is the perfect libertarian but the libertarians would like?sounds as though there is confusion in what the libertarians would like. libertarians aren't interested in getting involved on the side of the kurds or the turks. libertarians say go to congress and the constitution and you declare war. kennedy: do you think troops would want to aid saudi arabia and killing civilians and yemen? >> i'm not in favor of that in neither libertarians. let me finish. what you are saying is the president can't be doing anything libertarian are leaning towards a libertarian thought in turkey or syria because he is not doing it in saudi arabia. i've opposed the yemen war. i've opposed arming the saudi arabians and i have a pose the president policy of putting more troops in saudi arabia but i don't oppose just because some people are so hostile what you were buying into is the trump syndrome like the democrats do. the democrats is to be against the war in iraq but now they are for the war in syria because they hate trump so much so libertarians fall in that tra

they self-self-described libertarian and largely reformists. my question is if that are to implement reforms they have to delve into real complexion issues such as pensions, privatization of land, companies, and these could proverb unpop floor -- unpopular ukraine. >> i think you need to do what georgia did. georgia was exactly the same situation in 2004 when they had their rose revolution, in fact in many ways georgia's situation was bleaker than what currently exists in ukraine. and they elected a libertarian leader, and they quickly handled all the issue but i think the thing is quick. you don't get time to dillydally around because there's going to be opposition. give you a couple of examples. police corruption was one of the worst problems in georgia. they fired 35,000 police officers in a day. as a country of 4 million people so this i eequivalent of firing every cop in washington, dc. tomorrow there irno police officers. and of course crime went down when you fire the cops because the cops were the criminals and in a span of about 12 to

this is coming from a libertarian free market viewpoint. my question for you is do you thank in light of the republicans that a pragmatism for the best interest of the business opposed to ideology. >> i have this letter the charles koch wrote 1974, donors to the libertarian party. it said i am disgusted with the republicans. they are just as big government liberals is the democrats are. if you have the view i just described about how the world out of work with government intervention. the republicans are frustrating, to charles koch for decades. fast-forward in the year 2005, i interviewed the sky name steve monaghan who is one of the very first directors for mac is for prosperity and he vigorously remembers going to one of the early events when they started this network when charles koch said, look the democrats are a lost cause. were never going to influence them, were never going to get them to see our agenda. were going to focus on republicans. we need to move the republican party to where we see the world. strict libertarian. anti- reg

strict libertarianism. anti-regulation, stop government spending. american for prosperity actually focuses on the firepower if you will on the republican party to transform that and the reason is they see that as only valuable option and david koch ran as a vice president for nominee on the libertarian ticket back in 1980. he went around the country, donated a bunch of money, gave speeches and 3% of the pole. libertarianism does not pull well, i don't think it really ever has. and we realize we need to transfer the republican party to achieve her policy. so i think there has been a strong relationship over decad decades. >> charles and david koch oppose obama in the candidacy of the president trump. what you feel like in social issues beyond the economy, what you feel that charles fall on the political spectrum? >> on social issues? >> just beyond the self-interest of what they've done with republican party of deregulation and economic route the temporary is a. literature natuntemporary. the process is been in since the 1970s to create a free market

and as libertarians is not always cut and dry particularly foreign-policy. very much appreciate the conversation. >> the president does have the constitutional authority to wage the war and move the troops where he wants within the war after spending clear by congress. i don't support putting more troops in saudi arabia, people have asked about that, but let's be clear he's not putting them in the desert in the middle of a war zone, he is putting them on a permanent u.s. military base which he has the authority to do. kennedy: i understand we need to close some of those bases. and if you want to scale things back and bring people home, that's a great place to smart. thank you, sir. naturally democrats very skeptical of the presidents deal in a joint statement nancy pelosi and chuck schumer said the agreement searcy undermines the credibility of american foreign policy and sends a dangerous message to our allies and adversaries alike that our work cannot be trusted. president and one has given nothing. president trump is given up everything. did the president

