it's like from a libertarian point, because one thing is, libertarians are known for us. they do not like the government involve anybody, whether it's of a politician on the left or the right. how are they viewing all of the judicial proceedings they're going against donald trump? it's come, it's politically motivated. energy additional branch has been completely captured by political activists. it's something that the left is very good at. conservatives are extremely behind the volume. so our libertarians with their being less of us. but the left has completely captured academia and where do attorneys come from? you know, colleges, universities, academia, they're completely captured. it's all politically motivated. really calls into question the integrity of other court proceedings as well. i, i hope that the average person starts to wonder and suspect and become more suspicious of other court proceedings and, and hearings that, that they think maybe that's not so fair either. alex jones is one of the 1st things that comes to mind like him or not. donald trump is a polit

you know, so our libertarians with their being less of us. but the left is completely capture to academia and where to attorneys come from, you know, colleges, universities, academia, they're completely captured. it's all politically motivated. really calls into question the integrity of other court proceedings as well. i, i hope that the average person starts to wonder and suspect and become more suspicious of other court proceedings and, and hearings that, that they think maybe that's not so fair either. alex jones is one of the 1st things that comes to mind like him or not. donald trump is a political canary and a coal mine right now. so here's my question to you, alan. and all these cases, every single time, a new case comes against donald trump. why do you feel like he continues to rise in the poll from? if you don't think that necessarily is about the case itself is not, you know, whether he's guilty or not. she keeps continuing to rise and oppose with each accusation that comes against them. i think he's actually been slapped in the po

angela, we only have about 2 minutes left, especially coming from the libertarian perspective. do you agree with that, that when you attach things like birth control, does that help everyone and is it right to attach birth control to abortion? i to, to, to put the 2 in the same category. are they 2 separate subjects? is totally separate to me. health care for me is about human flourishing. and, and, you know, especially deregulation and allowing people to get the access, they need the things that are going to improve and, and help their lives, you know, to me in portion is the ending of life. and so i don't include that in health care, and i recognize that and you know, 3 percent or less of circumstances. it's necessary to save the life of the mother by the rest of the time. i do not agree that the, that is any way attached to help. i definitely want people to have access to good health care though, and i hope that our government will use restrictions and regulatory burdens that benefit insurance companies over individuals. you know, i'd like everybody to have affordable health

angela mcardle chair, libertarian national committee. and jessica roberts, at health professional and do and media commentator. thank you ladies. you know, before we, we broke off, we went to the break. we were talking about what conversations neither party i believe is having right now. in regards to abortion, it's real easy to throw a portion out there cuz it's black and white. but there's several other issues that both parties could do. but prior to this, i'm going to throw this over to you angela. what is the effect of the ro versus weight rolling on the issue? i mean, it was suppose to send it back to the state. $60000000.00 babies have still been allowed to be aboard america since the ruling. so bush is still legal in the united states. would that not have confirmed that conversation finish that conversation elected to the states to decide i think that this is just emboldened democrats and help them supercharge their base. i mean, to the extent that the supreme court has to deal with these issues like i get it and i'm sympathetic,

angela, we only have about 2 minutes left, especially coming from the libertarian perspective. do you agree with that, that when you attach things like birth control, does that help everyone and is it right to attach birth control to abortion? due to, to putting the 2 in the same category? are they to separate the subjects that is totally separate to me? health care for me is about human flourishing. and and um, you know, especially the regulation and allowing people to get the access they need to things that are gonna improve and, and help their lives. you know, to me, in portion is the ending of a life. and so i don't include that in health care and i recognize that and you know, 3 percent or less of circumstances. it's necessary to save the life of the mother. but the rest of the time, i do not agree that that, that is any way attached to help. i definitely want people to have access to good health care though, and i hope that our government will use restrictions and regulatory burdens that benefit insurance companies over individuals. you know, i'd like everybody to have af

