. >> lida [inaudible] on behalf of the department of public health. so, i didn't hear anything in the appellant's presentation that would support reversing the director's decision here. in fact, the director didn't have discretion, the cap in the bayview of 45 permits had been reached. there's 69 permitted establishments so the director couldn't make any exception specific to appellant and -- yeah, i'll stop there. >> good evening, i'm june wine trop, i'm the manager of this regulatory program. this is the first case that you are hearing for the amendments to 19h that were inbacker enacted in january, and i will say that you are correct, there was no heads-up given really to anybody that the law was going to be passed and that there was going to be a date at which this density level would start to be enforced. it's a complicated law and we are working hard to come up with some consistent guidelines. this case is actually very clear to us though, so it's nice that there is some level of clarity and i'll explain to you why. we -- first of all, you shoul