>> let me just make one further point about the leveson inquiry because i think it is important. i think what my right and honorable friend the education secretary was saying and i think what's important for all of us in this house to say is while these inquiries are going on, i do think it's important for politicians who, come on, let's be frank, benefit sometimes when the press are a little less hard hitting than they have been in recent years, it's important for us to say we support a free, vibrant, robust press. important that's an point and that is what he was saying. now, turning to the health reforms, turning to the health reforms, the gentleman said something that i agreed with. he said this, he said, the n.h.s. will have to change because of the rise of the age of the population, because of the rise in the number of long- term conditions, because of the rise in expectations and costs. sounds a bit familiar, mr. speaker. he's right it has to reform. the problem for the labour party is they are against both the money that needs to go into the n.h.s. which they say is irres

well any big obama on the same day as these wiki leaks revelations we learn from the leveson inquiry in the u.k. that rupert murdoch's news corporation adding gauged in systemic widescale. bribery of corrupt police officers corrupt government officials in the u.k. so here you have rupert murdoch doing all the bad things that everyone is up in arms about in terms of what is being revealed through with the leaks but somehow through were rupert murdoch's organization there's not that level of outrage your thoughts on the role of the media in maintaining this this dual standard system where murdoch is good given so far a slap on the wrist for doing things for doing is spying illegal spying corruption where is wiki leaks which is doing actually a public good service is seen as somehow in bed with the terrorists well it's certain certain very big forces are attacking wiki leaks it would seem. the u.s. government for example there are you know people who really don't want we keep leaks doing what they're doing they're a major threat to something and that's why you see blockading in the paym

. >> i'm glad the audible lady asked that queion because i've no intention of preepting the leveson inquiry in any way at all but i think we look back to the debate we had in this house, both the right honorable gentleman the labour party, to get on with the job, to give every signal we want to be able to adopt what is proposed without there being sort of regulatoryrbitrage between the parties but i think there is an understanding on that basis. given there is the understanding i will just repeat again. i think it's important that honorable members on all side stretch the importance of a free press in the health of our democracy. >> hard-working families in my constituency are astonished that a benefit cap for some 26,000 pounds is being opposed by the party opposite. will my honorable friend agree with me that would always mae a and provide benefits for those that are unable to work? >> i'm delighted, mr. speaker, my honorable friend caught your eye because today's the day that the welfare bill becomes an act. anfor the first time we will have a proper cap on wefare, supported by this site