which is what will happen given how turkey sees the kurdish people, a lot of libertarians are sayingou are a neocon. >> you have been exposed. >> i am ja john bolton. >> this is not a withdrawal, we were moving a couple dozen troops from this place to that, mantpresident saying we're bring the troops home, i would like to bring them home faster than suits y does, but 80 countries are in this coalition, have to plan this out, trump is famously impulsive. kennedy: he spoke with erdogan yesterday. >> this happened on december 2018, he had a phone call with erdogan then he will have a change of policy. it should not just be about american troops it is about war. kennedy: that is what i thought, we're not talking about the kurds, who perished or 24,000 wounded or hundreds of thousands of civilians, displaced and lost their lives jim? >> that isa -- >> not that funny. >> it is frustrating. it rookie wreaks of impulsivene. and president trump said that obama was the founder of isis, most damy part of this, rand paul, he got beaten by a rake by his neighbor. he must have did something on som

i think of conservatism as having a libertarian minded heart when it comes to federalism, governments be involved in people's lives less and less and less. the reason i'm a conservative though instead of a libertarian is because i also feel a lot of kinship with conservative social values, which are often in line with evangelical values. sometimes, if i'm feeling frosty, i might call it [inaudible] because even though i'm holding a big fan of the government -- >> we can get into that. >> but in terms of being an evangelical i believe the bible is an errant which i think is a prominent feature of evangelicalism. i believe in the holy spirit guiding you. i believe in most of the things you found in southern baptists denominations. and the fact i was southern helps. >> did you grow up southern baptist? >> yeah, we went to southern baptist churches that you've heard of like first baptist church in dallas, texas and in lynchburg, virginia. >> you certainly have the evangelical pedigree, if you will. you have the conservative background and have written for conservative outlets and that --

economically, you are clearly on the libertarian right but when it came to your biggest preoccupation euroscepticism and your increasing dissatisfaction with written‘s membership of the european union. it got me expelled from the conservative party. exactly. 2009, david cameron who i dare say you had never been eye—to—eye with on europe, actually decided to fire you, expel you from the party because you'd decided to vote for ukip. and give them some money. the way i was expelled by was eric pickles, who was the chairman, writing an email saying, "you are going to be considered for expulsion and you can "write to appeal if you want to and blah, blah, blah," and i wrote back saying, "i don't care about my rights "of appeal, i shan‘t appeal." later i was interviewed by anne mcevoy. she then asked eric pickles who said, "oh, no, i neverspoke to him, or had a long chat with him." i never spoke to him in my life. maybe that tells us something about politicians and politics but let's stick with you and your evolution to becoming one of the prime movers behind what we now know is the brexit c

so you think how could it be she has issues with libertarians? it goes back to that morality or ethics of individualism that we have a right but our founders believed that. it is not amoral in any sense it is deeply moral. >> fountainhead and atlas shrugged are well known. >> richard in 1938 it is the world of the premises of collectivism for a society where there word i has been abolished and individual choice has been abolished. and someone who is a true individual very talented and curious and capable individual. then starts to think for himself. and to do his research that things will be of great service to my fellow man. and it's a story about what happens. so it's the hunger games with that popular culture and then have that moral message spirit that predates orwell by ten years. >> it is quite similar in some ways. but i think it's enormously appealing and it shocked to see how popular we came out with this one year ago and has distributed 40000 copies since then. fell long before even any graphic novel as a award-winning model comic illus

this goes to the bigger picture of how you can become a libertarian.ourself, how many conflicts were the result of decision made by someone who knows his hands will never be dirty. you think about whether it is syria, whether it's guns, whether it's the drug war. do you feel strongly enough to do it yourself? do you d feel strongly enough to confiscate opioids or guns or go to syria. it turns you into a libertarian externally fast. >> juan: in australia, they did do a ban and it worked. >> emily: in this country, it's treating the symptom, not the problem. he's not addressing the epidemic of young people taking their own lives and streaming at doing all of this for the attention, the horrific aspects, the components behind the shootings. he is just talking about the weapon. >> juan: coming up, dana perino joins us for a preview of her exclusive interview with facebook ceo mark zuckerberg. [ orchestral music playing ] mom you've got to get yourself a new car. i wish i could save faster. you're making good choices. you'll get there. ♪ were you going to t

economically, you are clearly on the libertarian right but when it came to your biggest preoccupation was brexit. euroscepticism and your increasing dissatisfaction with written's membership of the european union. dissatisfaction with written's membership of the european unionm got me expelled from the conservative party. exactly, 2009, david cameron who i dare say you had never been eye to eye with on europe, actually decided to fire you, expel you from the party because you'd decided to vote for ukip. and give them some money. the way i was spilt by was eric pickles, who was the chairman, writing an email saying, you are going to be considered for expulsion and you can write to whoever you want to and blah, blah, blah and i wrote back saying, i don't care about my rights of appeal, i shan't appealed. later i was interviewed by anne mcavoy. she then asked eric pickles who said, oh, no, i neversaid that. i've had a long chat with him. i never spoke to him in my life. maybe that tells us something about politicians and politics but let's stick with you and your evolution to becoming on

