also got situations that we've seen in paris now where people have come back from places such as libya syria and of course i could be that were surprised to britain if we think of the manchester bombing that killed many people mostly young people again just a couple of years ago again there's libya connections and so you've got a situation where again to make it a general statement as opposed to specific to this moscow case where you've got a situation where i think generally instability has increased the prospects of terrorism taking place not only because you've got a situation where the west for example has been intervening in countries such as syria iraq libya and that has produced to some extent at least a motivation for attacks taking place and again i'm emphasizing i'm not trying to speak with any knowledge of this moscow attack but certainly the majority of taxes taken place for example in britain the motivation and i say that from what the bombers or the killers of the attackers have stated themselves either in a suicide videos or in a court appearance later most of them have said.

and there was no shortage of pressing issues to discuss but you clued the conflicts in yemen libya syria and afghanistan unrest in iraq and lebanon and the plight of muslims in myanmar and indian administered kashmir summits organizers say although meetings like this are often convened to try and tackle conflict and wars in the muslim world this one is different they say steam the role of development in achieving national sovereignty shows reviving cultures and strengthening economies are seen as means to overcoming problems for that to be achieved a strong political leadership in the muslim world a clear vision and close coordination are needed to perhaps the main challenge facing delegates at this summit is how they will be judged by muslims with wars people being displaced and unrest up. cross many muslim countries people say that summits in the past have failed to achieve anything substantial so when the leaders here stand up in front of this war for a photo op they will be under pressure to be seen to act. on kuala lumpur. coming up in the news ahead more tanks and fighters arrive o

the opposite sides but they have been able to agree on certain terms to in libya in egypt for example there or in the northern syria but how this will of hold in libya is something that will again depend on i think the leaders the leaders of the 2 countries how they will be able to keep the diplomatic channels open and whether they will able to compromise from each other's position to reach a solution there otherwise if turkey can act turkey comes to a confrontation with do russian backed forces and there is a direct involvement of the 2 of militaries there that will complicate things between the 2 countries ok let me bring in more stuff for the person who clearly i think has the hardest job or at least one of the hardest jobs is the u.n. envoy gas on sanaa may he had a plan in april it was completely torpedoed by have to as actions now he's planning to have an international conference in berlin that's been repeatedly delayed then he's trying to get the libyan parties together then he s'posed to organize a constitutional referendum then he's supposed to have an election is any of that going to happen moustapha. wel

the catell or ease have also financed and islamist movements in libya and syria and internees and egypt they have contributed to the electoral victories of the muslim brotherhood. and the. saudis and iranians have seen how they worst enemies gain power and do everything to overthrow them. the 2 countries staked everything on the return of the military in order to eliminate the muslim brotherhood. in egypt they chose to support general el-sisi and guarantee him financial aid. under his command the egyptian army staged a coup that ended in the blood. the egyptian regime took revenge on him by sentencing a team of al jazeera reporter has to 3 years in prison. sick and that's how the riff deepened on the arabian peninsula between qatar on the one hand and saudi arabia and the united arab emirates on the other. was a hole in the united arab emirates there's an extreme concentration of power in the hands of the crown prince of abu dhabi who is reined in all his brothers his. mohammed bin zayed 1st project was to create a credible army and to focus all its military strategy around the protecti

and there was no shortage of pressing issues to discuss that you clued the conflicts in yemen libya syria and afghanistan on arrest in iraq and lebanon and the plight of muslims in myanmar and indian administered kashmir the summits organizers say although meetings like this are often convened to try and tackle conflict and wars in the muslim world this one is different they say steam the role of development in achieving national sovereignty shows reviving cultures and strengthening economies are seen as means to overcoming problems for that to be achieved a strong political leadership in the muslim world a clear vision and close coordination are needed to perhaps the major challenge facing delegates at this summit is how they will be judged by muslims with wars people being displaced and unrest across many muslim countries people say that summits in the past have failed to achieve anything substantial so when the leaders here stand up in front of this war for a photo op they will be under pressure to be seen to act. under kuala lumpur. opposition legislators in venezuela who make up a ma

of the uprisings in 2011, the one that started in tunisia and moved right through to egypt and libya and syriand beyond, and was the vessel for high hopes. but say for the people, it came to very little. here in beirut, they had a vigil outside iraq's embassy to protest the killing of hundreds of iraqi demonstrators in the last few weeks. i think there is a sense in lebanon that in the demonstrations, they have beenec quite lucky,se everything that has happened has been largely peaceful. in iraq, it is the opposite. fins in the streets. l of the young iraqis who went to the street to demand to live free of militias. here in lebanon, we want to live in dignity in our country, free of any foreign interference. jeremy: in iraq, the middle eastern problems of unemployment and corrupt leadership are amplified by years of war and foreign interference iraq has oil, but the money doesn't reach most people. protesters keep risking death on the streets because they are desperate. a th blaming iraq's leaders and their close allies in iran. iranian hard men may be directing the pression with the metho ty