however, he considers himself a libertarian and, and our co capitalist. he's an economist, he's an academic and a political outside, or where do you see that he falls on this political spectrum? is he truly a departure from the political do all police so many have complained about in argentina? it's a really good question and we have to separate mulay between his fingers, suffolk of speech. and he's the top yeah. what she has put into practice in the short time she supposed to be in an office. first of all, the mos decided that when do they become too embarrassed? i saw what did you go figure? she's a rhetoric, was it totally lever, tatiana, and i'm not going to be the least. and the philosophy brooklyn was in general terms and the states use of div that's takes money from the people to the dock sees that through the show only it sees to guarantee it probably bates property on that to all commercial relations between people. it should be handled by different markets on, in the way for you them is going to be a cheap ask because made the extreme compar uh,

of the nations, the libertarians of the muslim nations, the arab nations, and they are afraid becausey are seeing these 3 goals of announcing that they have not achieved any of them. until now, one is to destroy it

if civil libertarians have their way, in my view. every civil libertarian ought to support his position. it's a matter of process. there are arguments. whether it applies to a president or vice president since they are not named. whether a president is an officer. there's cases that suggest they are not. those kinds of arguments are interesting. the 14th amendment itself requires it be overturned. due process. the 14th amendment incorporates the 5th and 6th amendment. for example here, either section 3 is self-executing or it isn't. we have this griffins case from 1869 that says it isn't. it requires federal legislation in order to apply this section. whether that's required or not, he was being -- using this section to circumvent his civil rights is inappropriate. what i mean is this. we have a federal statute, insurrection. they had every opportunity to charge him with that. they never did. they never even presented to a grand jury because they couldn't make out probable cause. if they had, you would have all of the 5th and 6th ame

he calls himself a narco, capitalist, libertarian.e wants to abolish the country's central bank, and one of his favorite campaign props was a chainsaw, signaling his goal of slashing up the state. he's also a big admirer of donald trump. so can he actually fix argentina's economy? or will he bring it further into ruin? with me now is shannon o'neil, a senior fellow for latin american studies at the council on foreign relations and the author of "the globalization myth, why regions matter." shannon, welcome. >> thanks for having me. >> interesting thing about him is he's different from -- some people say he's sort of like bolsonaro, but some people say he's like the left wing populist. but he's different. explain who this guy is. >> what he has in common is he's anti-establishment, but he's an anti-argentina establishment. so he's appealing to young vote who are tired of hyper inflation, of recession, of financial booms and busts, of the difficulties of life and day-to-day in argentina. so he's come in -- >> which have been run by a ki

>> the free speech libertarian advocate.y one that's important america. that's important to america. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> i love about joe biden, >> what i love about joe biden, which run on, is which he should run on, is in this divided world we have this divided world that we have at moment, that his is at the moment, that his name is an anagram of be joined. and i think that's, that's that's what he run on. and i think he should run on. and i think he's on sort of basis. he's work on that sort of basis. >> but i mean, andrew, you must have must see he's the have you must see that he's the biggest to trump without doubt. >> but trump is his own gift, isn't he? i mean, he is glorious. he gets more column inches than anybody, and he's the the more the only guy i know. the more you throw at him, the more his popularity increases. yeah, you can charges in the can have all the charges in the world. what's better than that? can have all the charges in the w0|tellsihat's better than that? can have all the charges in the w0|tellsi

