my family's expense. and so, as i too have learned through this process, patience is in fact a virtue. especially in the face of vendetta journalism. i hope that the court's findings will serve as a warning to all media organisations who have employed these practices and then similarly lied about them. their pattern of destroying evidence and consuming unlawful behaviour continued into the litigation itself, and as the judge continued into the litigation itself, and as thejudge has ruled, even to this day. i am happy to have won the case, especially given that this trial only learned of a quarter of my entire claim. even on just that, it is clear that mirror group's persistent attempts to suggest that my claim was, to quote their counsel, fantastical, in t

, the detachment commander, with levenson, what could be, only a rout, and so they began the performancewith whom she was very friendly, and said that we have a very talented director who staged a play, but the destruction closed it, and stepanova, who was fadey’s wife, yes, and angelina stepanova, that means she had a turntable at home, somewhere very high up, she called and said, my sasha is here. they were opening the play, and suslov came to the performance, his father said that he came in galoshes, it was terribly funny for him to look at these galoshes, because no one wears goloshes, and he came in , he didn’t even understand what he was deciding. his fate, but suslov watched the performance, began to applaud the next day in the newspaper truth article, what a great work, and how right it is that levinson leads the squad, the human heart, how to survive the new year, cinnamon is the most new year's spice, winter fun, what you need to be prepared for at the skating rink, the program to live healthy, will answer all questions. tomorrow on the first. the best. new season, on sunday on

so they staged a rout, levenson, the detachment commander.venson, what could be only a defeat, as it were, they began to close the performance again. and then the actress babanova called. angelina stepanova, with whom she was very friendly, said that we have a very a talented director who staged the play, what a disaster, it’s being closed, and stepanova, who was fadey’s wife, yes, and angelina stepanova, that means she had a turntable at home, somewhere all the way up, she called and said, here’s mine sashenka closed the performance, and suslov came to the performance, his father said that he came in naked shoes, it was terrible for him to look at these naked shoes, because no one wears naked shoes, but he came in naked, he didn’t even understand what was being decided on his fate, but suslov watched the performance, began to applaud, the next day in the newspaper there really is an article, what a great work, and how right it is that levinson leads the detachment, he didn’t throw him out of bedabir, we’ll break through, on the day of heroes

in 2012, the levenson inquiry looked into the culture and ethics of press and publish its recommendationsts. she came to a settlement over phone hacking in 2021. but today, it was prince harry who was in the spotlight because the duke of sussex, along with 100 others, had accused the mirror group newspapers widespread, novel activities between 1991 and 2011. the

in 2012, the levenson inquiry looked into the culture and ethics of press and publish its recommendations. sienna miller was one of the many phone hacking celebrity claimants. she came to a settlement over phone hacking in 2021. but today, it was prince harry who was in the spotlight because the duke of sussex, along with 100 others, had accused the mirror group newspapers widespread, novel activities between 1991 and 2011. the high court has ruled prince harry was the victim of phone hacking and has been awarded more than £1a0,000 in damages. the mirror group newspaper has issued a statement today. it said the group apologises unreservedly for where historical wrongdoing took place, and prince harry by his lawyer has said today is a great day for truth as well as accountability. let's get more now on charities warning that millions of people might need to borrow to pay essential bills during the festive season. concerns have been heightened by an increase in the energy price cap in the new year. the government says targeted payments have helped ease the burden. live now to brighton to ta

former senior directors of the company, one of them former chief executive sly bailey, who told the levenson12 there was no evidence of hacking. we have only seen unsubstantiated allegations and i have seen no evidence to show me phone hacking has ever taken place. this, thejudge said, was untrue, she had known for years about the practice and turned a blind eye. hacking, he said, had been widespread and habitual at the mirror since 1996. this is far from the first hacking case the mirror has lost. prince harry was awarded over £1a0,000 in damages, an amount that could increase considerably as other stories are considered. but costs and damages of more than £100 million have already been paid out to many other victims. the company, now known as reach, said, "we welcome the judgment that gives the business the necessary clarity to move forward from events that took place many years ago. where historical wrongdoing took place, we apologise unreservedly and have taken full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation." for prince harry, this is a landmark moment, it's 132 years since a seni

again a performance by zakharov, so they staged a rout, levinson, the detachment commander , with levensonina stepanova, with whom she was very friends, she said : his fate is being decided, but suslov watched the performance, began to applaud the next day in the newspaper, there really is an article about what a great work it is, and how right it is that levinson leads the detachment. i remind you that this is a podcast of lisenstein's witnesses, which we host we, film historians, stanislav dizinsky and natal ryabchikova, and today we are talking about the creative legacy of the wonderful soviet and russian cinema and theater director mark anatolyevich zakharov, our guest is alexander zakharov. and in the cinema, he also had this practice of writing more on the cutout and then handing it in little by little. no, it was just filmed there, for example, a scene in an ordinary miracle, when yevgeny pavlovich appears in the window, remember the politburo before, it’s all a little bit like this when evgeny pavlovich appeared , he did this in the window, when there was a premiere at the cinema h