economically, you are clearly on the libertarian right but when it came to your biggest preoccupationxit. euroscepticism and your increasing dissatisfaction with written‘s membership of the european union. it got me expelled from the conservative party. exactly. 2009, david cameron who i dare say you had never been eye—to—eye with on europe, actually decided to fire you, expel you from the party because you'd decided to vote for ukip. and give them some money. the way i was expelled by was eric pickles, who was the chairman, writing an email saying, "you are going to be considered for expulsion and you can "write to appeal if you want to and blah, blah, blah," and i wrote back saying, "i don't care about my rights "of appeal, i shan‘t appeal." later i was interviewed by anne mcevoy. she then asked eric pickles who said, "oh, no, i neverspoke to him, or had a long chat with him." i never spoke to him in my life. maybe that tells us something about politicians and politics but let's stick with you and your evolution to becoming one of the prime movers behind what we now know as the brex

generally i'm on the libertarian side of the republican party. generally it is important to me to keep government as small as possible so that individual liberties are as great as possible, but here it is not government versus individual liberties. it is government versus big pharma, who is not playing square with us. i would give medicare that power and that would be a seachange on day one. >> i'm eric. i am a 23. you just said that we had about 1000 reasons to be friends with china. i'm wondering if you could elaborate. together, wewe get could do a great deal. i myself have a thought about andissue with north korea mr. trump has taken that on himself to have one on ones with his new -- who he says he has fallen in love with. i think he came pretty close to pressing the nuclear button on north korea when he was unhappy with mr. kim right at the beginning. right after he sent cruise missiles to blow up the base that dropped chemical weapons into syria. even i supported that. i think he was feeling his oats and almost went all the way on north ko

joining me, former president clinton impeachment manager, and former libertarian nominee for presidentbarr. welcome back. >> thank you, kennedy. kennedy: so, how does this look to you today? seems to change every day. >> it is a mess. if you look at it on the surface like too many republicans in congress do, they might say, gee this really nice now we is subpoena witnesses, while have president able to participate. and everything is nice. no, no. the fact is that if you cut through all of the clutter in this resolution, and there is a lots of clutter 6 different committees, with jurisdiction, page after page of rules, the bottom line is schiff remains in control, and republicans on the committees cannot do anything without his permission. kennedy: i don't understand that. we're in dangerous territory for them, at some point, the script will flip. and shoe will be on other foot it will be easy for a republican lead house to do the same thing, is adam schiff now in charge of this even though he is chair of intelligence committee becaused iednadlerscrewed up so baddie. >>, it makes no sen

republicans and democrats rallied around for the fisa court and libertarians said don't trust it. >> dana: yes. >> me and you disagree on that. there's no due process. so now we have instances where americans are spied on and a sham investigation and they say at least we go a warrant from a fisa court. >> dana: and michael horowitz, the inspector general, says it's within the next couple weeks or so that we'll have his report that focuses only on the fbi's role. >> but now it's very interesting. there's republicans that are conveniently talking about things like the deep state and talking about the surveillance apparatus in a way that they're offended by but they are the oned that allowed the state to get this bloated. and they realize people in power, all you have to do is set a couple of traps in secret -- this is opaque. we have no idea how this court works. we really don't know how the application process works. what kind of oversight they have once an application is okayed and you can -- >> dana: maybe they'll change policies -- >> libertarians have been begging to do that for y

semi good libertarian. we got this much man panel, we're not turning it down could believe me. >> first up, trump really going on the road to impeachment, one of his former campaign managers said all aboard, his time frame may surprise you. and did you hear about the crazy gun battle in mexico over el chapo's son? we'll have more on the violent south of the border, coming up. fun fact: 1 in 4 of us millennials have debt we might die with. and most of that debt is actually from credit cards. it's just not right. but with sofi, you can get your credit cards right - by consolidating your credit card debt into one monthly payment. you can get your interest rate right - by locking in a fixed low rate today. and you can get your money right. with sofi. check your rate in 2 minutes or less. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. ♪ ♪ everything your trip needs, for everyone you love. expedia. colon cancer screening. for people 50 and older at average risk. honey, have you seen my glasses? i've always had a knack f