-afghan relations and the managerial state, which is setting off the libertarian sirens in me and otherpeople in the room. his current research focuses on the domestic politics of u.s. foreign policy from 1934 to 1942. and the evolution of foreign-policy attitudes within the republican party. his report -- his work appeared in several outlets. he has a master of arts in history from georgia nation in -- george mason in 2016. with that, victoria, if you wanted to set the table for us today and tell us where you see things going. victoria: sure. thank you very much for that kind introduction. good to be with both of you. i appreciate everyone coming in person and joining us online and on c-span. for this very timely discussion of this topic that has been seething about the heritage foundation, particularly in the davis institute. this is a conversation i've been having in different iterations from 2007 on. what we have seen, between the conclusion of the second bush term and what we are going into here in 24 has been a really radical shift in the way national security policy is designed a

libertarian at times. he said he was a republican at different times he said he was a radical. but i never got the sense conservative. why did you choose that subtitle? the last conservative both last part and the conservative. you know, there's a couple of different reasons i did, and i'm very aware that friedman did not call himself a conservative and would probably not like the title of it but he didn't go so far as f.a. hayek did to write an essay why i'm not a conservative. maybe if he had written that essay, i wouldn't say i can't you know, i can't move for its title, but i kind of mean it in two ways. one is when you look at his the people he interacted with, the people he gave his ideas to within american politics, those who found him most compelling, most of those people called themselves and conservatives in the united states is different than conservatism in other countries, in large part because it incorporates what in other countries is called liberalism or neo liberalism. it celebrates end of

the world when it elected a new president, javier milei, who called himself a narco capitalist libertarian. he wanted to abolish the central bank and he had a chainsaw signaling his goal of slashing up the state. he's also a big admirering of donald trump. so can milei actually fix argentina's economy or will he bring it further into ruine? with me now is shannon o'neill, a senior fellow for latten american studies and the author of the book, the globalization myth, why regions matter. welcome. >> thanks for having me. >> the interesting thing about milei, is he's different from -- some people say he's like bolsonaro who is a right wing populist and he's a bit like the left wing populist. explain who this guy is. >> he's anti-establishment but anti-argentina establishment. so he's coming in and appealing to an audience and to voters especially young voters who are tired of high, if not hyper inflation and inflation and financial booms an busts an the difficults of life of day-to-day in argentina. >> which have been run by a kind of populist establishment for decades. >> they've been in off

rid of the shah of iran, everything would be terrific in iran bause we'll bring about democratic, libertarian, secular government, or whether jimmy carter didn't realize what he was saying or didn't or thought that the shaw was so strong and powerful a character like ferdinand marcos that this stuff would go over big in the united states but it wouldn't matter the shaw. "the ladder is my guess is that carter had no understanding of how weak the show was. i was the person that was responsible for reporting to the president of the united states about what was going on. i wasn't the only person, but i was the principle, that was my job. and i wrote memos saying, there are demonstrations, uh, there are problems, we're seeing signs that things are not going well, it doesn't seem to be getting better, but i do remember vividly in..." august of 1978, which was quite a long ways into it, though the biggest demonstrations hadn't happened yet, um, ambassador sullivan was on vacation and came home and and i took him into the white house to see uh, mr. bushinsky, the national security advisor, and he, i

guest: nikki haley is more libertarian than i am comfortable with and i think they had more americanamilies are comfortable with. she has been reticent to be able to commit anything at the federal level. donald trump, we did a scorecard earlier. out of all the candidates, regraded them on five things, protecting kids from transgender ideology, the hormone surgery and all of that, protecting them from poor and online. donald trump got five checkmarks out of the six we were grating on and everyone else fell short. he is a very good profamily candidate. host: if you would like to ask our guest a question or make a comment can do so on our lines by party. republicans, 202-748-8001. democrats, 202-748-8000. independents, 202-748-8002. you were a panelist yesterday at cpac on trans issues. can you tell us what it was about and what you talked about. guest: it was primarily focused on how to protect kids from the surgeries and hormone blockers that cause permanent harm and damage. i was so blessed to be joined on the main stage by reputable doctor, his name is eton hime, who was a whistlebl