action and there was no shortage of pressing issues to discuss but you clued the conflicts in yemen libya syria and afghanistan on arrest in iraq and lebanon and the plight of muslims in myanmar and indian administered kashmir summits organizers say although meetings like this are often convened to try and tackle conflict and wars in the muslim world this one is different they say its theme the role of development in achieving national sovereignty shows reviving cultures and strengthening economies are seen as means to overcoming problems for that to be achieved a strong political leadership in the muslim world a clear vision and close coordination are needed to. it's important to note that many people have been waiting for asses to some of the questions there is a lot of anticipation there's been a lot of anticipation doing the last several days about 2 main issues one of them is where the real things will be addressed whether real decisions will be taken whether this summit will be different from the islamic summits that have been taking place over the last several decades. one of the prime m

undermined the interests of our country, whether we are talking about in the recent past, iraq, libya, syria, afghanistan. you can go on and on down the list. you see how there is some hypocrisy there because some dictators, the u.s. says we need to go and overthrow this evil dictator. there are other dictators in other countries that the u.s. supports and even calls allies and partners. this is something that i will end as president, this long-standing practice of regime change and nationbuilding and instead focus on these decisions about when and where our military takes action, or our role in engaging with other countries based on what is in the best interest of our national security and having the foresight toook at what are the consequences down the line of those actions that we are taking, and will they help people in other countries, or will it hurt? that is something that does not happen often enough. yes, ma'am, in the back. >> high. , first, i want to say you are amazing. >> thank you. >> my question is about how are you going to deal with foreign leaders who do not take women -- >

peacefully they're mobilized more intelligently because now people understand from what happened in libya and syria and other places that an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind that in the end of the day there are no winners of civil wars and i learned a bit of that sunny when i was in new york right after the arab spring when i heard the great professor nobel winner joseph stiglitz economist talking to the occupy movement in new york in the middle of war street and i heard him say we are all inspired by the arab spring why because of this very particular lead that lists the popular mobilization of people demanding positive change demanding justice freedom and certainly less that any of the elite and more voice for themselves in the governing of the country or i think we've just got about 2 minutes left so i'm and try and do is give each of our remaining 2 guests a minute each and let's try and look forward to 2020 rémy where do you see this rebellion against the elite if we can summarize it like that when you see it leading the world well after at least there's some clarity in terms really of. th

refugee flows driven by poverty and inequality in latin america as well as those i referred to in libya and syria. i look forward next year to hosting the un climate conference in britain where a british labour government will lead the campaign to go much further than the campaign to go much further than the paris accords of 2015, historic as they were. because at that moment, britain is not set to meet its targets of net zero until 2099 and the rest of the world even later. we have to act now. which is why our manifesto puts the green industrial revolution absolutely at its heart. to help settle conflict and promote human rights in our trade and aid policies as well as foreign policy and deliver ambitious global climate agreements, our internationalism means we will create a peace and conflict prevention fund and invest an extra 400 billion to expand our diplomatic capacity and increase our oversight of arms exports to ensure we are not feeling conflicts in yemen or anywhere else in the middle east. the labour party stands behind the international consensus since of a genuine two state solution

economics he says the region is being challenged by all groups migrating from conflict zones like libya and syria. these jihadist forces and nuns have this mess the reese has found a safe haven within that particular southern region and the. top of west africa south region and is a matter of finding the territory that the kind of pretty an ox of a caliphate and then exist and do whatever you want to do so it's a social fact territory based along religious lines in the course of that. where the army last night gold in northern iraq in a fire sale of perhaps a mile you'd look at a quantity of facts but it's a show about a flight attendant surely you know that she actually meant to say a religious jihadist agenda syrian activists say near freezing temperatures are slowing the government's offensive on the last rebel held bargain so they'd leave the fighting has forced 130000 civilians from their homes this month many into makeshift camps the region has suffered weeks of artillery bombardment n.-s. strikes by the syrian government and its russian allies about football but how can they do this to us e