libertarians, you're going to face some hard questions in 2020. do you think the first amendment is worth saving? do you believe that your fellow american should be punished by the government no less just because they don't agree with whatever secularist claim is now mainstream? if the democrats win, given the support that they have from the media and academia in hollywood, it will be nothing to restrain them. not even the supreme court which they've already threatened to pack anyway. if they don't agree with the secularist collective, they will try to drive you from public life. and destroy you. submit or be shunned, agree or be abolished. that's a reality should be at the forefront of voters minds next november. and that's "the angle." here to respond, chairman of the american conservative union my fellow of the american principal project, raymond arroyo, fox news contributor. raymond, the 2020 ban, trying to back away from the freedom statements made, is the strikingly really credible? >> i'm not sure it is, laura, because every one of them sup

world war iii, but you can't go quietly on that one. >> i'm kevin, president of the dartmouth libertarians. >> great. welcome. >> thank you. apart from your position on red flag laws, as president would you defend americans' second amendment rights? >> there's 300 million rifles out there in private hands lawfully acquired. people often sometimes say, why don't we license them all? we'll have the government license them. they can come in and show them to the police chief once a year just to prove they've still got it. huh-uh. year one would be nice to see you. year three would be, that gun is staying here. and people hate to hear me say this, but it's true. throughout history, when the government makes it impossible for citizens to own firearms, the result is often slaughter of the citizens. there's a reason the second amendment was there. the columnists were sick and tired of having the british b l billetted in their houses. the british could keep their guns but the colonists couldn't. they were afraid they would shoot them in their own houses. they were quite right to be afraid of that.

i'm president of the dartmouth libertarians. >> welcome. >> thank you. apart from your position on red flag laws, as president, would you defend american's second amendment rights? >> oh yeah. there are 300 million rifles out there in private hands, lawfully acquired. people say, why don't we license them all? they can come in and show them to the police chief once a year to prove they still have it. you know, your one would be, nice to see. your three would be, that gun is staying here. people hate to hear me say this. it's true. throughout history when the government makes it impossible firearms,ns to own the result is often slaughter of the citizens. there's a reason the second amendment was there. the colonists were tired of having the british sleep in their houses. the british to keep their guns but the colonists couldn't. it did come to that. himmler made it impossible for jews to own a firearm in germany. when the knock came on the door, you were carted off to the concentration camp. joseph stalin -- that was 12 million people. joseph stalin, same

semi good libertarian. we got this much man panel, we're not turning it down could believe me. >> first up, trump really going on the road to impeachment, one of his former campaign managers said all aboard, his time frame may surprise you. and did you hear about the crazy gun battle in mexico over el chapo's son? we'll have more on the violent south of the border, coming up. cologuard: colon cancer screening for people 50 and older at average risk. honey, have you seen my glasses? i've always had a knack for finding things... ...colon cancer,to be exact. and i find it noninvasively... no need for time off or special prep. it all starts here... you collect your sample, and cologuard uses the dna in your stool to find 92% of colon cancers. you can always count on me to know where to look. oh, i found them! i can do this test now! ask your doctor if cologuard is right for you. covered by medicare and most major insurers i get it all the time. "have you lost weight?" of course i have- ever since i started rent

. >> first conservativism is having a libertarian minded heart when it comes to federalism being involved in people's lives echo the reason am conservative i have some kinship with those values that are often in mind my - - in line with those evangelical values. sometimes i call it conservative area and. >> we will get into that. >> but in terms of being an evangelical i believe it is a prominent feature i believe in the holy spirit guiding you and i believe most of the things you would find in southern baptist plus i was southern. >> we went to southern baptist. >> i grew up in virginia. >> so you have that evangelical pedigree. and the conservative background and you make no bones about that that is the position you are coming from when you are writing to critique donald trump. you start the book with several stories that you mentioned it as a window into how you felt about the way evangelicals were talking to donald trump with the general election as well. to the story about 1980 for your had a protest with your parents so tell us that story. >> and how that came back as election was g