the freedom is to get the guy and traditions and the importance of family and religion and appear libertarian by any means. >> you work on this with the people in europe and latin america and elsewhere. a little bit more on the implications abroad of the collapse or at least the pausing of the american commitment. ... he speaks for his point of view they didn't have the appeal that donald trump ended up having to actually lead a movement, and mass movement of followers. so when we think about what with the contingencies and the individual choices that led us here, i would you say two things. there were several events in obama's second term that created the foundations to the trump movement. and their continuing today. one was the supreme court decision on same sex marriage, pushed the religion right, large part into the religious right into an oppositional attitude for america and american government. a lot of the work that it been done for decades to make the religious right belief and american principles and believe in the sympathy between religiosity and american political ideals collapsed

in fact, argentina today is a large testing ground where the ideas of ultra-liberalism and libertarianisming developed. meley spoke in davos at the world economic forum that the state is an enemy that hinders development, it should not interfere in the economy, this shock therapy, it is unknown whether it will give any results, from our russian experience we can say, that in the early nineties we also went through similar experiments. to be mutually beneficial, non-discriminatory, as long as the argentines tell us that they are ready for this, but understand that their market must be made attractive for foreign investment and demonstrate some kind of solvency, without this the development of relations in this area will be objectively difficult. well, i propose to continue the economic topic, including, you mentioned brix, argentina, apparently, refused to join the organization, but at the same time, the country's authorities say they are ready. cooperate, to what extent does this format suit moscow and other brix members, and in general, how can argentina be useful for brix and brix for a

conservatives are addicted to the language of libertarianism. which is fine.s a terrible ideology but in inaccurate -- but in an academic setting, have these debates. in the real world, you elect a d.a. or a judge in judges are elected throughout the country. you elect the state supreme court justice, you elect an attorney general and so on and so forth to have an office with specific powers, duties and responsibilities with the expectation that they will use that authority to defeat evil, protect the good and accomplish positive change in society. you have to use that power fearlessly. you have to measure your success by what is actually happening in the world. it may seem like a tangential point but it's not. conservatives passed laws all the time that say do this and don't do that area they don't actually change anything in the real world once the laws have been passed.a number of states for example have passed laws saying that you can have this in the curriculum or you can't have that and you can't teachdei and so forth. without exception, i can promise yo

it is a powerful message that all libertarians express they do and say that we, the english , the scots, the iranians, the arabs, the muslims, and the non-muslims , all of us in england and outside of england , tell the international community that we condemn the bombing of gaza , we condemn this genocide, and the western regimes pretend to care about world peace. give and commit to democracy and respect for rights. don't put an end to it, put an end to the killing of palestinian children. i believe that anyone who does not stand against israel's genocide is complicit in killing the people of gaza, and i cannot say more than that. now , the myth of the west's desire for democracy and the story-telling of the heads of the countries of this part of the planet with the catastrophes and the resistance of the palestinian people has been fully exposed. 1. maybe you have seen this image many times in your child , but it didn't matter to you, or if the child changed his reaction, we would no longer follow these bad moods , the beginning of ugly and beautiful habits, which, according to experts,

onlyneniki.net, you can let her know that you are against her, i don't think an informed or understanding libertarianervative can. keep nicky haley, i 've noticed how she feels about our foreign interference, i've noticed her involvement in the military-industrial complex. 8 billion dollars were paid to attract her to this team. and i also noticed as she stated that she wants you to register when you go online to prevent people from posting anonymously. i believe she does not understand that our republic was founded by men like ben franklin, sam adams, madison, john gray and others who usually wrote out of fear of government, they usually wrote anonymously, so today i declare that i against niki. go to onlyneniki.net, put your signature and show that you are also against niki. so, it's one thing to understand that nicky haley is a vile, bloodthirsty harpy. a feminist who definitely should not be given power. most reasonable people already understand this, but launching a website is not niki’s - this already implies a certain level of rejection of niki, which is interesting and can be discussed. joini