you know, libya, syria, yemen. all of those are u.n. operations, but let's be clear. it is not the u.n., it is not the secretary-general that does not want to deploy troops there. it is the un security council that cannot agree to deploy troops there. the second part is we have to remember that multilateral institutions, international cooperation it is not the them, it is the us. we are all part of making that machinery work. now, i think the debate today around international cooperation is absolutely fascinating. it seems to me that we live in an age, and you were also inferring, that we are more connected than ever before. the world is more connected than ever before, and not only by smartphones or digital technology. we are also more mobile than ever before in human history, whether it comes to people, diseases, or those that actually want to overthrow our way of life. denmark's approach to this was that demands of us more international cooperation, not less. i mean, there are no boundaries that are going to stop ebola. there are no boundaries that will stop the sp

syria she wasn't there i mean she. donna secretary of state what happened what happened in libya when one because you've been ghazi was unfolding actually the the cia facility in benghazi was actually was governing the so-called program ocracy opposition in syria and it was raised by. state department madam clinton so this this she she had her hand in that in that game also now these shows that we saw before a few any are france celebrating were part of a march longer c.n.n. packaged about a week ago about how everything. is benefiting russia and some people may may have forgotten that this idea of tying trom directly to the kremlin was actually it actually originated with the clinton camp we know from the weekend leaks e-mails that it was mike but asked there her the chairman of her campaign who came up with this idea why do you think 3 years later after the miller probe after everything that didn't stick to dylan why are they still running away with this narrative i think they just don't have anything else they have nothing else to put it if they if they if they have something broadly they would have come with someth

be a first of all a peace do keep but uthe to be an international military presence you know, libya, syria, yemen, although there are u.n. operations. but let's be clear. it's not the u.n. it's not the secretary general that doesn't want to deploy rmts troops there. it's the u.n. security council that cannot agree that actually you ought to deploy troops there. and that's the second point is we have to remember that multilateral institutions, international cooperation is not them. it's the us. i mean, we are all part of making that machinery work. now, i think the debate today around -- international cooperation and multilateralism is absolutely fascinating. it seems to me that we live an in age -- i think kathryn you were hinting that we are more connected than ever before. you know, the world is more connected than ever before. and not only by smartphones or digital technology. we ares are more mobile than ever before in human history. whether it comes to people, diseases or those that actually want to overthrow our way of life. now, i suppose denmark's approach would be that demands of

the shapes and all the board of sort the middle east is changing now as you can see inside syria inside libya inside the maritime borders for this is that i cannot say that the only concern that turkey concerns about is not the libyan nation or government of a court but also at the same time turkey is pushing this issue because often it's south interests inside the mediterranean because there is a fait accompli inside the eastern part of the mediterranean in between the united arab emirates griese cypriots and egypt and turkey is being confined to a similar plan which conflicts turkey to a very limited part of the mediterranean but at the same time libya has cannot approach the scene you simply can't turkey carve out a wider area for its own interests. bilaterally between itself and libya against the wishes perhaps of egypt israel or greece cyprus and so on yes there that is diplomacy. which will give turkey a chance because turkey is already drilling in it is economy exclusive zones based at the same time greece and the cypriots at the same time declared that place as they economy calls on f

syria's largest city and u.s. president donald trump has tweeted about the situation in libya saying russia syria and iran are killingor on their way to killing thousands of innocent civilians in italy province don't do it turkey is working hard to stop this college our white house correspondent kimberly halkett give some context around the timing of trump's tweet. this tweet from the u.s. president comes on the heels of statements by the u.n. secretary general where there has been a very strongly worded statement regarding the military escalation the concern about the impact on civilians and also the call for sort of a sation in the violence in terms of the hostilities given the fact that those impacted have been children so there is a concern sort of the world is watching at the u.n. level you add to that that the u.s. congress has been also watching very closely the escalating violence in fact so much so it pushed through a pentagon budget that included very tough sanctions against syria russia and also iran for alleged war crimes the president signed that into law on friday so it appears that this is on his mind

you know basically we are not a threat you anymore and algeria is not syria libya so while the discourse of violence and the threat of violence is having even used by the regime it seems that it's not an argument that has been well all right so i am not a leave it. thank you thank you very much for joining us from algeria and thank you as well. here with us and we thank you for joining us on inside story thanks for watching you can see the program again any time by visiting our website al-jazeera dot com you can go for further discussion to our facebook page that's facebook dot com forward slash a.j. inside story you can join the conversation on twitter our handle is a.j. inside story for myself and the whole team here in the house thanks for watching. new leaders place children in this refugee camp the latest victims of the unending sectarian violence in central african republic among them are survivors of unspeakable violence 10 year olds in work as mother is dead her father is gone killed because they were christian by their own muslim neighbors this is the least you home an overcrowd