i consider you a libertarian conservative lawyer in good standing in many ways.ou're active in -- no, you're active in contemporary stuff. you opposed some of the legal argumentation to justify obamacare. what are those conversations like for you? >> well, i mean i think in a lot of cases and one of the reasons we form checks and balances is there are a lot of folks who consider themselves legal conservatives because of their views about the rule of law, the nature of american government and the obligations the government has that are very uncomfortable not only with the way the president conducts himself but also with a number of people within the administration and within congress that enable the president. so part of creating checks and balances and issuing statements like this is to let those that feel this way know that they're not alone. certainly i have many conversations with conservative students, young members of the federalist society and the like, who have these concerns and who worry that being a legal conservative means exonerating or enabling this

there was even a libertarian. what faiths are you? christians, jews, muslims. and the project that they were working on was actually bringing the bald eagle, our nation's symbol, back to the nation's capital. we have bald eeg whoagles who fr this beautiful landscape day in and day out because of the work of those national service participants. but i want to talk just briefly about could we bring this idea to scale and what have we learned from various models. interestingly, in 1933, franklin roosevelt calls congress into emergency session. by summer has 250,000 young unemployed men in the woods through the civilian conservation corps. by the end of the program, 3 million had served, 3 billion trees had been planted, 84 million acres of land had been saved, which is the entire acreage of our national park system today. and when you talk to the ccc boys, it was a spiritual experience for them. it changed the trajectory of the rest of their lives. it was also run by the u.s. army. a young george c. marshall organized the ccc camps. so the thought we would have for

>> book tv is on location in las vegas at the freedom fest libertarian convention where we talk with others here and now we want to introduce you to one. this is hyrum lewis who teaches at byu in idaho. here's his cover of his book "there is a god". i want to start with those last words. in the last days. what are you referencing? >> yes, i'm referencing a specific faith tradition. there's a lot of work in apologetics coming out they had gotten aggressive in the 21st century. >> who are the new atheists? >> used to talk about the four horsemen. richard [inaudible] wrote a book and sam harris and christopher hitchens just passed on and [inaudible] they call them the four horsemen of the easiest apocalypse. they are aggressive and angry. it's much more let's live in i can't believe but if you want to believe that your business and it's probably good for you but the new atheists will have none of this. they will say i don't believe in i will mak sure no one else please either and i will crusade to try to distort everyone's faith. and so, part of it is plain the new atheists but i'm not

not the endless war, the libertarian spectrum is talking about. there is a war commencing in syria because we pulled 50 troops out from preventing the war. >> margaret: you heard the secretary acknowledge war crimes. the state department is afraid of ethnic cleansing. so, looking at all of that aren't sanctions just punitive, not preventive? is there a responsibility here to do something? >> i think there is. i think it is not necessarily going to prevent turkey from tkoeg what they're doing. this has been turkey's dream for a long time. the president basically gave the green light to do it. they are important. we have to continue to say this. which is when the united states backs away, chaos follows through. we had a situation of stability there. it wasn't perfect. the president of turkey probably didn't want joint patrols with the u.s. he wanted to attack. we're the united states of america. we can prevent things like. that we have to remember our strength and not run away from every conflict we can have. >> margaret: the wallstreet journal had

support for care we spoke with west benedicts the executive director of the libertarian national committee he told us nobody is interested in conducting a credible investigation. democrats have so now fundraising even almost trying to raise money off the impeachment. scandal and also of course republicans are doing it as well and i think it does undermine the investigation but to be honest i don't think anybody cares about doing a credible investigation during this impeachment process mostly republicans and democrats just want to score points against each other and try and raise money for their campaigns and try and get themselves elected i don't think democrats really care if the impeachment succeeds but then they have something they can talk about on their campaigns and say how bad trump is and say donate for us for president and donate for democrats for u.s. senate ultimately it's the politicians who benefit and it's the american people and often the rest of the world who. is hurt by this impeachment effort. thank you teasing out international this morning we're back in 30 minutes with

you don't need 50% of adult vapers to be so angry that they decide to stay home or vote for a libertarian or vote for elizabeth warren. all they have to do is stay home. when you have people who switched to the products after years and years of smoking, they're so proud of themselves -- and they should be for getting off of cigarettes finally. then you have the republican president who campaigned on we're going to deregulate, we're going to fight bad regulations, we're not going to be like the obama administration was. you see that well on this issue they're all the same. they will stay home. host: caller from virginia. good morning. caller: good morning. the traditional cigarettes, the secondhand smoke is harmful. as far as vaping products is the smoke harmful to people around them? guest: no. the vapeer produced by a vaping product, there was a professor, well respected tox colings and he published an extensive review on all the science of secondhand e cigarettes and his conclusion and he has a spernlt in pregnant women, is that the levels of exposure are so tiny in a room that there re