is that with a kind of libertarian unregulated capitalism that we're falling into . i think, you know, you have a few people that are able to exploit the powers that money gives them to negatively impact, very large numbers of people by removing or decreasing their ability to afford the kind of lives that say want to let go of it is like go look miss our lives like we normally stays in because these are these. he normally leaves me steve plans to lose ample, if used to have funds as now to the point. look at it, was there running or tech came running there? you can't. there's nothing in there is like truly getting worse and worse every year. and as we go, would you like to leave this area? i would love to leave this area are visit the color space, but i would definitely love to leave this area. i can't leave this area cuz there's like my asset cuz family lives and has my music. i to my body here, legal. make it all the legal, make it out. you know, for you is a lot easier to call my brothers boy jarvis. now are you talking to the guy? and there's more my god is shadl

what you need to do to help you okay, is that with a kind of a libertarian unregulated capitalism that we're falling into. i think, you know, you have a few people that are able to exploit the powers that money gives them to negatively impact, very large numbers. of people by remove themes or decreasing their ability to afford the kind of lives that they want to live. gotta go over this like go look miss our lives were we normally stays in because these are these. he normally leaves misty plants too long. really young boys used to have fun as now to the point. look at it was they're running their tent came right in there. you can't do nothing in there is like truly getting worse and worse every year. and as we go, would you like to leave this area? i will to leave this area are visit the color space, but i would definitely love to leave this area. i can't leave this area cuz it's like my asset cuz family lives and has my music to my body here. legal. maybe it all get out, you know, where it was a lot easier to call my brother's point, jarvis. now are you talking to the guy in our time?

bent, in libertarian bent, like in argentina, it's donald argentina, whether it's donald trump whitegiorgia house whether it's giorgia meloni in italy or whether it's le and people that le pen and people like that across some european democracies, i that's democracies, what i think that's telling us that, yes, the telling us is that, yes, the british conservatives have been in time, but in power for a long time, but there's point here. there's a deeper point here. i don't think they've really understood how tectonic understood how the tectonic plates are on the plates of politics are on the move. aren't looking for move. people aren't looking for the old conservative ism of the same old conservative ism of the same old conservative ism of the 1980s and the 1990s. they're looking for what i would call national conservatism, a kind of conservatism that takes borders seriously, that lowers migration, prioritises you migration, that prioritises you know, the british people, that isn't afraid to leave things that undermine the security of the country, like european courts, that reshapes t

means they use us from both sides, and that's why the last differences were first approached with a libertarian , then a strength that we found inside, not this. in general, the situation has been in the hands of the past days and it is still the case, and it takes money from them, they provide for their lives, and whatever they do, it has nothing to do with iran, even if iran wants to be under the influence of the soviet union, we have become the victims, and we are with kambakhsh and chiameh. in hand we all wanted to be iranian and to have friendly relations with the soviets but to be independent. for ourselves , they wanted, not iran, a certain state of affairs, and whatever they do, they take their orders from basco here. it was clear that kagbe was not in the leadership of the tudeh party and that they do not have their own authority. they are completely waiting for the decisions that moscow announces to them, for example, in the case of the august 28 coup , although the masses kept shouting anti-imperialist slogans , they remained silent during the american coup on august 28, so that the

is that with a kind of a libertarian unregulated capitalism that we're falling into. i think, you know, you have a few people that are able to exploit the powers that money gives them to negatively impact, very large numbers of people by remove themes or decreasing their ability to afford the kind of lives that they wanna live. gotta go over the like the look ms. olive way we normally stays and because these are these, he normally leaves the plant to long really jump. all of these to have fun is now to the point. look at it was, they're running their tech came running there. you can't do nothing in there is like totally getting worse and worse every year. and as we go, would you like to leave this area? i will to leave this area are visit because base, but i will definitely be allowed to leave this area. i can't leave this area cuz it's like my asset cuz family lives and says, why i'm using i to my buddy here. legal. maybe it all of our partners to retail, a legal make it out, you know, where it is a lot easier to call my brothers boy jarvis. now are you talking to th