the leveson inquiry was intended to be in two parts but five years on, the second phase still hasn‘tpress. "never again!" said the government at the time. but that inquiry was only part one. and former prime minister gordon brown, whose bank and mortgage accounts were broken into, says it‘s now time for part two. leveson one could only deal with part of the problem. the whole of the problem has got to be dealt with, including the way murdoch newspapers impersonated people. including the way that there were breaches of the law. including also how e—mail interception might have happened, as well as telephone interception. these are very serious issues. the remit of the first inquiry was broad. to look at the culture, practice and ethics of britain‘s press. a second, more specific, inquiry would look at claims of police corruption and allegations of corporate wrongdoing at news international. but five years on, it still hasn‘t happened. it was almost certainly the worst experience of my life. one man splashed across tabloid front pages was the teacher, christopherjefferies. he was wrong

of news international in the past, then any case for not going apart with the part two of the leveson inquiryprecisely the behaviour part two of levesonis precisely the behaviour part two of leveson is supposed to look into. we are still waiting for the results of consultation on whether leveson part two will go ahead but i hope the secretary of state's words indicate that she'll show some courage, stand up that she'll show some courage, stand up to vested interests, do the right thing and allow the inquiry to proceed. she must not ask 0fcom to do itsjob with proceed. she must not ask 0fcom to do its job with one proceed. she must not ask 0fcom to do itsjob with one hand proceed. she must not ask 0fcom to do its job with one hand tied proceed. she must not ask 0fcom to do itsjob with one hand tied behind its back. mr speaker, can i thank the honourable gentleman for his response and assure him that 0fcom will not be doing any work with one hand tied behind their backs as the honourable gentleman suggested. if i can deal with the issue of the leveson inquiry, the consultation first, i think it

leading to the phone hacking scandal leading to the closure of the the news of the world and the leveson inquiry the company in two between the news division and zist in two between the news division and 21st century fox, the entertainment division, and the bid is coming from the entertainment division and he thinks that tactic will be enough to convince the mega later not to worry about this on competition grounds. thank you forjoining us. —— the regulator to worry. cumbria police has unreservedly accepted the criticism of an investigation into the death of 13—month—old poppi worthington four years ago. the police complaints watchdog found it wasn't fit for purpose and that officers didn't look sufficiently into whether she had been abused despite her injuries. a family courtjudge ruled she had probably been sexually assaulted by her father, who denies any wrongdoing. judith moritz reports. poppi worthington only lived for 13 months. she was found with serious injuries at her home in barrow in 2012. the investigation which followed her death was so flawed that more than four years on, serious f

that got completely subsumed by the phone hacking scandal which led to the leveson inquiry and the closeorld. rupert murdoch calculated that the political heat was too much for him to buy sky and ta ke was too much for him to buy sky and take control. since then he has split his company into two. this is coming from the entertainment division, 21st century fox. he and his son james are division, 21st century fox. he and his sonjames are saying that if it comes from the entertainment division it should satisfy the uk regulator. what does it mean for viewers who might be watching this? this is about who gets to control the media not just this is about who gets to control the media notjust in britain, but in the wider world. karen bradley has said she is minded to refer this to 0fcom mainly on grounds of media plurality. will there be a excessive control that rupert murdoch and his family have of the british media? in the short term it will not make much difference. this is really a way of the rupert murdoch family getting 100% of the profits you mention. they own 39% of sky already. it wil