it's a question that some people on the free enterprise side, the free-market conservative or libertarian side don't always ask, who benefits. i think sometimes people on the right or right of center are uncomfortable with that question in policy debates because they say why should it matter who benefits? we see elizabeth warren will say tax cut is bad because rich people benefit. but i think it's actually a very important thing to talk about. one influences are debates gif you remember in the 2008 campaign and the passage of obamacare, barack obama thought it was important to point out that he was battling the health care sector, that he was battling the drug drugmakers or he was battling the insurers. very important and interestingly, he was not telling the truth when he said that. it shaped the way obamacare turned out, that the hospitals and drugmakers were largely behind it, or they got to craft certain principles. it helped us understand why the bill became what it did. it's less surprising that we've seen hospital consolidation when you realize the big hospitals were supporting lot

we've got the thoughts of the us libertarian presidential candidate as well as the views of a digitalspecialist on the story. can look at the system and say is this really geared towards things like terrorism or is this really just geared towards imprisoning lower classes for minor crimes like drug use these types of technologies have historically been used to micromanage non-crimes and basically profiting private prisons and police unions they've been used in my command these non-crimes instead of doing anything to keep americans actually safer there are many ways that such technology could be used in ways that follow the 4th amendment that have massive privacy protections that make sure that they are not violating people's natural right to privacy and dignity this government is choosing to use this technology in a way that violates the 4th amendment this is being hosted on on the amazon network and to me this is a significant thing because it is a choice that amazon has made to support this kind of morally dubious unconstitutional type of warrantless searches heard of what is happen

. >> booktv is on location in las vegas at the freedom fest libertarian convention. we are talking with authors and want introduce you to one. this is hyrum lewis who teaches at dy you in idaho and here's the cover of his book, "there is a god: how to respond to atheism in the last days". i want to start with those last words. in the last days, what are you referencing? >> referencing a specific faith tradition. there's a lot of work coming out, the new atheist has been aggressive in the 21st century. >> host: who are the new atheists? >> guest: they talked about the four horseman. sam harris, christopher hitchens passed on and daniel bennett, call them the force and of the atheist apocalypse. they are aggressive and angry. the old idea of the 20th century was much more live and let live. the idea that i can't believe but if you want to believe that is your business. i don't believe and i'm going to make sure nobody else believes it and i'm on a crusade to destroy faith. part of it is the apocalyptic -- talking about the last -- trying to broaden the scope of apologe

. >> booktv is on location in las vegas at the freedom fest libertarian convention. we are talking with authors here and we want to introduce you to want. this is hyrum lewis, he teaches that byu in idaho. here's the cover of his book, "there is a god: how to respond to atheism in the last days". i want to start with the last words, "in the last days" what are you referencing? >> referencing a specific faith tradition. there's a lot of work in apologetics coming out the new atheists have gotten very aggressive in the 21st century a. >> where the new atheists? >> usually talking about the four horsemen, richard dawkins, he wrote a book called the god delusion but he has some cold followers, sam harris, christopher hitchens passed on, and daniel bennett Ãbthe column the four horsemen of the atheist apocalypse. they are aggressive and angry. the old atheism of the 20th century was much more live and let live. the idea was i can't believe but if you want to believe that to our business and is probably good for you and probably good for society. the new atheists will have

support for key of we spoke with west benedict the executive director of the libertarian national committee he says both parties only care about scoring points . democrats are so now fund raising even trying to raise money off the impeachment . scandal and also of course republicans are doing it as well and i think it does undermine the investigation but to be honest i don't think anybody cares about doing a credible investigation during this impeachment process mostly republicans and democrats just want to score points against each other and try and raise money for their campaigns and try and get themselves elected i don't think democrats really care if the impeachment succeeds but then they have something they can talk about on their campaigns and say how bad trump is and say donate for us for president and donate for democrats for u.s. senate ultimately it's the politicians who benefit and it's the american people who is hurt by this impeachment effort. and that's government says it won't be complying with new e.u. rules after farmers descended on the hague in tractors brussels wants to