was just answering questions about the middle east he was asked about the chaotic situation in syria and libya and want to discuss those things with. russian president joked about whether or not the person who asked the question believes everything that western media has to say that went on to say that in touch with our partners in the middle east is the most important thing and there he then went on to answer questions about pension reform in russia but he says nothing is being. just at the moment now the russian president has already been answered questions for just over 2 and a half hours and is still going to be popping in and out to listen in as he answers questions on global issues. and other news u.s. house democrats have stuck to their guns adamantly going ahead and impeaching donald trump is accused abuse of power and obstructing congress but the whole impeachment saga could backfire on the democrats as appears to have rallied republican support something the u.s. president has been quick to note the 230 the naser 197 president is one. article one is adopting. this lola's hard assume

start with iraq and then we're going to move to syria lebanon libya somalia sudan and iran. i think it's highly probable the administration has already made the decision to go to war against iran there are already u.s. troops inside iran want to repeat that there are already u.s. troops inside iran the u.s. has long had its eyes set on trying to impact regime change in iran and much of what you've seen the u.s. doing with regards to iran has been on a covert level we've seen a report in new yorker by seymour hersh that a u.s. source told him that u.s. marines were operating in the blue key missouri and kurdish regions of iran have you ever heard of that report i've never heard of the report and never read the article nor do i intend to do you have any interest as to whether or not. as the u.s. ambassador i don't have any interest as to whether or not u.s. marines are actually operating in iran right now and i said i had not heard of the report and i didn't intend to read the article in the new yorker if i gave you this article right now walked it over would you look at it i

side by side to fight to dash and ices and libya times change the kurds thought that as well where time of change because we cannot apply what happened in syria and libya and i'm talking about how alliance is coming up. the. trump said that he appreciated mr have to a significant role in fighting terrorism their shared vision for libya's transition to a stable democracy high praise from the leader of the western world for your main enemy isn't that standing by you it's a pretty look almost anybody can. say those things about you know we still believe that the administration of united state that mr ation of the white house believed that some wrong mistakes so long messages have been around about after and he's fighting terrorism i think the force in the u.s. is badly informed yes i think the britain and by inform and i believe that the message passed yesterday from the foreign ministers would libyan foreign ministers and the libyan internal ministers they want to see libyan stable and the problem in libya certainly through a political process yeah but they don't necessarily want you to win any more do they. the issue is not winning a war we ar

sanction laws against iran, libya, syria and the sudan. why are you advocating, why did you advocate to deregulate one of the worst corporate recidivists operating in the u.s. banking system particularly when it is not even a u.s. bank. >> let me first say that i share many of your concerns about deutsche bank. i obviously can't comment on any of the specifics, because from a regulatory standpoint, it would be inappropriate for me to comment specifically on deutsche bank, but i share many of your concerns, and particularly the sanctions is invasion is something that we will not tolerate by anybody domestic or internationally. and i think that the issue, and i will add to this generically, and not as it relates to deutsche bank, and the question is that the banks will be regulated. and so the u.s. subsidiaries, and the way that we have changed the structure, there is intermediary holding companies so that the foreign subs that are effectively u.s. foreign institutions, and we can look at the risk at that level. >> i understand the sub-serie

support turkey might offer libya or when but it reinforces turkey's role in influencing libya's future like with syria russia and turkey have taken different sides increasing their diplomatic leverage and corporation. we russia by the way are in permanent contact with mr seraphina's government with marshall have to we continuously communicate with our partners including those in turkey in europe in other countries in our opinion the best solution would be to find compromise between the 2 sides of the conflict. at the u.n. al-jazeera asked the secretary general spokesman for his take on turkey's military assistance i think the secretary general a couple times yesterday was very clear in his expression and frankly of his i would say is frustration at the situation in libya of the constant flouting by various member states of the arms embargo and of the continued fighting that we're seeing in and around tripoli and other places in the country but that fighting certainly isn't over yet rory chalons al-jazeera any turkish troops deployment would need approval from parliament as mohammed out though explains

doing is actually trying to relocate some of the militant fighters that it's been supporting in syria to libya to get them away from turkey where perhaps if the turks are seen to her sold them out by not supporting a continuation of the war in syria they could become very or could turkey itself so there are all sorts of wheels within wheels going on here normal or particularly attractive but also all of them risk. sparking a wider conflict between also turkey and its greek neighbors between all the partners of the west and so it's a rather bizarre situation from which the united states is in many ways standing aside what we know will say for example the russian president said just a couple of days go by what he was meeting with the italian prime minister that only a peaceful resolution to this conflict is impossible how likely do you think that attack us intervention could actually resolve the conflict. well i don't think it's likely to resolve it is it is possible that it would prop up the government in tripoli and for instance the italian government in a sense tacitly supports the turkish si